0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 182 views22 pagesRocket Project Studentexample PDF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Bobby Nordlund | > iak
Taye Newman 00% =r ae
Captain O'Reilly ¢
eee ‘ + ob
21 Apri 2010 aie
Rocket Competitive Success Criteria (CSC) Analysis pe
Costly components Lo
ae.
‘component Rate Quantity, Cost
Engine Adaptor System | $5000 2.00 $10,000.00
Body Tube | $20000/in 10.50" {$105,000.00
Balsa Wood '$100/in’ 10.03in* $1,003.00
B6-0 & A8-3 $1,000,000 1.00
‘Actual payload: 32.48
Cost-to-payload ratio: $34,444.54/¢
‘Two tools were used to predict the rockets performance. Firstly, the commercial RockSim software (by
‘Apogee) was ands a highly-accurate rocketry modeling program that does just about anything rocketry.
It was used to model each of the four configurations in order to determine which design held a KanKowed
competitive advantage in the competition. Ukimately, our modeling predicted the B-A design would
have acost-to-payload ratio more than 12% less than any other design.
rahe
MATLAB proved a useful, albeit cumbersome, tool for predicting our rocket’s performance.
Unfortunately, it was hamstrung by our measured thrust data which lacked the accuracy of Estes’ Boy es
published thrust profiles. The -12% error in Impulse seen in the Thrust Lab was carried forward and
reflected clmost exactly in the discrepancy between RockSim’s predictions and MATLAB's predictions of
our rocket’s performance: the difference between 305' and 260'.~ Th's 4 O6™ Coinc: derdal foes easly
The margin we built into our design was swallowed by Skt winds out gf the SE. Our over-stable rocket
experienced significant weather-cocking that tured precious vertiatglstance inte horizontal distance,
resulting ina fight just beneath the altitude predicted by RockSim: 292
Xe ellens
MATLAB Inputs
8M pays
Temperature: 293 K 9
Pressure: 101325 Pa
Payload-less initial mass: 0.1151 kg.
Booster mass: 0.0810 kg
Payload: .0324 kg
Drag coefficient: 0.80
Cross-sectional area: 7.45*10* m?
‘5 “_g ge PreaghMATLAB Outputs
© Takeoff mass: 147.5 g
© Atend of boost.
(© Velocity: 21.7603 m/s
© Height: 9.6785 m
‘+ Atend of upper stage...
(© Velocity: 36.0384 m/s
© Height: 24.8395 m
© Atend of coast.
(© Velocity: 0 m/s (stopped)
© Height: 79.2591 m (260.0363 ft)
Flight Profle
dct Tine Toe
oct ii)
2
wane
=
Tvs TneBobby Nordlund
Taylor Newman
Captain O'Reilly
A201-5001
21 April 2010
Rocket Project: MATLAB CodeA204 Rocket Project
EA204 Rocket Project
Contents
i
Nordlund and Newman 21 March 2010
This script seeks to model the performance of a two-stage rocket fitted with an
Estes BO and A8 serial-stage propulsion system. The values of input parameters are
freely adjusted, although the thrust data is the direct result of experimentation and
is less-readily modified. Thrust, mass, weight, and drag (all functions of time) are
accounted for in the script. Assumptions are limited to the use of published burn-
time values.
format short, clear all; cle
Enter Parameters
temperature=293; $Temperature (K)
pressure=101325; SPressure (Pa)
m0=.1151; $Payload-iess initial mass (kg)
mb=.0410; Booster mass (kg)
payload=.0324; sPayload mass. (kg)
Cod-.8; iDrag’ coefficient (approximate)
As. i5e-4; SEffective cross-sectional area (m*2)
Preliminary Calculations
Baire2672, 83/ (arK) Rye
rho= (pressure) /(R_air*temperature) ;_tkg/n”
mem Ospayload; Yactual initial mass
S-pisplay Kelavent Pareneters
disp(cat (2, "Payload mass: *,num2str (payload*1000) ," 9")
disp (cat (2, "Booster mass: ';mumastr(m 8"1000) ,
disp (cat (2; ‘Takeoff mass: ',num2ste (mat
i
ay)
a)
Booster Stage Calculations
‘Assume three forces: Thrust (T_B6), Weight (W), Drag (D) Note: Worthless data in
1001b6-4a, 2001a8-3a, 2001a8-3b and data from 5001b6-4a (C465:C545) appears
to be from’a different size engine.
L)sxlsread(‘thrustdata!, '2001b6-4a" , 'C225:C305');
2)=xisread(*thrustdata* , '3001b6-6a", 'C685:C765");
3)sxlsread(*thrustdata’, '3001b6-6b" , '315:C395");
y
)
4)=xIsread(*thrustdata' , '5001b6-6a", 'C553:C633")7
S)=xlsread(*thrustdata', *6001b6-4a", 'C605:C6a5"
2,6) =axlsread(*thrustdata’ , '6001b6~4b", 'C463:C543");
‘erence: [Link] commonwealth .net /récket store/estes/[Link]
Ns impulse, -8 8 burn time, 6.24 g propellant
[Link] [Link]A204 Rocket Project
I_Béstrapz(T_B6,1)/100; Ns
17Bé=mean (I B6, 2); SAverage total impulse
T3p_B6=1 B67 (.00624*9.81); SAverage specific impulse
n_dot=7 B6/(Isp_B6*9.61); tMass Flow Rate (Sellers 14-7)
t=.01; Ttime interval
© Mass Lost (trapezoidal method)
m_lostat®(~.5* (m dot (1)4m_dot (Length (m_dot) )) +cumsum (m_dot (1: length (m_dot)))
molost(1)=0; tinitial mass lost. due to thrust
miiost (2) tt (m dot (1) +m dot (2))/27 Strapezoidal integration of m dot from 0 to t
msm_O-m. lost,
Wen.*9.81; Weight
v boost (1)=0; initial velocity
“boost (1)=(T BG (1)-W(1))./m(1); Yacceleration at t=0 (D=0)
cost (2)=(TB6 (2) -W(2)) :/m(2); Aacceleration at t-0 (assume D=0)
foe ke2: length (T_B6) =1
¥ boost (k) =v boost (k-1) +t
poin
D(k)=.S*rhoty boost (k)~2*C d*a; tbrag
boost (ik) = (TB6 (k) “W(k) -Dik)) «/m(k)} Sredefine acceleration with Drag
acboost (+1) =(T_B6 (k+l) ~W (k#1)-D(k))./m(k+1) ; Stemporary D assumption
1 boost (k-1) +a_boost (k))/2; Strapezoidal integration point by
end
v_bew boost (length(v_boost)); Svelocity at burnout
hoboost=t* (—. 5+ (v boost (1) +v boost (length (v boost) ))+cunsum(v_boost (1:Jength(v_boost))))7
hoboost (1)=0; singeial height
hoboost (2) =t* (v boost (1) + boost (2))/2; Strapezoidal integration of v from 0 to t
hob=h boost (length (h_boost})?
disp(*At end of boost
disp(cat(2,' Velocity is ‘,num2ste(v b)," m/s'))
disp(cat(2;" Height is *,ndmauee (h by," m'))
At end of boost.
Velocity 18 2127603 m/s
Height is 9.6785 m
Upper Stage Calculations
Assume three forces: Thrust (T_B6), Weight (W), Drag (D) Reference: Estes A8-3
(2.5 Ns impulse, .5 s burn time, 3.12 g llant) Note: Worthless data in 1001b6-
4a, 2001a8-3a, 2001a8-3b and data from 5001b6-4a (C465:C545) appears to be
from a different size engine.
sA)mxisread(' thrustdata', '1001a8-3a!, '¢305,
'2)axisread(*thrustdata', *2001b6-4b", "C121
(3)=xisread *3001a8-3a", "C260
‘4)sxisread *5001a8-3a", 1C550
{S)exisread *5001a8-3b' , "C470.
16)=xlsread "e001a8-3a", "C510.
FTAG(2) 7) aularead(*thrustdata’y "6001a6-3b"» "C475:C525") +
‘Refetence: [Link] commonwealth: not/rocketstore/eates/[Link]
§ Estes Ae-3 (2.5 No inpuise, «5 8 burn ime, 3.12 q propellant)
EAB=trape (78,1) /1007"aNs
TAB-neat (7 8,2); daverage total impulse
Tep_AB=1 G7 (.50312"9,81)7 SAverage specific impulse
iStet NO/(1sp_A8*9,01); wave Flow Rate (Sellers 14-7)
01; Stine interval
Viigo Lose (trapezoidal myLiod)
m_Lostet*(~.5* (im dot (1) rm dot (length (m dot) )) +cunsum(m_dot (1:ength (m_dot))))7
milost(1)-0; tinfeial mass lost. due to thrust
matost (2)=t* in dot (1)+m_dot (2))/27 Strapezoidal integration of mdot from 0 to t
men O-m b-m Losey
fens? 5-81) SWeight
Upper (1)=v'b; Sinitial velocity
Du}=.S*rhoty upper (1) "2c dea; Atnitial drag
a_upper (1)= (FAB) -W(2) -D12))'./m(1)7 Qacceleration, D-D(v_b)
‘acupper (2)= (T7A8 (2) -W (2) -D(1}) ./mi2); tacceleration, assume D is still D(v_b)
Tor? he siengen (rae) -1
v_upper (k) =v upper (k-1) +t* (a_upper(k-1) +a_upper (k)}/27 trapezoidal integration point by
point
D(k)=.S*zhoty_upper (k)*2*C_d*A; $rag
upper (k) = (TAB (K) -W(k) -Dk)) -/m(k)? Sredefine acceleration with Drag
acupper (ke1)=(T_AS (kel) -W(k+1) -D(x)) «/miks1) 7, temporary D assumption
v_uev_upper (length (v_upper)); tvelocity at burnout
sppSe=h_b+t* (=. 5* (¥_upper (1) +v_upper (length (v_upper) )) tcumsum(v_upper (1: length (v_upper))))+
[Link] [Link]A204 Rocket Project
b_upper (1)=h by initial height
houpper (2) =h-b+t* (v_upper (1) #v_upper (2)) /2,
housh upper (Tength (f_upper) )
disp(TAt end of upper stage, ..')
disp(cat (2,' velocity is ‘;numastr(v_u),* m/s")
disp(cat(2;' Height 1s ',namaste(h_uJ,'’m'))
Strapezoidal integration of v from 0 to t
At end of upper stage.
Velocity 15.36.0384 m/s
Reight is 24,8395 m
Coast Stage Calculations
mem(length(m)); tmass at burnout
Wom+9.81; aWeight’
Byers av ur Mnitial, velocity
DU)=.5*rho*v coast (1)*24C_d*A; SInitial drag;
a_coast (1)=(-W-D(1)) /m; saéceleration, D=D(v 0)
accoast (2)=(-W-D(1))/m; tacceleration, assum® D is still D(v_u)
j,hiterating factor
while v_coast (length(v_coast))>=0
‘y_cBast (k)=v_coast (k~1) +t* (a_coast (k-1)+a_coast (k))/2; Strapezoidal integration point by
point
D(k)=.5*rhoty coast (k) ~2*C_d*A; Drag
a_coast (k)=(-W-D(k))/mj_8¥edefine acceleration with Drag
cast (kt1)=(-W-D(k)}/mz Stemporary 0 assumption
end.
vle=v_coast (Length (y coast))
Treoasech ust® ("599 const (1) +v_coast (Length (v_coast))) +cunsum(v_coast (
foeoast(iJ=n us jinstral height
hrcoast (2) Hust! (y-coast (1) sv coast (2))/2; ttrapezoidal integration of v from 0 to t
fresh coast (Zength (eeoast)) 7
Ire fgeteh_c*106/(2.54°12)7 theight in feet
Gisp(cat end of coaste--*)
Gisplcat gr, Velocity ‘2s num2atecy.e)," m/e, (otogped)’))
displcat (2,' Height Le *,ndmastethieTs*’m or * numistr(h «
length (v_coast))))
ty,' £0"))
At end of coast...
Velocity is 0.035923 m/s (stopped)
Height is 79.2591 m or 260.0365 ft
Concatenated Profiles
Thrust vs. Time
‘Tecat (1,mean(T_B6,2),mean(T_A8,2))";
figure (i) sthrust’ Pict
hold on
Lot (0: ,01:1.31,7,'-k') S$Plot of averages
legend (‘average’ thrust", 3)
plot (0:.01:.8,7_86,".")’AB6-0 Plots
plot (.8:.01:11377 Ae, ".*) SA8-3 Plots
title(*Thrust vs.—Tine*), ylabel ("Thrust (M)'),xlabel (Timo (3)
get (figure (1), "cotor', ‘whlee")
SPeLight brorite ;
velocity=cat (2,v boost, v_upper,v_coast)
height=cat (2,h’boost,h’upper,h coast);
figure (a) |
subplot (1,2,1) Velocity Profile
plot (0;.04; (length (velocity) ~1) /100, velocity, '-k")
axis({0°5 0 max(velocity) +5})
title('velocity vs. Time’), ylabel (‘Velocity (m/s)'),xlabel('Time (s)')
subplot (1,2,2) sHeight Profile
plot (0: 01; (length (height) ~1) /100,height,
‘axis ({0'5 0 max (height) +10) )
title(*Height vs. Tine") ,ylabel (‘Height (m)'),xlabel (‘Time (s)
set (figure (2), color’, !white!)
suptitie(*Flignt Profile")
eat)
[Link]A204 Rocket Project
Thnust vs. Time
Thuust (N)
—— Average thrust
02 O4 O86 08 1 12 14
Time (8)
Flight Profile
Velocity vs. Time Height vs. Time
locity (mvs)
Bom 8 RS
Height (m)
sos 8 8
irae ape iatiia si) spina ta aiG
Time (s) Time (8)
[Link] [Link])Bobby Nordlund
Taylor Newman
Captain O'Reilly
A201-5001
21 April 2010
Rocket Project: RockSim Model, Predictions, and Parts Listpha Newmar Nordlund) a Saraeeaereeeees
ameter 0.5780 Ih, Span ameter: 3970 In
ted stage mass 145.63
ny Margin: 3.71 Overstable
pes Alpha (Newman/Nordlund
Daeter 0.9760 I, Span dlametr: 35760 In
39 9 Selected Stage mse 104
9.0992 Iny Margin: 4.49 OverstableModified Estes Alpha (Newman/Nordlund) - Simulation summary
Sim. Ress Er
Alt. Ft, [Link]/s Acc. Ft./s/s Time App. Vel. deploy ft/s Alt. deploy Ft. CSimulation index
495 301.28,(zy uno) sssee"
* (els) £0-2985¢8' ‘epi0u Jo WeUOH (wD) ESSH5"T '(H) BSSHSTO‘O “UOREAS Jo srPeY 6 1407 :S5eH "O00 °99 ©
“UL. 0000'0 914 Inds "Ut 0900°7T 21a PEPE g:adeus ‘snupered T «
ada 8ua/AineAIod :1eHeVeW ‘OASeId “Ul ZT - Ul ZT - Sansa BINY>eIEG
(cyu06) gece
* (@ wi) £0-279840°2 :en40U Jo waLIOW (UD) ££9062'0 * (W) €2906200°0 :[Link] Jo sypeY 6 SZE'E :S8eH "UL OSZT'O 9D «
uno [Link] 0 ase BA WOsy "UI 000S'0 :uOReDOT "Ut O0Sz"9 :4AT “Ul 29EC'O :aI “UL 0096°0 :aOBUH BULERRD
soded :JeueneW 'SS-07-UD - SZTOE - S0ISy Buy! BujLEWUOD
(eyuo6) eoscoe
* (ew) £0-27992072 :ens0u Jo weWO (uD) €£9062'0 *(W) €/906L00'0 voReAAS jo srpey 6 Sze“C:SSEW "UE OSZTO :9D ©
UNO J0.0W Jo UO kw “UT 0005"0 :UONeDeT “UT 0062 “URN “UI ZSEL' :aI “UT 0096°0 140.8UH BuLERURD «
soded 1eHeNeW ‘55-07-49 - SZTOE - Sorsg Buys GujLeqU2D
(296) cease
* (26x) 60-22£9976 ‘ens8u Jo wowOH (uD) 21262990 (Ww) 21262900'0 ;vOReNA Jo snpeY 6 Spz"0 'SeN '“U SBGO'D 9D «
{UNO Ja}OW Jo seq 2X LOLS “UT 0005'Z {LORIN “Ut O/T {UBT UL ¥SES'OT : 7T# AIH “UT 0OT' :ACSPOR AUR «
sodeg :Jeu0IeW ‘07-19 P14 “Gua - Z-Z9TOE - saIS3 >POIg BU6U
(0 :°N9 * “ut 0000"0 :Nx wisypeW *(ZyW96) HO06T'L
* (sub) c0-240061' sensu Jo woUdH (uD) £2021'z () £20710"0 ‘vOReAKS 0 SKIpeY 6 66ST :SSEW "UL OSLET “9D ©
‘21 Apo Jo 3569 a4 HOH “UT 000" UOC) “UE 0OSL" [UAT “UL ODT" ZAI“ OSEL'O :00 ©
sodeg yeuoreW ‘OZ-L8 - SBOE 183 - 50953 IUNOW 10;
(0 Fen * “Ur 0000"0 :Nx wuSIPOW *(Z 96) BOLB6T
* (@ iby) $0-280486"F 40440 WoUON (uD) BH45U'S *() ByEELSO‘O “UOREAS Jo SFIPEY B T00'9 :S5EW "UL OSLA'E ‘SD ©
"ul 00S¢'c UR1 "Ut 00S6°0 ‘aT * "Ul 0526°0 :00 +
sodeg s1euoveW ‘0S-19 - 980€ 18a - saxsa 0qm Apos,
(2106) 0 (evitBx) 0 zeps0u 0 yWaWOy (uD) 0 (ww) 9 :uOReAB 0 snpeY 6 OOL'ST 858M “UI 0000.0 5 «
op HeUaeW “aBWINIY - ZAY OM/ASTAIV - SULPe}V04 JOWALY
(226) 0* (2 vw) 0 zen.0U 0 WOLOW (w2) 0 (W) 0 :uOReAAB Jo srupey B 000'0S :358W * "UI 0000'0 :59 «
‘esjeg :1eueveW 'BET-ONM - O806T - e9Body peoed
22ND "Ul 2002's °NX WHS>POY ' (v6) 6>EO'HY
* (Zw) 90-26460F'y :esoU jo weWON (uD) TZHEY'E * (WH) TzHHYED'O :UOREAAB J Shipey 6 C1" :SSEW "Ul LT6E'Z $99
"UL 0926°0 :UB1 “UT 006° [00 954 APO "UT 0946'0 £210 “UL OOSC2 "UR "BNO PHOS fades 35ON «
sje ‘reuDyeW “Wwoysn9 - U0 950N
syed seureysnsLaunch lug Estes - "1/8" per
#0: 0.1720 In, 1D: 0.1560 In, Len: 2.0000 In, Loc: 0.3750 In
CG: 1.0000 In, Mas: 0.162 g Radu of gyration: 0.0147552 (m) , 1.47552 (cm) Moment of inertia: 3.53335e-08 (kgm2) ,
(0.353335 (gcm*2)
"=, Material:
Fin set - Custom, Material: Balsa
* OG: 2.0298 In. , Mass: 1.551 g Radius of gyration: 0.0252479 (m) , 2.52479 (cm) Moment of inertia: 9.8882e-07 (kam*2),
‘9.8882 (gem™2) , RockSim XN: 9.9263 In. , CNa: 18.9332
Booster parts
Body tube Estes - EST 3086 - BT-50, Material: Paper
00: 0.9760 In, ID: 0,9500 In. , Len: 2.7500 In.
‘CG: 1.3750 In.» Mass: 1.987 g Radius of gyration: 0.0219652 (m) , 2.19652 (cm) Moment of inertia: 9.588316-07 kgm™2) ,
9.58831 (gem42) , RockSim XN: 0,0000 In. ,CNa: 0
Motor Mount Estes - EST 3085 - BT-20, Material: Paper
* 00: 0.7360 In, , 1D: 0.7100 In. Len: 2.7500 In. Location: 0.0000 In, From the front of Body tube
© CG: 1.3750 In. « Mass: 1.492.g Radius of gyration: 0.0212077 (m) , 2.12077 (cm) Moment of inertia: 6.710722-07 (kgm2) ,
6.71072 (gam*2), RockSim XN: 0.0000 In. , CHa:
Engine hook Estes - Engine hook - Standard size, Material:
* 0G: 0.0000 In. , Mas: 1.400 g Racus of gyration: 0 (rm) , 0 (cm) Moment of inertia: © (kam/2) , 0 (gcm”2)
Centering ring Estes - 30125 - CR-20-55, Material: Paper
‘Centering ringOD: 0,9600 In, ID: 0.7362 In, Len: 0.2500 In. Location: 0.7500 In. From the base of Motor Mount
"CG: 0.1250 In, , Mass: 3.325 q Radius of gyration: 0.00790673 (m) , 0.790673 (cm) Moment of inertia: 2.07867e-07 (kam“2) ,
2.07967 (gem*2)
‘Tube Coupler Estes - 30125 - CR-20-55, Material: Paper
Centering ringOD: 0.9600 n, 1D: 0.7362 In, Len: 1.0000 In. Location: -0.5000 In, From the front of Motor Mount
* CG: 0.5000 In, , Mass: 13.300 g Radius of gyration: 00106347 (rm) , 1.05317 (cm) Moment of inertia: 1.50334e-06 (karn2),
15.0834 (gom*2)
Fin set - Custom, Material: Balsa
* CG: 1.4694 In. , Mass: 1.299 g Radius of gyration: 0.017447 (m), 1.73447 (cm) Moment of inertia: 3.90662¢-07(hgm*2)
3.90662 (gem™2) ,RockSim XN: 11.6108 In , CNa: 18.3099Bobby Nordlund
Taylor Newman
Captain O'Reilly
A201-5001
21 April 2010
Rocket Wind Tunnel Lab Data Reduction
a. Calculated air density: 1.1804 kg/m?
b. Rocket's cross-sectional area: 4.82710 m?
[see MATLAB script}
d. Calculated drag coefficient: 1.2384
Drag va. Velocity Squared
"Zoo —so0 tooo 200 1400 ve00 Tao 7000 —Z200 2400700
Volocty Squared (nis?)
€. Calculated r value: 0.99845,
f. [see MATLAB script)
‘Notes: The obviously incorrect value calculated for the drag coefficient demands a reassessment of the
Rocket's actual cross-sectional area. With a cross-sectional area of 7.45x10* m’, the rocket yields a drag
coefficient equal to 0.80237—a much more realistic result.
\ rt Win Arh ogy
Exell + : cise up wth tas?A204 Drag Lab
EA204 Drag Lab
Contents
‘Lab Data
‘Data Reduction
‘Drag Calculations
Plot (for drag coefficient)
Nordlund and Newman 21 March 2010
‘This script seeks to determine drag coefficient from collected drag data.
format short, clear all; ele
Lab Data
v=60, 70,80, 90,100,110); aWind Tunnel Velocity (mph)
vev.*5286/3600#12*5.54/100;_ 4(m/a}
drag (1,:)=[.05, .08, -1,.13,.16,.19]; $Axial force while streamlined (1b)
rag (2, :)=[ 106, :08, :10,.13,.16, .19]7 saxial force 'w/ misaligned fins (1b)
Data Reduction
‘Air Density Calculations (rho)
P_ambient=29.8; Sinlig
Plambient=P_ambient/29,92*1.0132e5; %Pa
‘Tambient=536.87. 88
‘Tlambient-T_ambient*20a/519; x
Raire287; 13/ (Kg"K)
rho=(P_ambient)/(R_air*T ambient); kg/m”3
disp(cat (2, "Air Derisity:~", numzst® (rho), " kg/m*3"))
Air Density: 1.1804 kg/m*3
Drag Calculations
Cross-sectional area d=.976" or 2.48cm
r=,0123952; radius (m)
a=pitr*2; tcross-sectional area (m*2)
disp (cat (2, ‘Cross-sectional area: ",num2str(a),' m°2"))
% Calculate v2
dragemean (drag, 1) .*4.448; vaverage drag (to account for slop) (i)
coettpolytit (¥."3,drag;1)7 Neoetfsesente of polynomial
Jesum ((polyval (coeff, v.42) “drag) .*2) 7
musmean (drag) 5
Sesum ( (drag-mu) .*2) 7
z2e1-J/S;
disp(cat (2, 'r°2 value (for D vs. v-2 curve fit)
Calculate Drag Coefficient
¢ decoeft (1) /(a*rho/2);
disp(eat (2, "Coefficient of drag: ‘,numastr(c a),
M(enis clearly denotes troubled data) ))
*-mumastr (x2) ))
sectional area: 0.00040260 m2
2 value (for D'vs. V*2 curve fit): 0.99845
efficient of drag: 1.2384 (this clearly denotes troubled data)
file /1N:/Astro\ntm/EA204_ [Link][4/29/2010 [Link])A704 Drag Lab
Assume effective area nearer 7.45e-4 m*2
better=7.45e-4; more likely cross-sectional area (m~2)
d_betterscoeff(1)/(a better*rho/2) ;
disp (cat (2, ‘Likely coefficient of drag:
‘snumaste (C_d better), ...
(assumes a=",num2str(a better), m-2 with £n3)7))
Likely coefficient of drag: 0.80237 (assumes a=0.000745 m*2 with fins)
Plot (for drag coefficient)
figure (a)
Plot (v:~2, drag, '*k", (min (v) :max (v)) .*2,polyval (coeff, (min(v) :max(v)) .*2,'~k"))
title(‘prag vs. Velocity Squared")
ylabel ("Drag (i) ")
xlabel ("Velocity Squared (m*2/s*2)")
legend ("Data", ‘Linear Interpotation® ,1)
text (2000, .50, 'm=c dta*zho/2")
text (2000, .45, cat (2, 'C_d=',numgatr (Cd) ))
reat (2, 'r™25" ynumastr (2)))
1); "color", ‘white’)
Drag vs. Velocity Squared
+ Data
Linear Interpolation
+
A
boo eto 000 a0 Tao 1600 1800 m0 2200 Dan] aN
Velocity Squared (m/s?)
file//N:/Astrotfhtml/EAZ04_Draglab.htmil4/29/2010 [Link]}Bobby Nordlund
Taylor Newman
Captain O'Reilly
EA201-5001
21 April 2010
Rocket Thrust Lab Data Reduction
a 1804 kg/m?
b. Thrust data taken every 0.01s for the published duration of burn. [see MATLAB script}
‘c._ Integration done in MATLAB. [see MATLAB script)
Estes B6 Results:
‘Average total impulse: 4.3665 Ns
Average specific impulse: 71.3318 s
‘Average thrust: 5.4582 N
‘Average maximum thrust: 10.8837 N
Average standard deviation: 0.5635 N
Estes 06 Tet Pi
Te)
Estes 86 Error Analy:
“Published Value Measured Value |___% Error
‘Maximum Thrust (N) 12.10 10.88 7-10.05
Average Thrust (N) 6.25 5.46
Impulse (Ns) 5.00 437Estes AB Results:
Published Value Measured Value
‘* Average total impulse: 2.1898 Ns
‘Average specific impulse: 35.7734 s
+ Average thrust: 4.3797 N
'* Average maximum thrust: 12.0857 N
‘+ Average standard deviation: 0.72021 N
aoa 0
Tee)
Estes AB Error Analysis.
‘Maximum Thrust (N) 11.80
Average Thrust (N) 5.00
Impulse (Ns) 2.50
3 Error
2.42
“12.41
2.41
Conclusion: With motors in the A and B range, even the smallest standard deviation will result in
significant variability in motor performance. Adding margin between the performance requirements and
predicted performance is the best way to mitigate the demonstrated effects of motor inaccuracy. y “sg
Nott
values were used instead.
ropellant mass comparison i
Pee rele
impossible due to unmeasured ejection charge mass. PublishedEA204 Thrust Lab
1of3
+ Prcliminary Cteulatons
+ Estes A Data Reduction
Nordlund and Newman 21 March 2010
‘This script seeks to aggregate data fom test cell experiments and publish averaged results
‘This script will also display errr analysis results to compare published and measured values,
format short, clear ally ele
‘Thrust Data
‘Note: Worthless data in 100106-4a, 2001a8-3, 2001a8-3b and data from S001b6-4a,
(C465:C545) appears to be from a different size engine, Estes B6
Aperdsread(*chrusedaca’, “2001b6—4a", 1622510308")
{2yexdsread(*thrustdata’ !001b6~6a", *C6BSiC765") 7
1) 3)eelaread(*thrustdata’, *3001b6-€b', "C318:6395)
‘A)sxlsread(*thrustdata’, "5001b6~€a",°C3532C633") 7
‘Syexdsread(*chruseaaea’, "6001b6 60308854);
6 {:, )nalaread("ehrustdata', "6001b6—48","C463s0543") 5
Estes Re
fr 1)=xLszead (*ehrustdata
‘2o01a8~3a', 1030820355")
fad‘ ehruatdata',*3001a8-34"s"e260:0310"97
yad(*thrustdata', *S001a8-34", "€550:0600") +
fad" thrustdata’,*5001a8-38',*C420:€520")
yead|"thraatdata’, €004a8-38", *CS10;0560"93
‘Dyeadsread("thrastdata’,*6001a8~3b", *C475:525°) 7
Preliminary Calculations
Pamosont=29.
ambient?
fambient~536-87 aR
‘Tanbient=T anbiont*200/S197 4K
177437 kgK)
Fhow (P_anbient) /(Rair*T ambient); thg/n°3
Gtsplcae (2, "Air Seaeity:*youmbatx (eho) k9/0°2"))
sat
Estes B6 Data Reduction
Reference: 5.0 Ns impulse, 8 s bum time, 6.24 g propellant
dtepl86 weoute:)
rape (F_B6,1)/100; ans
0 total impulse
Average total inpulse:"ymum2ats(1_B6)," Ns"))
46/(.00624"9.81); saverage apecttic inp
*sgunastr (Eep_B6)," ©*))
thrust: *;mumaste(T
(0,2),2); "tae
Slopleaeray average macinia thrusts fomumdeee(@ BE max)" MD)
TBE stdengan(eed(? B6,0,2)) 1
Aispieat (2s Average standard deviation: *,mumaste(3_B6_sta)," N"))
Areay
Propellant mass comparison impossible due to unmeasured ejection
Error=(‘category’, "Published Value", ‘Measured Value’, "¥ Exror')7
[Link] hil
4/29/2010 13:12EA204 Thrust Lab
20f3
Beror (2s
Error (2!
ADT max. H's °T ave. (M's Iapulse (Hs) "2
2)=(12.176-25/5.0)7
Error (2:4,3)=(7_B6 maxi?_B6 average; 1 86);
pereent=100*((1F_B6 maxi _BG_average/I_B6]~(12.1/6.25;5.0}) «/{12-1;6.25/5.01);
Error (2:4,4)={percent (1) ;percant (2) spezeant (3) 2
atsp('a6 trror analysis")
tepterzer)
Wthrost Plot
figured)
old on
plot (0: .01:.8,nean(7_B6,2),"-k*,0:-01:-8,medtan(1_B6,2),":4")
Yogend\ oan thruct';"moaien erst")
plot (0!.019.8,7.B6,"<")
Eitle (‘Estes BE Thrust Profile"), xlabel ("Time (s)"),ylabel (Thrust (4) *)
set (figured), ‘color", “wnite')
Average total impulse: 4.3665 Ns
Average specific inpuise! 71.3318 #
Avorage thrust: 5.4562 N
Average maximin thrast: 10.8637 8
eaory” ‘Published Value’ ‘Measured Value' "8 Err
trae. wt 2.1000) { 10.8837) {-10.0522)
saves asf 612800) | Si4se2] (71216698),
Meputae (We)! 3s. 3665) (12/6604),
Estes B& Thst Profle
001 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
Tie (9)
Estes AS Data Reduction
Reference: 2.5 Ns impulse, .5 s bum time, 3.12 g propellant
tap (cas Resuieas')
TAbserape(f AU, 1)/100) ms
TAtenean(Z_AB,2); tAverage total impulse
Gispreat (2,7 Average total inpsleet-mum2ate(Z_A8),* Ne")
Tap ABsI_AG/(.00624"9.81); bAverage specific. tnpal
aisplcatt2, "Average specific impulses." numdetx (Zap_A@)," ©")
|_A8/.33 Sinpulse cividea oy burn tine
‘Avezaye thrust: ";nuadate(T AG average), N'))
TAB saxenoan (max(T AG, (]/1),2))"ehvorage Aaximum thrust
pleat (2, Average masini thrust: senumaste(2.A® max)" N*))
TMM staemean(sta(? A8,0,2))7
dispfeat 2," Average’ standard deviation: ‘,nua2ete(RAG_std)," N*))
error Array
§ Note: propelant mass comparison impossible due to unneasured ejection
§ charge’ mass
file:/N:/Astro\hrnV/EA204_ThrustLab bul
4/29/2010 13:12EA204 Thrust Lab [Link] Thrust ab bil
30f3
Error={"Catogory', ‘Published Value', ‘Measured Valve's "8 Exxox")
Error (2:4,2)=(°T tas fo. iw)" "Impulse (is);
Error (2:4,2)=(11. |
Error (2:4, 3)=(1 AB maxyt AB avorage/T_A®);
percent~100*(((7_A8_nax/7_A8_average;I_A0}~ (12.
Ercor (2:4, 4)={pexcent (1) :perGent (2) spezeent (3)
GispU’Ab Error Analyese")
isp (Error)
throat, Plot
figure (2)
hold on
lot (0: 01; .5,mean(t_A8,2),'-X',0:.01:.5,median(T_)
Tegend(?mean thrust"; median thrust")
LOE (0: 015.8) T.A8,".")
Set (figure 2), "Color", white")
title ("estes AS Thrust Profiie'),zlabel (Tine (2)),ylabel(' Thrust (M)")
5.052.519 ./112.85.0;2.8)) 5
29,
Average total impulse: 2.1898 ms
Average thrust: 4.3797
Average maximum thrust: 12.0857 6
Average standard deviation: 0.72021 8
KCategory’ “Published Value’ “Measured Value * Error"
Tmax. iW)" 11-8000) 12.0857) (3.4216)
rave. mM)" 31 43797) [-12/4060)
Mmpule imey* 2.8000) 251680) {-12 4060),
Estes Ab Tavs Profle
“
—Wean trot
2 Median thrust
10
8
€
% 6
4
“9 G05 OT 018 02 0m 03 om 04 0% OS
Time (8)
4/29/2010 13:12