● purpose enhances case analysis and, ultimately, success in
law school.
●
● Reread cases. Cohesion: merging of relevant facts, issue,
rule, and rationale, achieve intra-textual connections, finding
underlying threads. Hypotheticals: e.g. alternative outcomes
if the facts had been different.
● Voice your own response or feelings: do you approve or
disapprove the opinion?
● Evaluate the quality of judgements. Cases are not cut-and-
dried. It is the judge rather than the law who should be
responsible.
● The novices' mistakes: contextually defining words, adding
incorrect information, and attempting to assign names to the
plaintiff and the defendant.
●
● Constantly stop and analyze, instead of summarize or
paraphrase.
● Link text to larger context while reading.
● Take an adventure and discover what is implicit in the text.
● Find literary style, jurisprudential or interpretive posture,
legal and historical context, omissions of fact or lapses in
logic.
● Reading facts-holing-reasoning to exact information and then
writing-paraphrasing them is wrong.
● Judicial adjudication is power, coercion, even violence, not
merely interpretation. Readers