0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views13 pages

Energies: Predictive Maintenance of Power Substation Equipment by Infrared Thermography Using A Machine-Learning Approach

Energies

Uploaded by

João Lemos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views13 pages

Energies: Predictive Maintenance of Power Substation Equipment by Infrared Thermography Using A Machine-Learning Approach

Energies

Uploaded by

João Lemos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

energies

Article
Predictive Maintenance of Power Substation
Equipment by Infrared Thermography Using
a Machine-Learning Approach
Irfan Ullah 1 ID , Fan Yang 1, *, Rehanullah Khan 2 , Ling Liu 3 , Haisheng Yang 3 , Bing Gao 1
and Kai Sun 3
1 State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology,
School of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
[email protected] (I.U.); [email protected] (B.G.)
2 Department of IT, CoC, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia; [email protected]
3 State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Jinzhong Power Supply Company, Jinzhong 030600, China;
[email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (H.Y.); [email protected] (K.S.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-023-6510-2430

Received: 21 October 2017; Accepted: 27 November 2017; Published: 1 December 2017

Abstract: A variety of reasons, specifically contact issues, irregular loads, cracks in insulation,
defective relays, terminal junctions and other similar issues, increase the internal temperature of
electrical instruments. This results in unexpected disturbances and potential damage to power
equipment. Therefore, the initial prevention measures of thermal anomalies in electrical tools are
essential to prevent power-equipment failure. In this article, we address this initial prevention
mechanism for power substations using a computer-vision approach by taking advantage of infrared
thermal images. The thermal images are taken through infrared cameras without disturbing the
working operations of power substations. Thus, this article augments the non-destructive approach
to defect analysis in electrical power equipment using computer vision and machine learning.
We use a total of 150 thermal pictures of different electrical equipment in 10 different substations
in operating conditions, using 300 different hotspots. Our approach uses multi-layered perceptron
(MLP) to classify the thermal conditions of components of power substations into “defect” and
“non-defect” classes. A total of eleven features, which are first-order and second-order statistical
features, are calculated from the thermal sample images. The performance of MLP shows initial
accuracy of 79.78%. We further augment the MLP with graph cut to increase accuracy to 84%.
We argue that with the successful development and deployment of this new system, the Technology
Department of Chongqing can arrange the recommended actions and thus save cost in repair and
outages. This can play an important role in the quick and reliable inspection to potentially prevent
power substation equipment from failure, which will save the whole system from breakdown.
The increased 84% accuracy with the integration of the graph cut shows the efficacy of the proposed
defect analysis approach.

Keywords: ANN; substation maintenance; infrared thermography; defect identification; thermal images

1. Introduction
Thermal energy plays an important role in the electrical equipment of power substations for
diagnosis of the fault in its early stages, which increases the operational reliability of the power grid’s
working life. All electrical objects with temperature above zero emit infrared radiation which increases
the internal temperature of electrical equipment in the electrical power substation. The current passing
through electrical equipment in the substation causes heat in the electrical devices such as relays,

Energies 2017, 10, 1987; doi:10.3390/en10121987 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies


Energies 2017, 10, 1987 2 of 13

capacitors and transformers. The human eye cannot visualize the thermal energy because infrared
energy is emitted as heat energy in objects. The heat images of an object’s surface are only possible
by infrared thermography, in which the invisible heat energy is converted to visual heat energy,
which shows the heat picture of the object. The color of the object in the thermal picture changes
with the temperature of the surface of the object. As a result, an increase in resistance determines
an increase in the heat signature of the electrical equipment. With the passage of time, electrical
components also begin to depreciate, due to various reasons such as poor materials, dirty joints,
overload, unbalanced load, insulation, corrosion and wiring faults [1]. Therefore, the electrical
equipment in power substations such as arresters, air-breaker switches, step-down transformers,
distribution, cutout switches and fuses, circuit breakers, and so on, suffer breakdown when the inside
temperature of electrical equipment rises at an irregular level. Besides the previously discussed
reasons, the main anomalies also arise because of reasons including unbalanced current, minor cracks
in insulators, contact problems, and increases and decreases of voltage levels and other similar related
issues. In this work, we focus on detecting this increase in temperature, which helps in the remedy of
breakdown even before it occurs.
Thus, in this article, for non-destructive defect analysis and prevention in power substations,
we use the computer vision approach and machine learning to detect the problem in early stages
of equipment breakdown by exploiting and taking advantage of the infrared thermal images.
Therefore, our approach and contribution augments the non-destructive approach to defect analysis in
electrical power equipment using computer vision and machine learning, and thus shows the efficacy
of our approach. We use a total of 150 thermal pictures of different electrical equipment in 10 different
substations in operating conditions, using 300 different hotspots and using a total of eleven features.
These features are first-order and second-order statistical features. For detection, our approach uses the
multilayered perceptron (MLP) to classify the thermal condition of components of power substations
into “defect” and “non-defect” classes, achieving an accuracy of 79.78%. For performance enhancement,
we use the graph cut to increase the accuracy to 84%. By using and augmenting the graph cut to
increase performance, we argue that the successful development and deployment of our approach
can play an important role in quick and reliable inspection to potentially prevent power substation
equipment from failure, saving exponential costs. The 84% accuracy shows the efficacy of the proposed
defect analysis approach.
The heat produced in electrical components can be sensed by infrared thermography (IRT).
IRT captures the thermal profile of different electrical components using an infrared camera.
The thermal profile contains the heat image and values of temperature scale of the equipment. Colors of
different temperatures represent different temperature regions in the electrical devices. With the
thermal profile, the thermal images can be analyzed by the thermographers which categorize the status
of defective parts by the urgency level of maintenance of electrical equipment. Finally, the concerned
departments can examine the hot component, fixing the equipment according to the matter of priority.
Over the years, thermography has become an important method for preventing and predicting
the surface defects of different materials as a result of its non-intrusive, safe and inexpensive setup.
Therefore, many studies have shown that thermography performs a variety of applications and is
a useful technique for the operational working of electrical equipment [2–12].
As an electrical device deteriorates, its resistance rises and it thus produces more heat. The thermal
energy produced from an electrical component is proportional to the square of the current, and its
resistance (I2 R loss) [11]. The increase in heat can trigger the failure of an electrical component and set
the equipment on fire. By using thermography for investigating the electrical equipment under peak
working conditions, the damaged part of the equipment can be classified and identified by its level of
seriousness [11].
Supporting cost of electrical components plays an essential part due to the reduced cumulative
working expense of power substations. The maintenance cost of electrical equipment can be
increased by the absence of information data and repair of equipment in the power substation.
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 3 of 13

Generally, the working performance of electrical equipment is not checked frequently, which can
play a vital part in the early prevention of a fault and for increasing the life of electrical equipment.
Rather, the timetable for maintenance is determined by using the failure component history of the
substation. Infrared thermography is nowadays widely used for screening the performance of electrical
equipment, which gives data with respect to the working status of the component for increasing work
operation of equipment, counteracting possible failure and controlling the maintenance expense of
electrical equipment.
Typically, when the IRT techniques are applied, the thermal electrical defect and status of the
defect are recognized by inspection of its delta T (∆T) criteria [12]. The procedure is commonly
known as a qualitative-based temperature estimation system [13]. The delta T criteria of any part of
the component is explained as an increase in the value of the temperature over the temperature of
a reference value—which is normally the ambient temperature—the temperature of a similar segment
of electrical component under a similar condition, or the most extreme acceptable temperature of
the component [14]. Different standards for the ∆T criteria [14] are defined by NETA, NFPA, NFPA
70-B [15], ASTM-E [16], and so on.
In Refs. [17,18], artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used for the classification of a defect
in different materials. The neural networks are powerful and strong mathematical models for the
classification and pattern-recognition problems. These days, ANNs are famous for being used to
resolve real-world non-linear complex problems in electrical equipment. In the past few years, different
research papers about ANNs’ application for fault analysis in electrical equipment using infrared
thermography have been presented. In these research papers, the different suitable thermal image
features were utilized as inputs to the ANNs for classification of faults in the various electrical systems.
Research presented in Ref. [19] used a neuro-fuzzy network approach for the fault detection in surge
arresters while the inputs of the ANN were thermal images and selected identification feature variables.
The system was classified into four different categories that are light, faulty, normal and suspicious
classes, and the overall system performance for diagnosis of fault is no more than 10% for classification
of light, faulty, normal and suspicious classes. In the article [20], the author obtained 93.38% of the
accuracy of a three-layer ANN classifier. The author used RBG color space for the scaling the data
and internal temperature data to identify the faults in electrical equipment into four main classes that
are high, medium, intermediate and low. In Ref. [21], the author used the support vector machines
(SVM) classifier for the classification of ground substation faults. The accuracy of the SVM classifier
was about 83%. The total dataset consisted of 20 images of feature samples of Zernike moments.
The authors of [22,23] proposed an intelligent classification technique. The three-phase intelligent fuse
and an ANN-based class system for diagnosing different types of connection problems in electrical
equipment were presented. The three input features were absolute extreme temperature, mean
temperature distance and relative maximum temperature, compared to other areas of image distance
and histogram in other areas of the image. The test error rate using only the histogram distance as
input was 31.2%, and for the remaining three features as the input of ANN, the performance noted was
9.5%. The data set was only 74 infrared thermal images. One of the main disadvantages of these works
was a limited thermal image database that can sometimes be the result of uncertain reliability and is
questionable in the research community. In the article [24], the MLP classifier and discriminant analysis
classifier are used for circuit breaks only. The system accuracy for multilayer perceptron networks was
80.40%, and the accuracy of the discriminant analysis classifier was 82.42%. The total database used 368
thermal images. The author recommended that the infrared thermography technique is more useful for
fault diagnosis in circuit breakers. Actually, this is a two-dimensional prediction and is cost-effective in
electrical equipment, especially in circuit breakers. The infrared thermographic technique was used in
Ref. [25] for predictive maintenance of parallel power cables in electrical equipment. In the article [26],
the author used the self-adaptive technique for the fault diagnosis system of the rolling bearing under
different working conditions using IRT technology, and genetic algorithm (GA) and nearest neighbor
(NN) models for selecting suitable features to increase the accuracy. In Ref. [27], the author used the
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 4 of 13

thermographic infrared technique for the fault diagnosis of three phase-induction motors. In Ref. [28],
the author presented a new approach for testing the thermal power installation equipment using the
infrared thermographic technique. The SVM classifiers were used to detect the status of computer
servers using thermal fault diagnosis, achieving 81.5% accuracy [29].
In this research article, we investigate the application of thermography infrared technology
for predictive maintenance to identify the presence of a defect and non-defect in electrical power
substations of 110 kV .The maintenance cost of electrical components plays an essential part to reduce
the cumulative working expense of power substations. The maintenance cost of electrical equipment
can be increased by the absence of information and repair of equipment in the power substation.
Generally, the working performance of electrical equipment is not checked frequently, which can
play a vital part in the early prevention of a fault and for increasing the life of electrical equipment.
Rather, the timetable for maintenance is determined by using the component failure history of the
substation. Therefore, from the automated defect analysis and detection perspectives, we use the
machine-learning approach of MLP to detect defects in a non-destructive manner. From an image
perspective, we use the statistical features in infrared images to characterize the thermal status into the
“defect” and “non-defect” categories in power substation equipment.

2. Predictive and Preventive Maintenance of Electrical Equipment


Usually, for the maintenance of electrical equipment in the power substation, there are typically
two main approaches used, being run to failure (RTF) and preventive maintenance. The RTF approach
is straightforward and simple, where in this case there are no outflow cash expenses on the maintenance
issues of electrical equipment before the electrical equipment shuts down. The method is based
on waiting for the electrical equipment to shut down before any equipment care action is taken.
Thus, this approach is costly and time-consuming. Hence, an infrared thermography-based technique
for the diagnosis of electrical power substations allows the predictive and preventive maintenance for
early protection of electrical equipment failure without shutting down the running operation of the
power substation. This approach is thus feasible and optimized, saving a great amount of time and
considerable resources.
According to historical US data [30], the effective use of predictive and preventive maintenance
of electrical equipment reduces the cost to 33% from 50%, which is neglected by the majority of the
production and the manufacturing plants in the world. The benefits of predictive and preventive
maintenance from various points of view are as follows:

• Decreases the unscheduled shutdown


• Increases the suitable use of manpower
• Increases the output volume of the plants
• Decreases the management expenses of instruments
• Increases working life of devices

2.1. Predictive Maintenance of Electrical Equipment


Looking after electrical devices based on the online monitoring of real-time operating status—by
frequently collecting data on the efficiency of different electrical equipment, heat distribution of devices
and other factors dependent on statistical data—relates to the predictive maintenance of electrical
equipment. Therefore, the program plans the entire maintenance action based on the accurate data,
and in case of an important anomaly, this is fixed before the failure of the whole system. Detection of
faults in early stages of electrical equipment can prevent them before serious disorder occurs, and
thus, significantly reduces downtime, the maintenance cost of devices, and increases working time
of devices.
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 5 of 13

2.2. Preventive Maintenance of Electrical Equipment


Monitoring of electrical components in power substations according to the historical data of
working capacity, previous failure data of components and mean time to failure (MTTF) component
performance, is called preventive maintenance of electrical components [31]. The preventive
maintenance of electrical components technique requires upgrading and repairing actions for
components. Let us suppose that an electrical component in a power substation generally works for
almost 10 months before needing a little fix. By using the preventive approach, the electrical component
is removed from the site and reconstructed after ten months of working operation. From this example,
the schedule of fixing the electrical component is already defined, and is determined by monitoring
personnel. If there is no essential repairing after nine months, then it is a total waste of time, money,
materials and labor. This approach is an accidental decision which is not maintained by any kind of
accurate data.

3. Artificial-Intelligence Defect-Identification Model for Power Substations: Proposed Approach

3.1. Thermal Image and Delta Temperature Criteria Analysis


For our approach, we use the infrared thermal digital camera manufactured by FLIR T630 to
capture the thermograms of electrical equipment of 10 power substations in Chongqing, China.
The infrared camera standard temperature measurements range from −40 ◦ C to +150 ◦ C and +100 ◦ C
to +650 ◦ C. The thermal images contain focal plane array; the detector-type uncooled microbolometer
has a pitch of 17 um, working in the spectral band of 7.5 um–14 um. The IR resolution of T630 is
640 × 480 pixels with the thermal sensitivity Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference (NETD) of
<40 mK at +30 ◦ C (+86 ◦ F). For taking the thermal images, the thermal camera lens direction was kept
straight to the required electrical component in order to obtain the correct thermal measurement of
equipment. The distance between the required component and the infrared camera was in the range
from 5 to 8 m. The radiation coefficient was fixed to 0.95, as suggested for the electrical equipment
thermography [32]. The temperature around the devices was approximately 2 degrees centigrade to
6 degrees centigrade during the inspection in the power substation in winter in Chongqing, China.
We collected a total of 150 thermal pictures of different electrical equipment in 10 different substations
in operating conditions, with 300 different hotspots used.
In this paper, depending on the electrical component working temperature, the thermal states of
the components have been primarily manually classified into two groups based on the significance
level, which is from level 1 to 3, using ∆T conditions listed in Table 1. Furthermore, these three groups
are divided in two groups which are “defect” and “non-defect”. The maximum difference between
hotspots and the normal temperature is set as ∆T criteria. This technique is commonly identified as
qualitative temperature measurement classification. The key advantage of this technique is the slight
change of emissivity of the temperature measurements. At the same time, the main disadvantage
of this technique is that it cannot define the effect if a shutdown occurs at the same period in the
equipment, because of the reference equipment [10].

Table 1. Three categories of investigations with recommended suggestions.

Class of Equipment ∆T (◦ C) Recommended Suggestions


Non-Defective <16 Normal equipment section
Equipment >25 Defected area of equiment, repair instantly
Defective Equipment 16 < T < 25 Minor defect, check on specific area of equipment

3.2. Feature Extraction


For feature extraction, the thermal images are manually located in small rectangular shapes.
The sample thermal images are shown in Figures 1 and 2. For feature analysis, these thermal images
Table 2. List of extracted features used in experiments.

Feature Kind Feature Abbreviation


First-order histogram-based features Mean B1
Variance B2
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 Standard deviation B3 6 of 13
Skewness B4
Kurtosis B5
are then converted into grayscale, in which the hot areas correspond to white regions andBcold
Energy 6
areas to
black. A total of eleven second-order and first-order statistical features Entropy are extracted from
B7 the area of
interest and are Co-Occurrence
Gray-Level evaluated in this research
Matrix study.
(GLCM) The seven first-order
features Contrastfeatures are mean, B8 variance,
standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, energy and entropy. The-second Correlation order statistical
Bfeatures
9
are
energy, contrast, entropy and homogeneity. The statistical features list
Homogeneityis shown in Table 2.
B10 The eleven
statistical features are denoted as B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 , B6 , B7 , B8 , B9 , Energy
B10 and B11 . B11

Energies 2017, 10, 1987 Figure 1.


Figure 1. Sample
Sample thermal
thermal image
image with
with hot
hot and
and cold
cold points.
points. 7 of 14

Figure
Figure 2. Sample thermal
2. Sample thermal image
image with
with possible
possible expected
expected defects.
defects.

3.3. ANN: Multilayered Perceptron (MLP)


In this subsection, we explain the generic structure of the ANN (MLP). Section 4.1 represents the
experimental MLP analysis. Figure 3 shows the generic model of the MLP. The MLP is considered
one of the most popular networks for object classification and recognition. The MLP architecture
consists of three layers: input layer, hidden layer and output layer. The architecture of the generic
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 7 of 13

Table 2. List of extracted features used in experiments.

Feature Kind Feature Abbreviation


First-order histogram-based features Mean B1
Variance B2
Standard deviation B3
Skewness B4
Kurtosis B5
Energy B6
Entropy B7
Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features Contrast B8
Correlation B9
Homogeneity B10
Figure 2. Sample thermal image with possible Energy
expected defects. B11

3.3. ANN:
3.3. ANN: Multilayered
Multilayered Perceptron
Perceptron (MLP)
(MLP)
In this
In this subsection,
subsection, we
we explain
explain the
the generic
generic structure
structure of
of the
the ANN
ANN (MLP).
(MLP). Section
Section 4.1
4.1 represents
represents the
the
experimental MLP analysis. Figure 3 shows the generic model of the MLP. The
experimental MLP analysis. Figure 3 shows the generic model of the MLP. The MLP is considered MLP is considered
one of
one of the
the most
most popular
popular networks
networks forfor object
object classification
classification and
and recognition.
recognition. The
The MLP
MLP architecture
architecture
consists of three layers: input layer, hidden layer and output layer. The architecture
consists of three layers: input layer, hidden layer and output layer. The architecture of the of the generic
generic
MLP network is shown in Figure 3. In the generic MLP of Figure 3, the input layer
MLP network is shown in Figure 3. In the generic MLP of Figure 3, the input layer represents the represents the
number of
number of nodes,
nodes, which
which isis equal
equal to
to the
the input
input features
features count;
count; and
and the
the output
output layer
layer represents
represents the
the
number of nodes, normally equal to the number of the target classes. A single hidden
number of nodes, normally equal to the number of the target classes. A single hidden layer is shown.layer is shown.
However, the
However, the number
number of of hidden
hidden layers
layersdepends
dependson onthe
theproblem
problemat athand
hand[33].
[33].

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Standard MLP
MLP model.
model.

In the
the standard
standardMLP MLPneural
neuralnetwork
networkofofFigure
Figure3,3,the
theinput
inputnodes
nodesare
areK K,1K
, K2. … Kn, the predicted
In 1 2 . . Kn , the predicted
outputs are
are UU1,, U
U2 … Um and the middle layer is the hidden layer. Q represents the weights between
outputs 1 2 . . . Um and the middle layer is the hidden layer. Q represents the weights between
the layers and corresponding nodes.
the layers and corresponding nodes.Figure
Figure3 3shows
showsonly onlythe
thegeneric
genericmodel.
model. In In
ourour
experiments, 11
experiments,
input
11 inputnodes
nodesduedueto to
1111 features and
features andone
oneoutput
outputnode
nodedue duetotobinary
binaryclasses
classes“defect”
“defect”and and“non-defect”
“non-defect”
are used.
are used.

4. Experimental Setup and Result Analysis


As our objective is to construct a reliable non-destructive system for the detection of defects in
power substations, one of the problems of any automated defect/non-defect detection system is the
acceptable detection performance given features within the computing resources. The point here in
this research work is the investigation of the thermal images and its feature-set calculation to get
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 8 of 13

acceptable automatic defect/non-defect detection performance with limited resources. With 11 features
and the MLP, we design a system that can generate an acceptable performance. We further increase
this performance by introducing the augmentation approach using graph cut. The augmentation
approach uses the graph to combine the MLP and thermal image structure to increase the performance
to 84%. In order to construct a reliable system based on machine learning (ML), the system must be
investigated from multiple parameters and settings. Therefore, we show different modalities and
their effect on the performance. Firstly, as the initial defect analysis is based on MLP, we discuss the
experimental setup for MLP, a training phase and testing phase of the MLP and then the graph cut to
increase classification performance.

4.1. MLP-Based Defect Analysis


From an experimental analysis point of view, we use the MLP from MATLAB, R2012a and WEKA.
WEKA is used for checking the conformity of the results. For the performance evaluation of the MLP
neural network for power substation electrical equipment thermal fault recognition (i.e., non-defect
and defect classes), the temperature around the devices was approximately 2 to 6 degrees Celsius
during the inspection in the power substation in winter in Chongqing, China. We collected a total of
150 thermal pictures of different electrical equipment in 10 different substations in operating conditions,
with 300 different hotspots; the 300 thermal image samples are separated into testing and training
datasets. For ordering the testing dataset and training dataset, the five-fold cross-validation technique
is used in this experiment [34]. As there are comparatively fewer data samples, therefore, we used
five-fold cross validation rather than ten-fold cross validation. Also, we believe that five-fold cross
validation will have a better chance to cover the entire training samples and produce a reliable model.
In the five-fold cross-validation technique, the whole dataset is divided into five folds. The details of
samples in each fold are given in Table 3. The five iterations of testing and training are presented in
Table 3. In every iteration, for training the MLP, the four-fold data are used. For testing, the single-fold
data is selected. At the final stage, the average value of all the five folds is calculated as the MLP
performance. The multilayered perceptron network is trained by changing the hidden-nodes layers
from 1 to 20, the epochs are fixed at 330, and 0.005 is selected as the learning rate. For performance
evaluation, we use accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. We use these parameters as they are standard
for tasks similar to ours and provide a good representation of the performance for the autonomous
tasks based on machine learning. These parameters are defined as follows:
 
D + ND
Accuracy = Number of total data × 100%
 
D
Sensitvity = × 100%
D +l
 
ND
Specifiicity = ND +m × 100%

Hence, D = total number of “defect” states correctly classified; ND = total number of


“non-defect” states correctly classified; l = total number of “defect” states classified as “non-defect”
states; and m = total number of “non-defect” states classified as “defect” states.

Table 3. Data samples and their distribution in classes.

Folds Defect Class Non-Defect Class Total


1st Fold 50 20 70
2nd Fold 60 10 70
3rd Fold 40 30 70
4th Fold 30 15 45
5th Fold 20 25 45
Total 200 100 300
Table 3. Data samples and their distribution in classes.

Folds Defect Class Non-Defect Class Total


1st Fold 50 20 70
2nd Fold 60 10 70
3rd Fold 40 30 70
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 4th Fold 30 15 45 9 of 13
5th Fold 20 25 45
Total 200 100 300
4.2. Graph and Graph-Cut Integration
4.2. Graph and Graph-Cut Integration
A graph is a combination of nodes and edges (arcs) representing a phenomenon. Graph cut
A graph
is a technique is a combination
for segmenting of nodes based
a graph, and edges
on (arcs) representing
the weights a phenomenon.
of the nodes [35].Graph cut iscuts
Graph a have
technique for segmenting a graph, based on the weights of the nodes [35]. Graph cuts have many
many applications in different fields. In this paper’s context, we integrate graphs and graph cuts into
applications in different fields. In this paper’s context, we integrate graphs and graph cuts into an
an MLP-trained model to increase the classifier performance, or in other words, to help the classifier
MLP-trained model to increase the classifier performance, or in other words, to help the classifier
increaseincrease
the classification performance.
the classification performance.Graph
Graph cuts arevery
cuts are very famous
famous for minimizing
for minimizing energies
energies in the in the
binary binary
class problem. Since
class problem. our
Since ourproblem
problem ininthe
the experimental
experimental setupsetup is “defect”
is “defect” and “non-defect”,
and “non-defect”, we
integrate
we integrate graphcuts
graph cuts in
inthe
theMLP
MLP setup to increase
setup classification
to increase performance.
classification Figure 4 shows
performance. a setup4 shows
Figure
a setupofofexploiting
exploitinggraph cut cut
graph and and
the MLP modelmodel
the MLP createdcreated
to increase the classification
to increase algorithm. The
the classification algorithm.
proposed algorithm is explained in the following results section to enhance the MLP classification of
The proposed algorithm is explained in the following results section to enhance the MLP classification
the “defect” and “non-defect” detections.
of the “defect” and “non-defect” detections.

Figure 4. Generic diagram to improve accuracy of the defect/non-defect detections.


Figure 4. Generic diagram to improve accuracy of the defect/non-defect detections.
4.3. MLP and Graph-Cut Results
4.3. MLP and Graph-Cut Results
Based on the two previous subsections, we carried out the experiments for defect and non-defect
Based on the two previous subsections, we carried out the experiments for defect and non-defect
detections in thermal images using MLP. Firstly, we discuss Figures 5 and 6, which show the training
detections in thermal images using MLP. Firstly, we discuss Figures 5 and 6, which show the training
phase of theofMLP
phase andand
the MLP thethetesting phaseof of
testing phase the the
MLP,MLP, respectively.
respectively. Thisand
This training training
testing isand
showntesting is
shown forfor comparative
comparative analysis.
analysis. Figure
Figure 5 shows
5 shows the training
the training performance
performance of MLP
of MLP trained trained
using the using
the Levenberg–Marquardt
Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) (LM) algorithm.
algorithm. InIn Figure
Figure 5, in
5, in thethe training
training session,
session, multilayer
multilayer perceptron
perceptron
(MLP) neural network achieves an average of (from the five folds) 92.16%, 86.47% and 88.90% for
specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, respectively. From the set of five folds, the performance of the
fifth fold is highest for specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, which are 95.54%, 91.01% and 100%,
respectively. For the testing in Figure 6, the same MLP gives 82.72%, 80.26% and 79.78% for specificity,
sensitivity and accuracy, respectively. In this research, we are interested in accurate detections, that
is, accuracy. Our results in the testing phase show an almost 80%-accurate model, which is enough
for our application purposes in this project. However, as a contribution, we present an approach
to enhance the defect detection performance in thermal images. We integrate the graph and the
79.78%-accurate MLP model into the setup to further make the proposed robustness. The proposed
approach/algorithm is depicted in Figure 4. In this approach (Figure 4), we use the MLP model
created already (in previous experiments) and represent it as the trained MLP model in the algorithm
of Figure 4. We start with the thermal image, and based on the idea of weight calculation for [36],
we calculate the two types of weight from the thermal image. One of the weights represents pixel
sensitivity and accuracy, respectively. In this research, we are interested in accurate detections, that
is, accuracy. Our results in the testing phase show an almost 80%-accurate model, which is enough
for our application purposes in this project. However, as a contribution, we present an approach to
enhance the defect detection performance in thermal images. We integrate the graph and the 79.78%-
accurate MLP model into the setup to further make the proposed robustness. The proposed
approach/algorithm
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 is depicted in Figure 4. In this approach (Figure 4), we use the MLP model10 of 13
created already (in previous experiments) and represent it as the trained MLP model in the algorithm
of Figure 4. We start with the thermal image, and based on the idea of weight calculation for [36], we
strength, represented
calculate the two as “pixel
types weights”
of weight in Figure
from 4, andimage.
the thermal the other
Oneweight
of the represents the neighborhood
weights represents pixel
weight, represented
strength, as the as
represented “neighborhood
“pixel weights” weights” in Figure
in Figure 4, and 4. These pixelweight
the other weights are merged
represents the with
neighborhood weight, represented as the “neighborhood weights” in Figure 4.
the weights from the MLP model, which is the probabilistic output of the thermal image pixel value ofThese pixel weights
MLP.are merged
Finally, thewith the constructed
graph weights from from
the MLPthismodel, which isisthe
combination cutprobabilistic
into defectoutput of the thermal
and non-defect sections
usingimage pixel valuealgorithm
the graph-cut of MLP. Finally, theWe
of [35]. graph constructed
tested from thison
this approach combination is cut into
thermal images anddefect
found andthat it
non-defect sections using the graph-cut algorithm of [35]. We tested this approach on thermal images
increased the detection accuracy by more than 4%, as shown in Figure 7. With the algorithm of Figure 4,
and found that it increased the detection accuracy by more than 4%, as shown in Figure 7. With the
we get an accuracy of 84%. We believe this is a good contribution, as the normal classifiers, for example
algorithm of Figure 4, we get an accuracy of 84%. We believe this is a good contribution, as the normal
MLP,classifiers,
have limitations
for exampleonMLP,
correct
havedetections
limitationsdue to training
on correct datadue
detections and noise indata
to training theand
data. With
noise in the
proposed
the data. With the proposed algorithm of Figure 4, we successfully showed that a classifier output by
algorithm of Figure 4, we successfully showed that a classifier output can be increased
combining
can be with otherbymodalities.
increased The 84%-accurate
combining with other modalities. detection shows thedetection
The 84%-accurate efficacy shows
of our the
detection
efficacysetup
and requirements
of our detectionofsetup
the project.
and requirements of the project.

120
Training Stage Performance
100
100 95.31 95.74 95.74 95.54 92.16
90.17 90.17 89.01 85.56 91.01 88.9
88.23 87.6 85.56 86.47
80.74 85.54
80

60

40

20

0
2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th 1nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Average of Five
Folds

Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity

Energies 2017, 10, 1987 Figure 5. Training stage performance.


Figure 5. Training stage performance. 11 of 14

Testing Stage Performance


100
90.9
87.5
90 84.28
85.71 85.41
82.85 81.42 81.74 82.72
80.76 79.78 80.26
78.57 79.59 76.19 76.08
80 76.19
73.68
70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
1st 2nd 3th 4th 5th Average of Five
Folds
Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity

Figure 6. Testing stage performance.


Figure 6. Testing stage performance.

84%
1st 2nd 3th 4th 5th Average of Five
Folds
Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity

Energies 2017, 10, 1987 11 of 13


Figure 6. Testing stage performance.

84%

79.29%

MLP Accuracy MLP + Graph cut

Figure 7.
Figure Performance comparison
7. Performance comparison of
of MLP
MLP and
and MLP
MLP with graph cut.

5. Conclusions
Conclusions and
and Future
Future Work
Work
For autonomous
autonomousandand non-destructive
non-destructive fault detection
fault detection in powerinsubstations,
power substations, we have
we have demonstrated
demonstrated
the application the
ofapplication of computer
computer vision vision and
and machine machine
learning to learning to problem
detect the detect theinproblem in early
early stages of
stages of equipment
equipment breakdown. breakdown.
For this, For
we this,
usedwe theused the thermal
thermal images generated
images generated by an infrared
by an infrared camera.
camera. Therefore,
Therefore, our approach
our approach and contribution
and contribution augments augments the non-destructive
the non-destructive approachapproach
to defectto defect
analysis
analysis in electrical
in electrical power power equipment
equipment and shows
and shows the efficacy
the efficacy of theof the approach.
approach. We We usedaatotal
used total of
of 150
thermal
thermal pictures
pictures ofof different
different electrical
electrical equipment
equipment in in 10
10 different
different substations
substations in
in operating
operating conditions,
conditions,
using
using 300
300 different
different hotspots
hotspots and
and using
using a total of eleven features. TheseThese features
features are
are first-order
first-order and
second-order
second-order statistical
statistical features.
features. For
For detection,
detection, our
our approach
approach used
used the
the MLP
MLP to to classify
classify the thermal
condition
condition ofof components
componentsofofpowerpowersubstations
substationsinto
into“defect” and
“defect” “non-defect”
and “non-defect” classes, achieving
classes, achievingan
an accuracy of 79.78%. For performance enhancement, we adopted the graph cut to increase the
accuracy to 84%. By using and augmenting the graph cut to increase performance, we argue that
the successful development and deployment of our approach can play an important role in the
quick and reliable inspection of power substations, and can potentially prevent power substation
equipment failure, thus saving exponential costs. The 84% accuracy shows the efficacy of the proposed
defect-analysis approach.
In the future, we plan to increase the performance of the defect analysis using a non-destructive
approach to at least 90%. We also plan to investigate this area in light of deep learning, as it provides
an accurate model and performance enhancements. One of the problems is the number of images
available, and we hope to increase the number of images by visiting and analyzing other substations.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(grant numbers 51477013) and the State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company Jinzhong Power Supply
Company. We are thankful to all our lab fellows for providing support during research experiments and for
valuable suggestions.
Author Contributions: This paper is a result of the collaboration of all co-authors. Irfan Ullah was responsible for
the modeling results and wrote most of the article. Fan Yang and Rehanullah khan conceived and revised the
manuscript. Ling Liu and Bing Gao provided the theory. Haisheng Yang and Kia Sun supervised the project and
helped in related most of the corrections.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 12 of 13

Abbreviations
IRT Infrared thermography
ANN Artificial neural network
MLP Multilayer perceptron networks
SVM Support vector machine
NETA National Electrical Testing Association
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
ASTM-E American Society for Testing and Materials
RTF Run to failure
MTTF Mean time to failure
CB Circuit breakers

References
1. Korendo, Z.; Florkowski, M. Thermography based diagnostics of power equipment. Power Eng. J. 2001, 15,
33–42. [CrossRef]
2. Ge, Z.; Du, X.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Jin, Y. Performance monitoring of direct air-cooled power generating
unit with infrared thermography. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 418–424. [CrossRef]
3. Lahiri, B.B.; Bagavathiappan, S.; Jayakumar, T.; Philip, J. Medical applications of infrared thermography:
A review. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2012, 55, 221–235. [CrossRef]
4. Bougriou, C.; Bessäh, R.; Le Gall, R.; Solecki, J.C. Measurement of the temperature distribution on a circular
plane fin by infrared thermography technique. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2004, 24, 813–825. [CrossRef]
5. Balaras, C.A.; Argiriou, A.A. Infrared thermography for building diagnostics. Energy Build. 2002, 34, 171–183.
6. Royo, R.; Albertos-Arranz, M.A.; Cárcel-Cubas, J.A.; Payá, J. Thermographic study of the preheating plugs
in diesel engines. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2012, 37, 412–419. [CrossRef]
7. Manana, M.; Arroyo, A.; Ortiz, A.; Renedo, C.J.; Perez, S.; Delgado, F. Field winding fault diagnosis in DC
motors during manufacturing using thermal monitoring. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 978–983. [CrossRef]
8. Titman, D.J. Applications of thermography in non-destructive testing of structures. NDT E Int. 2001, 34,
149–154.
9. Al-Kassir, A.R.; Fernandez, J.; Tinaut, F.V.; Castro, F. Thermographic study of energetic installations.
Appl. Therm. Eng. 2005, 25, 183–190.
10. Jadin, M.S.; Taib, S. Recent progress in diagnosing the reliability of electrical equipment by using infrared
thermography. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2012, 55, 236–245.
11. Lizak, F.; Kolcun, M. Improving reliability and decreasing losses of electrical system with infrared
thermography. Acta Electrotech. Inf. 2008, 8, 60–63.
12. Gill, P. Electrical Power Equipment Maintenance and Testing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988.
13. Chou, Y.-C.; Yao, L. Automatic Diagnostic System of Electrical Equipment Using Infrared Thermography.
In Proceedings of the SOCPAR ’09 International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition,
Malacca, Malaysia, 4–7 December 2009.
14. Infraspection Institute. Standard for Infrared Inspection of Electrical Systems & Rotating Equipment;
Infraspection Institute: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 1–18.
15. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). NFPA 750 Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems 2006
Edition; Style (DeKalb, IL); National Fire Protection Association: Quincy, MA, USA, 2006.
16. ASTM E1934—99a(2014) Standard Guide for Examining Electrical and Mechanical Equipment with
Infrared Thermography. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1934.htm (accessed on
22 September 2017).
17. Manduchi, G.; Marinetti, S.; Bison, P.; Grinzato, E. Application of neural network computing to thermal
non-destructive evaluation. Neural Comput. Appl. 1997, 6, 148–157. [CrossRef]
18. Darabi, A.; Maldague, X. Neural network based defect detection and depth estimation in TNDE. NDT E Int.
2002, 35, 165–175. [CrossRef]
19. Laurentys Almeida, C.A.; Braga, A.P.; Nascimento, S.; Paiva, V.; Martins, H.J.A.; Torres, R.; Caminhas, W.M.
Intelligent thermographic diagnostic applied to surge arresters: A new approach. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.
2009, 24, 751–757. [CrossRef]
Energies 2017, 10, 1987 13 of 13

20. Shafi’I, M.A.; Hamzah, N. Internal fault classification using artificial neural network. In Proceedings of the
2010 4th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), Shah Alam, Malaysia,
23–24 June 2010; pp. 352–357.
21. Rahmani, A.; Haddadnia, J.; Seryasat, O. Intelligent fault detection of electrical equipment in ground
substations using thermo vision technique. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on
Mechanical and Electronics Engineering (ICMEE), Kyoto, Japan, 1–3 August 2010; pp. V2-150–V2-154.
22. Smedberg, M. Thermographic Decision Support—Detecting and Classifying Faults in Infrared Images.
Master’s Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.
23. Wretman, D. Finding Regions of Interest in a Decision Support System for Analysis of Infrared Images.
Master’s Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.
24. Huda, A.S.N.; Taib, S. Application of infrared thermography for predictive/preventive maintenance of
thermal defect in electrical equipment. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 61, 220–227. [CrossRef]
25. Mendes, M.A.; Tonini, L.G.R.; Muniz, P.R.; Donadel, C.B. Thermographic analysis of parallelly cables:
A method to avoid misdiagnosis. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 104, 231–236. [CrossRef]
26. Huo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Sath, R.; Shu, L. Self-adaptive fault diagnosis of roller bearings using infrared
thermal images. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
(IECON 2017), Beijing, China, 29 October–1 November 2017.
27. Jeffali, F.; El Kihel, B.; Nougaoui, A.; Delaunois, F.; Manssouri, I. Thermal diagnotic of a rotating machine
using the nondestructive technique of infrared thermogrphy. J. Nat. Sci. Sustain. Technol. 2015, 10, 219–232.
28. Łopata, S.; Kocot, M. The conditions for thermographic testing of thermal power engineering installations.
Czasopismo Techniczne 2017, 10, 179–192. Available online: http://www.ejournals.eu/Czasopismo-
Techniczne/ (accessed on 28 November 2017).
29. Liu, H.; Xie, T.; Ran, J.; Gao, S. An Efficient Algorithm for Server Thermal Fault Diagnosis Based on Infrared
Image. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 910, 012031. [CrossRef]
30. The Basics of Predictive/Preventive Maintenance—Google Search. Available online: assets.tequipment.net/
assets/1/26/Documents/Ti30predictive_maint.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2017).
31. Fluke Corporation. The Basics of Predictive/Preventive Maintenance; Fluke Corporation: Everett, WA, USA,
2005; pp. 1–6.
32. FLIR Advanced Thermal Solutions: FLIR T600 Series Infrared Cameras for Research & Science.
Available online: http://www.flir.com/science/display/?id=46818 (accessed on 22 September 2017).
33. Haykin, S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 1st ed.; Herrmann, M., Bauer, H.-U., Der, R., Eds.;
IEEE Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 107–116.
34. Schaffer, C. Selecting a classification method by cross-validation. Mach. Learn. 1993, 13, 135–143. [CrossRef]
35. Boykov, Y.; Kolmogorov, V. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow 193 algorithms for energy
minimization in vision. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004, 26, 1124–1137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Micusík, B.; Hanbury, A. Automatic image segmentation by positioning a seed. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2006,
3952, 468–480.

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

You might also like