Roofing: Practical Building Conservation
Roofing: Practical Building Conservation
HERITAG E
PRACTICAL BUILDING CONSERVATION
ROOFING
Although the move away from thatch and, later, shingles meant a stronger roof
structure was needed, even the heaviest stone slates were relatively common from the
16th century onwards, particularly where fissile stone could be sourced from delves
(small quarries or delphs) which outcropped near the surface.
The Industrial Revolution vastly improved transport links. The advent of the canals and
railways led to the rapid export of cheaper, lightweight Welsh slate and machine-made
tiles around the country. This led to the closure of many stone quarries and reduced
demand for handmade tiles.
ROOFING
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
A sound roof is essential for the protection of the building and its contents. It is the first defence
against the weather, its primary function being to shed rainwater and snow, and to convey the
runoff safely away from the building via weatherings and rainwater disposal systems. It must
also deal with problems caused by internally generated moisture and wind-blown snow and rain
which can occasionally enter a well-constructed roof. In addition, it must resist damage from
other environmental factors, particularly wind, and the sunlight that causes thermal movements.
The loading imposed on the roof coverings depends upon the direction of the wind, the
topography of the surrounding area, the height and configuration of the roof, and turbulence, but
the force can be considerable, particularly at the eaves, ridges and verges. Tiles are especially
susceptible to wind damage.
Today, roofs must also satisfy modern demands, such as the expectation that it should not
contribute to the spread of fire, should be an acoustic buffer and should reduce carbon dioxide
emissions by minimising heat transfer out of or into a building. The latter is a requirement
under the Building Regulations when a major renovation such as re-roofing is proposed.
However, conservation principles still apply to any work, as does the requirement to ensure that
energy efficiency measures do not have unintended consequences that could jeopardise the
longevity or performance of the building. Most traditional buildings are built from permeable
materials that are able to absorb moisture and release it freely by evaporation, both internally
and externally; this is often described as the ability of the building to ‘breathe’. Provided the
building is well maintained and adequately ventilated, the evaporation of moisture keeps
dampness in the building fabric at levels where it will not cause decay or harm human health.
Changes to this system that reduce airflow, such as the introduction of impermeable materials
or components such as membranes, need to be handled carefully to avoid damage.
Thousands of historic buildings have survived for centuries despite changing weather patterns,
dramatic storms and changes in the way buildings are used. If a roof eventually fails, water
penetration will harm and may even destroy not just the finishes and internal decoration, but
eventually the structure itself. Therefore, once a roof covering has deteriorated to the point
where patch repairs are no longer economic, it will need to be replaced. �ENVIRONMENT �BASICS
The materials used for roof coverings are resistant to deterioration and decay if laid correctly,
but regular inspection and maintenance of rainwater goods and occasional repair is nonetheless
essential. These should all follow the usual principles of conservation: that is, be the minimum
required to limit the rate of deterioration, be timely, and be carried out in a manner that does
not harm the heritage values and significance of that building.
Many materials have been used for roofing in England and have given us diverse and beautiful
roofscapes. But attractive as they are, their most important attribute is the ability to keep out
water and, in this respect, size of the roofing unit – particularly width – is most significant. Size
of the individual roofing materials and the way they overlap have most influenced how they have
been used. The wider and longer the individual units, the fewer joints are needed and, on the
whole, the lower the pitch of the roof can be.
ROOFING
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Traditional roof designs evolved largely in response to local climatic conditions and the building materials and skills
available, although they were also much influenced by local practice, regulations, wealth and fashion. Most roofs
were pitched, as the objective was to shed water away from the structure as quickly as possible. The steeper the pitch,
the more timber was needed to build the roof structure to span the space below. Most of the steepest pitched roofs
in England survive in the east where, ironically, it is driest. Plentiful oak forests and a rich tradition in timber-
framed building were significant reasons for this. In Devon and Cornwall, rainfall is much higher but there was a
lack of good quality timber. Roof pitches are shallower, so local detailing has evolved to compensate. For example,
west country straw-thatch was ‘combed’ to remove all the leaves and shoots, and fixed with all the butts pointing
downwards to speed the passage of water from the roof. In many other parts of England, it was acceptable to use
bruised straw, which retained much of the leaf and in which butts and ears of the straw were mixed up, because the
steeper pitch of the roof compensated for reduced water-shedding properties of the material. West country slating
also evolved to include detailing adapted to the local materials and climate. Slates were often very narrow, so, to
prevent water ingress, they were triple-lapped. In more exposed locations, slates were also bedded in lime mortar to
improve wind resistance and were often repaired by covering with a lime slurry coat; a temporary expedient that put
off repairs but could eventually lead to the collapse of the roof.
Elsewhere, similar variations were apparent. In south Yorkshire, sandstone slates are laid at comparatively shallow
pitches, as their size and laps are adequate to deal with the climate, but similar stone in Northumberland further
north is pitched steeper because of the higher rainfall. Low pitches were only possible where the joints were protected
from water ingress. Thus, pantiles had a particular advantage of being single-lapped and therefore imposed less
loading, and only required a comparatively modest roof structure. True flat roofs (in practice, roofs with a very slight
fall) were only possible with amorphous materials or continuously supported decking and a jointing system which sits
above the area of water runoff.
common rafters
truss
laths or battens
purlin
wall plate
ridge
valley board tie beam
dormer window
hip rafter
raised gable or
gable parapet
timber boarding
fascia board
soffit board
(under)
closed eaves wall plate
(rafter feet
concealed)
side abutment
flat roof
open eaves
(rafter feet
exposed)
flying rafter
OVERSAILING VERGE
close verge
ROOFING
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Southampton to Scarborough, but excluding Sussex where Horsham stone is used. The
table below lists the more important historical stone-slate sources. Some of the stones
listed supplied a small and very local market compared to metamorphic slate. Shales
and schists were used on a very limited scale, and there are none produced today.
Present-day sources of stone slates are small operations, which tend to come and go as
the rock becomes worked out. The list of Further Reading at the end of this chapter
gives details of where to find information on current producers.
Dorset and Somerset Purbeck Limestone, Forest Marble, Upper & Lower Lias Limestone
Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire Purbeck, Corallian, Forest Marble, Hampen Marly Beds, Taynton and
Trougham tilestones, Stonesfield Slate, Chipping Norton Limestone,
Lower Fullers Earth Rock, Inferior Oolite, Marlstone
Gloucestershire, Bristol region, Pennant Sandstone, Tilestones (Murchison), Old Red Sandstone,
South Wales Lower Lias Limestone
Welsh Marches including Gloucestershire, Old Red Sandstone, Tilestones (Murchison), Cheney Longville Flags,
Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Shropshire alternata limestone, Chatwall Sandstone, Harnage slates (Hoar Edge
Grit), Grinshill Flagstones, Hope Shale (Corndon Hill)
Staffordshire, Cheshire, Derbyshire, Carboniferous Millstone Grit and Coal Measures sandstones
Lancashire, Yorkshire, County Durham,
Northumberland
Slaley
Barnard Castle
Eden Valley Brandsby
Yorkshire Dales
Elland Edge
Rossendale
Collyweston
Corndon Hill
Harnage
Shropshire sandstones
Duston
Tilestones from
Stonesfield
Llandeilo to Ludlow
Hereford Sandstones Cotswold Limestones
Forest Marble from
Pennant Sandstone around Dorset to Oxfordshire
Bristol, the Forest of Dean and
Horsham
north of the South Wales Coalfield
Ham Hill
Sherborne
Portland and Purbeck
ROOFING
GUIDANCE
The main source of technical advice for slating is BS 5534:2003 Code of practice for
slating and tiling. This deals thoroughly with tally-slate roofing, but random slating is
not covered in any detail, and there is no advice specifically for stone roofing. As with
all British Standards, the guidance is conservative and consequently may be at variance
with the construction of an existing historic roof. In most cases this will be obvious: for
example, there may be an absence of an underlay. Where there are differences, the first
question to ask is whether changing existing details to conform to modern practice
would confer significant technical advantage. If the answer to that is ‘no’, then any
change that significantly alters the historic integrity or the character of the roof is
unlikely to be justified.
The latest edition of BS 5534 should always be checked in relation to head/side laps, to
confirm that slate manufacturers' and importers' guidance is accurate, up-to-date and
appropriate for the specific roof and its environment.
In the case of stone slate or random slate roofs, it will usually be wise to seek the advice
of an expert to decide whether adopting modern practices would provide significant
benefits. On the whole, if traditional techniques have performed well, then these should
be replicated in repair.
LOCALISED REPAIR
Slate and stone-slate roofs can be maintained for a long time by regularly inspecting
them and carrying out minor works such as replacing slipped slates. Top-fixed slates can
be swung to one side (although torching may make this difficult) to allow access for
re-fixing slipped slates, and any displaced torching renewed if it is accessible.
If the slates are tightly head-nailed there is a risk that the heads will break as the slates
are swung aside, so a slate ripper should be used to pull out or cut the nail. Replacement
slates can then be fixed with tingles or hidden fixings. Tingles are often made of lead
strips nailed to the batten and folded up over the tail of the slate, but they are liable to
become unrolled by heating and cooling or by the weight of snow. Allowing an extra
length of lead and folding it back down onto the slate below can help, but it is better to
use a substantial copper strip – about 1 or 2 mm-thick – which is not so prone to this
problem. A variety of hidden fixings are available.
Re-fixing with lead tingles is not suitable for large or heavy slates. Substantial copper
Collyweston slates being re-laid to strip is better, but the best option may be a strong non-corroding wire hooked under the
form a laced valley, at Apethorpe tail of the slate. If the underside is accessible, similar wire can also be used to re-fix
Hall, Northamptonshire. individual slates by tying them to the battens.
ROOFING
ROOFING
A variety of different systems have been used at joints on lead roofs. Laps were traditional,
although drips are much more common today. For most vertical joints, hollow rolls were used
exclusively on gentle pitches until the beginning of the 20th century and standing seams were
used on very steep pitches. Both have performed well. Wood-cored rolls were introduced in the
late 19th century for a number of reasons, including the suggestion that they allowed the
non-specialist plumber to lay lead roofs.
Roofs with hollow rolls may have survived so well because of the fixing methods used. Widely
spaced copper clips within hollow-roll joints on both sides of the sheet ensure an even distribution
of stresses, and no holes are made through the lead. By contrast, the undercloak to a wood-cored
roll was traditionally nailed along its length before being covered by the overcloak, which would
have been simply dressed down on the other side. This type of over-fixing could restrict thermal
movement, and result in fatigue cracks or thermal ripples in the lead sheet across the roofing bays.
Another factor that affects the life of wood-cored roll joints is the amount of bossing used to
form the joints. If done excessively particularly at roll ends (nosings), it can thin the lead sheet,
resulting in premature fatigue cracking. However, hollow rolls on some roofs have also been
known to crack at the point where they were turned down at the roof edge, both along and
across the roll, which may be due to the size of the hollow roll that was formed.
40
WELT LAP WITH CLIPS ON FREE EDGE LAP WITH CONTINUOUS WELDED CLIP
UNDERLAYS
Underlays were rare before the late Victorian period. Inodorous felts and reinforced
papers were introduced on flatter pitches to provide a slip-layer, allowing the sheets to
expand and contract freely, and overcome problems caused by uneven decking or
projecting fixings.
A variety of materials have been used throughout the 20th century, including
impermeable underlays with bituminous surfaces, vapour-control layers, geotextiles
and fleeces, all of which were designed to deal with particular conditions.
ROOFING
ROOF COVERINGS: LEAD
Wind damage is a major cause of failure. Strong winds can produce highly variable air
pressure across a roof. Where turbulence creates negative pressure above part of a copper
roof, the internal pressure may force a copper sheet off the roof. This exposes adjacent
sheets to the wind which may lift them from beneath, so once one sheet is removed,
adjacent sheets frequently follow. Wind can also initiate vibration of the copper on the
substrate, which causes a loud drumming noise within the building.
Copper can also suffer damage as a result of flexing due to wind loading or thermal
movement. When copper sheet is deformed it undergoes changes to its crystal structure,
known as ‘work hardening’. Repeated movement makes it very brittle and can
eventually lead to cracking. ‘Star cracking’ is a characteristic failing in copper sheet,
caused by repeated flexing of a sheet due to wind or thermal movement, and is normally
confined to localised areas, usually the verge, ridge or eaves. Failure to repair star cracks
results in their enlargement, and the risk of water ingress into the roof and wind
damage. Long sheets of copper may buckle due to thermal movement if they are too
long, and this can also eventually lead to cracking.
Work hardening of copper also occurs due to folding the sheet to form seams and joints.
Work-hardened joints are more susceptible to cracking due to thermal or wind
movement, especially as the copper ages. Cracking of welts and seams due to age
hardening, especially when three or more sheets are folded together, is also a major
cause of failure. Annealing (heating) copper relieves this inherent stress, and is usually
required to avoid cracking when seams or joints are opened up.
Copper roofs are also susceptible to mechanical damage caused by tools or scaffolding being
dropped on them, or by people walking across them and squashing the standing seams.
NO CROSS CLIPS
DEVELOPMENT OF CRACKS
IN STANDING SEAMS
crack
Top: Wind loading or thermal stress can cause a rectangular copper sheet, which is securely fixed at the edge
to flex along the lines of folds which tend to be diagonal. Where the lines cross, additional stresses result in
the star crack.
Bottom: Cracks in a standing seam. Where a number of copper sheets have been folded over to form a seam,
the area is subject to work hardening. The sheets are restrained by copper clips fixed to the decking and may
not have room to expand laterally when subject to solar heating. This can create stress in the joint, eventually
resulting in cracking. It is fairly normal to find this sort of problem on roofs over about 70 years old.
ROOFING
ROOF COVERINGS: COPPER
For fixing copper sheet direct to the substrate, the traditional method of copper nails is
still recommended. Stainless-steel nails and brass screws are also used today, as neither suffers
from galvanic corrosion with the copper sheet. Stainless-steel clips are also used between
copper roofing details and the substrate to enable expansion and contraction to freely occur.
DETAILING
On most historic buildings, traditional sheet sizes, joints and detailing should be
replicated. Unless there was an inherent fault in the design that contributed to deterioration,
traditional copper roofing should not be replaced with the long-strip system.
Left: Traditionally, copper sheet was
dressed by hand to form the seams,
but nowadays the edges of the
sheets are often pre-formed in the
workshop using a profiling machine.
However, for complicated shapes
the seams must be hand-formed
on site.
Right: For traditional copper roofing,
the seams must be finished by
hand, as, in most cases, they need
to accommodate the cross welts.
For long-strip copper roofing, which
does not have cross welts, an on-site
seaming machine can complete
the joint.
12 mm
JOINTS ACROSS FALL
Single-lock
cross welt
COMMON ROLL
15 mm
Double-lock
cross welt
44 mm
38 mm
STANDING SEAM
25 mm
(approx)
CONICAL ROLL WITH A
SADDLE PIECE AT DRIP
38 mm
65 mm
50 mm
felt
underlay dog ear under
saddle piece
sheet folded
to fit into the
corner
44 mm
ROOFING
ROOF COVERINGS: COPPER
Before beginning any treatment or repair, it is important to inspect and evaluate the current condition of the corrugated
cover and the supporting structure, and to assess how effectively the roof has performed to date. Particular attention
needs to be given to individual components, especially those in vulnerable areas such as connections, bolts, rivets and so
on. There are some useful extra steps that should be followed to look for corrosion.
Since good records of corrugated-iron and steel roofs are comparatively rare, it is very useful to identify all the
components and their condition, and the sequence of the original assembly.
MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION
As previously described, the generic term ‘corrugated iron’ includes both wrought iron and mild (carbon) steel, together
with many different types of metallic or polymer-coated steel roofs. If identification is needed, then sampling should take
place in an area where it will not damage the function of the roof; for example, in the undercloak of a corrugation or in
an area of already damaged sheet. Samples should then be sent to an appropriate laboratory (a metals laboratory for the
substrate or a polymer laboratory for the coating). The nature of the coating will also be extremely important.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN INSPEC TING IRON & STEEL ROOFS
ROOFING