Power Voltage Transformers: A New Solution For Power Systems in The Region
Power Voltage Transformers: A New Solution For Power Systems in The Region
net/publication/293132773
Power Voltage Transformers: A new solution for power systems in the region
CITATIONS READS
0 487
3 authors:
Boris Bojanic
Koncar-Instrument transformers Ltd, Croatia, Zagreb
10 PUBLICATIONS 20 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Boris Bojanic on 22 January 2019.
Abstract— Power Voltage Transformers are units which are generally unobtrusive outline when compared to other vital
primarily used for auxiliary supply of substations. The main components in a substation, especially power transformers.
objective of this paper is to demonstrate that they can be used The desire of every customer is to spend as little resources as
for other purposes as well, namely for rural electrification by possible on maintenance, monitoring, diagnostics and fault
serving as the main transformer in a compact substation. To prevention of these transformers. This is why the inherent
support such unconventional grid topology, transformer in- reliability of such units is a key issue.
service reliability has to be unconditionally ensured and
increased. The means of doing so by utilizing the open-core Low cost, high performance reliability and practically non-
transformer concept are emphasized in this paper. By raising existent maintenance requirements for the entire course of
awareness that alternative uses for these transformers exist, a their lifetime are the main reasons why these units gained
positive impact on the global availability of electrical energy in popularity as an auxiliary source of low-voltage power for
regions with low electrification rates can surely be enticed. substations. This way, such units supply power to secondary
systems, SCADA, lighting fixtures and other small consumers
Index Terms— In-service reliability, Internal Fault prevention, within a substation, thus replacing a distributive transformer,
Open-core Power Voltage Transformers, Rural Electrification, tertiary winding of a power transformer or a diesel generator
Station Service [5]. This application granted them the moniker Station Service
Voltage Transformers, upheld by some manufacturers, which
I. INTRODUCTION is already finding its way into procedures for future
Power Voltage Transformers (henceforth PVTs) are standardization [6].
single-phase units used for direct transformation of power The main driving force for the application of such
from high, transmission level voltage (between 72.5 and 550 transformers seem to be utilities in countries with sparsely
kV) to low voltage (under 1 kV). Via that direct energy populated territories and a distribution grid which is not
transfer, the distribution grid is bypassed entirely. This extended enough to cover these territories. Great examples of
eliminates the necessity for the intermediate transformation of such countries are Australia, Canada and USA. However, due
power, consequently removing the related costs of primary to the liberalization of the electricity market as a whole, many
and secondary equipment as well as the costs of the transmission system operators prefer to invest in their own
corresponding infrastructure. infrastructure, rather than to rely on the distribution grid. This
The single identifying property of these transformers is trend is becoming more relevant in European countries such as
that they are built under the technological principles of Estonia, Slovenia and others.
instrument transformers rather than their power or distributive The findings in this paper are based on open-core PVTs
transformer counterparts [1]. This postulate entails that they only. Open core PVTs are a novel product, however the basic
are also still designed according to relevant standards for concept of their operation is thoroughly explained in papers
instrument transformers, ensuring that these transformers [1] and [5] and will be kept to a minimum in this paper.
retain the same insulation requirements, very low permissible
partial discharge levels and a possibility of constant operation Conceptually, this paper is divided in two parts. The main
at an increased voltage [2] - [4]. idea of the first part is to raise awareness that other possible
applications of PVTs exist, namely as standalone transformers
With that in mind, the rated power of such units is in lightweight substations. Furthermore, the goal is to provide
relatively low, compared to power transformers, spanning the context for such applications. The second part of the paper
from 10 to 333 kVA. puts the emphasis on operation reliability and internal fault
The general aim is to keep any PVT unit as close as prevention, as these are the necessary foundations that make
possible to inductive voltage transformers and rely as much as the applications described in the first part of the paper viable.
possible on their maintenance free operation principle and a
=NK
CUBICLE CUBICLE
+NK1 =NK
+NK1
SURGE SURGE
ARRESTER ARRESTER
Figure 1: Power Voltage Transformer based substation – Traditional layout (left), Compact layout (right)
IV. IMPACT OF THE OPEN-CORE CONCEPT ON OPERATION However, the most important feature which is inherent to
RELIABILITY AND INTERNAL FAULT PREVENTION the open-core concept is the internal fault prevention [5].
PRIMARY TERMINAL According to [13], one of the most likely places for the
BELLOWS COVER inception of an internal fault is the primary winding of the
VOLUME PVT. The fault can originate between two adjacent turns,
COMPENSATING layers or sections.
BELLOWS
CORE
If the winding is composed of one part only, any internal
CAPACITIVELY
GRADED MAIN LIMB fault will most likely lead to a direct line-to-ground short-
INSULATION circuit, with the fault current flowing through the entire
winding. Because the magnitudes of such currents are usually
SECTIONED
PRIMARY
in the kA range, the subsequent release of energy is sudden
WINDING and eruptive, which will most likely cause a sudden pressure
rise within the transformer and a consequent pressure and
SECONDARY
WINDING energy release (i.e. explosion).
OPEN CORE FLUX-DIRECTING On the other hand, if the primary winding is divided into
YOKE several sections, connected in series, any fault within the
section or between two adjacent sections remains confined to
that section alone [5]. The grid voltage is then distributed
CORE CLAMPING
across the other, “healthy” sections, thus limiting the fault
current.
Figure 2: Open-core Power Voltage Transformer cross-section (left). Since the open-core design allows for the sections of the
Open core outline (right)
primary winding to be galvanically connected to the screens in
The open core is essentially a pole in the center of the the main insulation, as shown in Fig 3, the same principle also
transformer, as shown in Fig. 2. The main trait of this type of extends to the faults located within the main insulation [13].
magnetic core is that the main flux is partially closed through
HV
the non-magnetic material, meaning that an air gap is
inherently present in the main magnetic circuit [5]. The main
flux path is dictated by the flux-directing yoke, which forces
the flux path to close in the immediate vicinity of the main
core limb [5].
Two main benefits of the open-core concept, the
ferroresonance immunity and the inrush current decrease are a
direct consequence of the aforementioned air gap [5]. Other
benefits are caused by the fact that the absence of the return
core limbs allows for a different insulation system concept
including a sectioned primary winding. This design solution
ensures a better distribution of overvoltages of any frequency
and a lower overall dielectric stress in the main insulation, Figure 3: Schematical representation of the sectioned primary winding
which makes satisfying the insulation requirements for higher
voltage levels (245 kV and above) much easier [12]. All three The number of primary winding sections for open-core
benefits allow for a more fail-safe operation of open-core PVTs is substantial, and varies between 14 – 50 sections,
PVTs and remove occurrences which can be a potential origin depending on the voltage level and power rating [1].
of either major or minor transformer fault.
These hypotheses were confirmed by the testing of an The current in the short-circuited coil increased up to 30 times.
open-core inductive voltage transformer [5]. For testing In terms of actual values, the maximal value of the primary
purposes, a worst case scenario was simulated by short- current under fault conditions was 1.6 A, while the current in
circuiting an entire coil of the primary winding, as shown in the faulty coil was 16 A. While the latter value is high enough
Fig. 3. The transformer with the faulty coil was placed under to thermally damage the fault location, the former value is not
rated voltage. The current measurements during the test high enough for a sudden overload of the entire winding. The
showed that the rated current was increased approximately results of the calculation correspond very well to the findings
two-fold across the winding and remained in the range of on the actual tested transformer described above.
milliamperes. The current in the faulty coil is naturally higher.
These results show that open core PVTs are essentially
The increased thermal stress gradually overburdened the comparable to capacitive voltage transformers (CVTs), in a
transformer, which led to an increased release of gasses from sense that their insulation also consists of many elements
the transformer oil. This naturally led to a pressure rise inside connected in series, thus making a direct line-to-ground fault
the transformer. When the oil pressure exceeded the design impossible.
value of the intentional weak spot of the transformer (the
bellows cover – shown in Fig. 2, a controlled release of To prove their behavior in case of internal faults, all types
pressure occurred in the stainless steel dilatation bellows, of instrument transformers are usually subject to internal-arc
causing no oil spill, resulting only in the detachment of the withstand test as defined by [2] and [4]. This test essentially
bellows cover, as shown in Fig. 4. simulates a complete breach of the main insulation and
evaluates the ability of the transformer to resist the energy
surge caused by the internal arc.
The applicability of this test to paper-oil insulated
transformers with capacitively graded main insulation is
argued in detail in reference [13], the point being that this type
of failure is extremely improbable at fault locations proposed
by the standards. This is even more valid for all open-core
transformers including PVTs, which, as described above, are
in this regard conceptually similar to capacitive voltage
transformers. CVT standards do recognize this fact, which is
why internal arc testing is excluded from the proposed tests
defined by these standards [14].
While this test has been successfully performed on open
core transformers, it is not a testament to any realistic in-
operation scenario, which is why this paper emphasizes the
internal fault prevention described in this chapter as
Figure 4: Detachment of the transformer bellows cover – Internal fault
test culmination substantially more relevant [15].
After the test, the transformer was inspected and the faulty V. AVOIDING AND MITIGATING FAULT CONSEQUENCES
coil was replaced. The transformer was then subjected to
According to [13] 85 - 95 % of major transformer failures
repeated routine testing according to the IEC norm, which it
are caused by slow processes. The “explosion safety” feature
passed successfully [3]. These results proved that no other
described above adds to that number by reducing the faults
component was affected by the fault in one of the sections.
originating from within the transformer to slow phenomena,
The bellows cover serves as a connecting point towards accompanied by pressure rise. This means that the only
high voltage, meaning that its detachment automatically parameter that needs to be monitored during transformer
disconnects the transformer from the grid, thus interrupting the operation is indeed the pressure. By installing an overpressure
supply to the fault location. This serves as an additional layer switch, a simple and robust monitoring option, in the
of safety provided by design. secondary terminal box, the operator can have valid warning
information well before the culmination of the fault.
To extend the applicability of the described testing to
PVTs, a Finite Element Method based calculation was According to [13], an additional way to ensure a reliable
performed, taking into account the realistic transformer operation during the entire expected lifetime of the
geometry. transformer is by routinely testing partial discharge levels at
power frequency withstand voltage. Partial discharge level has
By short-circuiting one section at a time, the fault current to remain under 10 pC for the 1 minute duration of the test.
flowing through the primary winding Ifp can be obtained, as When the appropriate voltage-time curves are extrapolated, it
well as the fault current flowing through the short-circuited appears that the transformers will be partial discharge free at
section Icp. The results of such a calculation, performed for a the rated voltage during their entire lifetime, meaning a lower
145 kV 50 kVA PVT are shown in table II. rate of insulation ageing and breakdown possibility which
Even in the worst case scenario the primary current under would be caused by the presence of partial discharges. This
fault increased 3 times in comparison to the rated current Irp. suggestion is already adopted by some technical specifications
in Europe and Canada.
TABLE II. FEM CALCULATION RESULTS FOR PRIMARY WINDING AND FAULTY COIL CURRENT INCREASE
One might argue that the principles described above do not mitigation can be made even safer and more environmentally
cover the faults which exceed the transformer insulation friendly.
ratings, or short-circuit withstand capability, such as impulse
overvoltages of high amplitudes, for example. The final thought of the paper is that Open-core Power
Voltage Transformers present a very fail-safe alternative for
The way oil-filled transformers can mitigate the providing the much needed increase in electrification rates in
consequences of such fault is by using synthetic ester as their the developing countries of the world by focusing on a new
insulation medium. Synthetic esters have commonly been used way of power delivery instead of a new way of power
in distributive transformers, but there are no reports of their generation.
application in the instrument transformer market [16].
One of the main benefits of synthetic esters is the lower REFERENCES
flammability, which is secured by higher flash and fire points [1] I. Žiger, D. Krajtner. Z. Ubrekić and M. Brkić, “ Design of the Open-
and a lower calorific value. They are thus classified as K3 fire core Power Voltage Transformers”, International Colloquium
hazard classification according to IEC 61100 standard [17]. Transformer Research and Asset Management, Dubrovnik, Croatia,
May 2012.
The other major benefit is biodegradability. According to [2] IEC 61869-1:2009, Instrument Transformers- Part 1: General
OECD 301 and IEC 61039, synthetic esters are classified as Requirements, International Electrotechnical Commission, Oct. 2007.
readily biodegradable and non-water hazardous. Both of these [3] IEC 61869-3:2009, Instrument Transformers- Part 3: Additional
assets alleviate potential fault damage and consequences. requirements for inductive voltage transformers, International
Electrotechnical Commission, July 2011.
According to references [16] and [17], there are no barriers [4] IEEE C57.13, IEEE Standard requirements for instrument
regarding material compatibility, short-circuit performance, transformers, IEEE Engineering society, July 2008.
and no negative effect on the transformer lifetime. According [5] I. Žiger, B. Bojanić, D. Krajtner, “Open-core Power Voltage
Transformers: Concept, Properties, Application “, IEEE Energycon
to the same literature, performance regarding impulse 2014, Cavtat, Croatia, May 2014
overvoltages and temperature rise has to be evaluated, [6] IEEE PC57.13.8, IEEE Standard requirements for Station Service
especially the latter due to a higher viscosity value of synthetic Voltage Trasnformers, IEEE Engineering society, Unpublished.
esters, which also requires an alteration of the oil [7] International Energy Agency, “World Energy Outlook 2012”, Paris,
impregnation process. France, Nov. 2012
[8] Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, “Rural Electrification
By removing the fire potential of oil-filled units and by Strategy and Plan - Covering the Period 2013-2022”, The Government
equipping them with silicone shed insulators, the impact on of the Republic of Uganda, Sep. 2012.
[9] Safety, Health and Environment Department - KPLC, “Environmental
their surroundings, including both the natural environment and and Social Management Framework for Kenya Last Mile Connectivity
other high voltage equipment, is drastically decreased. Programme”, Kenya Power, Aug. 2014.
[10] International Energy Agency, “World Energy Investment Outlook”,
The conclusions show that, with the application of new Paris, France, June 2014
insulating fluids, enhanced testing procedures and a robust [11] O.R. Calvo, R.G. Ibarra, A. Solano, E. Acosta, “Rural Electrification in
monitoring, paper-oil insulated PVTs can achieve an increased Chihuahua, Mexico at one third of the cost vs a conventional
level of operation safety, while retaining a negligible effect on substation”, World Energy Congress, Montreal, Canada, Sep. 2010
the environment. [12] M. Poljak, “Insulation System of Combined Instrument Transformers “,
Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing,
Zagreb, Croatia, 2006.
VI. CONCLUSION [13] M. Poljak, B. Bojanić, “Method for the Reduction of In-service
This paper strives to show that Power Voltage Instrument Transformer Explosions”, European Transactions on
Transformers can be used for other applications in addition to Electrical Power, vol. 2, pp 927-937, Oct. 2010.
[14] C93.1-1999, American National Standard Requirements for Power-
auxiliary supply. Their applicability for rural electrification is Line Carrier Coupling Capacitors and Coupling Capacitor Voltage
shown through several examples of economically appealing Transformers (CCVT), American National Standards Institute, May
lightweight substation solutions. In order to completely 1999.
simplify the substation design, transformer reliability and fault [15] Inductive voltage transformer type VPU - Internal arc protection class
mitigation has to be taken to the next level. The open-core II, Test Report, KONČAR - High Power Test Laboratory, Zagreb,
Croatia, July 2014.
concept inherently possesses several advantages which [16] Working Group A2.35, “Experiences in Service with New Insulating
without a doubt drastically increase both. Furthermore, by Liquids”, CIGRE, Oct. 2010.
utilizing updated test criteria, a simple and robust monitoring [17] I. Radić, I. Sitar, B. Jakopović, A. Majcen, “Synthetic Esters in Power
scheme and a novel insulating fluid, the risk of fault and Special Transformers”, International Colloquium Transformer
occurrence can be reduced even further, while potential fault Research and Asset Management, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2012.