A Woman Under the

Influence
By Ray Carney

While most American films function in a “story-

telling” mode, presenting generic, generalized,
summary ideas about society and experience,
John Cassavetes’ films were personal to a fault.
Although “A Woman Under the Influence” be-
came a lightning rod for second-wave feminist
praise and criticism, on the assumption that Cas-
savetes was depicting the life of a “neglected,
unappreciated housewife” or something of the
sort, Mabel Longhetti was actually an artistic self
-portrait—a portrait not of a kind of housewife
Cassavetes had virtually no knowledge about or Gena Rowlands. Courtesy the Museum of Modern Art..
interest in, nor a portrait of his own wife Gena
Rowlands, who does not resemble Mabel in any
way, but of the filmmaker himself. As odd as it and high-school student who compensated for
may sound, Mabel and her situation were Cassa- his academic deficiencies by functioning as a
vetes’ representation of his own life and imagina- joke-telling, order-disrupting class-clown and
tive stance—with Gena Rowlands’s personality showoff to his shocked and admiring classmates;
and attitudes being represented in the film, to the and finally and most importantly as an adult pos-
extent they are present at all, not by the charac- sessed by unpredictable, uncontrollable extreme
ter of Mabel but by her emotionally conservative mood swings in a time before manic-depression
and cautious husband Nick. Mabel was Cassa- was understood and accepted as a clinical diag-
vetes’ reflection on the pressures he felt he was nosis for his condition. In both his manic and de-
subjected to not only by marriage but, more gen- pressive states, Cassavetes “misbehaved” per-
erally, by social conventions and expectations of formatively, emotionally, verbally, socially, and
what is and is not “normal” and “acceptable” be- sexually, to a degree that stretches the limits of
havior. plausibility for anyone not familiar with the
heights and depths of serious manic-depressive
Cassavetes the man was at least as eccentric, illness—astonishing and inspiring his friends with
idiosyncratic, and emotionally demanding, as his bravado and terrifying his enemies (and his
frustrated by understandings of what was and loved ones) with the rages fueled by the massive
was not regarded as “normal” behavior and ex- consumption of alcohol he used to self-medicate
pression, and as ready to deviate from and flaunt his mood swings. That—and not the feminist
social conventions as his protagonist is at her movement, sympathy with the loneliness of a
most extreme. In the course of his life he had stay-at-home mother, or the predicament of a
built an entire personal philosophy around the wife married to a man who doesn’t understand
supreme importance of non-conformity and un- her—is Mabel’s origin story. For anyone familiar
fettered emotional expression. These were more with Cassavetes’ own views and behavior, there
than ideas to Cassavetes; they were his entire is not a moment’s doubt that Mabel is a gender-
way of being. Since childhood he had functioned changed self-portrait of her creator—just as for
as an emotional, imaginative, and social outsider anyone familiar with the dynamics of Cassavet-
in most situations he found himself in—first as an es’ marriage to Gena Rowlands, it is equally
attention-deficit, hyperactive, non-English- clear that Nick, particularly with respect to his
speaking, eight-year-old Greek immigrant who emotional conservatism and fear of scandal, is a
couldn’t sit still in school or keep his attention gender-changed portrait of Rowlands, as seen
focused on his work; then as a middle-school from Cassavetes’ viewpoint.
For those reasons, it is probably not surprising tell, as a few of the more intellectually honest
that “A Woman Under the Influence” confused— feminist fans of the film admitted, but only in pri-
and sharply divided—representatives of the bur- vate—too close to aspects of themselves they
geoning “women’s movement.” A number of the recognized but were embarrassed by and want-
film’s advocates defended Gena Rowlands’s ed to deny. Cassavetes had done the same
performance as a deeply insightful portrait of a thing in the film he did throughout much of his
mistreated housewife, while a larger number of life; he had said things he was not supposed to
detractors argued, in opposite directions, either say, revealed emotional facts he should not
that Cassavetes’ vision of Mabel was have revealed, violated understandings about
“unrealistic” and that she was “too extreme” or what was and was not “acceptable” to say and
“too crazy” to identify with; or, in an opposite do. Just like Mabel. One more demonstration of
vein, that she was too cautious, conservative, his deep psychic and emotional connection with
and traditional, insofar as she didn’t assert a her.
free and independent identity beyond the con-
fines of marriage, family, and motherhood. In a
decade when Jane Fonda, Ellen Burstyn, Faye
Dunaway, Glenda Jackson, Sally Field, and Jill The views expressed in these essays are those of the author and
Clayburgh were offering entirely positive—and do not necessarily represent the views of the Library of
Congress.
eminently sane, strong, and emotionally stable
“role models”—Mabel’s emotional extremity, her
vulnerability, her desperate quest to be loved Ray Carney teaches at Boston University. He is the
and accepted, and her commitment to mother- author of fifteen books translated into a dozen lan-
hood and wifehood as anchor points in her iden- guages. He conducted a series of
tity were frowned on. She was what we would “Rosebud” con-versations with Cassavetes before
his death, in which the filmmaker revealed
now call “politically incorrect.” In fact, even many
unknown information and gave him tens of
of the film’s most ardent admirers admitted pri- thousands of pages of un-published fiction, drama,
vately that they could hardly bear to watch her. and film material. He is currently completing two
She was emotionally too exposed, too needy, in books: Masterworks of Independent Film and a
too much pain and anguish (look again at the “I radical re-evaluation of the work of Robert
have five points” scene if there is any doubt Bresson. More information is availa-ble at: http://
about what they are referring to) and—truth to [Link]/rcarney/aboutrc/[Link].