0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views9 pages

Legal Aspects of First Information Reports

This document discusses the format and salient features of a First Information Report (FIR) under Indian law. It begins by providing background on what constitutes an FIR - namely that it is a written report made when information about a cognizable offense is given to the officer-in-charge of a police station. It then outlines the required format for an FIR, including sections for details of the offense, parties involved, and place/time of occurrence. Finally, it lists some key requirements - an FIR must be in writing, signed by the complainant, read back to them, and sent to the magistrate. It also clarifies that an FIR applies only to cognizable offenses for which an arrest can be made without a warrant.

Uploaded by

Shivansh shukla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views9 pages

Legal Aspects of First Information Reports

This document discusses the format and salient features of a First Information Report (FIR) under Indian law. It begins by providing background on what constitutes an FIR - namely that it is a written report made when information about a cognizable offense is given to the officer-in-charge of a police station. It then outlines the required format for an FIR, including sections for details of the offense, parties involved, and place/time of occurrence. Finally, it lists some key requirements - an FIR must be in writing, signed by the complainant, read back to them, and sent to the magistrate. It also clarifies that an FIR applies only to cognizable offenses for which an arrest can be made without a warrant.

Uploaded by

Shivansh shukla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

INDEX

 Acknowledgement

 Abstract

 Introduction

 History of FIR

 Format of FIR

 Salient features of FIR

 Procedure o FIR

 Biblography
Abstract

To study the various legal aspects of Section 154, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and whether
telephonic information comes under the umbrella of the said provision‘ We have, so far,
attempted a detailed and searching analysis on the legal issues with regard to the statutory duty
of an officer-in-charge of a police station in registering the First Information Report and
commencing the investigation thereon as well the principles relating to the exercise of extra-
ordinary and inherent powers of the High Court in quashing either the FIR or the entire criminal
proceedings as the case may be; and bearing in mind the enunciations of law, we have given our
anxious consideration and careful thought to all the related legal issues emerge therewith.

We shall also focus on the evidentiary value of FIR, its validity when it is unreliable and
ingenuine and the legality of mere oral intimation or telephonic information. To begin any
investigation, it is quite obvious that the police need to know that an offence has been
committed. This can be possible if someone approaches the police station and gives the details of
the offence committed. This is often called as the First Information Report (in short, FIR) and
has been contemplated under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973 (hereinafter
referred to as “Cr.P.C.”). The basic requirements of FIR as per the section are that, in case of a
cognizable offence, if information is given to an officer-in-charge of the police station orally,
then,

1. It shall be reduced to writing by such officer;

2. Such information shall then be read out to the informant;

3. The signature of the informant shall be received on the written information;

4. And. finally, it shall be entered in the diary \book meant for this purpose, by such officer.

5. A copy of the report is also to be handed over to the informant under clause (2) of the section.
INTRODUCTION

First Information Report is written by a Police Officer. State has duty to take in to its cognizance
the commission of a cognizable case. Generally a Police officer does not possess the adequate
knowledge to deal with these cases promptly, as these cases demand urgent attention because the
delay erases the available evidences. A Police officer has to perform many duties at the same
time when he registers a case. He has to do the panchnama, finger print expert, forensic expert
and investigation is also conducted by him. John Cratman in his book “Police” defined police as
“Crystallizing the concept and practices ofthe maintenance of public peace, safety and security.”
The ‘Arthsastra’ of Kautilya mentions about the existence of police during the Mauryan period.
As a law enforcing agency ensuring order, the origin of the police in India can be traced to the
earliest Vedic Period ofIndian History. An Inspector General of Police once said: “I have worked
24 years in police department and honestly speaking, I do not know how to draft a F.I.R.
properly. I do not know how to inspect a scene of crime scientifically and to be more specific, I
do not know how to interrogate a suspect psychologically.”4 The Supreme Court in the case of
D.K. Basu v. State of W.B. observed that “in view of the expectation of the society that police
must deal with the criminals in an efficient and effective manner and bring to book those who are
involved in the crime. The cure can’t however, the worst than the decease itself.” SC disapproves
ofreckless arrests in criminal cases. “It appears that the police is not at all implementing it. What
invariably happens is that whenever an FIR of a cognizable offence is lodged, the police
immediately go to arrest the accused person. This is clear violation of the judgment of the apex
court.” The court issued direction to the chief secretaries, home secretaries and law secretaries of
all the states and Union Territories to “strictly comply with the judgment of the apex court in
Joginder Kumar’s case. Further FIR and important issues have been discussed in eight chapters.

SCOPE AND OBJECT

The term F.I.R. or ‘first information report’ has not been defined by the Code of Criminal
Procedure. The word ‘information’ means something in the nature of a complaint or accusation,
or at least information of a crime, given with the object of putting the police in motion in order to
investigate, as distinguished from information obtained by the police when actively investigating
a crime.
The first information is that information which is given to the police first in point of time. It is
only when the report is such that investigation could be started on it, that it can be called a first
information report. The report first recorded by the police relating to the commission of a
cognizable case is the first information report. It is a document of considerable importance, the
object being to show on what materials the investigation commenced and what was the story
then told.

HISTORY OF F.I.R1

The information regarding a cognizable offence by whomsoever given which is first in point
oftime and on which investigation actually commences is the FIR and not one recorded thereafter
or on reaching the spot. The information recorded U/S. 154 Cr.P.C. is known as First
Information Report though the first is not mentioned in the Code ofCriminal Procedure. The
information need not necessarily be against a person by name, it may be against an unknown
person. In such a case it is the duty ofthe Police Officer to find out the real offender during the
course ofinvestigation.51 The First Information Report is earliest report made to the Police
Officer held in the case ofSoma Bhai v. State of Gujarat.

(i) Earliest version ofthe case is F.I.R.


(ii) (ii) It is not open to the officer-in-charge ofPolice Station to consider information as
FIR according to his discretion.
(iii) (iii) If information comes at a police station simultaneously from a number of
persons, the officer-in-charge can use his common sense and record one statement as
the FIR.
(iv) (iv) In case of more than one FIR-There could not be more than one FIR in one case,
even if there are many victims of the alleged offence, writing three FIR’s in one case
is illegal. What is recorded in the first point of time and which reached the officer-in-
charge ofpolice station first is FIR

1
[Link]
FORMAT OF FIR

REPORT IN NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCES

UNDER SECTION 155 Cr.P.C.

G.D. [Link]....................................Page No............................. Date......... ………………………

Police station/outpost
………………………………………………………….District………………………………….

1. Date and time of report


………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………….

2. Name and address of the complainant


……………………………………………………………………………………….

3. Gist of offence reported


………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………….

4. Place of occurrence with date and time


……………………………………………………………………………………..

5. Address of the witness, if


any…………………………………………………………………………………………
……………
6. Disposal (To be stated
briefly)………………………………………………………………………………………
………………

7. Disposal reference

[Link]....................................Page No.
.................................Date..........................................

8. Received copy
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………….

Signature of SHO

PS ..............................................

Complainant

SALIENT FEATURES:

1. There has to be the presence of a fact, supported by evidence.


2. FIR should be in written form.
3. Complainant’s signature is necessary.
4. After writing of the statement, it is necessary that the statement be read over to the
maker.
5. It is the duty of the police officer to enter such information in the record.
6. Complainant has the right to receive the copy of such FIR.
7. Original F.I.R must be sent to the Magistrate forthwith.

It is necessary that the action against which the complainant have to file an FIR should be
cognizable in nature, i.e the crime should be such where there is no warrant required for the
arrest.

Section 2(l) &155 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732

Section 2 (l) :" non- cognizable offence" means an offence for which, and" non- cognizable case"
means a case in which, a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant;

Section 155. Information as to non- cognizable cases and investigation of such cases.
(1) When information is given to an officer in charge of a police station of the commission
within the limits of such station of a non- cognizable offence, he shall enter or cause to be
entered the substance of the information in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the
State Government may prescribe in this behalf, and refer the informant to the Magistrate.
(2) No police officer shall investigate a non- cognizable case without the order of a Magistrate
having power to try such case or commit the case for trial.
(3) Any police officer receiving such order may exercise the same powers in respect of the
investigation (except the power to arrest without warrant) as an officer in charge of a police
station may exercise in a cognizable case.
(4) Where a case relates to two or more offences of which at least one is cognizable, the case
shall be deemed to be a cognizable case, notwithstanding that the other offences are non-
cognizable.

2
[Link]
Procedure to file an FIR3

 The FIR requires the mentioning of time and date of the crime and the identity of the
committer, e., the accused in a manner that it becomes easy for the police to identify
the accused.
 After the complainant has registered the complaint, he has the right to claim the copy
of the FIR free of charge. The police then, after the registration of the said FIR has to
conduct an investigation regarding the statement made in the FIR. The police can in
the case that it finds the statement baseless, and that there is no evidence supporting
the same may after communicating it to the maker, decide to drop any further
investigation.
 In the case, the police find any evidence supporting the makers statement, they have to
file a charge sheet that is to be given in the court before the trial begins.

In the cases of refusal by any police officer to file an FIR, a person has a right to directly
approach Judicial Magistrate.

3
[Link]
BIBLOGRAPHY

 [Link]
 [Link]
 [Link]
 [Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

Historically, the concept of policing in India can be traced back to the Mauryan period and even earlier, as recorded in texts like the 'Arthsastra'. Over time, the role of police evolved to maintain public order, leading to the institutionalization of formal processes like FIRs. These developments reflect an ongoing progression towards systematized law enforcement, emphasizing structured documentation and legal processes to manage crime and public safety .

The procedural requirements for filing an FIR include reducing oral information of a cognizable offence to writing, reading it back to the informant, obtaining the informant's signature, and entering the details in a designated diary. A copy of the FIR must also be provided to the informant free of charge. Additionally, if the police officer refuses to file an FIR, the informant has the right to approach a Judicial Magistrate directly .

The First Information Report (FIR) holds significant importance as it marks the commencement of the investigation process under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It serves as a formal document that not only provides details of a cognizable offence to the police but also starts the investigation based on the facts provided. The FIR acts as a record of the initial report regarding the crime and is crucial for setting legal proceedings in motion .

The 'first information' in FIRs is legally defined as the first communication to the police about a cognizable offence that justifies an investigation. It is distinct from other information gathered after an investigation begins. The purpose is to document the initial case narrative and evidence foundation for police action, ensuring that correct procedural steps are initiated from the moment a complaint is first lodged .

The challenges highlighted by the Inspector General suggest significant gaps in technical and procedural competencies among police officers, such as drafting FIRs properly, conducting scientific crime scene investigations, and psychological interrogation of suspects. These challenges impede effective policing and reliable investigation processes, leading to potential inefficiencies and injustices in criminal investigations. Addressing these issues requires procedural training and capacity building for police officers to ensure adherence to legal standards .

The Supreme Court's observation in D.K. Basu v. State of W.B. emphasizes the need for police to handle criminal cases efficiently without resorting to arbitrary arrests. It criticizes the practice of immediate arrests post the lodging of an FIR, recognizing it as a violation of principles established in prior judgments like Joginder Kumar’s case. The impact is the reinforcement of judicial directives aimed at ensuring that police actions conform to legal norms and prevent misuse of power during investigations .

If a police officer refuses to register an FIR, the informant has the right to approach the Judicial Magistrate directly to get their complaint recorded. This remedy underscores the legal rights of citizens to ensure that their grievances are heard and acted upon, safeguarding against potential arbitrariness and neglect by the police. Such legal provisions are critical for maintaining public confidence in the justice system and ensuring accountability in law enforcement agencies .

In the context of non-cognizable offences, Section 155 Cr.P.C. mandates that the police must record the information in a prescribed form and refer the informant to a Magistrate since they cannot proceed without a Magistrate's order. The FIR does not institute an immediate investigation as in cognizable cases, highlighting its different procedural treatment for non-cognizable offences .

The principle of recording a single FIR per incident is significant in preventing legal confusion and ensuring clarity in the judicial process. It prevents the dilution of the narrative and maintains a coherent chain of evidence, thereby strengthening the integrity of the investigation. Multiple FIRs could lead to conflicting accounts and complicate legal proceedings, hence it is crucial to consolidate all initial reports into one legally binding document to uphold procedural consistency .

FIRs hold substantial evidentiary value as they chronicle the primary account of a crime upon which investigations commence. However, their reliability can be compromised by factors such as inaccuracies at the time of reporting, deliberate misinformation, or procedural lapses such as failure to document it correctly or verify the complainant’s statement. This necessitates careful judicial scrutiny to assess their credibility and relevance in legal proceedings .

You might also like