Ciq Financials Methodology PDF
Ciq Financials Methodology PDF
Methodology Guide
Client Support
U.S. / Support Phones: 1.800.523.4534 Hong Kong Support Phone: +852.2533.3565
Canada / or Email: clientsupport@
1.303.721.4802 standardandpoors.com
South
Email: clientsupport@
America
standardandpoors.com
Mexico Phone: 1.800.288.2872; Japan Sales and Support Phone:
after the dial tone, dial +81.3.4550.8600
1.800.523.4534
Email: clientsupport@
standardandpoors.com
Europe Phone: +44.(0)20.7176.8580 Client http://support.standardandpoors.com
Fax: +44(0)20.7176.1203 Support
Email: clientsupport@ Website
standardandpoors.com
Copyright © 2012 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part
thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a
database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates
(collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as
well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy,
completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or
otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any
data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S
FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR
HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost
income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if
advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not
recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of
any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not
be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or
clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except
where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an
audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another
jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgement at any
time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of
an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of
their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P
business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information
received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from
obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its
Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription),
and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about
our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
1
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
History
History dates back to the early 1990s for US companies and varies by region for
companies outside the United States:
Europe: 1996
Asia-Pacific: 1998
Middle East and Africa: 1999
Latin America and Caribbean: 1996
Canada: 1996
Delivery
S&P Capital IQ Financials data is delivered by Xpressfeed for easy data loading and
maintenance and for quick, seamless integration with all S&P Capital IQ and Compustat
data packages as well as third party data from vendors such as Russell, MSCI and
Thomson.
The Xpressfeed Loader generates the database schema and structure, and loads S&P
Capital IQ Financials data as a set of tables with primary key relationships. The
underlying “one-delimited file per table” structure enables fast bulk-loading of the data.
Xpressfeed also automates the daily updates of Financials data to keep the database up
to date.
S&P Capital IQ data is delivered in two types of files: Full History files and Update files.
Full History files contain a complete data set that is updated weekly.
Update files contain the database updates that have occurred since the Full
History files were produced.
Data Sources
S&P Capital IQ collects data from:
Publicly Available Sources: S&P Capital IQ collects data from all publicly
available sources including regulatory agencies, company websites, exchange
websites and news agencies.
2
Methodology
Languages
S&P Capital IQ currently translates documents from over 30 languages including: Arabic,
Bahasa, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew,
Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Latvian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese,
Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish, and Thai. We are actively
expanding our translation capabilities; please contact your account team for the current
list.
Sourcing
In the sourcing stage, S&P Capital IQ acquires documents from multiple sources
including feeds from the SEC, SEDAR, ASX and RNS, exchange websites, news
agencies (e.g., Lexis-Nexis and Dow-Jones) and company websites. Our web crawlers
search for the latest documents on all major global exchange websites, ensuring both
timely and complete sourcing. In addition to sourcing English language documents, a
team of linguists—assisted by custom translation software— translate the main tables,
MD&A, segment and capital structure data to English from over 30 languages (Note:
industry specific data is currently only collected for English filers.) While documents may
be translated, all data is collected and presented in the document’s native currency.
Document Processing
The processing phase of collection is a two-step process. First, the financial statement
tables in a document are processed using proprietary software that ensures a timely
collection by analyzing documents algorithmically. In the second step, analysts verify the
initial collection, classify any unrecognized line items, search for additional disclosure in
the notes, and identify unusual items. Analysts focus on the Income Statement, Balance
Sheet, Cash Flow Statement, share and per share data and supplemental data (e.g.,
capital structure, pension and industry specific metrics).
Analysts utilize two approaches to break out one time charges such as litigation charges,
merger and restructuring expenses, gains and losses on sales of assets and
investments, as well as other unusual items in the MD&A and the notes. By running these
two processes in parallel, S&P Capital IQ ensures that our dataset provides all the
necessary information to analyze your subject company on a normalized basis. All
unusual items are broken out of the main statement line items and tagged individually.
New filings are processed by our financial analysts in approximately two to seven
business days.
S&P Capital IQ’s supplemental dataset is unrivaled by our competitors in both breadth
and scale of operations, ensuring a more complete and timelier collection. Analysts
concentrate either on an industry (e.g., Airlines, Oil & Gas, Cable, Wireless and Telecom,
3
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
Real Estate and twelve other industries) or data set (e.g., business and geographic
segments, pension and OPEB data, options and warrants, etc.).
Quality Assurance
The data collection process includes four separate levels of pre-standardization quality
assurance checks that occur once analysts have completed their work. The first level of
checks occurs at the document/statement level. Software tally checks prevent analysts
from committing non-balancing statement data to the database in addition to ensuring the
line item tags applied are consistent with the statements in which they are typically found.
The second phase of the QA process covers a wide range of potential inconsistencies in
the data within the processed document as well as across historical documents for the
same company. In this stage, among other potential collection errors, the checks identify
spikes and dips in line item values, wrongly-tagged data, incorrect units, reversed signs
and compare disclosure and collection patterns across periods. Within the first two QA
stages, over 9,300 automated checks are run against the full list of data item tags.
In the third phase of the QA process, collection team leaders randomly sample
production documents and perform a thorough review of the data collected from a
document. Team leaders currently sample approximately 10% of all production
documents. In addition to the checks described above, the QA process also focuses on
the work of individual analysts through an external QA team. This team operates
separately from the collection teams and randomly samples the work of individual
analysts. All errors generated are validated and corrected by a team of analysts separate
from the team that originally collected the data. Once all checks are cleared, the raw data
is committed to the database and ready for standardization.
Once a document is processed and all errors are cleared, S&P Capital IQ runs a series of
SQL-based procedures on the as-reported database and applies analytical rules and
logic to convert a data set that reflects various levels of detail and disclosure into a
uniform standardized data set. Standardized S&P Capital IQ data can then be used in a
meaningful cross-period or cross-company analysis, trading comparable analysis, or
screening.
Industry-Specific Templates
The standardized financial statement data is presented in seven industry-specific
templates with a layout corresponding to reporting practices and patterns accepted by
financial analysts in North America and most of the investment community:
Standard/(Industrial), Banks, Brokerage, Financial Services, Insurance, Real Estate and
Utility. While some line items may overlap across templates, in most cases they have a
unique composition and mapping structure made possible by the depth of the as-reported
data in Premium Financials.
4
Methodology
Calendar Years: In most cases a company’s Calendar and Fiscal Years will overlap.
In those cases where they do not, S&P Capital IQ considers the LTM period with a
period end date falling in November, December or January to represent a Calendar
Year.
Annualized Stub Periods: When due to fiscal year changes, a company reports an
annual period of less than twelve months, S&P Capital IQ will generate an annual
period by annualizing the stub value.
Component Periods
In the S&P Capital IQ Premium Financials data set, it is important to understand the
relationship between a period and instances of that period. In most data sets, a financial
period will only have one instance of financials, often representing the latest available
data. In contrast, S&P Capital IQ collects each instance (or filing) of financials for a
financial period separately, giving you the opportunity to avoid forward bias by analyzing
only the data available as of a specific filing date.
5
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
The Premium Financials data set is maintained by applying the filing date of the initiator
document (the document with the highest filing date) to all of the calculated periods, and
ensuring the calculation only takes into account component periods filed prior to the
initiator document filing date. Additionally, to decrease the probability of corporate
structure or accounting changes affecting cross period calculations, S&P Capital IQ only
considers component periods filed within 15 months of each other. This rule is best
illustrated with the Q4 calculation: while most companies generally file quarterly or interim
financials for the same period twice, annual financials for the same period are often filed
in more than two distinct documents. Therefore, we often run into situations where we
could calculate an orphaned Q4 based on an annual and 9 month YTD filed more than a
year apart. In the majority of such cases, corporate structure and accounting changes as
well as further restatements and reclassifications only accounted for in the annual but not
in the 9 month YTD result in misleading quarterly data.
For example, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has four instances of its FY2005 ending January 31,
2005 and five instances of the 9M YTD period ending October 31, 2004. The original
instance of the FY2005 annual was filed March 31, 2005 while the latest, reclassified
instance was filed March 27, 2007. As noted above, in order to calculate a Q4 we require
a corresponding 9M YTD value filed prior to the filing date of the initiator document. The
latest 9M instance to meet this requirement for the March 27, 2007 annual was filed on
December 2, 2005. Had we used this instance to generate a Q4 as of January 31, 2005
we would have generated an instance with a meaningless revenue figure as a result of
the disposition in 2006 of their South Korea operations, which was only mentioned in the
March 27, 2007 document.
Restatement Types
In addition to calculating synthetic periods, we use analytical rules to apply restatement
types to the calculated instances. These are the restatement types we use to identify the
nature of a given instance as well as convey information regarding any potential
restatements or reclassifications in the data.
“P” “Preliminary”: Preliminary earnings release
“O” “Original”: Original company filing for a period
“NC” “No Change”: Appearing again in a later filing but unchanged from the
original, or not comparable due to different reporting currencies
“RD” “Reclassified for Disposal”: Reclassified for disposal of business or assets
“RS” “Restated”: Results are fundamentally different from the original, i.e., Net
Income, Retained Earnings or Cash from Operations differ
“RC” “Reclassified”: Figures are somewhat different from original, but the bottom
line results are the same
“DO” “Discontinued Operations”: Statement not calculated due to Discontinued
Operations disclosed in the higher component period.
Financial Periods
In order to present a complete and up-to-date picture of a company’s financial
statements, S&P Capital IQ generates additional periods not explicitly reported by the
companies. Examples of generated periods are: annualized stub periods, quarterly cash
flow statements, non-press release Q4s, implicitly restated periods, synthetic quarters for
interim filers, last twelve month (“LTM”) financials, calendar years (inconsistent with fiscal
year patterns) and calendar quarters.
6
Methodology
Fiscal Years
S&P Capital IQ standardizes fiscal years for comparability across companies; a
company’s fiscal year corresponds to the calendar year end of its fourth quarter. In the
Premium Financials data set, any company with a fiscal year end date following Jan 15th
will be labeled as having completed its fiscal year in that calendar year. However, if the
period end date of the fiscal year is prior to January 15th, the company will be labeled as
having completed the fiscal year in the prior calendar year. For example, Wal-Mart’s
fiscal year end (FYE) was on January 30, 2009, and as such they completed their 2009
Fiscal Year.
Fiscal Quarters
A fiscal quarter end date is determined by the day the particular period ends on. If the
period end date is greater than or equal to the 15th of the current month, the period end
date is set to the last day of the current month, while if the period end date is prior to the
15th, the period end date is set to the last day of the prior month.
In some situations, S&P Capital IQ will calculate a quarterly period based on the
difference between two consecutive year-to-date periods. All quarterly cash flow, fourth
quarter non-press release income statement periods and generated restated or
reclassified financial periods are calculated according to that logic. In addition, S&P
Capital IQ will generate fiscal quarters for semi-annual filers.
1
Capital IQ compares certain metrics on the income statement such as Revenues, Operating Profit and Net Income to establish if a restatement or
a reclassification is needed.
7
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
the results the company reported for Q1 in their Q1 filings, S&P Capital IQ will recalculate
Q1 based on the difference between the 6 months YTD number and the 3 month Q2
number. When we look at an equivalent situation in a Q3 filing, new Q2 YTD instances
can be calculated, which in turn can lead to the calculation of additional Q1s and so on.
Synthetic Quarters
In the case of semiannual filers, S&P Capital IQ generates synthetic quarterly data by
splitting in two the interim 6 month period and the difference between the annual 12
month and the interim 6 month periods. For example, once filed, the semiannual period
generates Q1 and Q2 and the annual period generates Q3 and Q4. Consequently, Q1
and Q3 generate YTD periods by mapping Q1 to YTD Q1 and adding Q3 to the
semiannual period to generate YTD Q3.
Calendar Years
In most cases a company’s calendar year will align with their fiscal year (the fiscal year
ends prior to January 15th). However, in some instances S&P Capital IQ will define a
company’s calendar year financials as the calculated LTM value with a period end date in
November, December or January.
Please see the section on “Last Twelve Months (LTM)” for more information on the LTM
calculation.
Calendar Quarters
In most cases a company’s calendar quarters will align with its fiscal quarters. However,
when this is not the case, calendar quarters are defined by the month in which the period
ends, as follows:
• CQ1: is defined as the fiscal quarter ending in February, March or April
• CQ2: is defined as the fiscal quarter ending in May, June or July
• CQ3: is defined as the fiscal quarter ending in August, September or October
• CQ4: is defined as the fiscal quarter ending in November, December or January.
Calculation Types
S&P Capital IQ provides 13 instance-level calculation types that provide further
transparency regarding the S&P Capital IQ standardization process.
REP – As reported data.
LTM – Latest twelve months [YTD + Annual – Prior Year YTD]
8
Methodology
9
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
to the database. Once all the fundamental data has been updated, the company is
considered inactive and additional financial data is no longer collected.
S&P Capital IQ uses the following guidelines to determine survivorship for acquisitions
and mergers:
Discontinued Operations
There are instances in S&P Capital IQ’s financial data where a period on the Income
Statement or the Cash Flow Statement is tagged with statementRestatementTypeId 12
(DO), noting that the period was not calculated due to Discontinued Operations (DO).
As noted in previous sections, S&P Capital IQ generates a significant amount of
additional data by combining financials from more than one statement into a single period
or instance of a period. This process is done in accordance with a number of rules and
10
Methodology
logic that ensure comparability across the universe. The DO rule ensures S&P Capital IQ
does not calculate an instance of a financial period when the later YTD instance used in
the calculation contains discontinued operations items while the earlier YTD period does
not. There are no exceptions to this rule.
The DO rule exists as it is difficult to present an accurate calculated quarter or YTD
period when the later instance discloses a DO and the earlier instance does not. There is
usually no way to break up the single DO line item present on the income statement or
the cash flow statement from the later instance into the standard line items contained in
that statement. Although DO usually represents a small percentage of a company’s
continuing operations it may also represent a significant share of a company’s business.
In this case, a calculation of a period without the DO Rule may result in non-meaningful
data such as negative revenues or positive expenses. Even in cases of relatively
insignificant DO, we still prefer to allow users to make their own assumptions about this
item and the impact it has on the company’s financials in the given period.
11
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
Notes:
12
Frequently Asked Questions
13
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
Presentation
The organization of financial statements may vary across different accounting standards:
for example, U.S. companies present the current components of a classified balance
sheet above non-current components, while other countries present non-current
components above current components. Other differences include the presentation of
current assets net of current liabilities, showing a direct method cash flow statement
versus indirect, etc. Such presentation differences have no direct impact on the bottom
line and although S&P Capital IQ’s seven industry templates follow presentation practices
adopted in the U.S., International users can easily rearrange statement components to
present financial statements in the format they prefer. In that sense, while S&P Capital IQ
“adjusts” various presentations to fit the U.S. presentation pattern, such adjustments can
be easily undone and templates can be rearranged. Please note that this is not a
reclassification from one accounting standard to another per se but simply rearranging
rolled up reported line items into preset S&P Capital IQ templates.
Classification
Despite the ongoing convergence of accounting standards, certain general ledger entries
can still be classified and incorporated into financial reports differently across different
GAAPs. Such classifications are done by internal accounting professionals and
independent auditors and there is usually little visibility into these practices. As a result,
there is very little S&P Capital IQ or any analyst can do to remove discrepancies of this
nature. If different accounting standards treat different items as components of revenues,
for example, without further breakdown of revenues, analysts will have to take such
discrepancies into account in their analysis.
There are several cases in which the type of discrepancy, availability of detailed data and
consistency of disclosure enable S&P Capital IQ to make adjustments to reported data.
Such cases are the exception rather than the rule and below are some examples to
illustrate this.
• Preferred Shares in Brazil and Germany: Although formally classified as
preferred equity shares, Brazilian and German preference shares display the
features of common equity, i.e., they participate in earning distribution, have
voting rights, etc. As a result S&P Capital IQ prefers to treat those shares as
common equity. This treatment is taken into consideration in the presentation of
Income and Balance Sheet Statements as well as EV and Market Cap
calculations.
• Pension related expenses: Neither FASB nor IASB has issued a specific
guideline on the disclosure of pension expenses on the Income Statement. U.K.
companies tend to combine pension expenses along with other financial costs,
14
FAQs
What is the difference between the various EBIT values that S&P Capital IQ
provides?
In addition to the EBIT values defined above, S&P Capital IQ calculates an alternative
EBIT used in the calculation of trading multiples This EBIT calculation, EBIT Incl. Equity
Income from Affiliates, is adjusted for Income from Equity Method investments and is a
component of all of our TEV/EBIT and TEV/EBITDA multiples. The TEV values that S&P
Capital IQ calculates include the book value of equity method investments, and in order
to account for the income or loss from these investments we adjust EBIT accordingly. For
more on TEV refer to the FAQ “How Does S&P Capital IQ CalculateTotal Enterprise
Value?” This variety of EBIT is used exclusively for calculation of multiples and is not
used in any other EBIT ratio calculation or presentation of EBIT.
S&P Capital IQ has created two additional supplementary versions of EBIT adjusted for
Stock Based Compensation, which is included as an expense in Operating Income: EBIT
(Excl. Stock-Based Comp.) and EBIT (Excl. Stock Based Comp and Incl. Equity from
Affiliates). S&P Capital IQ adds Stock Based Compensation back to these two EBIT
values for better comparability since historically some companies chose to expense
Stock Based Compensation on their Income Statements and others did not and also for
comparability of periods before and after the adoption of SFAS 123R.
Historically, S&P Capital IQ used to calculate EBIT by adding back Stock Based
Compensation but after the adoption of SFAS 123R this adjustment became irrelevant.
15
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
Therefore we are now only adding back Stock Based Compensation to the two
supplementary EBIT values labeled as "Excl. Stock Based Comp."
The four values of EBIT discussed above are used to calculate additional EBIT based
items such as EBITA, EBITDA, and EBITDAR. Therefore, these three items are also
calculated, presented and used in four different varieties similar to EBIT as discussed
above.
16
FAQs
How does S&P Capital IQ define Levered and Unlevered Free Cash Flow?
Free Cash Flow (FCF) is a normalized measure of the net cash flows generated by a
company's operating, investing and financing activities that can be distributed to common
equity, debt, and preferred equity holders. Levered FCF measures the discretionary net
cash flows a company can distribute to its shareholders after it meets its interest payment
and tax obligations, while Unlevered FCF assumes that the company has no immediate
interest payments to cover.
S&P Capital IQ calculates Levered Free Cash Flow as follows:
EBIT * (1-37.5%)
- Interest Expense * (1-37.5%)
+ Depreciation & Amortization, Total
+ Other Amortization
+ Sale/(Purchase) of Intangible Assets
- Capital Expenditure
- Change of Net Working Capital
= Levered Free Cash Flow
S&P Capital IQ calculates Unlevered Free Cash Flow as follows:
EBIT * (1-37.5%)
+ Depreciation & Amortization, Total
+ Other Amortization
+ Sale/(Purchase) of Intangible Assets
- Capital Expenditure
- Change in Net Working Capital
= Unlevered Free Cash Flow
To estimate cash outflows associated with tax obligations, S&P Capital IQ applies a
statutory tax rate of 37.5% for all companies across the board. We realize that a lot of
companies outside the United States are subject to different tax regulations and rates
and the tax rate we are using in the formulas above is only a proxy and an estimate.
Caution is advised when an in-depth free cash flow analysis is required.
17
S&P Capital IQ Financials Methodology
How does S&P Capital IQ calculate the Dividend Adjusted Stock Price?
S&P Capital IQ adjusts the close price on the day prior to the Ex-Dividend date by
subtracting the percentage amount of the dividend as follows:
(1-(Div. Amount (t)/Close Price (t-1)), where (t) is the Ex-Dividend date and (t-1) is the
trading day prior to that date.
The dividend adjustment factor is cumulative and applies to all historical stock price data.
S&P Capital IQ does not adjust stock prices for stock dividends or spin-offs.
18
FAQs
Cutoffs:
Z < 1.81 (high risk of bankruptcy)
Z > 3.00 (low risk)
1.81 < Z < 3.00 ("gray area")
19
Revision History
The changes made to this document include the following:
Table 1. Revision History
21
S&P Capital IQ calculates EBITDA by adding Total Depreciation & Amortization from the company's standardized Statement of Cash Flows to the calculated value for EBIT. When actual Depreciation & Amortization figures are unavailable, S&P Capital IQ may estimate them using an earlier period's data or by adjusting recent quarterly or annual values. If none of these approaches yield data, S&P Capital IQ will not estimate EBITDA for the period, resulting in a null value .
S&P Capital IQ manages regional reporting variations by standardizing data for comparability across regions, allowing financial information to be viewed consistently despite local reporting differences. It offers historical data with varying start dates depending on the region: U.S. from the early 1990s, Europe and Latin America from 1996, Asia-Pacific from 1998, and Middle East and Africa from 1999. Furthermore, to ensure comparability, fiscal years are aligned with calendar years based on specific rules about the fiscal year end dates .
Non-press release Q4 financials are significant because Q4 results are often not detailed in press releases and may only appear in summarized formats like annual reports. S&P Capital IQ manages these by calculating Q4 income statements using a methodology similar to their cash flow calculations, specifically by subtracting Q3 year-to-date financials from the full annual figures to ensure completeness and accuracy in their data .
S&P Capital IQ calculates Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) by dividing Diluted Net Income, which adjusts Net Income for common shareholders for potentially dilutive securities like convertible debt, by the Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding for the period. In cases where a company reports negative Net Income, Diluted EPS is represented by Basic EPS because further calculation of dilution is considered immaterial .
S&P Capital IQ determines fiscal quarter end dates based on the period's ending day: if the end date is on or after the 15th, the quarter end is the last day of that month; otherwise, it is the last day of the prior month. This treatment allows for standardized reporting that mitigates discrepancies caused by variations in fiscal quarter definitions, leading to more consistent financial data sets .
The Altman Z Score is a financial metric designed to assess the likelihood of a company entering bankruptcy. It uses various financial ratios, including profitability, leverage, liquidity, solvency, and activity ratios, to produce a single score that predicts the likelihood of financial distress. It is widely used in financial analysis to evaluate a company's credit strength and overall financial health .
Total Enterprise Value (TEV) is regarded as the cash-less value of a company as an asset, theoretically equal to the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the WACC. These cash flows are un-levered and belong to all capital suppliers. S&P Capital IQ calculates TEV by including the book value of equity method investments and adjusting EBIT for income or loss from these investments .
S&P Capital IQ standardizes financial data by applying consistent treatment across different accounting standards, such as separating pension-related expenses and treating preferred shares uniformly as common equity in equity calculations. By reclassifying or adjusting accounting figures across various standards, S&P Capital IQ ensures that financials can be compared reliably across different geographic and regulatory environments .
S&P Capital IQ generates additional financial periods such as annualized stub periods, quarterly cash flow statements, non-press release Q4s, implicitly restated periods, synthetic quarters, last twelve month (LTM) financials, calendar years, and calendar quarters. These periods are created to provide a complete and updated view of a company's financials that would otherwise not be fully captured in officially reported filings due to fiscal year changes or varying reporting standards .
S&P Capital IQ defines EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Taxes) as Operating Income normalized for unusual items, excluding non-operating charges. This measure is particularly applicable to non-financial firms since interest is an operational expense for financial services. Therefore, EBIT is not available for financial institutions like banks or brokerages within S&P Capital IQ data. Users should be cautious when evaluating conglomerates or firms with financial divisions due to differing EBIT applicability .