Rian Vincent A.
Nebab
Legal Research Midterm Exam
Topic:
“Doctrine of the free exercise and non-establishment clauses relating to religion
in the Constitution”
Bibliography
Primary Sources:
The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines:
Article II, Sec. 26;
Article III, Sec 5;
Article VI, Sec 29, par. 2;
Article IX- C, Sec 2, par. 5.
Treaty:
“International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, (1966)
https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/International%20Covenant%20on%20Civil%20and
%20Political%20Rights.pdf (Retrieved: November 1, 2018).
Decided Case(s):
On Non-establishment clause:
Everson v. Board of Education, 30 U.S 1
Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S 421
Adong v. Cheong Seng Gee, 43 Phil 43
Islamic Da’wah Council of the Philippines v. Office of the
Executive Secretary G.R. No. 153888
Gonzales v. Archbishop of Manila, 51 Phil 420
Fonacier v. Court of Appeals, 96 Phil 417
Austria v. Central Philippine Union Mission Corporation of the
Seventh Day Adventists, G.R No. 124382
Taruc v. Bishop Porfirio, G.R No. 144801
On Free Exercise Clause:
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu, 219 SCRA 256
Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers Union, 59 SCRA 54
American Bible Society v. City of Manila, 101 Phil 386
German v. Barangan, 135 SCRA 514
Soriano v. Laguardia, G.R No. 164765
Estrada v. Escritor, A.M No. P-02- 1651
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602
Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 205728
Centeno v. Villalon, 236 SCRA 197
Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819
Secondary Sources:
Book(s):
Nachura, Antonio Eduardo. An Outline Reviewer in Political Law, (2015).
Cruz, Isagani A. & Cruz, Carlo L. Philippine Political Law, (2014).
Journal(s):
“Religious Freedom in Focus”, The United States Department of Justice, Vol. 76,
(September 2018) https://www.justice.gov/crt/religious-freedom-focus-
volume-76-september2018#florida (Retrieved: November 1, 2018).
Web-page sources:
https://www.lawphil.net/
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
https://supreme.justia.com/
Relevancy of the Materials:
The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines provides us several provisions as a
guide in determining and knowing the limitations of religious freedom which
embodies the Doctrine of “free exercise” an d “non-establishment” clauses.
Basing the research on the decided cases of the Supreme Court gives us the idea
in applying or construing the statute provided for or in cognizance of the
provisions enacted and promulgated by the Legislature. It enlightens the mind
of the researcher to fully understand the topic.
Secondary sources are of great place to begin a research. Secondary sources
often explain legal principles more thoroughly than a single case or statute, so
using them can help the researcher to save time. The books inquired also help
the researcher to avoid unnecessary research, since it is a broader explanation of
the topic which is discussed and expounded by the author of the book regarded
as one of the researcher’s references. The web-page sources also provides a more
elaborated discussion on the topic wherein the researcher wants to reach-out to
the external world where laws are being imposed.