Subject Cataloguing Challenges Explained
Subject Cataloguing Challenges Explained
14.0 OBJECTIVES
As we are already aware, one of the approach by which users access a catalogue or
search for information is by subject. In this context subject cataloguing assumes a
great importance. In this unit, we discuss various aspects of subject cataloguing.
After reading this Unit, you will be able to:
• explain the concept of subject cataloguing;
• distinguish it from author/title cataloguing;
• analyse various problems associated with subject cataloguing and arrive at
appropriate solutions;
• describe different methods (approaches) of subject cataloguing;
• and suggest appropriate method of subject cataloguing for your library.
14.1 INTRODUCTION
The primary function of any library is to make available the information it possesses
(documentary as well as other types), to the/users on their request.
To fulfil this objective, each library maintains a properly organised catalogue. The
catalogue is to be constructed on sound principles. By studying Units 1-4 of Course
BLIS 04, namely `Purpose
5
Subjects Indexing, Vocabulary
Control and Recent
and Types of Library Catalogue', you are in a position to construct a suitable catalogue
Developments in Cataloguing to meet the needs of your library.
For a person in need of information on a specific topic (i.e. specific subject), the library
catalogue has to provide the facility of subject approach to library contents. If this
facility is provided in the catalogue, the library user, on his own, will be able to find the
items which are available in the library on a given subject as well as items related to the
subject of his interest.
During the process of cataloguing, the cataloguer must take into account the dual
manifestation of the items added to the, library collection. That is to say, that these
items are both intellectual as well as physical entities. In descriptive cataloguing, the
physical description pertains to the physical entity (document), while subject catalogue
provides access to the intellectual content of the entity. In practical terms, subject
catalogue is designed to provide subject access to the library contents.
Inquirers, who need information on a certain subject will approach the catalogue with
some questions formulated with their own terminology. These terms must be translated
into the pre-determined access categories of the cataloguing. Certainly, such
communication between the inquirer and the catalogue usually takes place with the
assistance of the librarian.
There are different ways of providing subject approach to library materials. One of the
methods involves the arrangement of library materials using a classification scheme.
This results in a systematic arrangement of materials according to their subject content.
The second, and the most commonly used method, is indexing the library materials
through the use of a list of subject-headings or controlled vocabulary. This method also
provides access to the intellectual content of a library. Classification provides a logical
or methodical approach to the arrangement of documentary materials, whereas subject
cataloguing provides mainly the alphabetic approach to the concepts discussed in these
materials. These two methods offer two alternative modes of access to a library
collection. The concept of subject cataloguing, the ways and means by which it differs
from other aspects of cataloguing and the techniques available for this purpose as well
as the problems confronted in subject cataloguing are discussed in this unit.
14.2 SUBJECT CATALOGUING
You will recall from your study of Block l of this course, that a library catalogue
constitutes a complete record of the library's collection of documents. Also, you have
learnt that the essential functions of a catalogue and the principles upon which it is
constructed are not affected by the physical form. Even so, the card catalogue has
become by far the most popular form of a library catalogue.
In the card catalogue, it is possible for a document to have a number of representations,
though practical considerations limit this number. Each document representation
(substitute) is in the form of a catalogue card, known as an entry. Each entry indicates
some characteristics of the document, such as authorship or subject content. In other
words, multiple access points are provided for a document in a catalogue. The entries
that indicate the inclusion of documents in classes defined by subject content are
known as `subject entries'. The process of preparing subject entries for documents and
organising them for subsequent retrieval is known as Subject Cataloguing.
14.2.1 Meaning and Purpose
Since an entry in the catalogue serves as a document substitute, it is necessary to
provide relevant information for individualising it so that the document can be retrieved
or located from amongst the others belonging to the same subject category. This job is
usually accomplished with the help of a call number assigned to the document. In
addition to entries for individual documents, the catalogue also contains directions
which refer the searcher from one heading to another heading under which potentially
relevant information in the form of document entries can be found. Such entries in the
catalogue are known as references. These references also help the searcher in locating
information about the related subjects to the subjects of his interest.
"The assigning of headings and references, with retrieval of documents through the
medium of a catalogue, in response to request for information on specific subjects is
generally defined as subject cataloguing". Subject cataloguing forms an integral part of
the total process. Therefore, there is little need to emphasise on the important role of
6 subject cataloguing in libraries. The potential use of library materials cannot be
exploited without it, especially in large libraries.
Also, the vast increase in the number of documents in every sphere of human Subject Cataloguing - Problems
activity, clubbed with the increased complexity of the pattern of knowledge, calls for
a foolproof method of access to records on any subject. Thus, subject cataloguing is
concerned with subject description of documents.
All forms of subject catalogues have a two-fold objective: first to enable an enquirer
to identify documents on a given subject and second, to make known the presence of
material on allied or related subjects. Shera and Egan (1956) summarise the
objectives of subject cataloguing as follows:
• To show such affiliations among subject fields, which may depend upon use or
application of knowledge;
• To provide means to the users to make a selection from among all terms in any
particular category, according to any chosen set of criteria such as, most
thorough, most recent, etc.
With the above objectives, the techniques developed and designed to meet the
requirements of subject cataloguing are discussed in the following sections of this
Unit.
1) Explain briefly (in not more than 10 lines) the concept of subject cataloguing.
ii) Check your answers with the answers given at the end of this Unit.
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………… 7
Subjects Indexing, Vocabulary
Control and Recent 14.3 SUBJECT APPROACHES
Developments in Cataloguing Most of the users approach information sources not with names of who might have been
responsible for their creation, but with a question that requires an answer on a or a topic
for study. Users seek documents or information on a particular subject. In order to make
provision for this common approach, it is necessary to arrange documents on the shelf
and entries in catalogues in such a way that items on a specific subject can be retrieved.
In other words, it may be said that subject approach is very important in the access to
and exploitation of documents in a library. Before we actually discuss the methods
developed by librarians and information workers to meet this requirement, let us
consider the question "What is a subject?" While talking about a subject we normally
refer to a given area of knowledge, or the contents of a document of a given scope. A
subject may be defined by:
a) an area of interest,
b) an area in which an individual researcher or professional works,
c) an area in which an individual writes, and
d) an area of knowledge being studied:
Let us consider a well-known area such as Physics. To understand this subject, let us
first ask a student studying this subject, as to what constitutes this subject. Also, let us
find out the definition of physics from a few dictionaries and encyclopaedias. We may
come across different definitions and different boundaries for this subject area alone. We
may also find that different users and separate pieces of literature hold different
perspectives on one subject. The points of divergence in perspective can be categorised
into two types:
a) different labels (names) that are used for a subject, and
b) different concepts about scope and associations with other subjects that are evident.
Essentially, these factors form the basis of problems in identifying a satisfactory subject
approach and the need to have a vast array of tools to explain the subject approach to
knowledge. It is possible and convenient to select a particular view point on the scope,
associations and labels for subjects which coincides with the way in which subjects are
handled in the literature. In libraries, most devices for the organisation of knowledge
concern themselves primarily with organising documents, based on literary warrant.
This approach is known as pragmatic approach. The main limitation of the approach is
the time and collection dependency of the resulting tool. There is an alternative method
for the designf subject retrieval devices, and that is to build schemes, which depend
upon theoretical views about the nature and structure of knowledge. This theoretical
approach is important in determining the nature of subject devices required for the
organisation of knowledge. A subject device normally seeks to fulfil two functions
a) To show what a library or information centre has on a particular subject; and
b) To show what a library or information centre has on related subjects.
Different devices for the organisation of knowledge place different emphasis based on
the relative importance of these two functions. However, the two functions are inter-
dependent and neither can be excluded without impairing the effectiveness of the other.
A user who starts a search with a specific subject in mind may, in fact, be seeking a
specific subject which does not quite match his requirements. For example, a user might
start looking for "growing of tomatoes". A document on `vegetable gardening' may
contain equally valuable information on `growing tomatoes' but
generally he will not try to notice it because he believes that the more specific subject -`
growing tomatoes,' will not be covered in the document `vegetable growing'. Later, on
examining the document, he may discover that the information, he is looking for, is
available in the document on `vegetable growing'. Thus, broader subjects may help the
user even with a specific search.
Classification schemes as well as alphabetical indexing systems attempt to fulfil both the
basic functions mentioned earlier. The distinction arises from different emphasis.
Classification schemes specialise in showing network of subjects and displaying
relationships between subjects while alphabetical indexing systems specialise in
establishing specific labels for subjects and providing direct access to individual
subjects. Also, it may be stated here that author and title catalogues enable the user to
locate documents of which the user knows either the name of the author or title of the
8 documents, while subject catalogues enable him to find out documents of his interest
even without knowing any of these items of information.
The subject approach may be totally alphabetical or it might be classified supported by Subject Cataloguing - Problems
alphabetical indexes.
Self Check Exercises
2) Explain briefly (in 5 to 6 lines) what constitutes a subject.
Note: i) Write your answers in the space given below.
ii) Check your answers with the answers given at the end of this Unit.
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
14.3.1 Alphabetical Subject Approach
There are different means of providing alphabetical subject approach to documents
and information. But, all these methods are confronted with some common problems.
These problems are mainly concerned with the label (name) that is given to a subject
in an alphabetical subject catalogue. Therefore, the basic problem pertains to the
naming of a subject. It is generally agreed that a user-oriented approach should be
followed in subject catalogues in naming the subjects. In order to achieve this
objective, the various approaches of different users must be taken into consideration.
If a subject has more than one name, a library catalogue must bring all material on that
subject together (within the limitations of the scope of the collection) under those
names. Specific problems encountered in this connection are :
a) synonyms, b) homographs, c) singular and plural forms, d) multiword concepts, and
e) complex subjects.
It is rather important to understand as to how the above mentioned aspects present
problems to the subject cataloguer. First of all, let us briefly discuss about them.
a) Synonyms are terms with the same or similar meanings. Such terms are present in
every subject. Near synonyms are most common. True synonyms which mean
exactly the same thing and which are used precisely in the same context, are
rather- unusual. However, even near synonyms are regarded as equivalent for
some purposes. Some situations in which synonyms arise are :
i) In case of some subjects which have one stem and several derivatives. For
example: steriliser, sterilising, sterilised, or computing, computed,
computation. Sometimes, it is acceptable to treat such words as equivalent to
one another, and at other times it is important to differentiate between them.
ii) Some of the subjects might have both common and technical names, and these
must be recognised for the purpose of subject cataloguing so that depending
upon the clientele for whom the catalogue is meant, these are reflected in the
catalogue. Examples are `Sodium Chloride' and `Salt', `radish' and `raphanus
sativus', etc.
iii) Use patterns of terms also present problems to the cataloguer. The cataloguer
should try to keep pace with changes in normal usage.
iv) Some concepts are defined differently in different versions of one language.
American and English are examples of such differences in usage for example,
lift and elevator. In all such cases, the user should be guided from the heading
that is not chosen to the one that is chosen (preferred) in the catalogue.
The merging of synonyms carries implications for the effectiveness of a library
catalogue as a retrieval tool.
c) Homographs means words which have the same spelling but different
meanings. In normal language usage, the meaning of such homonyms is
established by the context in which the \ term is, used. But, in a catalogue the
term is used as heading and therefore, it will be difficult to establish the 9
interpretation to be placed on the homograph. In such cases,
Subjects Indexing, Vocabulary
Control and Recent
qualifying terms must be used to provide proper connotation to the homonyms in
Developments in Cataloguing the catalogue. Once this is resorted to, then there might not be any ambiguity.
Examples: 1) Pitch (Cricket), Pitch (Music), 2) Tank (Military vehicle), Tank
(Water tank), etc.
c) Use of Plural and Singular forms: Generally, the plural and singular forms of the
same noun are regarded as an equivalent, but there are some situations, when it is
necessary to treat them distinct. In case, only one form of heading is permitted in
the catalogue, then it is common practice to adopt the plural form. However
specific rules are provided for the usage of singular or plural form.
d) Multi-word Concept: Some subjects cannot adequately be described by one
word, and require two or more words to specify them fully. Examples are:
Information Retrieval, Country Walks, Underwater Colour Photography, etc: In
such cases, no matter which word (in the term) is used as the main approach
point in the catalogue, the user might choose to seek the subject under the second
or third word (in the multiterm) first. Therefore, it is advantageous to provide
access via all significant words in a multi-word concept. In a multi-word concept,
sometimes the terms are presented in direct order; at other times, the inversion of
terms is also resorted to, for example, Military Hospitals can find a direct entry in
a catalogue which treats Military Hospitals as a unitary concept or it may be
found in the inverted form as Hospitals, Military. Sometimes inversion may lead
to grouping of like subjects. For example, inversion to Hospitals, Military will
cause this heading to be filed along other headings starting with the word
Hospitals. The primary disadvantage of inversion method is that the user of the
catalogue might not be in a position to predict the terms of a multi-word concept
that may be inverted. Also, the word order in a multi-word concept may also
create some problems of uncertainty to the users.
e) Complex Subjects: Complex subject contains more than one unit concept in them
and a number of terms may be used to fully describe these concepts. -Each of
these concepts might form a potential search key in a catalogue. With complex
subjects, citation order becomes important. By citation `History of Science' is not
the same as `Science of History'. The same- two terms `History' and Science'
serve to describe two subjects and it is only the order in which they are cited that
determines the meaning; in the natural language, the connecting word `is/are'
distinguishes statements of the two subjects. The occurrence of a variety of
concepts in the statement of one subject area is referred to as syntactic
relationship. The syntactic relationships and the ways they can be handled are the
distinguishing features between pre-coordinate and post-coordinate indexing
systems.
Self Check Exercises
3) List the problems encountered in alphabetical subject approach.
4) Explain with an example how a complex subject is handled in alphabetical
subject approach.
Note: i) Write your answers in the space given below.
ii) Check your answers with the answers given at the end of this Unit.
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
10 ……………………………………………………………………………………
14.3.2 Display of Subject Relationships Subject Cataloguing - Problems
The vital problem concerned with the alphabetical, subject approach is the naming
(labeling) of subjects. However, any tool such as the library catalogue used for the
organisation of knowledge, must also take into account the different relationships
existing between the subjects. There are two main categories of relationships between
subjects. These are known as the syntactic relationships and semantic relationships.
For example, in a topic such as `Sugar and Health', the concept `Sugar' and `Health'
are drawn-together in a specific context. Obviously any of these concepts may also
be present in other context, where the existence of relationships defined for the
purpose may be irrelevant. On the other hand, semantic relationships show aspects of
genus-species relationships and are expected to reflect widely accepted subject
relations. Entries should be made in the catalogue for linking such related subjects.
This is normally achieved by means of references and other devices such as,
alternative entries. These are some of the significant issues which cause problems in
subject cataloguing and the cataloguer must take these into account and try to provide
suitable solutions by which these problems might be minimised, if not totally
eliminated.
14.4 ALPHABETICAL INDEXING LANGUAGES
In this section let us look at the concept of indexing language, its categories and
functional use. Let us begin with the meaning of `indexing language'. It is the
language used to describe a s0ject or other aspects of information in an index or in a
library catalogue. The generally accepted difference between a library catalogue and
an index is that an index entry merely locates a subject or a concept, whereas a
catalogue entry includes some descriptive specification of a document containing the
subject. But the line of demarcation is not, in practice, hard and fast. The indexing
language can be an alphabetical language or may be a classification scheme. But, our
emphasis would be on alphabetical indexing languages. There are three main
categories of indexing, languages. They are: a) natural indexing languages; b) free
indexing languages; and c) controlled indexing languages.
14.4.1 Natural Indexing Language
One of the greatest hurdles in discussing natural indexing language is that it is not
easy to identify or know as to what exactly constitutes a natural indexing language.
We do not generally come across lists of natural indexing languages. Obviously, a
natural indexing language is the language of the documents that are indexed or
catalogued for a library. Hence, it could be static as long as the document collection
remains static. As soon as a new batch of documents is added to the library, the terms
of the indexing language are changed to accommodate the new terms contained in the
new set of documents. Each system will have a different indexing language even if
the documents cover the same subject area. Also, since the indexing language is
derived from the documents, added to the library or input into the system of different
records, even if they represent the same documents, they generate a different
indexing language. These variations affect the consistency associated with the library
catalogue and so, present many problems. Most of the natural indexing languages are
based upon the language of title, abstract and other text of documents.
There is a debate going on as to the effective use of natural languages for indexing
and subject cataloguing purposes. One school of thought believes that full
exploitation of the opportunities offered by computer systems could only be done
taking recourse to natural indexing language, whereas the other school holds the view
that controlled indexing language is the only proper way to index documents.
However, it may be mentioned that controlled indexing language is extremely time
consuming, costly and uneconomic. One of the applications of natural language
indexing is the production of indexes based on words in titles of documents such as,
Key Word In Context (KWIC) indexes.
14.4.2 Free Indexing Language
It is the nature of free indexing that any word or term-that suits the subject may be
assigned as a subject heading in catalogue or as an indexing term. The terms may be
human assigned or computer assigned although free language indexing is -commonly
used in the computer produced subject catalogues or indexes. The computer
generates the list, by indexing under every word which is provided, unless if is 11
instructed not to do so.
Subjects Indexing, Vocabulary
Control and Recent
14.4.3 Controlled Indexing Language
Developments in Cataloguing In the foregoing paragraphs we have discussed the concept of an indexing language
as also, the categories into which it falls. In the process, we have learnt the meaning
of natural indexing and free indexing languages. Let us now learn some facts
regarding controlled indexing languages and their use in subject cataloguing and
indexing.
Control is necessary in respect of terms used as subject identifiers in a catalogue or
index, because of the variety of natural languages. Such control may involve barring
of certain terms from use as headings or access points in a library catalogue or an
index. The term which are to be used are specified and the synonyms recognised and
as far as possible are eliminated. Preferred word forms are noted. The list of terms,
thus, prepared constitutes what is called controlled indexing language. One of the
methods by which such a language is formed, is to list or store the acceptable terms
in a vocabulary. Such lists contain specific decisions relating to the preferred words,
and also decisions regarding the form of words to be used; for example, singular or
plural, nouns or adjectives. There are mainly two types of controlled indexing
languages in verbal plane. They are: subject heading lists and thesauri. These two
types of controlled indexing languages have the following functions:
i) to control the terminology used in subject catalogues and indexes; and
ii) to control the display of relationships in catalogues and indexes.
Subject heading lists are lists of index terms normally arranged in alphabetical order,
which can be used to determine the terms to be used in a catalogue for describing
subjects (i.e., as subject headings) by cataloguers: These lists attempt to solve some
of the problems concerning alphabetical subject approach. They serve as guides to
the cataloguer and aid him in the task of subject cataloguing. The basic functions of a
subject headings list may be stated in the following terms:
i) The list records terms which shall be used in a catalogue or database, and also
indicates the form in which they shall be shown. It acts as an authority list for
index terms and their form.
ii) The list makes recommendations about the use of references for the display of
relationships in a catalogue in order to guide the users to distinguish associated
terms.
'Sear's List of Subject Headings and `Library of Congress List of Subject Headings'
are examples of popular list of subject headings. These two lists have been the basis
for discussion in respect of alphabetical subject catalogues or in other words, for the
theory and practice of subject cataloguing. We shall be learning more about these two
lists in Unit 15 of this course.
It was mentioned earlier that controlled indexing languages are of two types. In the
foregoing paragraphs we have discussed one of these two types namely `Subject
Headings'. Let us now try to understand the second type namely `Thesauri'.
Thesauri
The dictionary meaning of the word `thesaurus' is "a collection of words put in
groups together according to likenesses in their meaning rather than an alphabetical
list." However, in library and information science parlance the word thesaurus means
an authoritative list showing terms which may and sometimes may not be used in a
catalogue or index to describe concepts. Technically, a `thesaurus' could be defined
as "a compilation of words and phrases showing synonymous, hierarchical, and other
relationships and dependencies, the function of which is to provide a standard
vocabulary for information storage and retrieval systems" In a thesaurus, each term is
usually given together with terms; which are related to it in a number of ways. The
primary purpose of thesaurus is to exert terminology control in choosing proper
headings in subject cataloguing and indexing. This concept is being extensively used
since the 1950s in, many information retrieval systems and a variety of
bibliographical tools. A number of standards have come into existence to provide
guidance in the construction of thesauri. `Root Thesaurus' published by the British
Standards Institution is one of the best models. Apart from this, there are a number of
thesauri such as TEST (Thesaurus of Engineering, Scientific and Technical Terms),
and others concerned with INIS, INSPEC, AGRIS, etc., which are being used in
information storage and retrieval systems. We shall be learning more about the
12 `thesaurus' in Unit 15.
Self Check Exercises Subject Cataloguing - Problems
20