ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res.

8(06), 1607-1610

Journal Homepage: -www.journalijar.com

Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/11254
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/11254

RESEARCH ARTICLE
TRIPLE TALAQ: JUDICIAL REFORMS IN INDIA

Anam Wasey
Ph.D. Scholar (Law), Jamia Millia Islamia.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Manuscript Info Abstract
……………………. ………………………………………………………………
Manuscript History
Received: 25 April 2020
Final Accepted: 30 May 2020
Published: June 2020
Copy Right, IJAR, 2020,. All rights reserved.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Introduction:-
The word “Divorce” is well-known all around the globe and the concept of dissolution of marriage is found in every
religion and language. Marriage, according to the concept of Islam is an alliance that has the nature of a social
contract and can be put to an end i.e. it can be dissolved when it is unable to serve it purpose or ceases to serve its
purpose. But it should not be mistaken that marriage is merely a contract. It should not be misunderstood that it has
no solemnity and sanctity. Islam has a practical and realistic outlook on all human affairs and as a result of that it has
recognized divorce but only as a necessary evil. Thus, resort to divorce must be taken only in inevitable
circumstances. No one can refuse that at times such circumstances arise that makes it almost impossible for the
couple to pull together and live peacefully and happily in their conjugal home. And in such situations, it is better to
part ways rather than dragging on with the bitter, miserable and weak reality in a partnership that is forced. It is
more conducive for the couple to part ways with good will and grace.

Divorce or Talaq is a concept that is not completed unless the husband pronounces it and it comes to the notice and
knowledge of the wife. When dissolution of marriage is initiated from the side of the husband it is called Talaq.
When the proceedings initiate from the wife‟s side it is known as Khula(redemption) and when it is decided by
mutual consent that the parties want a divorce it is called Mubara’at.

As regards to the procedure of dissolution of marriage in Islam, generally there are two methods that are followed:
1. Firstly, the method prescribed and mentioned by the Holy Book, Qur‟an and Hadith which is known as Talaq-
us-Sunnat.
2. Second process is pronouncement of Talaq three times in one breath or on paper which is known as Talaq-ul-
Biddat.

Former is the one which is in compliance with the law and the latter is the one in violation of law. This method is
called Triple Divorce. This procedure of dissolution, Triple Talaq, was recognized by the Sunni Muslims and has
unfortunately gained prevalence in the entire Muslim society, especially in India.

Holding Triple Talaq i.e. the three pronouncements together as a final irrevocable form of divorce is not so simple.
It is problematic. This method of dissolution of marriage has created many socio-economic issues in the society.
Among all the rules and regulations of the Muslim Personal Law Board which have been criticized and protested
against adversely, the concept Triple Talaq is on the top. It is an extremely sensitive issue that has touched the lives
of Muslims, especially the Muslim wives. The process of Triple Talaq has developed through various stages of

Corresponding Author:-Anam Wasey 1607

history and if we see the recent controversies that are cropping up after every few days show that it is still in the
process of development and that such development has not come to an end. There has always been a good deal of
debate on the matters and laws relating to divorce. The uneasiness of this method has been discussed by various
authors, judges, jurists and other legal experts, such as Asaf Ali Asghar Fyzee, Syed Ameer Ali, Sir
DinshawFardunji Mulla, Faiz Hassan Badruddin Tyabji, Prof. Dr. Tahir Mahmood, Baillie, Fitzergald, Abdul Rahim
and many others. While considering the controversy among Muslim jurists and theologians, over the subject of triple
divorce it may be said that the scholars of both the views have over-emphasized their own arguments and underrated
those of others.

Seeing the social aspect of Triple Talaq it must be borne in mind that the society of Indian Muslims todayis far from
the true Islamic teachings, values and principles. In simple words, we can say, that Islam and Muslims are two
different concepts, far from each other. Somehow it is believed that divorce does not occur on the first
pronouncement of the word and if husband does not retract it within the specified period, it becomes final and
irrevocable.

Many Muslims have very rightly waived off and abolished the effectiveness of triple talaq as an irrevocable form of
divorce. Its rigidity has been put to an end. They have made the law of three divorces altogether amount to one
revocable divorce. However, no such change in the law or reform has taken place in India and if the attempts were
made, all such efforts had to face the allegations in the religious and political rights of the Muslim community.
While some judicial decisions viewed and defined triple talaq as rigid resulting in one irrevocable divorce, some
judges represented a liberal approach towards this matter. The courts are now departing from their old approaches
that were rigid and are inclining towards the views and approaches that are progressive i.e. pronouncement of talaq
three times in one breath amounts to a single talaq which is revocable.

In the year 1993, three Muftis of Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith had given a fatwa according to their maslak or law that if a
Muslim husband pronounces “Talaq TalaqTalaq”, it will not bring divorce into operation as per the Shariatand
subsequently will not affect the rights and obligations of the husband or wife. It shall be subject to legal
consequences such as, refrain from sexual cohabitation, but if the husband resumes cohabitation, talaq will stand
revoked and the couple would be entitled to stay together. This organization of Jamiat Ahl-i-Hadith is an all India,
non-political organization which draws its inspiration from the Holy Book, Qur‟an and Hadith. Some members of
this organization are on the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and some are on the All India Milli Counsel. This
verdict or fatwa stated that at least a month has to pass before the husband pronounces talaq the second time. After
another month only it can be pronounced a third time. After the first and the second pronouncement the husband has
a chance to reverse his decision and revoke talaq.

After this fatwa, the Allahabad High Court in the year 1994 pronounced a similar decision. On April 15, 1994,
Justice H.N. Tilhari of the Lucknow Bench held that the practice of uttering the word „talaq‟ in one go, goes to an
effect of being irrevocable was both unconstitutional and illegal. The Bench held as follows:

“The pronouncement “Talaq TalaqTalaq is no final talaq”. These words show the view of triple talaq published by
the fatwa by the Jamiat Ahl-i-Hadith published on 21st of May, 1993 in JareidaTarjuman. This way shows that both
the social as well as the judicial trend is shifting. This has been proved by referring to an article written by Fafia
Zakarianamed “Islam and Reforms” in which she repeatedly stated that the country‟s old traditions and values which
are prevalent in the society of Muslims, needs reform keeping in view the changing trends in the society which are
within the parameters of faith.”

Prof. Dr. Tahir Mahmood, in his own way pleaded that Muslim law is not a foreign law and is justiciable in a civil
court. The Indian Legal System has recognized Muslim Law as part of the Law of the Land i.e. “Lex Loci” and is
much a part of the law of this country as the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

In the recent years rights of the women have been progressing by advanced interpretations of Muslim Law by the
judiciary. These verdicts are markers that serve to support the rights of Muslim women. Despite such positive and
innovative interventions, Muslim women are still subject to ill-treatment and they suffer as they are not aware of
their rights.

1608
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 8(06), 1607-1610

After the landmark judgment of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano BegumAIR 1985 SC 945, which attracted
controversy in 1985, and subsequently the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, it seemed
that the right to maintenance of Muslim wives has extinguished. This controversy that arose in later cases in lower
courts as well as High Courts was settled in Danial Latifi v. Union of India2001 (7) SCC 740where Supreme Court
upheld the validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The court held that the
Muslim Women‟s Act, 1986 substituted the right to recurrent maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a new right consisting a lump sum provision to be made and paid to the woman soon
after she gets a divorce.

There have also been significant judicial verdicts that dealt with the controversial issue of triple talaq. The judgment
of Shamim Arav. State of Uttar PradeshAIR 2002 SC 3551is a landmark case on this issue which advocated,
promoted, directed and highlighted the method of dissolution of marriage as per the Holy Book, Qur‟an.

Citing the case of Riaz Fatima v. Mohd. Sharif(2007) DMC 26 Del,the High Court discussed in detail the issue of
proving talaq and the requirements essential for its validity. It stated as follows:
1. Reason for divorce must be reasonable as prescribed in the Qur‟an. Thus, the husband has to prove that he is
divorcing his wife for a valid cause.
2. He has to prove that he pronounced the word „talaq‟ thrice in the presence of witnesses or in a letter.
3. There has to a proof that Mahr has been paid and that iddat period is observed
4. The husband must prove that reconciliation/settlement efforts were made prior to the divorce.
These are the requirements that must be proved in order to deem talaq valid.
This leads us to arrive at a conclusion that the right of maintenance of a divorced Muslim woman from her husband
does not come to an end upon divorce and even after iddat if she does not have sufficient means to maintain herself.
She is entitled to such relief till she dies or remarries.

The Islamic policy has never been to confer an absolute authority of talaq upon a husband to be misused by him.
Unfortunately, this power of talaq or divorce has been misunderstood and distorted and the actual guidelines of
Islam for it have been flouted by the society as well as the courts. Thus, the result is that there is no legal control
over this power and right of a Muslim husband which is unfettered by uttering a few words.

The judicial verdicts, later, leaned in favor of subsistence and saving of marital tie and not on divorce and
separation. These pronouncements advocated and aimed to protect and safeguard the sanctity of marriage. But the
main motive was to protect the women who were victims of this weapon of triple talaq in the hands of husbands to
escape their obligation to maintain her.

There can be no doubt that giving three divorces together is a wicked and condemnable act. A number of traditions
and statements agree upon the evil of this method of divorce. But the legal permissibility of divorce with restrictive
safeguards and reservations still stand firm.

The best possible way of pronouncing divorce is the way prescribed in the Holy Book, Qur‟an and once Qur‟an as a
word of God has been given precedence over all other norms or ways, there should be no objections particularly
when that can save women folk from humiliation, mental torture thus making them helpless. And as Nikah is
solemnized by a Qazi, divorce or talaq must also be pronounced in the presence of aQazi. The enactment of Muslim
Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 has made this heinous act illegal and void and also penalizes
the one resorting to it with imprisonment and fine. It also provides the custody of children to the mother. But this
Act has various loopholes and needs amendment.

Islam stands for justice, equity and benevolence and therefore anything which is unjust should not be allowed and
must be done away with.

References:-
1. https://www.academia.edu/4515089/Position_of_Triple_Divorce_under_Muslim_Law
2. Fatwa, published on May 21, 1993, JareidaTarjuman, Delhi, Vol. xiii, No. 21 (A weekly brought out by Jamiat
Ahl-e-Hadith)
3. Frontline, June 2, 2006

1609
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 8(06), 1607-1610

4. Tahir Mahmood &Saif Mahmood, Muslim Law in India and Abroad, Universal Law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd,
Delhi 2012
5. Dr. KauserEdappagath, Divorce and Gender Equity in Muslim Personal Law of India, LexisNexis, Haryana,
2014
6. Furqan Ahmad, Triple Talaq, An Analytical Study with Emphasis on Socio-Legal Aspects, Regency
Publications,New Delhi, 1994.

1610