0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views9 pages

Chapter 02 PDF

Uploaded by

Martha Treviño
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views9 pages

Chapter 02 PDF

Uploaded by

Martha Treviño
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Objectives

1. Define the key terms and abbreviations listed at the


beginning of this chapter.
2. Identify national organizations, agencies, and
regulations that support quality assurance in healthcare.
Chapter 2: Quality Assurance 3. Define quality and performance improvement
and Legal Issues measurements as they relate to phlebotomy.
4. List and describe the components of a quality assurance
(QA) program and identify areas in phlebotomy subject
to quality control (QC).

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

National Standard and Regulatory


Objectives (cont’d) Agencies
5. List areas in phlebotomy subject to QC and identify QC • The Joint Commission
procedures associated with each.
– Voluntary, nongovernmental agency
6. Demonstrate knowledge of the legal aspects associated – Oldest & largest healthcare standards-setting body in
with phlebotomy procedures by defining legal nation
terminology and describing situations that may have
legal ramifications. – Establishes standards for operation of hospitals & other
health-related facilities and services
– Seeks to improve healthcare for public through evaluation
– Focuses on improving safety for patients & residents

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

1
National Standard and Regulatory National Standard and Regulatory
Agencies (cont’d) Agencies (cont’d)
• The Joint Commission • The Joint Commission
– New Accreditation Measurements implemented in 2009 – Sentinel event policy

– Using the following program-specific screening criteria • Helps organizations identify safety issues & prevent them

• Direct Impact Standards Requirement • If sentinel event occurs, organization is required to:

• Indirect Impact Standards Requirement 1. Perform a thorough & credible analysis of root cause

• Situational Decision Rules 2. Put improvements to reduce risk into practice

• Immediate Threat to Health and Safety 3. Monitor improvements to determine if they are effective

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

National Standard and Regulatory National Standard and Regulatory


Agencies (cont’d) Agencies (cont’d)
• The Joint Commission • College of American Pathologists (CAP)
– National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) – All members are board-certified pathologists
• Part of the overall CQI requirements – Offers proficiency testing & continuous lab inspection
• Overseen by a safety panel, physicians, nurses, risk – Designed for pathology/lab services only
managers, and other healthcare professionals
– Meets Medicare/Medicaid standards
• Patient Safety Goals for 2010
• Identify patients correctly
• Improve staff communication
• Prevent infection

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

2
National Standard and Regulatory National Standard and Regulatory
Agencies (cont’d) Agencies (cont’d)
• Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)
• (CLIA ‘88) – A global, nonprofit, standards-developing organization

– Federal regulations passed by Congress – Has representatives from the profession, industry, & government

– Establish quality standards that apply to all laboratories – Mission: to develop & promote best practices in clinical &
laboratory testing
– Standards address:
– Develops voluntary guidelines & standards for all areas of the
• Quality assurance laboratory
• Quality control
• Proficiency testing
• Laboratory records
• Personnel qualifications
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

National Standard and Regulatory


Agencies (cont’d) Quality Assurance in Phlebotomy
• National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory • Definition of Quality Assurance (QA)
Sciences (NAACLS) – A program that guarantees quality patient care by tracking
– An authority on educational quality outcomes through scheduled reviews of the following elements of
patient care:
– An autonomous nonprofit organization
• Appropriateness
– Provides accreditation & approval of clinical laboratory sciences
educational programs • Applicability
– Accreditation process involves external peer review of the • Timeliness
program
– Phlebotomy program review designed to improve student
outcomes and maintain quality education

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

3
Quality Assurance in Phlebotomy (cont’d) Quality Assurance in Phlebotomy (cont’d)
• QA Indicators • Quality System Essentials (QSEs)
– Guides to monitor all aspects of patient care – 12 fundamental components identified by CLSI

– Must be: – Used to develop a quality management process


– Are universal: can be applied to simple or complex operations
• Measurable
– Require processes, policies, & procedures be written & monitored
• Well-defined
– Three processes of “path of workflow”:
• Objective
1. Preanalytical
• Specific
2. Analytical
• Clearly related to an important aspect of care
3. Postanalytical

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Quality Assurance in Phlebotomy (cont’d) Quality Assurance in Phlebotomy (cont’d)


• Threshold Value • Process and Outcomes
– A level of acceptable practice beyond which quality patient care – Both process & outcomes must be reviewed to improve outcome
cannot be assured
– Process must be followed from start to finish
– Must be established for all quality indicators
– Measurement & evaluation must be standardized
– Exceeding threshold should trigger evaluation
• Quality Control (QC)
– Corrective action plan may be established
– Component of a QA program & a form of procedure control
– Uses operational checks to ensure procedures are performed
correctly
– Quality results when standards are met all of the time

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

4
Areas of Phlebotomy Subject to QA
Areas of Phlebotomy Subject to QA (cont’d)
• Patient Preparation Procedures • Tube, containers, & slide with bar codes for patient ID
• Specimen Collection Procedures
– Patient identification (use of bar codes) Video: Proper
identification
– Equipment
• Puncture devices
• Evacuated tubes
• Labeling
– Technique
– Collection priorities

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Documentation Documentation (cont’d)


• The Patient’s Record • QA Documents for Blood Collectors
– A chronologic documentation of medical care given – Nursing Services Manual/Specimen Collection Manual
– Required by law for hospital patients • Detail how to prepare patient & special collection instructions
– Every notation should be legible, precise, & complete – Contain in chart form:
– Purposes • Type & minimum amount of specimen needed
• To aid practice of medicine • Special handling required
• To aid communications between healthcare providers • Reference values for test
• To serve as a legal document (may be used in court) • Days testing is available
• To help hospital evaluate performance outcomes • Normal turnaround time

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

5
Documentation (cont’d) Documentation (cont’d)
• Laboratory Procedure Manual Infection Control Procedure Manual
• Most effective way to break the chain of infection: HANDWASHING!!!
– States policies & procedures for each test/practice
– Hand washing & other decontamination procedures
– Must be available to all laboratory employees
– Precautions when dealing with patients or handling specimens
– Must be updated at least annually
– Procedures to implement after exposure incidents
• Safety Manual • QA Forms
– Contains procedures related to: – Equipment check forms

• Chemical, electrical, fire, & radiation safety – Internal (incident) reports


• Identify problem, state consequence, describe correction
• Exposure control
• Should state facts, not feelings
• Disaster plans
• Handling hazardous materials
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Risk Management Legal Issues


• Definition • Tort: Definition – Invasion of privacy

– Identifying & minimizing risks to patients & employees – A wrongful act against – Breach of confidentiality
person, property, – Malpractice
– Two ways of managing risk: reputation
• Controlling risk to avoid incidents – Negligence
– Committed without just
• Paying for occurrences after they happen cause, intentional or not – Res ipsa loquitur

• Tort: Types – Respondeat superior


• Steps
– Assault – Standard of care
1. Identification of risk
– Battery – Statute of limitations
2. Treatment of risk
– Fraud – Vicarious liability
3. Education of employees & patients
4. Evaluation of what should be done in future
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

6
Legal Issues (cont’d) Legal Issues (cont’d)
• Malpractice Insurance • Avoiding Lawsuits
– Compensates insured in event of malpractice liability 1. Acquire informed consent before collecting specimens
– Individual workers are not typically targets of lawsuits 2. Respect a patient’s right to confidentiality
– Workers may be named as codefendants, though
3. Strictly adhere to accepted procedures & practices
– Depending on risk, worker may need professional liability policy
4. Use proper safety containers & devices
5. Listen & respond appropriately to patient’s request

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Legal Issues (cont’d) Legal Issues (cont’d)


• Avoiding Lawsuits • Informed Consent
6. Accurately & legibly record all patient info – Implies voluntary & competent permission

7. Document incidents or occurrences – Requires adequate information given to patient


– Nontechnical terms
8. Participate in continuing education to maintain proficiency
– Obtained before procedure
9. Perform at prevailing standard of care
10.Never perform procedures you are not trained to do

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

7
Legal Issues (cont’d) Legal Issues (cont’d)
• Expressed Consent • Implied Consent
– Should be specific & cover all procedures to be performed – Patient’s actions imply consent
– Verbal: should be followed by entry in patient’s chart – May be necessary in emergencies
– Written – Laws vary from state to state
• Gives best possible protection • HIV Consent
• Must be signed by provider & patient – Most states have legislation for consent for HIV tests
• Must be witnessed by 3rd party – Client must be advised on:
• Test & its purpose
• How test will be used
• Meaning of test & its limitations
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Legal Issues (cont’d) Legal Issues (cont’d)


• Consent for Minors • Litigation Process
– Minor cannot give consent for medical treatment – Phase 1: Patient incident occurs or injury is recognized
– Parental or guardian consent is required – Phase 2
– Personnel who violate this rule are liable for assault & battery • Injured party consults attorney

• Refusal of Consent • Attorney requests medical records, takes case

– Patient has constitutional right to refuse medical procedure • Negotiations for settlement

– Refusal may be based on religious or personal beliefs • If no settlement, complaint is filed

– Refusal usually must be verified in writing • Discovery: taking depositions & interrogating witnesses
– Phase 3: Trial
– Phase 4: Appeal
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

8
Legal Issues (cont) Test Info Chapter 2: Quality Assurance & Legal Issues

• Tort: Wrongful act other than breach of contract committed against • What department coordinates with lab for TDM?
someones person, property, reputation or other legally protected right. • Know: HIPAA, OSHA, CLIA ‘88, CLSI, CAP, NAACLS, Joint Commission, NPSGs
• Assault: Act or threat causing another to be in fear of immediate battery • Legal Issues: assault, battery, invasion of privacy, breach of confidentiality, tort, fraud
(harmful touching) etc.

• Battery: Intentional harmful or offensive touching of, or use of force on, • Difference between implied and informed consent
another person without consent or legal justification. • Good Samaritan Law
• Invasion of Privacy: The violation of one’s right to be left alone • Quality assurance, quality indicators, delta check, importance of documentation,
outcomes, threshold values, risk management
• Breach of confidentiality: Failure to keep privileged medical information
private • Manuals: safety, collection, procedure
• There will also be situation questions
• Negligence: The failure to exercise due care, the level of care that a person
of ordinary intelligence and good sense would exercise under given • Know your study questions
circumstances. What a reasonable person would or would not do.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

You might also like