Scribd
Upload
186 views1 page

Conjugal Property Consent Ruling

The petitioner, Thelma Jader-Manalo, made an offer to buy properties owned by the respondent spouses, Edilberto and Norma Camaisa. Edilberto agreed to the sale terms but did not obtain his wife Norma's written consent as required by law for the sale of conjugal property. The court held that under the Family Code, the sale contract was void without the written consent of both spouses, even if Norma participated in negotiations, as her consent in writing was necessary to validly dispose of conjugal property.

Uploaded by

Patricia Bautista
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
186 views1 page

Conjugal Property Consent Ruling

The petitioner, Thelma Jader-Manalo, made an offer to buy properties owned by the respondent spouses, Edilberto and Norma Camaisa. Edilberto agreed to the sale terms but did not obtain his wife Norma's written consent as required by law for the sale of conjugal property. The court held that under the Family Code, the sale contract was void without the written consent of both spouses, even if Norma participated in negotiations, as her consent in writing was necessary to validly dispose of conjugal property.

Uploaded by

Patricia Bautista
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

JADER- MANALO VS.

CAMAISA

FACTS:

Petitioner, Thelma A. Jader-Manalo made an offer to buy the properties of the respondents from the
husband of Norma Fernandez C. Camaisa, respondent Edilberto Camaisa. After some bargaining,
petitioner and Edilberto agreed upon the purchase price and terms of payment. The agreement
handwritten by the petitioner was signed by Edilberto, with assurance from him that he would secure his
wife’s consent. Petitioner was later on surprised when she was informed that respondent spouses were
backing out of the agreement. Hence, she filed a complaint for specific performance and damages.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the husband may validly dispose of a conjugal property without the wife's written consent.

HELD:

Under Art. 124 of the Family Code: “In the event that one spouse is incapacitated or otherwise unable to
participate in the administration of the conjugal properties, the other spouse may assume sole powers of
administration. These powers do not include the powers of disposition or encumbrance which must have
the authority of the court or the written consent of the other spouse. In the absence of such authority or
consent the disposition or encumbrance shall be void.”

The properties subject to the contract in this case were conjugal; hence, for the contracts to sell to be
effective, the consent of both husband and wife must be obtained. Respondent Norma Camaisa did not
give her written consent to the sale. Even granting that respondent Norma actively participated in
negotiating for the sale of the subject properties, which she denied, her written consent to the sale is
required by law for its validity. She may have been aware of the negotiations for the sale of their conjugal
properties, however that is not sufficient to demonstrate consent.

You might also like