Scribd
Upload
103 views2 pages

Rodriguez vs. COMELEC: Fugitive Status Ruling

Eduardo Rodriguez ran for governor of Quezon Province but was challenged as being a "fugitive from justice" due to pending criminal charges in Los Angeles. However, Rodriguez provided evidence that he left the US five months before the charges were filed, making it impossible for him to have fled to avoid prosecution. The Supreme Court ruled that to be considered a fugitive, one must have knowledge of existing charges or conviction at the time of leaving a jurisdiction. As Rodriguez left before any charges, he could not have intended to evade prosecution and was therefore not disqualified from running for office.

Uploaded by

Erick Jay Inok
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
103 views2 pages

Rodriguez vs. COMELEC: Fugitive Status Ruling

Eduardo Rodriguez ran for governor of Quezon Province but was challenged as being a "fugitive from justice" due to pending criminal charges in Los Angeles. However, Rodriguez provided evidence that he left the US five months before the charges were filed, making it impossible for him to have fled to avoid prosecution. The Supreme Court ruled that to be considered a fugitive, one must have knowledge of existing charges or conviction at the time of leaving a jurisdiction. As Rodriguez left before any charges, he could not have intended to evade prosecution and was therefore not disqualified from running for office.

Uploaded by

Erick Jay Inok
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

[G.R. No. 120099.

July 24, 1996]

EDUARDO T. RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON


ELECTIONS, BIENVENIDO O. MARQUEZ, JR., respondents.
Facts: The petitioner Eduardo T. Rodriguez was a candidate for Governor in the Province of Quezon in
the May 8, 1995 elections. His rival candidate for the said position was Bienvenido O. Marquez, Jr.,
herein private respondent. Private respondent filed a petition for disqualification before the COMELEC
based principally on the allegation that Rodriguez is a “fugitive from justice.” Private respondent
revealed that a charge for fraudulent insurance claims, grand theft and attempted grand theft of
personal property is pending against the petitioner before the Los Angeles Municipal Court. Rodriguez is
therefore a “fugitive from justice” which is a ground for his disqualification/ ineligibility under Section 40
(e) of the Local Government Code according to Marquez.

Rodriguez, however, submitted a certification from the Commission of Immigration showing that
Rodriguez left the US on June 25, 1985- roughly five (5) months prior to the institution of the criminal
complaint filed against him before the Los Angeles Court.

Issue: Whether or not Rodriguez is a “fugitive from justice.”

Held: No. The Supreme Court reiterated that a “fugitive from justice” includes not only those who flee
after conviction to avoid punishment but likewise who, being charged, flee to avoid prosecution. The
definition thus indicates that the intent to evade is the compelling factor that animates one’s flight from
a particular jurisdiction. And obviously, there can only be an intent to evade prosecution or punishment
when there is knowledge by the fleeing subject of an already instituted indictment or of a promulgated
judgement of conviction.

Intent to evade on the part of a candidate must therefore be established by proof that there has already
been a conviction or at least, a charge has already been filed, at the time of flight. This cannot be applied
in the case of Rodriguez. Rodriguez arrived in the Philippines on June 25, 1985, five months before the
filing of the felony complaint in the Los Angeles Court on November 12, 1985 and of the issuance of the
arrest warrant by that same foreign court. It was clearly impossible for Rodriguez to have known about
such felony complaint and arrest warrant at the time he left the US, as there was in fact no complaint
and arrest warrant — much less conviction — to speak of yet at such time.

Not being a "fugitive from justice" under this definition, Rodriguez cannot be denied the Quezon
Province gubernatorial post. –JOMARI BAYOT

You might also like