0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views7 pages

Bond Refunding and Leasing Analysis

1) Mullet Technologies is considering refunding its $75 million, 12% coupon bond issued 5 years ago that has 30 years remaining. It could issue new 25-year, 10% coupon bonds. 2) Refunding would require a 12% call premium on the old bonds and $5 million in flotation costs for the new bonds. Short-term proceeds would earn 6% for 1 month. 3) The net present value of the bond refunding is $2,717,131.96.

Uploaded by

doejohn150
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views7 pages

Bond Refunding and Leasing Analysis

1) Mullet Technologies is considering refunding its $75 million, 12% coupon bond issued 5 years ago that has 30 years remaining. It could issue new 25-year, 10% coupon bonds. 2) Refunding would require a 12% call premium on the old bonds and $5 million in flotation costs for the new bonds. Short-term proceeds would earn 6% for 1 month. 3) The net present value of the bond refunding is $2,717,131.96.

Uploaded by

doejohn150
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 18

Problem 3
Business Value 800,000 $
Total Current Shares 40000
Price/Share 20.00 $
Investment of 200000 @ $20/share
Angel Investment 200,000 $
Shares Sold to Investor 10,000
Problem 7
Input Data
Existing bond issue 75,000,000 $
Original Floatation cost 5,000,000 $
Maturity of original debt 30
Years since old debt issue 5
Call premium (%) 12%
Original coupon rate 12%
After-tax cost of new debt
Investment Outlay Before-Tax
Call Premium on old Bond (9,000,000) $
Flotation costs on new issue (5,000,000.00)
Immediate tax savings on old flotation cost expense 4,166,666.67
Extra interest paid on old issue (450,000.00)
Interest earned on short-term investment 225,000.00
Total after-tax investment (10,058,333) $
Annual Flotation Cost Tax Effects Before-Tax
Interest on old bond 200,000 $
Interest on new bond (166,666.67)
Net Savings 33,333 $
Annual Interest Savings Due to Refunding Before-Tax
Interest on old bond 9,000,000 $
Interest on new bond (7,500,000.00)
Net interest savings 1,500,000 $
Before-Tax
Annual Cash Flows 1,533,333 $
After Tax Interest Rate
NPV of Refund
New bond issue 75,000,000 $
New floatation cost 5,000,000 $
New bond maturity 25
New cost of debt 10%
Tax rate 40%
Short-term interest rate 6%
After-Tax
(5,400,000) $
(5,000,000.00)
1,666,666.67
(450,000.00)
225,000.00
(8,958,333) $
After-Tax
80,000 $
(66,666.67)
13,333 $
After-Tax
5,400,000 $
(4,500,000.00)
900,000 $
After-Tax
913,333 $
0.06
$2,717,131.96
Problem 7
Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $75 million, 12%
coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $5
million of floatation costs on the 12% bonds over the issue's 30
Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new
25-year issue at an interest rate of 10% in today's market. Neither they nor
mullet's management anticipated that interest rates will fall below 10% any
time soon, but there is a chance that rates will increase.

A call premium of 12% would be required to retire the old bonds, and flotation
costs on the new issue would amount to $5 million. Mullet's marginal federal
plus-state tax rate is 40%. The new bonds would be issued 1 month before the
old bonds are called, with the proceeds being invested in short
government securities returning 6% annually during the interim period.

Conduct a complete bond refunding analysis. What is the bond refunding's
NPV?
Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $75 million, 12%
year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $5
million of floatation costs on the 12% bonds over the issue's 30-year life.
Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new
year issue at an interest rate of 10% in today's market. Neither they nor
mullet's management anticipated that interest rates will fall below 10% any
time soon, but there is a chance that rates will increase.
A call premium of 12% would be required to retire the old bonds, and flotation
costs on the new issue would amount to $5 million. Mullet's marginal federal-
state tax rate is 40%. The new bonds would be issued 1 month before the
old bonds are called, with the proceeds being invested in short-term
government securities returning 6% annually during the interim period.
Conduct a complete bond refunding analysis. What is the bond refunding's
Problem 4
Problem Variables
NAL=PV Cost of Owning - PV Cost of Leasing
Tax Rate 40%
Loan Interest Rate 15%
Install Costs 1,500,000
Loan Value 1,500,000
After-tax Interest Rate(Loan) 9%
Residual Value 250,000
Lease Payments (400,000)
Year 3-Year Deprec.
1 0.3333 499,950 $
2 0.4445 666,750 $
3 0.1481 222,150 $
4 0.0741 111,150 $
Payment ($463,002.99)
PV Cost of Owning: 1 2
After-Tax Loan Payments ($463,002.99) ($463,002.99)
Deprec. Tax Savings 199,980 266,700
Residual Value
Tax on Residual Value
Net Cash Flow (263,021.99) $ (196,300.99) $
($241,304.58) ($165,222.62)
PV Cost of Owning: ($885,671.71)
PV Cost of Leasing: 1 2
Lease Payment (400,000) (400,000)
Tax Savings 160,000 160,000
Net Cash Flow (240,000) (240,000)
($220,183.49) ($202,003.20)
PV Cost of Owning: ($777,532.77)
Net Advantage Lease (NAL)
NAL=PV Cost of Owning - PV Cost of Leasing ($108,138.94)
Chapter 19
Year 3-Year
1 0.3333
2 0.4445
3 0.1481
4 0.0741
Deprec Tax Savings
199,980 $
266,700 $
88,860 $
44,460 $
3 4
($463,002.99) ($463,002.99)
88,860 44,460
250,000
(100,000)
(374,139.99) $ (268,538.99) $
($288,904.72) ($190,239.79)
3 4
(400,000) (400,000)
160,000 160,000
(240,000) (240,000)
($185,324.04) ($170,022.05)
MACRS 3-Year Class
Chapter 19
Problem 4
Big Sky Mining Company must install $1.5 Million of new
machinery in its Nevada mine. It can obtain a bank loan for
100% of the purchase price, or it can lease the machinery.
Assume that the following facts apply.

1-Machinery falls into MARCS 3-year class
2-Under either lease or purchase, Big Sky must pay for
insurance, property taxes, and maintenance
3-Firm's Tax rate is 40%
4-Loan would have an interest rate of 15%. It would be
nonamortizing, with only interest paid at the end of each
year for 4 years and the principal repaid at year 4.
5-Lease trms call for $400000 payments at the end of each of
the next 4 years.
6-Big Sky Mining has no use for machine beyond expiration
of lease and the machine has a a residual value of $250,000
at end of year 4.

Machine Cost -100000
Year 3-Year
MACRS 3-year 1 0.3333
3 year life 2 0.4445
Residual value after 3 years 30000 3 0.1481
After-tax Interest Rate(Loan) 0.08 4 0.0741
Lease
3 year lease -29000 Beginning
Lease Includes Maintenance
Tax 20%
Purchase
3 year loan
Interest paid at EOY
Before-Tax Cost 10%
Repaid A EO3Y -100000 End
Yearly Maintenance -3000 Beginning
Year 0 1 2 3
Lease
Cash Out Flow -29000 -29000 -29000
Tax Savings 5800 5800 5800
Net Cash Flow -23200 -23200 -23200
-23200 -21481.5 -19890.3
PV of Cost of Lease -64571.7
Purchase
Maintenance -3000 -3000 -3000
Loan Interest -10000 -10000 -10000
Repayment -100000
Tax Interest Savings 2000 2000 2000
Deprec Tax Savings 6666 8890 2962
Maint. Tax Savings 600 600 600
Residual Value 24000
Net Cash Flow -2400 -3734 -1510 -81038
-2400 -3457.41 -1294.58 -64330.6
PV of Cost Purchase -71482.6
Net Advantage Lease (NAL)
NAL=PV Cost of Owning - PV Cost of Leasing -6910.82
Chapter 19 Home Work - Handout Problem 6
MACRS 3-Year Class
Carmichael
machine that costs $100,000. The company is evaluating
whether it should lease or purchase the machine. The
equipment falls into the MACRS 3
would be used for 3 years and then sold, because the
firm plans to move to a new facility at that time. The
estimated value of the equipment after 3 years is
$30,000. A maintenance contract the equipment would
cost $3000 per year, payable at the beginning of each
year. Alternatively, the Firm could lease the equipment
for 3 years for a lease payment of $29000 per year,
payable at the beginning of each year. The lease would
include maintenance. The firm is in the 20% tax bracket,
and it could obtain a 3
payable at the end of the year, to purchase the
equipment
should be repaid at the end of the third year. If there is a
positive Net Advantage to Leasing the firm will lease the
equipment. Otherwise, it will buy it.
(Note: Assume MACRS rate for Year 1 to 4 are 0.3333,
.4445, .1481, and .0741.)

Deprec.
33330
44450
14810
7410
Carmichael Cleaners needs a new stream finishing
machine that costs $100,000. The company is evaluating
whether it should lease or purchase the machine. The
equipment falls into the MACRS 3-year class, and it
would be used for 3 years and then sold, because the
firm plans to move to a new facility at that time. The
estimated value of the equipment after 3 years is
$30,000. A maintenance contract the equipment would
cost $3000 per year, payable at the beginning of each
year. Alternatively, the Firm could lease the equipment
for 3 years for a lease payment of $29000 per year,
payable at the beginning of each year. The lease would
include maintenance. The firm is in the 20% tax bracket,
and it could obtain a 3-year simple interest loan, interest
payable at the end of the year, to purchase the
equipment at a before-tax cost of 10%; the $100,000
should be repaid at the end of the third year. If there is a
positive Net Advantage to Leasing the firm will lease the
equipment. Otherwise, it will buy it. What is the NAL?
(Note: Assume MACRS rate for Year 1 to 4 are 0.3333,
.4445, .1481, and .0741.)

You might also like