0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views6 pages

Flood Level and Discharge Calculations

The document provides hydrological information and calculations for a bridge located at chainage km 142+491, including highest flood level, lowest bed level, rugosity coefficient, cross-sectional area, wetted perimeter, hydraulic mean depth, bed slope, velocity, and discharge at three locations - upstream, at the bridge site, and downstream. Manning's formula was used to calculate values at each location.

Uploaded by

Arun Chauhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
146 views6 pages

Flood Level and Discharge Calculations

The document provides hydrological information and calculations for a bridge located at chainage km 142+491, including highest flood level, lowest bed level, rugosity coefficient, cross-sectional area, wetted perimeter, hydraulic mean depth, bed slope, velocity, and discharge at three locations - upstream, at the bridge site, and downstream. Manning's formula was used to calculate values at each location.

Uploaded by

Arun Chauhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

OD STATE, LOT-3

Bridge at Chainage km. : 142+491 (MNBR)


AT UP STREAM

Highest Flood Level (HFL) = 638.280 m


Lowest Bed Level (LBL) = 634.935 m
Rugosity Co-efficient (N) = 0.040

Using Manning's Formula


Relative Wetted
Offset
Distance NSL(m) Distance (m) Area(A) (m²) Perimetre (P)
(m)
(m) (m)
‐47.2426
47 2426 639.618
639 618 2.6623
2 6623 638.280
638 280 638.280
638 280
‐44.5803 639.211 5.7875 638.280 638.280
‐38.7928 638.936 2.6943 638.280 638.280
‐36.0985 641.155 7.9473 638.280 638.280
‐28.1512 640.933 3.6856 638.280 638.280
‐24.4656 639.146 4.0145 638.280 638.280
‐20.4511 639.587 6.5055 0.00 638.280 638.280
‐13.9456
13 9456 636 86
636.86 13 9456
13.9456 1 42
1.42 4 62
4.62 6 66
6.66 638 280
638.280 638 280
638.280
0 634.935 7.5901 3.35 33.23 14.08 638.280 638.280
7.5901 636.774 10.1699 1.51 18.41 7.81 638.280 638.280
17.76 640.327 3.7226 0.00 7.66 10.28 638.280 638.280
21.4826 640.932 8.6882 638.280
30.1708 642.459 638.280
Sum 63.91 38.83

Hydraulic Mean Depth (R) = A/P = 1.65


Bed Slope = S = 0.00570
Velocity = V = 2.64 m/s
Discharge (Q) = AV = 168.45 Cumec

C
Cross S
Section
ti 643
HFL:638.652

640

637

634
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
OD STATE, LOT-3
Bridge at Chainage km. : 142+491 (MNBR)
AT BRIDGE SITE

Highest
g Flood Level = 638.170 m
Lowest Bed Level = 634.094 m
Highest Ground Level = 642.312 m
Rugosity Co-efficient (N) = 0.040

Using Manning's Formula

Wetted
Relative Distance Offset Area(A) Perimetre
NSL (m)
Distance (m) (m) (m) (m²) (P)
(m)
‐108.9122 642.462 7.771
‐101.1411 641.377 12.219
‐88.9217 640.597 42.669
‐46.2527 639.168 8.362
‐37.8908 639.36 1.141
36.7495
‐36.7495 639.362 4.673
‐32.0765 638.845 8.138 0.00
‐23.9382 637.152 10.718 1.02 4.14 8.20
‐13.22 636.219 3.410 1.95 15.91 10.76
‐9.81 636.624 2.264 1.55 5.96 3.43
‐7.5456 635.527 0.159 2.64 4.74 2.52
‐7.3865 635.772 2.241 2.40 0.40 0.29
‐5.1452 634.779 5.145 3.39 6.49 2.45
0 634 094
634.094 3 222
3.222 4 08
4.08 19 21
19.21 5 19
5.19
3.2219 635.593 1.932 2.58 10.72 3.55
5.1542 635.545 7.978 2.63 5.03 1.93
13.132 635.867 5.728 2.30 19.66 7.98
18.8597 636.794 6.305 1.38 10.54 5.80
25.1644 638.639 26.752 0.00 4.34 6.45
51.9162 641.7

Sum 107.13 58.57

Hydraulic Mean Depth (R) = A/P = = 1.83


Bed Slope = S = 0.00570
Velocity = V = 2.83 m/s
Discharge (Q) = AV = 303.03 Cumec

Cross Section 643

HFL:638.170 641

639

637

635

633
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
OD STATE, LOT-3
Bridge at Chainage km. : 142+491 (MNBR)
AT DOWNSTREAM

Highest Flood Level = 638.020 m


Lowest Bed Level = 632.954 m
Rugosity Co-efficient = 0.040

Using Manning's Formula

Wetted
Relative NSL Distance Offset Area(A) Perimetre
Distance (m) (m) (m) (m) (m²) (P)
(m)
‐72.5993 639.284 13.1127
‐59.4866 639.895 10.4073
‐49.0793 639.561 28.9495 0.00
‐20.1298 635.632 2.4714 2.39 34.57 29.05
‐17.6584 635.389 6.4179 2.63 6.20 2.48
‐11.2405 634.388 3.9894 3.63 20.10 6.50
‐7.2511 633.892 7.2511 4.13 15.48 4.02
0 632.954 2.4986 5.07 33.33 7.31
2.4986 634.765 4.0745 3.26 10.40 3.09
6.5731 635.762 2.23 2.26 11.23 4.19
8.8031 636.85 9.7163 1.17 3.82 2.48
18.5194 636.982 16.2008 1.04 10.73 9.72
34.7202 637.684 10.9025 0.34 11.13 16.22
45.6227 640.182 0.00 1.83 10.91
Sum 156.98 85.05

Hydraulic Mean Depth (R) = A/P = 1.85


Bed Slope = S = 0.00570
Velocity = V = 2.85 m/s
Discharge (Q) = = AV = 446.74 Cumec

Cross Section
640

638

636

634

632

630
-75 -65 -55 -45 -35 -25 -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45
CALCULATION OF DESIGN DISCHARGE
Chainage at km. : 142+491 (MNBR)

Highest Flood Level (HFL) = 638.170 m


Lowest Bed Level (LBL) = 634.094 m

D I S C H A R G E C A L C U LA T I O N S

(A) USING DICKEN'S FORMULA :


(Referring Clause 4.1, IRC : SP 13 - 2004)
Where, Q = Peak runoff in cumec
M = Catchment area in sq. km. = 21.734
C = 11 - 14 where the annual rainfall is 60 to 120 cm.
= 14 - 19 where the annual rainfall is more than 120 cm.
The average rainfall of last 10 years in Nabarangpur district is 1400 mm
So, on an average considering C = 15

3/4
Q= CM = 15 x 10.066 = 150.99 Cumec

(B) USING RATIONAL FORMULA FOR PEAK RUNOFF FROM CATCHMENT:


(Referring Clause 4.13, IRC : SP 13 - 2004)
Where, Q = Discharge in cumec
P = Co - efficient of surface run-off for the catchment characteristics from Table 4.1
= Factor obtained from Fig. 4.2, IRC: SP: 13-2004
A = Catchment area in hectares
L = Distance from critical point to the bridge site in km.
H = Fall in level from the critical point to the bridge site in m.
tc = Concentration time in hours = (0.87 x L3/H)0.385
Io = Severest one hour rainfall in cm

P = 0.8
f = 0.950
A = 2173 Hectare
L = 6.887 km
H = 40.000 m
tc = 2.170 hr
Io = 56 mm

Q = 0.028 P ƒ A Io (2/tc + 1) = 163.432 Cumec

(C) USING MANNING'S FORMULA

Discharge(Q) = 303.03 Cumecs

DESIGN DISCHARGE (As per clause no. 6.2.1, IRC SP 13 2004) = 245.15 Cumec
SCOUR CALCULATION BY USING LACEY'S EQUATION
Chainage km. : 142+491 (MNBR)

Existing linear water way = NA m


Proposed Bridge span = 2 x 25 m
50 m
Effective linear waterway = 47.6 m
Highest ground level = 642.312 m
Highest Flood Level at the bridge site = 638.170 m
Lowest bed level at the bridge site = 634.094 m
Assuming a clear span = 25 m
Considering the number of spans at the bridge site = 2 No.
Length of Bridge Proposed = 50 m

Designed length of proposed bridge 50 m


Designed discharge as per IRC:78-2014 245.15 Cumec
Design Discharge (Q) 245.15 Cumec
Discharge per meter width (Db) 4.90 Cumec
Silt Factor (Ksf) 2.09
Mean Depth of Scour ( 1.34 (Db2/Ksf) 1/3 = 3.02 m

FOR ABUTMENT
Maximum Depth of Scour for Abutment = 1.27 x dsm = 3.838 m
Grip length = 1.279 m
Maximum Scour Level for Abutment = 634.332 m

FOR PIER
Maximum Depth of Scour for Pier = 2.0 x dsm 6.045 m
Grip length = 2.015 m
Maximum Scour Level for Pier = = 632.125 m

DESIGN FORMATION LEVEL

As per clause 106.8.2, IRC : 5 - 2015,


The minimum vertical clearance = 0.9 m
Height of bearing above the design highest flood level = 0.2 m
Pedestal height = 0.3 m
Bottom of Superstructure = 639.570 m
Depth of Superstructure = 2.000 m
Depth of wearing coat = 0.065 m
Hence, the depth of superstructure including the wearing coat = 2.065 m
Providing 25 m psc girdebridge without footpath = 2.065
Bridge Formation Level (FRL) = 641.635 m

Design Discharge (Q) = 245.15 cumec


1/2
Regime surface width of the stream (W) = 4.8 x Q = 75.155 m
Regime depth (D) = 0.473 x Q1/3 / Ksf1/3 = 2.390 m
DETERMINATION OF AFFLUX

If the waterway is restricted as per Clause 106.5.2 of IRC:5-2015, it will cause afflux at the
bridge site and the designed HFL will raised accordingly.Afflux shall be calculated by using
any suitable method based on conservation of energy or momentum. In absence of any
rigorous method, afflux may be calculated using Molesworth formula as below:
H = ((V2/17.88)+ 0.015) x ((A/a)2-1))
where, H = afflux in m
V =
average velocity of the water in the river prior to construction (m/sec)

A = unobstructed sectional area of the river at the proposed site (sq. m)


a = constricted area of the river at the proposed site (sq. m)
H = 0.098 m
V = 2.83 m/sec
A = 107.13 sq. m
a = 97.35 sq. m
HFL after afflux = 638.268 m

You might also like