Supply Chain Simulation Group 6
Summary
Year/Parameter Revenue Gross Profit Votes
1 $158,115,400 $48,572,500 ★
2 $154,181,500 $38,770,300 ★★★
3 $152,793,000 $45,221,700 ★★★★
4 $170,048,200 $51,187,560 ★★★
Year 1
Design Room
Option Decision Rationale
Upgraded Communication No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Exterior No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Stylish Yes Profitable, Low variance of
opinion
Storage Capacity Yes Profitable, Low variance of
opinion
Forecast Room
Model Forecast Rationale
Model A 62k Used Averages as
Consensus is subject to bias
Model B 33k Used Averages as
Consensus is subject to bias
Supply
Supplier Chosen Rationale
Far Far Away Yes Capacity utilization and low
cost
Far Away No
Pretty Close Yes Capacity utilization and low
cost
Very Close No
Production Change
Yes, We took a production change order based on the CELLDEX market research forecast.
Year 2
Design Room
Option Decision Rationale
Extended Battery No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Durability No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Stylish Yes Profitable, Low variance of
opinion
Storage Capacity No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Forecast Room
Model Forecast Rationale
Model A 54k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
approach
Model B 36k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
Approach
Supply
Supplier Chosen Rationale
Far Far Away Yes Capacity utilization & low cost
Far Away No
Pretty Close Yes Capacity utilization and low cost
Very Close No
Production Change
Yes, We took a production change order based on the CELLDEX market research forecast.
Year 3
Design Room
Option Decision Rationale
Extended Battery No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Durability No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Anti-Theft No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
High-Quality Audio Yes Profitable, Low variance of
opinion
Forecast Room
Model Forecast Rationale
Model A 63k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
approach
Model B 24k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
Approach
● Inform
Supply
Supplier Chosen Rationale
Far Far Away Yes Capacity utilization & low cost
Far Away No
Pretty Close Yes Capacity utilization and low cost
Very Close No
Production Change
Yes, We took a production change order based on the CELLDEX market research forecast.
Year 4
Design Room
Option Decision Rationale
Anti-Theft No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Audio Yes Profitable, Low variance of
opinion
Slim No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Camera Quality No Low profitability, High
difference of opinion
Forecast Room
Model Forecast Rationale
Model A 60k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
approach
Model B 26k ● Used Averages as
Consensus is
subject to bias
● Conservative
Approach
Supply
Supplier Chosen Rationale
Far Far Away Yes Capacity utilization & low cost
Far Away No
Pretty Close Yes Capacity utilization and low cost
Very Close No
Production Change
Yes, We took a production change order based on the CELLDEX market research forecast.
