81 Southwark Street, Waterloo, London, SE1 0HX
Temporary Work Structural Design Calculation for Bear
Gardens Concrete and Steel frame structure
EDC
A 7/29/2019 For Approval
Rev. Date Description
Client: Jon Greenhalgh,
Bear Gardens
London, SW17 7SN,
Sign Document Status Date
Designed Job No.: 1422
by RK For Approval 7/29/2019
Document
Checked by OM For Construction 01
No.:
Approved PK No. of Sheet
As Built
by pages: 1 of 3
Client: Jon Greenhalgh, RK
Project: 1422 - Bear Gardens Design
Doc. No.: 01 Sheet
Rev. A Date: 7/29/2019 2 of 3
Scope: The subject of these calculation is to design the structural load bearing members for the proposed loft
conversion, extension and to assess the adequacy of the existing structures that will be loaded due to the
conversion.
Codes, Standards & Reference Books
The following codes and standards have been referred to:
Publisher No. Year Title
BS 6399-1 1996 Loading for buildings, Part 1: Code of Practice for dead and imposed loads
BS 8110-1 1997 Structural use of concrete, Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction
BS 5950-1 2000 Structural use of steelwork in building, Part 1
BS 5268-2 2002 Structural use of timber, Part 2
Hilti TS 2012 Hilti Fastening Technology Manual 2012
Reference drawings
No. Drawing number Rev Description
1 1404-PRE-03 to -20 A 3 Story extension and loft conversion
2
3
Reference documents
No. Description
1 Naylor lintels, Prefabricated concrete lintel brochure
2 Catnic Lintels, Prefabricated steel lintel brochure
3
LC Load Combinations
The following load combinations are considered to demonstrate the adequate structural strength,
serviceability and stability of the structure in adverse condition.
Factored load combinations Where,
LC1 1.4 DL + 1.6 LL DL = Dead load
LC2 1.0 DL + 1.4 WL LL = Live load
LC3 1.2 DL + 1.2 SL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL WL = Wind load
SL = Snow load
Material
Structural steel
All structural steel shall be hot dip galvanized in accordance with NGTS 3.10. Minimum Steel Grade S275.
Bolts
All structural bolts shall be minimum 8.8 grade 43micron galvanised conforming to NGTS 3.10.
Timber
All structural timber shall be minimum C16 Strength class accordance with BS 5268-2.
Client: Jon Greenhalgh,
Project: 1422 - Bear Gardens
Doc. No.: 01
Rev. A Date: 7/29/2019
Wind load BS 6399 2:1997 (WL)
Basic wind speed Vb 21 m/s
Site elevation s 34 m From Google Earth
Site location Town
Closest distance to sea upwind 75.0 km
Effective height He 9.2 m
Length B 9.2 m
Width D 11.7 m
Altitude factor Sa = 1 + 0.001 s Sa 1.034
Direction factor Sd 1.0
Seasonal factor Sa 1.0
Probability factor Sp 1.0
Site wind speed Vs = Vb x Sa x Sd x Sa x Sp Vs 21.71 m/s
Terrain and building factor Sb 1.492
Effective wind speed Ve = Vs x Sb Ve 32.40 m/s
Dynamic pressure qs = 0.613 x Ve² qs 0.64 kN/m²
Size effect factor Ca 0.875
External pressure coefficients Windward Cpe + 0.85
Leeward Cpe - -0.50
Cpe - -1.40
Top
Cpe 0.20
Internal pressure coefficient Cpi -0.30
Windward wind pressure on walls and roof 0.48 kN/m²
Flat roof wind pressure -0.79 kN/m²
Leeward wind pressure on walls -0.28 kN/m²
Internal pressure -0.17 kN/m²
Roof -0.79 kN/m²
Leeward Wind direction
-0.28 kN/m² Internal pressure Windward
-0.17 kN/m² 0.48 kN/m²
Snow load BS 6399 3:1988 (SL)
Basic snow load sb 0.4 kN/m²
Altitude 34 m
Site snow load SL = sb SL 0.4 kN/m²
Client: Jon Greenhalgh,
Project: 1422 - Bear Gardens
Doc. No.: 01
Rev. A Date: 7/29/2019
Unit weight of walls, roofs and floors BS 1991 1:2002
Roof
Clay roof tiles 12 mm 0.7 kN/m² 0.70
Battens 25x50 @250c/c 0.0050 m³/m² 3.5 kN/m³ 0.018
Timber rafters 50x150 @350c/c 0.021 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.079
Celotex roof insulation 100 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.03
Battens 25x50 @400c/c 0.0031 m³/m² 3.5 kN/m³ 0.011
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
0.92
Flat roof
Flat roof membrane 10 mm 14 kN/m³ 0.14
Plywood 22 mm 7 kN/m³ 0.154
Timber joist 50x150 @350c/c 0.02 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.079
Celotex roof insulation 125 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.04
Battens 25x50 @400c/c 0.0031 m³/m² 3.5 kN/m³ 0.011
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
0.51
External stud wall
Clay roof tiles 12 mm 0.7 kN/m² 0.70
Battens 25x50 @250c/c 0.0050 m³/m² 3.5 kN/m³ 0.018
Plywood 11 mm 7 kN/m³ 0.077
Timber studs 50x100 @400c/c 0.013 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.046
Celotex wall insulation 100 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.03
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
0.95
External double brick wall
Clay brick 100 mm 19 kN/m³ 1.9
Celotex wall insulation 100 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.03
Block work 100 mm 10 kN/m³ 1.0
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
3.01
Partition wall
Plasterboard 2 layers 25 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.16
Wall studs 50x100 @400c/c 0.0125 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.046
0.21
Floor
Floor tiles 12 mm 0.32 kN/m² 0.32
Plywood 22 mm 7 kN/m³ 0.154
Client: Jon Greenhalgh,
Project: 1422 - Bear Gardens
Doc. No.: 01
Rev. A Date: 7/29/2019
Timber joist 50x150 @350c/c 0.02 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.079
Celotex floor insulation 100 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.03
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
0.67
Ceiling
Plywood 22 mm 7 kN/m³ 0.154
Timber joist 50x150 @350c/c 0.02 m³/m² 3.7 kN/m³ 0.079
Celotex floor insulation 100 mm 0.32 kN/m³ 0.03
Plasterboard 12.5 mm 6.51 kN/m³ 0.081
0.35
Prefabricated lintel design
Lintel L1 design
2 No. of lintels are used on an existing cavity wall on the second floor. The wall is typical brick outside and block work insi
with a maximum height above opening of 500mm is estimated. No other load is considered to act on the lintel.
Opening span l 800 mm
Wall height above lintel h 500 mm
Unit weight of cavity wall w 3.01 kN/m²
Load combination
LC1: 1.35 DL = 1.35 x 1.51 kN = 2.03 kN per m run
Assumed lintels are sharing the load equally than provide Naylor lintel ER1 with a load carrying capacity of
for 900 mm opening
Lintel is safe
Lintel L4 design
Lintel 4 is located on first floor, supporting an 800mm high cavity wall, timber frame wall and flat roof structure.
Lintel clear span l 600 mm
Cavity wall height above lintel h1 800 mm
Weight of cavity wall w1 2.41 kN/m
Timber wall height above lintel h2 2200 mm
Weight of external stud wall w1 2.10 kN/m
Roof tributary area 1.75 m/m
Roof weight w3 0.89 kN/m
Live load on roof LL 1.75 kN/m
Snow load on roof SL 0.70 kN/m
Load combinations:
Client: Jon Greenhalgh,
Project: 1422 - Bear Gardens
Doc. No.: 01
Rev. A Date: 7/29/2019
LC1: 1.35DL + 1.5LL = 9.9 kN/m run
LC2: 1.2DL + 1.2LL + 1.2SL = 9.4 kN/m run
Taking worst case and multiplied with span the loading is: 5.94 kN
Use Catnic CGE 90/100 Cougar Closed Eaves lintel with Safe Working Load of 25 kN
Lintel is safe
Pad stone design
B1 Steel beam pad stone design
Factored beam reaction F 10.0 kN Variable Load Safety Factor = 1.5
Permanent Load Safety Factor = 1.35
Characteristic strength of masonry 2.8 N/mm²
Width of beam end bearing 100 mm
Length of beam end bearing 152 mm
γm 3
Bearing Factor 1.25
Maximum Bearing Stress 1.17 N/mm²
Actual Bearing Stress 0.66 N/mm²
Characteristic strength of Pad stone 275.0 N/mm² Using steel plate
Width of Pad stone 100 mm
Length of Pad stone 152 mm
Thickness of pad stone 20 mm
Allowable pad stone stress 114.58 N/mm²
Stress under beam end bearing 0.66 N/mm² Therefore Padstone Stress OK
Allowable masonry stress 1.17 N/mm²
Stress under pad stone 0.66 N/mm² Therefore Masonry Stress OK
RK
Design
Sheet
7/29/2019 3 of 3
oogle Earth
Wind direction
RK
Design
Sheet
7/29/2019 3 of 3
0.70 kN/m²
0.018 kN/m²
0.079 kN/m²
0.03 kN/m²
0.011 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
0.92 kN/m²
0.14 kN/m²
0.154 kN/m²
0.079 kN/m²
0.04 kN/m²
0.011 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
0.51 kN/m²
0.70 kN/m²
0.018 kN/m²
0.077 kN/m²
0.046 kN/m²
0.03 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
0.95 kN/m²
1.9 kN/m²
0.03 kN/m²
1.0 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
3.01 kN/m²
0.16 kN/m²
0.046 kN/m²
0.21 kN/m²
0.32 kN/m²
0.154 kN/m²
RK
Design
Sheet
7/29/2019 3 of 3
0.079 kN/m²
0.03 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
0.67 kN/m²
0.154 kN/m²
0.079 kN/m²
0.03 kN/m²
0.081 kN/m²
0.35 kN/m²
de and block work inside,
on the lintel.
5.07 kN/m
Lintel is safe
of structure.
RK
Design
Sheet
7/29/2019 3 of 3
Lintel is safe