0% found this document useful (0 votes)
136 views15 pages

American Fork Pedestrian Crossing Standards

This document provides guidelines for mid-block pedestrian crossings in American Fork City. It discusses the need for pedestrians to cross streets at convenient locations and studies showing marked crosswalks alone do not necessarily increase safety. Engineering studies are required to determine if a location qualifies for a marked crossing. Warrants address factors like traffic speeds and volumes, pedestrian volumes, sight lines and distance to the nearest controlled crossing. When warrants are met, different types of marked crossings and signage are recommended based on the road type and traffic levels.

Uploaded by

Naveen Revanna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
136 views15 pages

American Fork Pedestrian Crossing Standards

This document provides guidelines for mid-block pedestrian crossings in American Fork City. It discusses the need for pedestrians to cross streets at convenient locations and studies showing marked crosswalks alone do not necessarily increase safety. Engineering studies are required to determine if a location qualifies for a marked crossing. Warrants address factors like traffic speeds and volumes, pedestrian volumes, sight lines and distance to the nearest controlled crossing. When warrants are met, different types of marked crossings and signage are recommended based on the road type and traffic levels.

Uploaded by

Naveen Revanna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

GuidelinesandStandardsforMidBlock
PedestrianCrossings

I.

ProblemStatement:

A. PedestrianNeeds

Pedestriansdesiretotravelfromorigintodestinationinasnearastraightlineasis
possible.Whenpedestriantravelinvolvescrossingastreetorhighway,many
pedestrianschoosetocrossatamidblocklocationwhenaprotectedcrosswalkatan
intersectionistoofarawayortooinconvenient.

B. CrosswalkStudies

In2005theresultsofastudyconductedbytheFederalHighwayAdministrationwas
publishedontheSafetyEffectsofMarkedVersusUnmarkedCrosswalksat
UncontrolledLocations.

Thisstudyinvolvedananalysisof5yearsofpedestriancrashesat1,000marked
crosswalksand1,000matchedunmarkedcomparisonsites.Allsitesinthisstudyhadno
trafficsignalorstopsignontheapproaches.Thestudyresultsrevealedthatontwolane
roads,thepresenceofamarkedcrosswalkaloneatanuncontrolledlocationwas
associatedwithnodifferenceinpedestriancrashrate,comparedtoanunmarked
crosswalk.Further,onmultilaneroadswithtrafficvolumesaboveabout12,000vehicles
perday,havingamarkedcrosswalkwasassociatedwithahigherpedestriancrashrate
comparedtoanunmarkedcrosswalk.

Inotherwords,pedestriansafetyontwolaneroadswasnotfoundtobedifferent,
whetherthecrosswalkwasmarkedorunmarkedandonmultilaneroadspedestrian
safetywasfoundtobeevenworse.

C. SolutioninGeneral

Markedcrosswalksalone(i.e.,withouttrafficcalmingtreatments,trafficsignalsand
pedestriansignalswhenwarranted,orothersubstantialcrossingimprovement)are
insufficientandshouldnotbeusedunlessimprovementscanbemadetoincreasethe
safetytopedestrians.

Thepurposeofthisinstructionistohelpdeterminewhenamarkedcrosswalkatan
uncontrolledlocationissaferthananunmarkedcrosswalkandtoprovidethe
appropriatesignageaccordingtotheTheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices
(2003),(MUTCD).

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page1

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

ThispolicydoesnotcovertherulesforSchoolCrosswalkZones.WhenaSchool
CrosswalkZoneiswarrantedtheUtahTrafficControlsforSchoolZones2005Edition,
Part7SupplementtoTheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices(2003),mustbe
used.

II.

General

A.ResidentialStreets

Speedsandvolumesonresidentialstreetsshouldbelowerthanonhigherclassification
streetsandshouldnotnormallyrequirepavementmarkingsorsignstoindicate
crosswalks.Requestsforcrosswalksonthesestreetsmaybeanindicationofother
trafficconcernswhichcanbedeterminedbyatrafficstudy.Basedonatrafficstudy,
crosswalkmarkingsorotherappropriatemeasuressuchastrafficcalmingmaybe
implemented.

B. MidblockCrossings

Amidblockcrosswalkisdefinedasacrosswalkatalocationotherthananintersection
withtrafficcontrolsforbothdirectionsoftraffic.Ifitisdeterminedthatpedestrianswill
crosstheflowoftrafficatmidblockratherthanusinganintersectionwithtraffic
controlstostoptheflowoftrafficandallowpedestrianstosafelycross,amidblock
crossingmaythenbeconsidered.

Crosswalklocationsmustallowmotoriststosafelyyieldforpedestrians.Sightdistance
roadwaygeometricsandthepotentialforrearendtypeaccidentsshouldbeevaluated.

Streetswithtwotrafficlanesinthesamedirectionpresentapotentialhazardwhena
vehicleinonelaneyieldstoapedestrianandobstructsthesightlineofthepedestrian
foramotoristintheotherlane.Midblockcrossingonroadwayswithtwolanesof
trafficinthesamedirectionwillnotnormallybeconsidered.Anengineeringtraffic
studymustbeconductedtoensurethesafeuseofamidblockcrossingispossible.

Thesafetyofmidblockcrosswalksisdependentonthejudgementofthepedestrian
andthemotorist.Engineeringstandardscanhelpbymakingcrosswalksmorevisible
andtoensuretheyareinstalledatsafelocations.

C. TrafficEngineeringStudy

Atrafficengineeringstudyisrequiredtodetermineifthecriteriaandwarrantsaremet
foramarkedcrosswalkataparticularlocation,andtodeterminethelevelofmarking
justified.
Thelevelofdetailrequiredforatrafficengineeringstudywillvarywiththelocation
underconsideration.EachcasemustbereviewedbythePoliceDept.,Engineering,and
PublicWorks.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page2

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

Theengineeringstudyincludesconsiderationof:

1. Speedandtrafficvolumedataonstreetsbeingcrossed.
2. Pedestrianvolume,ages,andlevelsofmobility.
3. Locationofpedestrianoriginanddestinationpointsandcrossingpatterns.
4. Existingsidewalknetworkandsidewalkramps.
5. Sightdistancesandsightobstructions.
6. Streetcharacteristicsincludinggrades,curvature,pavementwidths,andnumber
ofvehicleandbicyclelanes.
7. Locationofadjacentdriveways.
8. Onstreetparking.
9. Streetlighting.
10. Locationofdrainagestructures.
11. Distancetonearestprotectedormarkedcrossing.
12. Trafficsignalprogression.
13. Potentialforrearendaccidents.
14. Vehicleaccidenthistory.

III

WarrantsandGuidelinesforPedestrianCrossings

A. General

Markedcrosswalksareintendedtoprovidepedestrianswithafeelingofconfidencethat
itissafetocrossastreetatthemarkedlocationandtogivemotoristsadequatewarning
toexpectpedestrianstobeintheroadway.

Theyarealsotoencouragepedestrianstocrossroadwayswherethereareadequate
facilitiestoaccomplishthesepurposes.

ATrafficEngineeringStudyisrequiredwhenevaluatingalocationformarked
crosswalks.Thefollowingaregeneralcriteriatobesatisfiedinadditiontothewarrant
criteriashowninsectionIIIC.1.whenconsideringinstallationofmarkedcrosswalks:

1. Markedcrosswalksmustconnecttoestablishedsidewalksatbothends.

2. ADAaccessiblerampsshallbeincludedatbothendsofcrosswalkinstallations
unlessthereareengineeringreasonstheycannotbeprovided.

3. Adequatestreetlightingmustbeprovidedforthesafetyofpedestrians.

4. Streetparkingmustberestrictedadjacenttocrosswalkstoallowforadequate
sightlinesforboththemotoristsandthepedestrians.Thelengthoftheparking
restrictionshallbebasedonanengineeringstudy.MUTCDrequires50ftNo
Parkingminimum.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page3

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

B. ResidentialStreets

Markedcrosswalkswillgenerallynotbeinstalledonresidentialstreets.Marked
crosswalkswillbeevaluatedforuseonresidentialstreetswhenindicatedbyoneor
moreofthefollowing:

1. Thestreetintersectswithacollectororhigherclassificationstreetandthe
averagedailytrafficvolumeontheminorstreetexceeds1000vehiclesperday.

2. Thecrossinglocationiswithinadesignatedschoolzoneorisakeyelementofa
designatedschoolwalkingrouteplan.

3. Atrafficengineeringstudyindicatesasafetyproblemthatcanbeaddressedbya
markedcrosswalk.

Evaluationofmarkingacrosswalkonaresidentialstreetrequiresanengineeringtraffic
studyandsatisfyingtherequirementsofIII.A.

C. MidBlockCrossings

1.WarrantCriteria

Acrosswalkatamidblocklocationmaybeinstalledwhenthelocationsatisfiesthe
generalcriteriaofIII.A.andmeetsallofthewarrantcriteriaforamidblockcrosswalk
listedbelow:

a Thecrossingvolumeisnotcausedbyacorrectablegapinthesidewalksystem.

b Thereisaminimumdistanceof600feettothenearestprotectedcrossing.A
protectedcrossingisacrossingcontrolledbystopsignsorsignalsoratagrade
separation.

c Engineeringstudyindicatesnounsafevisibilityorsiteconditionswouldbe
created.

d Postedspeedis35mphorlessand85percentilespeediswithin5mphofthe
postedspeed.

e ThepedestrianandvehiclevolumesmustcrossintheINSTALLCROSSWALK
areaofChart1inAppendixA.

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page4

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

Whenamidblockcrosswalkiswarrantedthefollowingguidelinesshallbeused:

Level3SpecialEmphasispavementmarkingsshallbeused(SeeFig.2inAppendixA,
andFigure3B16oftheMUTCD)
AdvancedWarningsigns(R16)shallbeplacedinadvancewhendictatedbyan
EngineeringStudy(SeeFig.4inAppendixA,andR16signagefromtheMUTCD)
CrossingtreatmentsasshowninSectionIV.C.shouldbeconsideredwhentheAADT
is12,000veh/dayorgreater.

2.ExceptionstoWarrantCriteria

Thepedestrianvolumeandvehiclevolumewarrantsmaybewaivedforanyofthe
followingsituations:

a. Thecrossinglocationisakeyelementofadesignatedschoolwalkingrouteplan
b. Atrafficengineeringstudyindicatesasafetyproblemthatcanbeaddressedbya
markedmidblockcrosswalk.

c. Wherepedestrianusewoulddictate,suchasneartransitstops,bikecorridors,
parksandmultiusepathcrossings.

D.MajorIntersections

1. UnsignalizedIntersections

a. Allwaystopcontrolledintersection
ProvidedthegeneralcriteriainSectionIII.A.issatisfied,allwaystopcontrolled
intersectionsshallusethefollowingguidelines:
Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.(SeeFig.1inAppendix
A,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,speed,and
pedestrianandvehiclevolumes.Yieldtopedestrianssignsmaybeplaced
inadvanceofallwaystopcontrolledintersections.(SeeFig.1&2in
AppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Whencrossinglengthsaregreaterthan36feet,pedestrianrefugeislands
shallbeevaluated.

b. Partialstopcontrolledintersection
Eachapproachatapartialstopcontrolledintersectionwillbeeitherstop
controlledoruncontrolled.Crosswalkmarkingsatpartialstopcontrolled
intersectionswillbeevaluatedbasedonthecontroloftheapproachbeing
consideredasindicatedbelow.Teeintersectionswithheavyturningvolumes
andhighlyskewedintersectionsmayrequireadditionalconsideration.

i. Stopcontrolledapproaches
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page5

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

ProvidedthegeneralcriteriainSectionIII.Aissatisfied,stopcontrolled
approachesshallusethefollowingguidelines:

Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.(SeeFig.1in
AppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,speed,and
volumes.(SeeFig.1&2inAppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signsmaybeplacedinadvanceofstop
controlledapproachesatintersections.

ii.Uncontrolledapproachtointersection
Thissectionappliestotheuncontrolledapproachesofpartialstopcontrolled
intersectionsthataresimilartoamidblockcrosswalkinthatthepedestrian
iscrossinguncontrolledtraffic.Thewarrantsformidblockcrosswalks,as
statedinsectionIII.C.1shallbeusedwhenevaluatingcrosswalksacrossthe
uncontrolledapproachesatanintersection.ThePedestrianandvehicle
volumesmaybewaivedasindicatedinSectionIII.C.2.Providedthegeneral
criteriainSectionIII.A.issatisfied,andthemodifiedmidblockwarrantsare
satisfied,uncontrolledapproachesshallusethefollowingguidelines:
Markedcrosswalksonuncontrolledapproachesofintersectionsshallbe
Level3markings.
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signsshouldbeplacedinadvanceof
crosswalksacrossuncontrolledapproachesatintersections.
CrossingtreatmentsasshowninSectionIV.C.maybeconsidered.

2. SignalizedIntersections

ProvidedthecriteriainSectionIII.A.aresatisfied,signalizedintersectionsshall
usethefollowingguidelines:
Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.

Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,vehicle
speedandvolumes.

Signalsshallprovideenoughtimetoallowpedestrianstocrossthestreet
safelybasedonawalkingspeedof3.5feetpersecond,thisratemaybe
reducedatlocationswherethepredominatewalkingspeedisslower.

Actuatedsignalsshouldhavepedestriansignals(WALK,DONTWALK)
activatedbypushbuttons.

Pedestriansignals(WALK,DONTWALK)shallbeinstalledwhenthe
crosswalkcrossesmorethantwolanesofsamedirectiontrafficorwhen
theaveragedailyenteringtrafficvolumeexceeds10,000vpd.

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page6

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

IV.

STANDARDS

A. PavementMarkings

Crosswalksshallbeaminimumof10feetorthesamewidthastheapproach
walkwayifthewalkwayiswiderthan10feet.Whentheguidelinesandwarrants
sectionofthispolicyindicatestheuseofcrosswalkmarkings,oneofthefollowing
threelevelsofmarkingshallbeused:

Level1Standardcrosswalkmarkingsaretwo12inchwhitelines,6feetapart.
(Fig.1)

Level2Enhancedstandardcrosswalkmarkingsaresimilartostandardcrosswalk
markingsexceptthewidthofthewhitelinesisanywherefrom15incheswideto24
incheswide.(SeeAppendixA,Fig.1)

Enhancedstandardmarkingsmaybeusedwhenanyoneofthefollowingapply:
Crosswalkiswiderthan10feet
Crossingmorethan2lanesoftraffic
Intersectionenteringvolumeexceeds900vehiclesperhourforanyone
hour
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signisplacedinadvanceofcrosswalk
Acrossminorstreetattwowaystopcontrolledwhenmajorstreetspeed
limitexceeds35mph

Level3Specialemphasiscrosswalkmarkingsconsistofwhite2footwidebars
witha1footspaceat90degreestothecrosswalk.(SeeAppendixA,Fig.2)The
widthofthebarsandspacesmaybeincreasedupto36inchesatsomelocations
toallowthetiresofvehiclestotrackthroughthespaces.

SpecialEmphasisMarkingsmaybeusedatanyofthefollowinglocations:
Withinschoolzonesorasshownonaschoolwalkingrouteplan
Whenanengineeringstudyindicatestheneedforadditionalvisibility
Wherecrosswalktreatmentsareusedthatresultinraisedpavements

SpecialEmphasisMarkingsshallbeusedatthefollowinglocations:
Wheremidblockcrossingsareinstalled
Acrossuncontrolledtrafficatpartialstopcontrolledintersections
Wherecrossingsareinstalledonstreetshavinganaveragedailytraffic
volumeof4000vehiclesperday.

HighPedestrianAreasInbusinessdistricts,campuses,commercialareasandother
highpedestrianareaswherepedestrianactivityistobeencouragedandwhere
significantdistractionstomotoristsandpedestriansarelikelytooccur,engineering
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page7

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

judgementcanbeusedtoimplementahigherlevelofpavementmarkingthanwouldbe
indicatedbythecrosswalkmarkingstandards.Careshouldbetakentoinsurethat
specialemphasismarkingsatsomelocationsdonotweakenordetractfromother
crosswalkswherelowerlevelmarkingsareused.

B. FlashingYellowCrosswalkLights

Flashingyellowlightsmaybeusedatmidblockcrosswalksifanengineeringstudy
indicatesaneedtoincreaseawarenessofthecrosswalklocationorthepresenceof
pedestrians,(SeeAppendixA,Fig4).

Flashingyellowlightsdonotassignrightofway.

Improperinterpretationsofthepurposeormeaningofflashinglightscanleadto
conflictingmovementsandshouldbeconsideredwhenevaluatingtheuseofflashing
yellowlights.Forflashingyellowlightstobeeffective,theymustcommandrespect
frommotorists.Ifthelightsflashedcontinually,amotoristwouldloserespectand
ignoretheinstallationafterbeingfalselywarnedseveraltimes.Therefore,when
flashingyellowlightsareusedatcrosswalks,theyshouldbeactivatedbypedestrians.

Pedestrianactuatedlightsflashwhenapedestrianpushesabuttonorpassesasensor.
Theselightsindicatethepresenceofapedestrian.Thelightscanbemountedwiththe
crosswalksignsatthesideoftheroad,overthedrivinglanesonmastarms,orinthe
pavementwithairporttaxiwaystylelights.Forcrossingmultilanesamedirectiontraffic,
overheadorinpavementlightsarerecommended.

Figure3,AppendixA,showsatypicalMidblockcrosswalkandFigure4,AppendixA,
showsaMidblockcrosswalkwithflashingyellowwarninglights.

C. CrosswalkTreatments

Thepurposeofcrosswalktreatmentsistoimprovesafetyby:
Reducingvehiclespeedatthecrosswalk
Reducingexposureofthepedestriantovehicles
Increasingawarenessofthepresenceofpedestrians
Increasingvisibilityofthecrosswalk

1. PedestrianWarrantedTrafficSignals
Trafficsignalscanbeinstalledatanintersectionormidblockbasedonpedestrian
volumesifwarrantedbytheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices.(MUTCD)
Whentrafficsignalsareinstalledbasedonpedestrianvolumes,pedestriansignals
mustbeused.(WALK,DONTWALK)

2. GradeSeparationStructure
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page8

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

Whereitisnotpossibletoaccommodatepedestrianswithatgradecrossings,grade
separationmaybeconsidered.Thesefacilitiesareexpensiveandcanaddoutof
directiontravel.Therefore,gradeseparationshouldonlybelocatedwheretheiruse
wouldbemaximized.Toensureproperuse,thesefacilitiesmustbeopen,withgood
visibilityandeasilyaccessible.

3. CenterMedians
Centermedianscanimprovecrossingsafetybyprovidingapedestrianrefugewhich
willallowthepedestriantocrosseachdirectionoftrafficseparately.Centermedians
shallonlybeinstalledwherepavementwidthsaresufficienttoallowforthesafe
clearanceofpedestriansfrommovingtrafficandtheresultingtrafficlanesare
sufficientinwidthforthepostedspeedlimit.Crosswalksleadingtothecenter
medianwillbeoffsettoplaceemphasisonthemedianasastoppingplacefor
pedestrians.Atypicalmidblockcrossingwithapedestrianmedianandsignlocation
isshowninAppendixA,Fig.5.Whenacentermedianisusedandthereisalsoon
streetparking,bulboutsmaybeconsideredinconjunctionwiththecentermedian.

4. BulbOuts
Bulboutsforpedestriansshouldbeconsideredwhenwarrantsexistforpedestrian
crossingsatmidblockormajorintersectionsandthepavementwidthisgreater
than32feet.Bulboutsfortrafficcalmingpurposesmaybeinstalledonstreetsof
lesserwidthsbutarenotconsiderednecessarysolelyforpedestrianpurposes.A
typicalmidblockcrossingwithbulboutsisshownonAppendixA,Fig.6.The
illustrationalsoindicatesthelocationofsigning.

APPENDIX A

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page9

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

Figure 1 shows standard and enhanced crosswalk markings.


.

Figure 2 shows special emphasis crosswalk markings

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page10

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page11

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page12

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page13

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page14

AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS

PolicyforPedestrianCrossings

Page15

You might also like