Pipeline Integrity Management System

Updated Document Review 2Q 2011 POMA Subcommittee S b itt M Meeting ti

Introduction
PIMS = A comprehensive, systematic and integrated management program Objectives:
Provide information to effectively allocate resources for appropriate prevention, detection and mitigation activities Provide safe and reliable delivery of hydrocarbons Provide the means to improve the safety and incident-free operation

Principles:
Prescriptive Based Program Incorporate the worst case growth indications to establish intervals between successive integrity assessments Performance Based Program Utilize more data and extensive risk analyses, to achieve a greater degree of flexibility, specifically in the areas of inspection intervals, g techniques q employed p y tools used and mitigation

Integrity Management Plan Process Flow

1 2

5 4

Pipeline Integrity Management System

INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM VICO Pipeline Integrity Management System

PERFORMANCE PLAN Annual Performance Report

COMMUNICATIONS PLAN Pipeline Operation & Maintenanance Agreement (POMA)

MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PLAN VICO Authorization For Alteration (AFA)

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN BPMIGAS Oil & Gas Transportation Operation & Maintenance Guideline for Oil & Gas Upstream Activities

MEETING - POMA Operations & Maintenance Subcommittee - POMA Finance & Audit Subcommittee - POMA Management - Bi-parties - Gas Coordination

THREAT IDENTIFICATION - Critical Task Analysis (CTA)

PIPELINE DATA - POMA PIMS (GIS) - VICO PCT Archives

RISK ASSESSMENT - Task Risk Assessment (TRA) - Department Risk Register (DRR) - HLRR (High Level Risk Register) - MAR (Major Accident Review) - QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment)

INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 Year Pipeline Integrity Plan

INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT - Intelligent Pigging - Pressure Test - Direct Assessment - Fitness for Purpose Assessment

MAINTENANCE & INSPECTION - External Condition Monitoring - Internal Condition Monitoring - Civil & Peripheral Works - Pipeline Repair Programs - Manpower Allocation

PROCEDURES - International Codes - Government Regulation - VICO Engineering Standard (VES) - Pipeline SOP - Pipeline SWP

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS - East Kalimantan Pipeline Network Emergency Coordination Plan (EKPNECP) - Emergency Pipeline RepairSystem (EPRS) j Pipeline p Contingency g y Plan ( (MPCP) ) - Major

REPORTS - Intelligent Pigging - FFP Assessment - Direct Assessment - Early Landslide Detection - Pipeline Coating Surveys

End of Presentation Thank You!

Identify Potential Pipeline Impact by Threat

External corrosion Internal corrosion Stress corrosion cracking Manufacturing related defects Welding/fabrication related Equipment Third party/mechanical damage Incorrect operational procedure Weather related and outside force

Gathering Reviewing & Integrating Data

List of data:
Attribute Construction Operational Inspection

Stored in PCT Archives system POMA PIMS - provide timely and efficient access to all pipeline i li i information, f ti t to maintain i t i pipeline i li i integrity t it d data, t and dt to develop a solid foundation for a Geographic Information System y (GIS) ( )

Data Management
Manual Storage Server Store POMA PIMS
A computer software to store, inspect combine inspect, combine, analysis and display geographical data Facilitates the management of data with a geographic component, and eases data acquisition and utilization Developed by local IT company Web based system migration (being developed)

Risk Assessment
TRA (Task Risk Assessment) CTA (Critical Task Analysis) DRR (Departmental Risk Assessment) HLRR (High Level Risk Register) MAR (Major Accident Risk) QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment)

Integrity Assessment
Intelligent surveys (in-line inspection) Pressure testing Direct assessment Fitness for purpose (FFP) assessment

Intelligent Surveys (In-line inspection)

To check the general condition of the pipeline with respect to metal loss To inspect, electronically, every piggable pipeline on a regular basis Type: Magnetic Flux Leakage, Leakage High Resolution Tool Responses:
Immediate Indication shows that defect at failure point Scheduled Indication shows defects is significant but not at failure point Monitored Indication shows defect will not fail before next inspection p

Promptly review the result for immediate response indications Review within six months and a response plan developed

Pressure Testing
An industry-accepted method for validating the integrity of pipelines Function:
Strength test Leak test

Address time-dependent threats (external corrosion, internal corrosion, stress corrosion cracking, and other environmentally i t ll assisted i t d corrosion i mechanisms) h i ) Response: Any defect that fails a pressure test shall be promptly remediated by repair or removal

Direct Assessment
Utilize a structured process to integrate knowledge of the physical characteristics and operating history of a pipeline system t or segment t Assessment purpose:
External corrosion (ECDA) Internal corrosion (ICDA) Stress corrosion cracking (SCCDA)

Th The interval i t lb between t subsequent b t examinations i ti shall h ll b be consistent with guideline in ASME B31.8S

Fitness for purpose (FFP) assessment

Objectives:
Assess the results of the inspection Identify and prioritize any features, both corrosion and any other features, which may be an immediate threat to the integrity of the pipeline for remedial action Justify the need for a further detailed FFP by third party

The initial defect assessment criteria will use ANSI/ASME B31.G Some integrity assessment approaches (RSTRENG, DNV) can be utilized to reduce the number of repairs

Update, Integrate & Review Data

The improved status and updated information is retained and added to the data base Additional operating, maintenance and any other information is collected to improve the historical data base

Reassess Risk
Performed periodically within regular intervals and when substantial changes occur to the pipeline Consideration:
Recent operating data Changes to pipeline design and operation Analysis of the impact of any external changes Incorporation of data from risk assessment

Th The results lt of f integrity i t it assessments t are factored f t d into i t future f t risk assessments

Integrity Management Plan

10 Year Pipeline Integrity Plan document: Integrity Assessment Method Response to Integrity Assessments and Mitigation (Repair and Prevention) Repair Methods Prevention Strategy/Methods

Prevention Activities
Prevention Activities
Controlling Corrosion Preventing Third Party Damage Detecting Unintended Releases Civil and Peripheral Works

Pipeline Accessories Maintenance

a. Pig Traps b. Isolating Joints c. Chemical Injection Facilities d. Instrumentation e. Relief Valves f. ESD Valves g. Block Valve Stations a. Regular Patrol b. One Call System c. Pipeline Marker & Barrier d. External Protection a. Visual/Mechanical Inspection b. Leakage Control Measures c. Ground Movement a. Civil and earthworks b. Soil stability c. Erosion d. Pipeline road maintenance e. Population density impact f. Support structures g. Buildings

CP Monitor & Maintenance

a. Transformer/Rectifier b Test Point b. c. On/Off Potential Survey

Internal Condition
a. Routine Pigging b. Internal Condition Monitoring

External Condition Monitoring

a. Coating b. Above Ground Facility

Controlling Corrosion (1/2)

1 Pipeline Accessories 1.Pipeline Pig Traps End Closure Seals Bleed Locks Launcher Barrel Receiver Barrel Associated Valves Isolating Joints Chemical Injection Instrumentation Relief Valves ESD Valves Block Valve Stations Valves Site Condition Greasing, flushing, re-packing & stroking Warning signs signs, fence & availability of access (keys, gate etc.) Annually (opportunity basis) Twice annually Visually inspect, clean, grease & change if required Visually inspect, ensure seal, clean & grease Visually inspect internal & external condition Visually inspect internal & external condition Inspect for leaks or passing, grease, flush & repack if required Electrical isolation check Facilities & sample point inspected Control & protective equipment check to pipeline operation parameters Tested for setting pressure, re-certificate Function/stroke test Every pigging operation Every pigging operation Every pigging operation Every pigging operation Valves operated twice per year (minimum) As required Annually Annually 2 years Annually (opportunity basis)

Controlling Corrosion (2/2)

1.2. Cathodic Protection Transformer/Rectifier Test Points On/Off Survey Outputs to checked Outputs to checked Potentials recorded As required Four monthly As required

1.3. Internal Condition Monitoring R ti Pigging Routine Pi i Internal Condition Monitoring Product Analysis Corrosion Coupons/Probes Pigging Debris Product to be collected & analyzed Retrieve and inspect Sample to be collected and analyzed 3 months One result per 3 months When sudden increase in debris observed Prevent corrosion product, debris, build up/liquid hold up B Based d on assessment t

1.4. External Condition Monitoring Coating Above Ground Facility Check pipeline coating using CIPS, backed by DCVG & coating survey Visually inspect where external corrosion is suspected 3 years (See attachment 2) Continuous

Preventing Third Party Damage

Monitor third party activities, especially excavations, unauthorized vehicle crossing, pipeline security, encroachment, and special projects Monitor condition of pipeline ROW, especially areas of landslip, soil subsidence and road crossing Call number is stated in warning sign, and socializes through various public educations. Check overall condition, and increase marker frequency in heavily populated area Protect pipeline from external activities such as increasing wall thickness, line relocation, increase cover depth, and ROW rehabilitation Daily

Regular Patrol

1-3 month

One Call System

As required

Pipeline Marker & Barrier

Continuous

External Protection

As required

Detecting Unintended Releases

a Visual/Mechanical Inspection Above/below ground interface Associate Buried Pipe Visual inspection inspection, UT (internal corrosion) If corrosive conditions detected in above ground pipe or bad coating Excavate at selected locations to examine coating M Manual ll leak k survey Annually (Optimized 2 year depend results) Condition dependant Every 10 years or based on coating survey result 6 month th

Selected Buried Pipe Leakage Control Measures

Ground Movement

Install & monitor pipe clamp monitoring, monument, inclinometer and piezometer

1-3 month

Civil & Peripheral Works

a Pipeline p ROW Civil and earthworks, soil stability, erosion, pipeline road maintenance, population density impact impact, support structures and buildings. As required q

Performance Plan
All performance information is annually evaluated Monitor the success of integrity assessment techniques, pipeline repair activities and mitigation risk control activities The overall measurements:
Number of kilometers of pipeline inspected vs vs. program requirements Number of immediate repairs completed Number of scheduled repairs completed Number of leaks, failures, and incidents (classified by caused)

Communications Plan
External Communication
Landowners and tenants along the Rights of Way Local and regional emergency responders Public officials other than emergency responders

Internal Communication
Committee meetings (POMA Operations & Maintenance and Finance & Audit Subcommittee) in quarterly basis Bi-annually POMA Management Meeting Monthly Bi-parties Meeting Monthly Gas Coordination Meeting

Management of Change Plan

AFA - Authorization for Alteration, to ensure that, prior to implementation, changes to the pipeline system design, operation, ti or maintenance i t are evaluated l t d AFA process:
Proposal Review of proposal Approval I l Implementation t ti

Information of this alteration shall be distributed to everyone involved in the operation p

Quality Control Plan

The documented proof of the integrity management plan are fulfilled Guidelines: BPMIGAS Working Guideline for Operations and Maintenance of Oil and Gas Pipeline Transportation for Upstream Oil & Gas Activities No. 012/PTK/II/2007 An independent third-party review of the entire program may b requested be t dt to perform f integrity i t it management t program audit dit & review