Grievance Procedure Case Study Report
Grievance Procedure Case Study Report
Submitted To: Shri Sanjay Kr.Singh (Officer HR) Parbati HE Project Stage-II
Submitted By: Rosy Thakur MBA 2nd sem. Roll no-94/08 C.A.S.E. Group of institutes
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank Parbati HE Project, Stage II, NHPC Ltd. for providing me an opportunity for summer training. I am thankful to all the members working here for creating a friendly atmosphere throughout my training period. I wish to express my thanks to Mr. Sion Tirkey, Chief (HR) for allowing me to do the training. My sincere gratitude to Mr. Anurag Bhardwaj, Manager (HR) for his constant support and words of appreciation during training. Especially I am thankful to Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Officer(HR) who guided me a lot throughout the training and also helped in timely completion of this project. I am also grateful to my Parents and God for providing me constant inspiration during my training and in preparing the project report.
Rosy Thakur
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO.
I. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. II. a. b. c. d. e. III.
TOPIC
COMPANY PROFILE Historical evolution Profile of NHPC Objectives Mission Vision Partners in progress Joint ventures R&D activities Looking ahead-Plan X & XI New initiatives & assignments Awards ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE Board of directors Organizational structure of NHPC Organizational structure of Parbati-II Channel of information sharing Communication network
PAGE NO.
KEY OPERATIONAL PROCESS a. Phases of process b. A report on Parbati hydroelectric project SWOT ANALYSIS GRIEVANCE HANDLING IN NHPC a) Grievance Handling-Preface b) Grievance Policy and Procedure ANNEXURES SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSION REFERENCES I. II.
IV. V.
1. COMPANY PROFILE
GENERATION
GENER ATION 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06 2004-05 Y EAR 2003-04 2002-03 2001-02 2000-01 1999-00 1998-99 0 5000 14813.2 13048.7 12567.2 11286.4 11045.5 9862.7 8912.3 8774 8690.7 9917.3 10000 15000 20000
During the financial year 2007-2008 ,NHPC Power Stations achieved the highest ever generation of 14813.16 MU.
b. PROFILE OF NHPC
Authorised Capital Value of Assets Paid Up Capital Projects Completed Projects Under Construction Projects Awaiting Clearances Projects Under Survey and Investigation Stage Joint Venture Projects Projects on Turnkey Basis In 2007-2008 Energy Generated (Including Deemed Generation) Capacity Index Sales Turnover Net Profit Performance Rating In 2006-2007 Energy Generated (Including Deemed Generation) Capacity Index Sales Turnover Net Profit Performance Rating In 2005-2006 Energy Generated (Including Deemed 12567.15 MU 13048.76 MU 94.11% 19630 Million 9248 Million "Very Good" 14813.16 MU 96.13% 23010 Million Rs. 10040.9 Million "Execellent" Rs. 1,50,000 Million Rs. 3,17,000 Million Approx. Rs. 111,820 Million 31.03.2009 13 Nos. (5175 MW) 11 Nos. (4622 MW) 10 Nos. (6871 MW) 9 Nos. (7255 MW) 6 Nos. (3706 MW) 5 Nos. (89.35 MW)
Generation) Capacity Index Sales Turnover Net Profit Performance Rating In 2004-2005 Energy Generated (Including Deemed Generation) Capacity Index Net Profit Performance Rating 11286.43 MU 95.28 % 6845.8 Million "Excellent" 98.16% 17140 Million 7427 Million "Excellent"
a.
OBJECTIVES OF NHPC
Development of vast hydro potential at faster pace and optimum cost eliminating time and cost over-run. Completion of all on-going projects within stipulated time frame. Ensure maximum utilization of installed capacity and help in better system stability. Generation of sufficient internal resources for expansion and setting up new projects. Corporate development along with simultaneous Human Resource Development
b.
MISSION OF NHPC
To achieve international standards of excellence in all aspects of hydro power and diversified business. To execute and operate projects in a cost effective, environment friendly and socio-economically responsive manner. To foster competent trained and multi-disciplinary human capital. To continually develop state-of-the-art technologies through innovative R&D and adopt best practices. To adopt the best practices of corporate governance and institutionalize value based management for a strong corporate identity. To maximize creation of wealth through generation of internal funds and effective management of resources.
c. VISION OF NHPC
A world class, diversified & transnational organization for sustainable development of hydro power and water resources with strong environment conscience.
d. PARTNERS IN PROGRESS
NHPC has Memorandum of Understanding with: Montgomery Watson Harza Americas Inc., International Energy & Water Resources Group, USA for providing consultancy and management services in the field of hydropower and associated structures in India and other countries.
Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) to undertake Rural electrification works in various states in India .
e. JOINT VENTURE
S Project No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pakal Dul Kiru Kwar Loktak Downstream Indira Sagar Omkareshwar Country/State Capacity Jammu & Kashmir Jammu & Kashmir Jammu & Kashmir Manipur Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh 4 * 250 4 * 150 4 * 130 2 * 33 8 * 125 8 * 65 Total Total Capacity 1000 600 520 66 Status Awating clearances Awating clearances Awating clearances Awating clearances
US $ 10 per CER from both the projects annually over a period of seven years which shall be renewed for another two term of seven years each.
IT & Communication
NHPC has made a major break-through in utilizing information technology in its core functions by implementing ERP in NHPC with an objective of meeting the business objectives of timely completion of construction projects and optimally operating the generating power stations towards maximizing profit. During 200809, ERP has been implemented at pilot locations for Energy Sales and Accounting, Project Monitoring, Power Plant Operation, HR, Finance, Procurement etc. Employee Compensation and Employee Self Service functions are also being performed in ERP. To support ERP, IT&C infrastructure has also been strengthened considerably during the year. Various remote locations have been connected through additional link of ku-band based VSAT link. NHPC is also working towards development of enterprise class TIER-III Data Centre at Faridabad and Disaster Recovery site at its Regional Office at Kolkata. Once rolled over to all the locations during 2009-10, ERP shall provide backbone for information flow and decision making of various key business processes of NHPC as well as other routine functions across the Organization.
Quality Assurance
So far 10 Power Stations, one Region and Corporate Office have been certified ISO-9001 out of which Dul Hasti Power Station has been certified during the Year 2008-09. Nine Power Stations, one Region and Corporate Office have been certified ISO-14001 out of which Rangit Power Station has been certified during the Year 2008-09. Ten Power Stations, one Region and Corporate Office have been certified OHSAS-18001 out of which Loktak, Rangit and Dul Hasti Power Stations & Region-II (Banikhet) have been certified during the Year 2008-09. NHPCs three Power stations, one Region and Corporate Office have been certified IMS out of which Chamera-I, Chamera-II and Baira Siul Power Stations & Corporate Office are certified during the Year 2008-09. In addition to these certifications, initiatives have been taken for getting IS15700 (Sevottam), SA-8000 (Social Accountability Certification) and ISO-22000 (Food Safety Management System Certification).
S No. Project
Country/State
Capacity
Total Capacity
Status
Dhauliganga - I Uttarakhand
4 * 70
280 Commissioned
Indira Sagar*
Madhya Pradesh
8 * 125
1000 Commissioned
Dulhasti
3 * 130
390 Commissioned
Chamera - II
Himachal Pradesh
3 * 100
300 Commissioned
Total
1970
S Project No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Teesta - V Omkareshwar * Parbati - II Sewa - II Subansiri (Lower) Uri-II Chamera-III Teesta Low Dam - III Teesta Low Dam - IV Parbati - III Nimmo-Bazgo Chutak
Country/State Sikkim Madhya Pradesh Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Assam Jammu & Kashmir Himachal Pradesh West Bengal West Bengal Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Jammu & Kashmir
Total Capacity
Status
510 Commissioned 520 Commissioned 800 120 2000 240 231 132 160 520 45 44 5322 Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction
i.
Awards
During the year 2008-09 NHPC received various prestigious awards. Some of the important awards are enlisted below: President of India conferred NHDC (a subsidiary of NHPC) with a Gold Shield for early commissioning of 520 MW Omkareshwar Project at the National Award Function for Meritorious performance in Power Sector. CIDC Vishwakarma Award for best professionally managed company for 2009. Tanakpur Power Station, Chamera-III Power Station and Region-II (Banikhet) have been awarded with Greentech Environmental Excellence Award 2008, Greentech Gold Award 2008 and Greentech Golden Award respectively by Green tech Foundation, New Delhi for outstanding achievements in environment management and safeguards in hydro sector. Amity Corporate Excellence Award for dominant leadership and global presence in recognition of its achievements to the enviable position as one of the best and most admired companies of the world with unparalleled performance. SCOPE Meritorious Award for best practices in Human Resource Management for the year 2006-07 in recognition of its constant endeavours in incorporating the best HR practices as a strong people centric organization. Jury Award for environmental upgradation in recognition achievements in the field of environmental upgradation. of its
Award of Excellence from Indian Chamber of Commerce in recognition of excellent service in the Power sector. 1st prize among all Power PSUs for displaying excellent work in implementation of Official Language - Hindi.
II.ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES
a. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
communication by means of internet alongwith view of a person is available with whom we are communicating.
e.COMMUNICATION NETWORK
The organisational set-up at project level is similar to strong matrix organisation where general manager has the maximum authority. However, functional managers such as Chiefs(HR),Chief(Geo-Tech),Head of Finance,Head of Quality Control,etc have formal communication setup with respective functional divisions of corporate office. As the project is being constructed for generating hydropower, many stakeholders are listed below are also involved with this project. General Manager being the project manager(Project In-charge), is directly or indirectly communicating with these stake holders in order to satisfy their expectations from the projects. Stakeholders Ministry of Power,Govt. Of India Central Electricity Authority Govt. Of State Local Administration Project Affected People Locals In addition to above, project in-charge has to communicate with many statutory/non-statutory bodies of Central and State Govt. Statutory bodies Ministry of Environment and Forest Mining Department of State Explosive Department Non-statutory bodies State Electricity Board Public Works Department Formal communication The formal channel of communication is officially prescribed path for flow of communication between the various functional departments of the projects. This channel has been created for orderly, smoothly, accurately and timely flow of information at the desired point. Further, the communication network is also intended to prescribe for filtering of the information to various points to ensure that the information does not flow unnecessarily thereby causing the problem of overload.
a. PHASES OF PROCESS Phase 1: Survey & Investigation We do survey of different areas and there we assure the commercial viability. We see that the area chosen is fit for setting up of hydel project. During survey we keep in mind various things like; land should be on height for construction of dams, water should be available, soil should be of good quality so as to avoid soil erosions, etc. Phase 2 : (a) Detailed Project Report(DPR) We prepare a detailed project report in which all the procedures & actions to be used in the working of project are included. The major components included in Hydroelectric Power Plant are:1. Dam/Barrage
Head works i.e. power intake, head regulator and desilting chambers etc. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Head race tunnels/channels Surge shaft/surge chambers Pressure shaft/Penstock Underground and surface power house Tailrace channel or tailrace tunnel.
(b) Second thing which is taken careoff in phase 2 is clearances of all land, forest and defence disputes of the areas chosen for setting up of project. A Purchase Power Agreement(PPA) is signed with the respective states, these are the states who are beneficiary to the project and to which the electricity will be supplied after setting up of the respective project. The Public Investment Board(PIB) is asked for the funds. At the end of phase 2 a nod is given from the Cabinet Communications on Economic Affairs(CCEA) or the financial sanctions of cabinet has been received. Phase 3: Construction phase In this the construction work of the project starts and is completed in the specified time. In this the dams are set up, tunnels are bored, etc. At the end full setup of a hydel project is ready for generation of electricity.
Phase 4 : A hydroelectric power plant consists of a high dam that is built across a large river to create a reservoir, and a station where the process of energy conversion to electricity takes place. The first step in the generation of energy in a hydropower plant is the collection of run-off of seasonal rain and snow in lakes, streams and rivers, during the hydrological cycle. The run-off flows to dams downstream. The water falls through a dam, into the hydropower plant and turns a large wheel called a turbine. The turbine converts the energy of falling water into mechanical energy to drive the generator After this process has taken place electricity is transferred to the communities through transmission lines and the water is released back into the lakes, streams or rivers. This is entirely not harmful, because no pollutants are added to the water while it flows through the hydropower plant. Then the electricity generation starts and it is supplied to grid, from where it is supplied to different areas.
NHPC is a reputed company and attract potential expertise for working therein. Weaknesses Surplus staff on completion of project work. When some project work is completed and company has not been awarded sufficiently the new projects, so due to lack of sufficient work available a portion of staff becomes surplus. Dependence on neighboring countries for taking up new projects on Border Rivers. Due to border river water disputes and for the want of their settlement the project work around the borders is delayed in their execution. Lack of indigenous R&D to deal with silt problem. Silt problem reduces the life span of dams and the indigenous methods cannot check this problem. Lack of thrust for investigation and construction prospective schemes as water is a state subject. Since the water is the state subject so all the time the company has to follow the rules and regulation of concerned State Government(s) for proposing, constructing and executing the new hydropower project. This problem is faced particularly in interstate project. Opportunities Exponentially growing demand for power. Due to idealization and other developmental programme proposed/ undertaken in the country the demand for power is increasing day by day. Revenue emphasis on hydropower by way of announcing of hydro policy. New hydropower policies addresses many of the constrains affecting hydrodevelopment related to technical, financial, tariff related issues and managerial weaknesses.
Tourism industry (Development) The resources can be exploited for water sports and other activities to attract the tourists. Joint venture with cement industry (Based on the scope of material consumption). Joint venture with other companies particularly those engaged in manufacturing the input material needed for executing hydropower project will increase the extraction of hydropower manifold. Untapped Protection of hydropower sector. Our country is endowed with enormous economically exploitable and viable hydropotential assessed to be about 84,000 MW. However, only 15% of hydroelectric potential has been harnessed so far and 7% is under various stages of development. Threats Environment and Forest Clearance Stringent norms and cumbersome procedures for getting forest clearance and clearance from NBWL (where ever applicable) lead to delay in obtaining clearance of projects which may affect the capacity addition programme. Land Acquisition Most of the Hydropower Projects are located in hilly and difficult terrains which require large areas of land for infrastructure work as well as projects components including submergence. The process of land acquisition is quite cumbersome and requires simplification of procedures. Geological Surprises Bulk of the balance hydro power potential is available in the Himalayan region. Geological surprises especially in underground works are common in this area which result in time and cost over-run. Inter-State River Disputes A number of Projects on rivers passing through different states have been held up due to Inter-State River Disputes. Natural Calamities
As Hydro Projects are located in hilly terrains, landslides, hill slope collapses and road blocks, flood and cloud burst cause severe setbacks in construction schedules. Unexpected Complexities The development of Projects may be subject to unexpected complexities and delays, which may cause the actual costs of developing projects to differ significantly from our estimates. Any change to CERCs tariff regulations may adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Also the generation capacity may vary substantially because of variations in water flow due to climatic conditions, which may cause significant fluctuations in our revenue and profits.
V. GRIEVANCE HANDLING
In fact grievance handling is an area requiring great amount of research in any organisation. Klaas et al (1989a) stated that managerial reactions to grievance activity introduce bias into the process of performance appraisal .On examining data, results revealed that the relationship between grievance activity and performance ratings is due at least in part to bias triggered by employees filing and winning grievances against examining both the determinants of grievance filing and the impact of the grievance system on employee behaviour is needed. In fact, the grievance system or handling of grievance is one of the grayest areas in an organisation, one given to a huge amount of criticism from within the organisational incumbents. In his series of studies Klass (1989c) examined whether managerial decisions about employee grievances were influenced by the grievants work history with the organisation. Results suggested that managers, at later stages of the grievance process, are influenced by the grievant work history, even if that history is not relevant to evaluating the grievance. Research on grievance handling is both descriptive and normative. It confirms commonly held belief that filing grievances triggers bias and also shows the effectiveness of the problem solving approach in grievance handling rather than combative mode which is in effective.
Scope:
Grievance is and would mean a representation by an employee in respect of wage payment, increment, recovery of dues, working conditions, allotting quarters, medical facility, seniority, transfer, promotion etc. This procedure will apply to all employees of the corp.(including projects/units under administrative control) who are covered under industrial employment(standing orders) Act,1946.
Grievance Procedure:
The scope of this procedure is confined to individual Grievance only since other matters like wages allowance bonus hours for work and other benefits etc. fall under the preview of collective bargaining.
Objective:
Grievance procedure multi level mechanism and attempts to settle the Grievance at the lowest level of organization.
Procedure: Stage 1:
1. Aggrieved employee presents his Grievance verbally in person to his immediate supervisor. 2. If the employee is not satisfied, he may submit Form no. 1 to the immediate super officer not below the rank of astt. manager within one week. 3. Grievance shall be entered in the Grievance register for the reference of the officer. 4. An acknowledgement indicating the no. of Grievance shall be issued to the employee. 5. The astt. Manager makes necessary enquires and gives the employee the reply normally within 15 days.
Stage 2:
1. If the employee is not satisfied with reply or fails to get the reply within the assigned time, he may present his Grievance in form 2 to his manager/ dep. Manager stating the reason why he is not satisfied within one week of receipt of reply. 2. The manager will now process the case further. 3. The Grievance at stage 2 not take more than 3 weeks to give a reply.
Stage 3:
1. If the employee is not satisfied with the reply or fails to get the reply in the given time, he may present his Grievance to general manager/ head of project in form no 3. 2. The general manager/head of the project will look into the case. 3. Grievance at this stage should not normally take more 30 days. If Assistant Managers are not competent enough to deal with the Grievance at stage 1 and 2, the Grievance will be automatically disposed to next concerned authority.
Appeal:
If the employee is not satisfied with the decision of the general manager, he shall have the right to appeal to general manager/head of the project for division. If the employee desires he can take a representative of the recognized union or any co worker in order to facilitate the decision. Then the general manager communicates his decision.
VI. ANNEXURES
QUESTIONAIRE: Instructions:
The following statements are designed to elicit your candid responses .There are no right or wrong answers to these statements. After reading each statement please encircle the number which represents your response. Scale: 0=Not at all true; 1=A little true;2=A good deal true;3=Very much true
1. Management and the unions/associations co-operate to settle dispute in this organisation? Scale: 0 / 1 /2 / 3
25%
15 %
25% 35%
2.The management is ready and willing to look into and resolve the grievances of the workers ? Scale: 0 / 1 /2 /3
S CAL E
10% 35% 25% 0 1 2 30% 3
3.In NHPC employees feel free at all levels to express their views and feelings ? Scale : 0/ 1 / 2 / 3
S CAL E
15% 30% 20% 0 1 2 3 35%
4.The management of NHPC is sympathetic in dealing with the problems and complaints of the workers? Scale: 0 / 1 / 2 / 3
S CAL E
10% 30% 25% 0 1 2 3 35%
S CAL E
15% 35% 20% 0 1 2 3 30%
6. There is an effective system for assessing the solution of grievance of employees? Scale: 0 / 1 / 2 / 3
S CAL E
15% 35% 20% 0 1 2 3 30%
7.Grievances of employees are decided as per rules of NHPC without any partiality or favouritism? Scale: 0 / 1 / 2 / 3
welfare
facilities
to
its
S CAL E
10% 0 40% 20% 1 2 3 30%
9. The management makes efforts to cooperation amongst the employees of NHPC? Scale: 0 / 1 / 2 / 3
develop
S CAL E
15% 30% 20% 0 1 2 3 35%
10.There is an effective grievance handling procedure for the workers in NHPC? Scale: 0 / 1 / 2 / 3
S CAL E
15% 30% 20% 0 1 2 3 35%
It has been observed that whenever employees in any organisation report grievances, it reflects to two aspects. One is directly related with the grievance and another is related with the grievance and another is related with perception of the employee regarding the concern or the procedure by which organisation handles those grievances. If an employee reports a grievance and organisation demonstrates through its active regular, uniform and fair redressal system of grievance handling then employee feels satisfied .On the other hand if he feels that there is no fair and uniform redressal of the grievances, then it leads to compounding of the grievance itself. Quantitative and qualitative data both reflected the same such as NHPC has not been able to convince the employees of the existence of a credible system to address grievances. Certain steps in this direction would certainly reduce their discontentment.
Open forums with a bottom up approach Soliciting and respecting feedback An attitude of helping each other in which the employees do not fear airing their grievances must be created . GMs of the projects should make regular visits to sites to know the employees grievances and try to solve their problems. The present Grievance Redressal System may have a humane rather than a mechanical approach.
VIII.CONCLUSION
VIII. CONCLUSION
NHPC is a well established & multidisciplinary organization and has acquired sufficient expertise and state-of-art technology for planning and executing both large and small size hydro power projects. It has the support of highly qualified and experienced professionals in design and engineering, geotechnical engineering, latest range of construction and test equipments, technologies to accomplish any hydro power project from its concept to commissioning. The technical know-why and know-how, proficiency and experience of NHPC places it in a leading position to offer a wide range of consultancy services in the field of hydro power. With reference to the grievance proceedings majority of the NHPC employees held this view that their grievances basically centered on transfer and promotion policy.Working environment and the facilities at the projects were also a cause of their grievance. NHPC is marching towards ladder of success year by year and on operational front, the company contributes to improve upon the performance during the past years. The company generated 14,813.16 million units during the year 2007-08 registering an increase of 13.52 percent over the generation last year. Most of its power stations have exceeded their generation targets and achieved capacity index of 96.14 percent. Human resource is companys biggest asset and efforts have been made to channelize the talent towards the overall objectives of the company. In addition to the hydel power generation,NHPC has also taken initiatives for contributing to the cause of rural electrification programme under Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojna (RGGY) in 27 districts of states of West Bengal, Bihar, J&K, Chattisgarh and Orissa with an estimated cost of Rs.2580 crores, covering 32,400 villages and 20.80 lack of BPL households. A total of 1276 villages have been electrified and 59,479 BPL connections were provided during the year 2007-08. NHPC has also signed a MoU with the Ministry of Rural Development,Govt. Of India and Govt. Of Bihar. An contruction of rural roads and its maintenance under Pardhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana(PMGSY) . NHPC is committed to nurture and preserve nature-mankinds precious heritage for prosperity. The adverse impact, if any, of construction activities is mitigated and compensated by adopting measures like Compensatory Afforestration, Catchment Area Treatment, Wildlife conservation, Green Belt Development,
Fishery Management, Health Management, restriction of developing sites and Quary sites, etc.
IX.REFERENCES
IX. REFERENCES 1) Annual report (2007-08) of NHPC Limited. 2) NHPC News (House Journal) By-monthly. 3) Website of NHPC www.nhpcindia.com.