Identification of Potent Odorants in Different Cultivars of Snake Fruit ( (Gaert.) Voss) Using Gas Chromatography Olfactometry
Identification of Potent Odorants in Different Cultivars of Snake Fruit ( (Gaert.) Voss) Using Gas Chromatography Olfactometry
Department of Food Technology and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural Engeneering and
Technology, Darmaga Campus, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16002, Indonesia; Institute for
Plant Analysis, Federal Centre for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants (BAZ),
Neuer Weg 22/23, D-06484 Quedlinburg, Germany; and Institute for Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt
University Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
Three cultivars of snake fruits, Pondoh Hitam, Pondoh Super, and Gading, were freshly extracted
using liquid-liquid extraction. The aroma compounds of the three samples were analyzed by GC-
MS and GC-olfactometry using the nasal impact frequency (NIF) method. A total of 24 odor-active
compounds were associated with the aroma of snake fruit. Methyl 3-methylpentanoate was regarded
as the character impact odorant of typical snake fruit aroma. 2-Methylbutanoic acid, 3-methylpentanoic
acid, and an unknown odorant with very high intensity were found to be responsible for the snake
fruit’s sweaty odor. Other odorants including methyl 3-methyl-2-butenoate (overripe fruity, ethereal),
methyl 3-methyl-2-pentenoate (ethereal, strong green, woody), and 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3[2]-
furanone (caramel, sweet, cotton candy-like) contribute to the overall aroma of snake fruit. Methyl
dihydrojasmonate and isoeugenol, which also have odor impact, were identified for the first time as
snake fruit volatiles. The main differences between the aroma of Pondoh and Gading cultivars could
be attributed to the olfactory attributes (metallic, chemical, rubbery, strong green, and woody), which
were perceived by most of the panelists in the Pondoh samples but were not detected in the Gading
samples. This work is a prerequisite for effective selection of salak genotypes with optimal aroma
profiles for high consumer acceptance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemstation via an A/D converter as square signals. The six single
sniffing runs were accumulated to one coincident response chromato-
Snake Fruit Samples. Two cultivars of Pondoh snake fruits called gram, a so-called NIF profile (5), using a specially designed macro
Pondoh Super and Pondoh Hitam, and also a local cultivar called (6). The resulting NIF profile can be handled by the HP Chemstation,
Gading, at a stage of 5.5-6 months after pollination were collected for instance, to integrate peaks. Odors detected by only one or two
from the growers at Sleman, Yogyakarta. The fruits were transported judges were considered as olfactorical noise and rejected. Odor-active
by plane to Germany and were analyzed immediately after arrival. components were defined as those that were detected at identical
Overall Sensory Evaluation. The overall flavor impressions of the retention times by at least three panelists. It is known that the perception
three salak cultivars were defined by an experienced panel. After tasting and description of odor qualities is highly individualized. Therefore,
of the fresh peeled fruit flesh, the sensory impressions were fixed in after the sniffing session, an open discussion with the six panelists was
an open discussion with the six panelists with the aim of describing held with the aim of describing the odors using identical terms.
the flavor using identical terms.
Isolation of Volatiles by Liquid-Liquid Extraction. The flesh (200
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
g) of each cultivar was homogenized for 1 min in 300 mL of NaCl
solution (18.6% w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 Overall Sensory Evaluation. The overall sensory description
min at 3000 rpm to give a supernatant. To obtain a clear juice, the of the fresh snake fruits was evaluated by a panel. The aroma
supernatant was filtered through filter paper. A portion (250 mL) of was characterized with the following characteristics: fruity,
the filtrate was subjected to a fluid-fluid extractor apparatus (3) after
chemical, cheesy, overripe banana-like, earthy, caramel, pleas-
the addition of an internal standard. The volatile compounds were
extracted by 30 mL of 1,1,1-trichlorofluoromethane (Freon F11) from ant, vanilla, thinner, and unpleasant. The taste impressions were
the aqueous solution for 20 h at room temperature. The Freon fraction described as chemical, unpleasant, nutty, apricot, thinner, and
was concentrated with a Vigruex column directly before analyses. astringent (especially the Gading cultivar). It seemed that salak
Isolation of Volatiles by Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE). had an interestingly uniquee exotic flavor, especially for the
An aliquot of 10 mL of supernatant prepared as mentioned above was non-native consumer. Generally, the impression of overripe,
pipetted in a 20 mL glass headspace vial and saturated by adding 3 g cheesy, and sweaty character and astringent taste might be a
of solid NaCl. A stir bar (0.5 mm film thickness, 10 mm length; Gerstel constraint for the acceptability of snake fruit, especially for
GmbH, Mühlheim an der Ruhr, Germany) coated with PDMS was used. European consumers. Therefore, salak genotypes with a light
The stir bar was placed in the 20 mL vial. The vial was sealed with a fruity, pleasant aroma in combination with low astringent taste
crimp cap and stirred at 300 rpm at room temperature for 45 min. After should have best preference.
removal from the sample, the stir bar was rinsed with distilled water,
dried with a tissue, and transferred in a glass thermal desorption tube
Identification of Aroma-Active Compounds. Constituents
for GC-MS analysis. of the snake fruit extracts that could be identified by the GC-
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. For liquid samples a MS were in agreement with the published ones (1, 2). The
Hewlett-Packard GC-MS system (GC 5890 plus and MSD 5972) chromatograms of Freon extracts are very detailed and contain
equipped with a split-splitless injector at 250 °C was used. SBSE was more than 100 discrete peaks. The components were dominated
carried out with a system from Gerstel GmbH. The GC-MS was by the carboxylic acids and their methyl esters. Methyl
equipped with a Gerstel TDU and CIS4. Thermal desorption and cold 3-methylpentanoate, methyl 3-methyl-2-pentenoate, methyl
injection were carried out under typical SBSE conditions described in 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate, 2-methylbutanoic acid, and 3-
ref 4. The MS detector temperature was 280 °C. A polar column (HP methylpentanoic acid were found as the major components. The
INNOWax, 0.25 mm i.d. × 30 m length × 0.5 µm film thickness) was other esters that were abundantly detected included methyl
used with the following temperature program: 45 °C held for 5 min,
3-methyl-2-butenoate, methyl 3-hydroxy-3-methyl pentanoate,
then raised to 200 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min, and held for 30 min. The
flow rate of the carrier gas (He) was 1.0 mL/min. A volume of 1 µL
methyl hexanoate, and methyl 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate.
of each sample was injected with the split ratio of 1:3 and 1:50, The last two, however, were found only in smaller amounts in
respectively. For compound identification the Wiley and NIST libraries Gading cultivar. Some alcohols, furanones, and aldehydes also
were used. could be found among the identified compounds. Some terpenes,
Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry. Instrument and Operation. although in small amount, could also be detected using SBSE
The sniffing sessions were conducted in an air-conditioned room (22 sample preparation. One big and one medium peak remained
°C). A Hewlett-Packard GC 6890 series II gas chromatograph equipped unknown. Pondoh Super and Pondoh Hitam showed similar
with a polar fused silica column (HP INNOWax, 0.25 mm i.d. × 15 m patterns in their chromatograms. The Gading cultivar had slight
length × 1.0 µm film thickness) was used with split injection. Both differences, especially for the ratio of several components.
injector and FID temperatures were at 250 °C. The oven program was Figure 1 shows the NIF profile (top) versus the FID gas
the following for all runs: 45 °C for 5 min, then raised to 210 °C at a
chromatogram (bottom, inverted) of a snake fruit extract. The
rate of 10 °C/min, and finally held for 5 min. Each sniffing run
continued for 25 min. Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow importance of the olfactometric analysis in the study of the
rate of 1 mL/min. A volume of 1 µL of snake fruit extract was injected aromatic profile again was proved here (7, 8). Some evidence
at a split flow of 5 mL/min. The column outlet was connected either showed that minor compounds might be able to play an
with the FID via transfer line (monitor run) or with the sniffing port important role in influencing the flavor. Many of the major
equipped with a heated transfer line of identical length and a glass compounds such as methyl 3-hydroxy-3-butanoate, methyl
funnel. The complete sniffing session for one variety consists of two hexanoate, methyl 3-methylhydroxypentanoate, or the large
FID analyses, one with a boiling point sample for calculation of unknown peak produced little to no olfactory responses. On the
retention indices and one monitor run with the salak extract for retention other hand, some of the intense olfactory responses were found
time adjustment to the GC-MS run of the same extract. After the column in regions with little FID signals, that is, peaks 1, 3, 6, 17, 18,
outlet had been switched to the sniffing port, six separate runs followed,
and 20 and some others. As shown on the mirrored signal
carried out by six trained panelists.
between the FID and olfactory response (Figure 1), this
Data Processing. To determine potentially odor-active compounds
of the snake fruit extracts, the nasal impact frequency (NIF) method technique even allowed the detection of components that were
(5) was performed with modifications (6). Panelists recorded the unable to be detected by the FID. For example, peak 8, with
perception of an odor by pressing a button as long as the smell could cooked potato aroma description, usually corresponded to the
be received. Moreover, each panelist was encouraged to describe the presence of methional. No peak in the FID chromatogram
odor quality of each perception. The signals were registered by the HP correlated with this compound. This phenomenon has been
Snake Fruit GCO J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 53, No. 5, 2005 1639
NIF cultivara
no. RTb (min) RIc compound odor description identd S1 S3 S4
1 3.25 1011 methyl 2-methylbutanoate fruity, fresh 1, 2, 3 5 4 4
2 3.46 1020 methyl 3-methylbutanoate cheesy, snake-fruit like 1, 3 1 4 nd
3 4.63 1085 2-methyl-2-butenal metallic, rubbery, green 1, 3 5 5 nd
4 5.34 1127 methyl 3-methylpentanoate fruity, sweet, typical snake-fruit 1, 2, 3 5 5 6
5 6.16 1184 methyl 3-methyl-2-butenoate overripe fruit, fruity, green/ethereal 1, 3 5 5 6
6 6.66 1209 unknown pyrazine, metallic, chemical, woody, strong green 4 5 nd
7 7.63 1262 methyl 3-methyl-2-pentenoate ethereal, woody, strong green, spoilaged 1, 2, 3 5 6 5
8 10.24 1463 methional cooked potato 2 4 5 4
9 10.59 1478 unknown ester (m/z 41, 55, 87) fruity, sweet, typical snake-fruit (weak) 1 3 2 3
10 12.13 1591 4,5-dimethyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone warm, woody, burnt caramel, sharp spicy 1, 2 3 5 4
11 12.78−13.24 1658 2-methylbutanoic acid cheesy, unpleasant overripe, sweaty, sour, buttery 1, 2, 3 5 6 6
12 13.75 1741 tetrahydro-2-methyl thiophene stinky flowery, almond, stale 1 5 6 3
13 14.16 1780 3-methylpentanoic acid, 3-methyl- unpleasant riped cheese, rancid, pungent 1, 3 5 5 6
2-butenoic acid
14 14.80−14.93 1835 2-methyl-2-butenoic acid marzipan, unpleasant 1, 2, 3 3 3 1
15 15.28−15.36 1890 phenylethyl alcohol flowery, floral, drop acid (honey), fragrant 1, 2, 3 3 3 nd
16 15.54 1909 (E)-3-hexenoic acid stinky wet cloth, sharp pungent, vinegar, sweaty 1, 2, 3 3 5 4
17 16.54 2020 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone caramel, sweet, cotton candy 1, 2, 3 4 5 4
18 17.29 2113 unknown chemical, burnt 3 1 3
19 17.71 2215 unknown spicy, clove, Christmas cake nd 2 4
20 18.04 2226 methyl anthranilate strong, lovage, celery leaves, “Maggi” 1, 2, 3 6 5 3
21 18.38 2276 methyl dihydrojasmonate flowery, perfumery 2, 4 2 3 3
22 19.27 2378 isoeugenol spicy, cooked meals, smoky 2, 4 3 3 5
23 21.54 >2600 unknown vanilla-like 3 2 nd
24 21.67 >2600 unknown stinky flowery, silage 5 5 5
a Salak cultivars: S1, cv. Pondoh Hitam; S2, cv. Pondoh Super; S3, cv. Pondoh Gading. nd, not detected. b Retention time at GC-O. c Retention index. d Substance
identification: 1, MS library search; 2, aroma descriptors; 3, reference data; 4, SBSE-MS and library search.
breeders to develop new snake fruits varieties with optimized (11) Tu, N. T. M.; Onishi, Y.; Choi, H. S.; Kondo, K.; Bassore, S.
aroma and taste properties. M; Ukeda, H.; Sawamura, M. Characteristic Odor Components
of Citrus sphaerocarpa Tanaka (Kabosu) Cold-Pressed Peel Oil.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2908-2913.
(12) Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Evaluation of the Character Impact
We thank Dr. H. Schulz, the head of the Institute of Plant Odorant in Fresh Strawberry Juice by Quantitative Measurements
Analysis, BAZ, Germany, for helpful discussions. We are and Sensory Studies on Model Mixtures. J. Agric. Food Chem.
grateful for the participation of M. Diessner, K. Meilchen, and 1997, 45, 227-232.
M. Schenker as panelists. (13) Leudauphin, J.; Guichard, H.; Saint-Clair, J. F.; Picoche, B.;
Barillier, D. Chemical and Sensorial Aroma Characterization of
LITERATURE CITED Freshly Distilled Calvados. 2. Identification of Volatile Com-
pounds and Key Odorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 433-
(1) Wong, K. C.; Tie, D. Y. Volatile Constituents of Salak (Salacca 442.
edulis Reinw.) Fruit. FlaVour Fragrance J. 1993, 8, 321-324. (14) Jezussek, M.; Juliano, B. O.; Schierberle, P. Comparison of Key
(2) Supriyadi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Yoshida, K.; Muto, T.; Fujita, A.; Aroma Compounds in Cooked Brown Rice Varieties Based on
Watanabe, N. Changes in the Volatile Compounds and in the Aroma Extract Diltion Analyses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002,
Chemical and Physical Properties of Snake Fruit (Sallaca edulis 50, 1101-1105.
Reinw.) Cv. Pondoh during Maturation. J. Agric. Food Chem. (15) Rychlik, M.; Schieberle, P.; Grosch, W. Compilation of Odor
2002, 50, 7627-7633.
Thresholds, Odor Qualities and Retention Indices of Key Food
(3) Rapp, A.; Hastrich, H.; Engel, L. Gaschromatographische
Odorants; Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Lebensmittelchemie
Untersuchung über die Aromastoffe von Weinbeeren. Vitis 1976,
and Institut für Lebensmittelchemie der Technischen Universität
15, 29-36.
(4) Hayasaka, Y.; MacNamara, K.; Baldock, G. A.; Taylor, R. L.; München: Garching, Germany, 1998; pp 26-27.
Pollnitz, A. P. Application of stir bar sorptive extraction for wine (16) Kumazawa, K.; Masuda, H. Investigation of the Change in the
analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 375, 948-955. Flavor of a Coffee Drink during Heat Processing. J. Agric. Food
(5) Pollien, P.; Ott, A.; Montigon, F.; Baumgartner, M.; Munoz- Chem. 2003, 51, 2674-2678.
Box, R.; Chaintreau, A. Hyphenated-gas chromatography-sniffing (17) MacLeod, A. J.; deTroconis, N. G. Volatile Flavor Components
technique: screening of impact odorants and quantitative aro- of Cashew Apple (Anacardium occidentale). Phytochemistry
magrams comparison. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 2630- 1982, 21, 2527-2530.
2637. (18) Sakho, M.; Chassagne, D.; Crouzet, J. African Mango Gly-
(6) User contributed software ‘sniff.exe’: http://www.chem.agilent- cosidally Bound Volatile Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem.
.com/cag/servsup/usersoft/main.html. 1997, 45, 883-888.
(7) Valim, M. F.; Rouseff, R. L.; Lin, J. Gas Chromatographic- (19) Jirovetz, L.; Smith, D.; Buchbauer, G. Aroma Compound
Olfactometry Characterization of aroma Compounds in Two Analysis of Eruca satiVa (Brassicaceae) SPME Headspace Leaf
Types of Cashew Apple Nectar. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, Samples Using GC, GC-MS, and Olfactometry. J. Agric. Food
51, 1010-1015. Chem. 2002, 50, 4643-4646.
(8) Jordan, M. J.; Margaria, C. A.; Shaw, P. E.; Goodner, K. L.
Volatile Components and Aroma Active Compounds in Aquae-
ous Essence and Fresh Pink Guava Fruit Puree (Psidium guajaVa Received for review June 28, 2004. Revised manuscript received
L.) by GC-MS and Multidimensional GC/GC-O. J. Agric. Food October 29, 2004. Accepted November 9, 2004. We aknowledge the
Chem. 2003, 51, 1421-1426. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Bonn, Germany, for
(9) Acree, T. H.; Arn, H. Flavornet. http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ providing a short-term visiting grant under which this work was
fst/faculty/acree/flavornet/chem.html. completed.
(10) FlaVors and Fragrances: The Essence of Excellence, int. ed.;
Sigma Aldrich, Fine Chemicals: St. Louis, MO, 2001-2002. JF048950H