0% found this document useful (0 votes)
177 views3 pages

"Hay Fever Play Review: Humor and Deceit"

The play Hay Fever was set in the 1920s inside the Bliss family home. The actors portrayed their dramatic characters in an exaggerated and comedic manner. Taylor Rascher stood out as the perfect fit for his over-the-top character Simon Bliss. The director kept the production feeling authentic to the 1920s through costumes, mannerisms, and long pauses in awkward dialogue. The overall artistic intent was to entertain, which it achieved through the natural interactions and comedic moments between the characters.

Uploaded by

den
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
177 views3 pages

"Hay Fever Play Review: Humor and Deceit"

The play Hay Fever was set in the 1920s inside the Bliss family home. The actors portrayed their dramatic characters in an exaggerated and comedic manner. Taylor Rascher stood out as the perfect fit for his over-the-top character Simon Bliss. The director kept the production feeling authentic to the 1920s through costumes, mannerisms, and long pauses in awkward dialogue. The overall artistic intent was to entertain, which it achieved through the natural interactions and comedic moments between the characters.

Uploaded by

den
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Hay Fever was a comical play with a strong message.

The actors throughout this play

steadily used others to gain their own attention. The message this play left behind after many laughs

was do not use others, plain and simple.

The space was a well-constructed thrust stage however, the stage was not raised off the ground and

the seats appeared to be mobile which lead to the belief that this is an Environmental Theater. As for

the layout of the stage, there was a couch and a table in center stage for the first two acts, a door to

the unseen outside front of the house upstage right, there were two large double doors upstage

center leading to the backyard garden, and a raised floor upstage left containing a piano, a

bookcase and a door leading to the home library. Stage left there was a half spiral staircase that

lead up to the second floor which had a painting and lights that extended across to stage right. The

second floor also contained the bedrooms for the house but the doors were not in sight. The detail

was greater than expected: the hardwood floor throughout the first floor seemed to be genuine, the

actual bookcase filled with real books not stage books, and the extremely large double doors with

translucent glass and floral designs lead to the Garden, which featured an array of plants behind the

doors. The entire space was well lit for the duration of the play; the stage took place inside the Bliss’

home so the bright lighting added a confortable feel to the inside of the house. The theatre was

nearly sold out; it was hard to spot an empty seat, including the balcony and lower level seating. The

crowd contained nearly an even amount of student audience members and senior citizens; there

was few in the audience that appeared middle aged.

The play was well cast, the entire Bliss family did a great job showing how overly dramatic and

deceitful the family had become. Each actor portrayed their character accurately; there were no

standouts that didn’t match the character. Each visitor in the first act seemed to be feasible as far as

the possibility of a relationship was concerned. All of the family members acted genuine. There was

one actor who stood out as a perfect fit for his character. Taylor Rascher played Simon Bliss and

played him perfectly. Rascher’s character Simon was a young man who was dramatic and romantic

so much so it was almost to the point of ridiculousness. Rascher stole the show in the first act when

he was romancing with Michelle Luz, who plays Myra Arundel. Rascher was displaying his love for

Michelle Luz (Myra) in the most dramatic of fashions; he was playing the Bliss’ game of pretending

to be in complete love with someone and then a moment later change his mind. Rascher was

proclaiming his love with elegant speeches and coddling up next to her and eventually kissing her.

Rascher made this scene particularly hilarious because he was completely over the top in typical

Bliss fashion. Of course, all of this was for naught because Luz ended up kissing Joe Hubbard’s

character David Bliss in act two and also Rascher proclaimed his engagement to Caitlin

Stagemoller’s character, Jackie Coryton. Rascher made his voice more shrill and audible to appear
to be more dramatic and create more attention for himself. In the same way, Rascher used grander

gestures with his arms (flailing, waving, etc.) to cause a more dramatic effect.

The play was well interpreted by all whom were involved. Steven Wrentmore, the Director, kept the

1920’s feel by dressing in all 1920’s costumes and everyone spoke as if they were living at the time.

Michelle Bisbee, the scene designer, made the inside of the home appear 1920’s because

everything was grand. The Bliss’ home was grand with the spiral staircase, the very large backdoors,

and the eloquent piano. The actors’ mannerisms seemed like they were portraying a silent film. In

older movies, actors seemed very dramatic and had flamboyant actions to prove so; the actors

in Hay Fever shared the same feel for the dramatics. As far as Stephen Wrentmore’s directing goes,

he did an excellent job. The scene when Chris Karl (Richard) and Caitlin Stegemoller (Jackie) enter

and are left alone to make small talk with each other is the best pertaining to directing. The two

actors used the entire stage in this scene and were very awkward with one another. This was

Wrentmore’s doing because you could tell he had a vision for this scene in particular because it

seemed very crisp and well rehearsed. The actors played it perfect with the excessively long pauses

in their awkward small talk that the crowd was laughing through the entire scene. It appeared that

Wrentmore instructed the actors, to keep their pauses longer than natural to heighten the awkward

tension in the scene, which made it brilliant.

The blocking throughout the play worked with the floor plan very well. All of the blocking worked

seamlessly; the actors were never out of sight or in awkward positioning (ex. turned around, talking

to someone behind them while face forward, etc.) even during the second act in the first scene while

all eight actors were on set. One part of the set that stood out was the staircase, it is obviously very

large, but the way Owen Virgin followed Megan Davis up the stairs was seamless. They both walked

up the stairs with footsteps I unison, and Owen Virgin was so focused on every detail of Davis, it

almost screamed out how much he was infatuated with her.

The artistic intent of this production was to entertain, and it fulfilled that intent completely. The entire

audience was laughing during most of the production, I was even laughing out loud, which doesn’t

happen very often. Every interaction between the characters was comical at one point during the

production. An example of this playing out would be in the second act when Rascher busts through

the door and proclaims his engagement. The only purpose of this is to entertain and entertain it did.

The actors seemed natural moving along with their blocking and engaging with each other on stage.

There was no point at which it was confusing why someone moved here or there, every movement

made sense.

The overall mood that was portrayed by the combination of lighting, sound, set, and costumes was

very light and cheerful; at no point did the mood drop to something darker or saddening. This is
common with many comedies because it becomes hard to laugh if the overall mood is down and

dreary. The theatre space was very personal. First of all, it takes place in someone’s home so it is

immediately personal. Also, the stage was built into the crowd just about so the audience felt like

they were living the action out as it unfolded. The scenic design showed the audience without a

doubt it was the 1920’s, with the barometer on the wall, the staircase, the piano, and the lights

upstairs. However, there was little evidence to show what location the play took place.

All of the costumes were well designed for the appropriate characters. Adam Espinoza did a fine job

of showing how these people were all upper class with nice dresses and suits and tuxes, even when

they were home alone with only each other as company. Megan Davis’ costumes represented her

personality very well by drawing all attention to her with bright colors and silk-like texture. As far as

the lighting goes, there were no changes to the lighting during the play, except for at the end of each

act. The lighting emphasized a bright and cheerful mood throughout the play.

This production was definitely representational because it doesn’t break the fourth wall into the

audience. The actors never had any asides or soliloquies that were directed toward audience. The

set and lighting were representational due to the realistic feel throughout the house, everything was

relatable to the average person. The Bliss’ home looked like an ordinary home from the 1920’s.

The overall message seemed to be: do not mislead people or play games with their emotions, or

they will leave you. This was most clear during act three when Luz, Karl, Stegemoller, and Virgin

were all discussing how uncomfortable they all had felt the day before in the house and decided to

leave as soon as possible. This was due to the way the Bliss’ had romantic engagements just to get

attention for themselves and did not care about the feelings of the people they were hurting.

You might also like