CHAPTER 20: OPTIONS MARKETS: INTRODUCTION

1. Call option, X = 95 Put option, X = 95 Call option, X = 105 Put option, X = 105 Call option, X = 115 Put option, X = 115 Cost 12.20 1.65 4.70 4.40 1.20 11.00 Payoff 10 0 0 0 0 10 Profit 2.20 1.65 4.70 4.40 1.20 1.00

2.

In terms of dollar returns: Stock price: All stocks (100 shares) All options (1000 options) Bills + 100 options $80 8,000 0 9,360 $100 10,000 0 9,360 $110 11,000 10,000 10,360 $120 12,000 20,000 11,360

In terms of rate of return, based on a $10,000 investment: Stock price: All stocks All options Bills + options
Rate of return (%) 100 All options All stocks
100

$80 20% 100% 6.4%

$100 0% 100% 6.4%

$110 10% 0% 3.6%

$120 20% 100% 13.6%

Bills plus options

0 6.4

ST

100

20-1

3.

a. From put-call parity, P = C S0 + X/(1 + rf)T P = 10 100 + 100/(1.10)1/4 = $7.645 b. Purchase a straddle, i.e., both a put and a call on the stock. The total cost of the straddle would be $10 + $7.645 = $17.645, and this is the amount by which the stock would have to move in either direction for the profit on the call or put to cover the investment cost (not including time value of money considerations). Accounting for time value, the stock price would need to swing in either direction by $17.645 (1.10)1/4 = $18.07.

4.

a. From put-call parity, C = P + S0 X/(l + rf)T C = 4 + 50 50/(1.10)1/4 = $5.18 b. Sell a straddle, i.e., sell a call and a put to realize premium income of $4 + $5.18 = $9.18. If the stock ends up at $50, both the options will be worthless and your profit will be $9.18. This is your maximum possible profit since at any other stock price, you will need to pay off on either the call or the put. The stock price can move by $9.18 in either direction before your profits become negative. c. Buy the call, sell (write) the put, lend $50/(1.10)1/4. The payoff is as follows: Position Immediate CF CF in 3 months ST X ST > X 0 ST 50 (50 ST) 0 50 ST 50 ST

Call (long) Put (short)

C = 5.18 P = 4.00

Lending position 50/(1.10)1/4 = 48.82 TOTAL C P + = $50.00

By the put-call parity theorem, the initial outlay equals the stock price, S0, or $50. In either scenario, you end up with the same payoff as you would if you bought the stock itself. ST X ST > X ST + D ST + D X ST 0 X+D ST + D

5.

a. Outcome: Stock Put Total

20-2

b. Outcome: Call Zeros Total

ST X ST > X 0 ST X X+D X+D X+D ST + D

The total payoffs for the two strategies are equal whether or not ST exceeds X.

c. The stock-plus-put portfolio costs S0 + P to establish. The call-plus-zero portfolio costs C + PV(X + D). Therefore, S0 + P = C + PV(X + D) which is identical to equation 20.2. 6. a. Butterfly Spread X1 ST X2 ST X1 0 0 ST X1 X2 < ST X3 ST X1 2(ST X2) 0 2X2 X1 ST X3 < ST ST X1 2(ST X2) ST X3 (X2X1 ) (X3X2) = 0

ST < X1 Position Long call (X1) 0 Short 2 calls (X2) 0 Long call (X3) 0 Total 0 Payoff

X2 X 1

ST X1 X2 X3

20-3

b. Vertical combination Position Buy call (X2) Buy put (X1) Total Payoff ST < X1 0 X1 ST X1 ST X1 ST X2 0 0 0 X2 < ST ST X2 0 ST X2

X1

ST X1 X2

7. Bearish spread Position Buy Call (X2) Sell Call (X1) Total P a y o f f 0 X 1 X 2 S T ST < X1 0 0 0 X1 ST X2 0 ( ST X1) X1 ST X2 < ST ST X2 ( ST X1) X1 X2

P a y o f f
) ( X X 2 1

20-4

8.

a. By writing covered call options, Jones takes in premium income of $30,000. If the price of the stock in January is less than or equal to $45, he will have his stock plus the premium income. But the most he can have is $450,000 + $30,000 because the stock will be called away from him if its price exceeds $45. (We are ignoring interest earned on the premium income from writing the option over this short time period.) The payoff structure is: Stock price less than $45 more than $45 Portfolio value 10,000 times stock price + $30,000 $450,000 + $30,000 = $480,000

This strategy offers some extra premium income but leaves substantial downside risk. At an extreme, if the stock price fell to zero, Jones would be left with only $30,000. The strategy also puts a cap on the final value at $480,000, but this is more than sufficient to purchase the house. b. By buying put options with a $35 exercise price, Jones will be paying $30,000 in premiums to insure a minimum level for the final value of his position. That minimum value is $35 10,000 $30,000 = $320,000. This strategy allows for upside gain, but exposes Jones to the possibility of a moderate loss equal to the cost of the puts. The payoff structure is: Stock price less than $35 more than $35 Portfolio value $350,000 $30,000 = $320,000 10,000 times stock price $30,000

c. The net cost of the collar is zero. The value of the portfolio will be as follows: Stock price less than $35 between $35 and $45 more than $45 Portfolio value $350,000 10,000 times stock price $450,000

If the stock price is less than or equal to $35, the collar preserves the $350,000 in principal. If the price exceeds $45 Jones gains up to a cap of $450,000. In between, his proceeds equal 10,000 times the stock price. The best strategy in this case would be (c) since it satisfies the two requirements of preserving the $350,000 in principal while offering a chance of getting $450,000. Strategy (a) seems ruled out since it leaves Jones exposed to the risk of substantial loss of principal. Our ranking would be: (1) c (2) b (3) a

20-5

9.

a.

Protective Put ST 780 ST > 780 Stock ST ST Put 780 ST 0 Total 780 ST Bills and Call ST 840 ST > 840 Bills 840 840 Call 0 ST 840 Total 840 ST

Payoff Bills plus calls

840

780

Protective put strategy

ST 780 840

b. The bills plus call strategy has a greater payoff for some values of ST and never a lower payoff. Since its payoffs are always at least as attractive and sometimes greater, it must be more costly to purchase. c. The initial cost of the stock plus put position is 906; that of the bills plus call position is 930.

20-6

Stock +Put Payoff Profit Bill +Call Payoff Profit P r o f i t

ST = 700 700 80 780 126 840 0 840 90

ST = 840 840 0 840 66 840 0 840 90

ST = 900 900 0 900 6 840 60 900 30

ST = 960 960 0 960 54 840 120 960 +30

P r o t e c t i v e p u t B i l l s p l u s c a l l s
7 8 09 0 0 3 0 1 2 6

S T

d. The stock and put strategy is riskier. It does worse when the market is down and better when the market is up. Therefore, its beta is higher. e. Parity is not violated because these options have different exercise prices. Parity applies only to puts and calls with the same exercise price and expiration date.

10. The farmer has the option to sell the crop to the government for a guaranteed minimum price if the market price is too low. If the support price is denoted PS and the market price Pm then the farmer has a put option to sell the crop (the asset) at an exercise price of PS even if the price of the underlying asset, P, is less than PS.

20-7

11. The bondholders have in effect made a loan which requires repayment of B dollars, where B is the face value of bonds. If, however, the value of the firm, V, is less than B, the loan is satisfied by the bondholders taking over the firm. In this way, the bondholders are forced to pay B (in the sense that the loan is cancelled) in return for an asset worth only V. It is as though the bondholders wrote a put on an asset worth V with exercise price B. Alternatively, one may view the bondholders as giving the right to the equityholders to reclaim the firm by paying off the B dollar debt. Theyve issued a call to the equity holders. 12. The manager gets a bonus if the stock price exceeds a certain value and gets nothing otherwise. This is the same as the payoff to a call option. 13. a. If one buys a call option and writes a put option on a T-bond, the total payoff to the position at maturity is ST X, where ST is the price of the T-bond at the maturity date, time T. This is equivalent to the profits on a forward or futures position with futures price X. If you choose an exercise price, X, equal to the current T-bond futures price, the profit on the portfolio will replicate that of market-traded futures. b. Such a position will increase the portfolio duration, just as adding a T-bond futures contract would increase duration. As interest rates fall, the portfolio gains additional value, so duration is longer than it was before the synthetic futures position was established. c. Futures can be bought and sold very cheaply and quickly. They give the manager flexibility to pursue strategies or particular bonds that seem attractively priced without worrying about the impact on portfolio duration. The futures can be used to make any adjustments to duration necessitated by other portfolio actions. 105 ST 110 0 0 0

14. a. Written Call Written Put Total

ST < 105 0 (105 ST) ST 105

ST > 110 (ST 110) 0 110 ST

20-8

P a y o f f 1 0 5 1 1 0 S T W r i t e c a l l

W r i t e p u t

b.

Proceeds from writing options: Call = Put = Total = $2.85 4.40 $7.25

If IBM sells at $107, both options expire out of the money, and profit = $7.25. If IBM sells at $120 the call written results in a cash outflow of $10 at maturity, and an overall profit of $7.25 $10 = $2.75. c. You break even when either the put or the call written results in a cash outflow of $10.25. For the put, this would require that 7.25 = 105 S, or S = $97.75. For the call this would require that $7.25 = S 110, or S = $117.25.

d. The investor is betting that IBM stock price will have low volatility. This position is similar to a straddle. 15. The put with the higher exercise price must cost more. Therefore, the net outlay to establish the portfolio is positive. The payoff and profit diagram is:

P a y o f f
Net outlay to establish position

0 9 0 9 5 P r o f i t

S T

20-9

16. Buy the X = 62 put (which should cost more but does not) and write the X = 60 put. Your net outlay is zero, since the options have the same price. Your proceeds at maturity may be positive, but cannot be negative. ST < 60 60 ST 62 ST > 62 62 ST 62 ST 0 (60 ST ) 0 0 2 62 ST 0

Buy put (X = 62) Write put (X = 60) TOTAL

Payoff = Profit (because net investment = 0) 2

0 60 62

ST

17. According to put-call parity (assuming no dividends), the present value of a payment of $110 can be calculated using the options with March maturity and exercise price of $110. PV(X) PV(110) = = S0 + P C 105.30 + 7.30 2.85 = $109.75

18. The following payoff table shows that the portfolio is riskless with time-T value equal to $10. Therefore, the risk-free rate must be $10/$9.50 1 = .0526 or 5.26%. ST 10 ST > 10 Buy stock ST ST Write call 0 (ST 10) Buy put 10 ST 0 Total 10 10

20-10

19. From put-call parity, C P = S0 X/(l + rf)T If the options are at the money, then S0 = X and therefore, C P = X X/(l + rf)T which must be positive. Therefore, the right-hand side of the equation is positive, and we conclude that C > P.

20. a.b.

ST < 100 100 ST 110 ST > 110 Buy put (X=110) 110 ST 110 ST 0 Write put (X=100) (100 ST ) 0 0 Payoff at expiration 10 110 ST 0

The net outlay to establish this position is positive. The put that you buy has a higher exercise price and therefore must cost more than the one that you write. Therefore, net profits will be less than the payoff at time T.

10 Payoff 0 100 110 Profit

ST

c. The value of this portfolio generally decreases with the stock price. Its beta therefore is negative.

20-11

21. a. Joes strategy Cost 400 20 Payoff ST < 400 ST > 400 ST S 400 ST 0 400 20 S ST 420

Stock index Put option (X=400)

Total 420 Profit = payoff 420 Sallys Strategy Cost 400 15

Stock index Put option (X=390)

Payoff ST < 390 ST > 390 ST ST 390 ST 0 390 25 S ST 415

Total 415 Profit = payoff 415

Profit

Sally
390 -20 -25 400

Joe ST

b.

Sally does better when the stock price is high, but worse when the stock price is low. (The break-even point occurs at S = $395, when both positions provide losses of $20.) Sallys strategy has greater systematic risk. Profits are more sensitive to the value of the stock index.

c.

22. This strategy is a bear spread. The initial proceeds are $9 $3 = $6. The ultimate payoff is either negative or zero:

20-12

ST < 50 50 ST 60 ST > 60 Buy call (X = 60) 0 0 ST 60 Write call (X = 50) 0 (ST 50) (ST 50) TOTAL 0 (ST 50) 10 c. Breakeven occurs when the payoff offsets the initial proceeds of $6, which occurs at a stock price of ST = $56. The investor must be bearish: the position does worse when the stock price increases.

0 -4

50

60

ST Profit

-10

Payoff

23. Buy a share of stock, write a call with X = 50, write a call with X = 60, and buy a call with X = 110. ST < 50 50 ST 60 60 < ST 110 ST > 110 Buy share of stock ST ST ST ST Write call (X = 50) 0 (ST 50) (ST 50) (ST 50) Write call (X = 60) 0 0 (ST 60) (ST 60) Buy call (X = 110) 0 0 0 ST 110 TOTAL ST 50 110 ST 0 The investor is making a volatility bet. Profits will be highest when volatility is low and the stock price ends up in the interval between $50 and $60.

20-13

24. a. (i) b. (ii) c. (ii) d. (i) e. (ii) f. (i) [2 $(5545) (2 $5) $4] [Profit = 40 25 + 2.50 4.00] [Conversion premium is $200, which is 25% of $800]

20-14