0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views60 pages

The Feasibility of Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) Shells As Alternative Glue

The researchers aimed to produce an alternative glue from peanut shells as a way to reduce waste and create a more affordable option than commercially available glues. Peanut shells were ground into a powder and lignin was extracted using sodium hydroxide solution. The extracted lignin was then mixed with flour to produce a glue-like texture. The alternative glue was tested and compared to commercial glue based on color, odor, and stickiness. The results showed no significant differences between the alternative and commercial glue, supporting the hypothesis that the peanut shell glue is a feasible alternative.

Uploaded by

Cheri Bulahan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views60 pages

The Feasibility of Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) Shells As Alternative Glue

The researchers aimed to produce an alternative glue from peanut shells as a way to reduce waste and create a more affordable option than commercially available glues. Peanut shells were ground into a powder and lignin was extracted using sodium hydroxide solution. The extracted lignin was then mixed with flour to produce a glue-like texture. The alternative glue was tested and compared to commercial glue based on color, odor, and stickiness. The results showed no significant differences between the alternative and commercial glue, supporting the hypothesis that the peanut shell glue is a feasible alternative.

Uploaded by

Cheri Bulahan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Abstract
  • Acknowledgement
  • Chapter I: Introduction
  • Significance of the Study
  • Definition of Terms
  • Flowchart
  • Chapter II: Review of Related Literatures and Studies
  • Chapter III: Methodology
  • Chapter IV: Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
  • Chapter V: Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation
  • Appendices
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Bibliography

The Feasibility of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Shells as Alternative

Glue

In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements in Research III

Submitted to:

Mrs. Darlyn Joy I. Rivera

Submitted by:

Amador, Divine Leslie S.

Arnaiz, Robinson C.

Bradecina, Darylle Anne C.

Bulahan, Cherrie Mae J.

Canlas, Crisza Faye P.

Sibayan, Lea L.

March 2020
Table of Contents

Abstract ............................................................................................... i

Acknowledgement ................................................................................ ii

ChapterI. Introduction........................................................................... 1

Objectives .................................................................................. 2

Hypothesis ................................................................................. 2

Significance of the Study ............................................................... 3

Scope and Limitations ................................................................... 3

Definition of Terms ....................................................................... 4

Flowchart .................................................................................... 5

Chapter II. Review of Related Literatures and Studies ............................... 6

Chapter III. Methodology ..................................................................... 12

Chapter IV.Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data .................. 16

Chapter V. Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendation ......................... 22

Summary .................................................................................. 22

Conclusion................................................................................. 22

Recommendation ....................................................................... 23

Appendices ........................................................................................ 24

Appendix A. Plates ..................................................................... 24

Appendix B. Tables ..................................................................... 33

Appendix C. Anova ..................................................................... 36


Appendix D. Curriculum Vitae ...................................................... 39

Bibliography....................................................................................... 51

List of Tables ..................................................................................... 16

Table 1 ..................................................................................... 16

Table 2 ..................................................................................... 17

Table 3 ..................................................................................... 18

Table 4 ..................................................................................... 19

Table 5 ..................................................................................... 20

Table 6 ..................................................................................... 21

List of Figures .................................................................................... 16

Figure 1 .................................................................................... 16

Figure 2 .................................................................................... 18

Figure 3 .................................................................................... 20

List of Plates ..........................................................................................

Plate No. 1 Peanut Shell .............................................................. 24

Plate No. 2 Sodium hydroxide ...................................................... 24

Plate No. 3 Water ....................................................................... 25

Plate No. 4 Flour ........................................................................ 25

Plate No. 5 Mortar and Pestle ....................................................... 26

Plate No. 6 Microwave................................................................. 26

Plate No. 7 Weighing Scale ......................................................... 27

Plate No. 8 Step 1 ...................................................................... 27


Plate No. 9 Step 2 ...................................................................... 28

Plate No. 10 Step 3 .................................................................... 28

Plate No. 11 Step 4 .................................................................... 29

Plate No. 12 Step 5 .................................................................... 29

Plate No. 13 Step 6 .................................................................... 30

Plate No. 14 Step 7 .................................................................... 30

Plate No. 15 Comparing the color of A and B.................................. 31

Plate No. 16 Comparing the odor of A and B .................................. 31

Plate No. 17 Comparing the odor of A and B .................................. 32

Plate No. 18 Comparing the stickiness of A and B ........................... 32


Abstract

The researchers aimed to produce an alternative glue out of peanut

(Arachis hypogaea) shells that is considered as a waste nowadays. The

purpose of this research is to lessen the waste in the environment and to

lessen people's expenses in buying commercially-available glue.

The alternative glue was made by extracting lignin from the peanut

(Arachis hypogaea) shells. The said lignin was extracted by pulverizing the

peanut shells and adding 1.5 gram of sodium hydroxide into the mixture.

The extracted lignin was then mixed with flour to obtain the glue-like texture

of the substance.

The said product, alternative glue, was tested and compared to

commercially-available glue in 3 different terms: color, odor and stickiness.

Based on the data gathered, presented and analyzed, the researchers

come out with the conclusions. Based on the computed mean of the

compared group in different terms, it showed significant results from the

computations made. The researchers therefore conclude that the peanut

(Arachis hypogaea) shells is definitely feasible to be used as an alternative

to commercially-available glue.

i
Acknowledgement

The completion of the study would not have been possible without the

support and help of many individuals, we would like to express our

appreciation to all of them. The researchers would like to extend our sincere

gratitude to our research adviser, Mrs. Darlyn Rivera for mentoring us in

producing a high-quality study. We would also like to express our gratitude

to our families for the encouragement and cooperation which helped us

completing this research.

The researchers would like to extend our gratefulness to our

classmates, teachers and our school, Valenzuela National High School for

providing the necessities of our study.

Above all, we are grateful to our Almighty God, for supplying us with

knowledge and wisdom, thus letting us complete and finish our study.

ii
Chapter I

Introduction

Peanuts have a variety of industrial uses. Paint, varnish, lubricating oil,

leather dressings, furniture polish, insecticides, etc… Some parts of a peanut

are thrown away because they have less uses, like the peanut shells.

Nowadays, waste are scattered all around. Burning them is one of the ways

to hasten waste but it can only add pollution to our environment and burning

waste can produce carbon dioxide (CO2) which is one of the so-called

“greenhouse gases”, a continuous increase of carbon dioxide can cause

global warming hence, it will later cause climate change which will affect not

only humans but also other organisms.

The researchers came up with the idea of making an alternative glue

out of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shell’s lignin. . This will benefit the

environment for it will give purpose to the non-reusable wastes such as

peanut shells, it will also lessen the toxic components produced by

commercially-available glue. This will also benefit people’s expenses because

it is less expensive than the commercially-available glue. Thus, it will be one

of the solutions of the problems we are facing with.

1
Objectives

1. To make an alternative glue using Arachis hypogaea’s lignin.

2. To compare the alternative with commercial glue in terms of:

a) odor

b) color

c) stickiness

Hypothesis

There is no significant difference between the alternative and

commercial glue in terms of odor, color, and stickiness.

2
Significance of the Study

This study will be conducted to make an alternative glue out of Arachis

hypogaea’s lignin, which will be beneficial to the environment for it will give

purpose to non-reusable wastes such as peanut husks. It will be useful to

students who use glue because it is less expensive than commercially

available ones and can be easily made at home.

This research will also compare the alternative and commercial glue in

terms of odor, color, and stickiness. The ultimate goal of this study is to

create a more environmentally friendly glue that does not contain as much

toxic components than the ones available in the market. This way, the study

can help lessen the pollution.

Scope and Limitations

The aim of this research is to create an alternative out of peanut

(Arachis hypogaea) shells and to test the product in terms of color, odor,

and stickiness. The effects of alternative glue to the paper after a long

period of time are beyond the scope of the study. The research will be

conducted in Valenzuela National High School.

3
Definition of Terms

Durability How strong the product is

Glue Sticky material that binds two things

together

Lignin A polymer; the main component used

in making the product

Organic Produced without the use of artificial

chemicals

Peanut shells Where the lignin will be extracted

Sodium hydroxide Mixed with pulverized peanut

(Arachis hypogaea) shells to extract

the lignin out of it

4
Flowchart

Input Process Output

 To make an  Pulverize the  Alternative


alternative peanut shells glue
glue out of  Mix and stir
peanut with Sodium
(Arachis Hydroxide
hypogaea) with a ratio of
shells 20:1
 Dry in
microwave
 Mix with
water with a
proportion of
2:1
 Continue to
heat it with
100-110°C

5
Chapter II

Review of Related Literatures and Studies

Based on the study of Mizifan et. al (2014), the relevant information

about the lignin in straw and its application in the industry is scattered and

scarce compared to the wood lignin. This study of related literature has

shown that lignin as a by-product in the pulping process an, abundant

natural and renewable product has been widely used in the past. Studies

also showed that there is a great potential for many applications across

various industrial sectors as a replacement for increasingly scarce and

expensive petroleum based materials, including traditional products, e.g.

resins, composites, and emerging materials, biofuel and commodity

chemicals. The type of lignin differs not only from one to another species but

also depending on the isolation protocol. However, the lack of optimising or

processing technologies is significant when it comes to using technical lignin.

According to Sain, M. et. al (2016), lignin is one of the most abundant

bio-based polymers which are discarded as waste in the pulp and paper

industry in very large amounts. Production of rubber/lignin compounds is

discussed in this chapter as a promising approach for the development of

value-added products from lignin. Challenges facing the successful

production of such compounds have also been explained along with common

modification techniques from the literature.

6
As stated in the study of Sen, T. et. al (2016), natural fibers are a

renewable resource and have several advantages associated with them, they

impart the composite with high stiffness and strength. Moreover, it proves

that they have a desirable fiber aspect ratio, biodegradable, readily available

from natural sources, and more importantly, have a low cost per unit

volume.

According to Tran, G. et. al (2017), peanut hulls are a bulky waste

generated in large amounts. In peanut-producing countries, they are often

burned, dumped, or left to deteriorate naturally. In the recent past,

environmental concerns have led to interest researchers in using peanut

shells for a variety of purposes: fuel, mulch, carrier for chemicals and

fertilizers, bedding for livestock and poultry, pet litter, soil conditioners, etc.

Peanut hulls are also fed to livestock, particularly ruminants and rabbits,

although their high fibre content does not make them suitable for most

monogastric species.

According to Roberts (2019), peanut shells are used in the

manufacture of soap, cosmetics, wallboard, plastics and linoleum among

other things. Scientist and educator George Washington Carver extolled the

value of peanuts and their shells at the beginning of the 20th century. In the

21st century, scientists at Clark Atlanta University studied ways to use

peanut shells to make hydrogen for fuel.

7
Based from the literature of Somayyeh, K. (2017), lignin, a

polyphenolic compound, that produced as a by-product of pulp and paper

and bioethanol industries and has excellent potential to be used as phenol

replacement in phenolic adhesive formulation.

As stated by Tribota, A. et. al (2019), wood is the main source of lignin

in the world. This generic term lignin describes a large group of aromatic

biopolymers, i.e. the second most abundant class of biopolymers on Earth. It

accounts for approximately 30% of wood weight while conferring rigidity and

antimicrobial properties to wood.

According to Zhao, L. et. al (1994), reaction conditions for

hydroxymethylation of pine kraft lignin (KL) are optimized by kinetic studies

of the reaction. Characterization of the resulting hydroxymethylated kraft

lignin (HMKL) indicated that about 0.36 mole of the - CH2OH/C9 unit was

introduced into the lignin under the optimal reaction conditions, of which

about 0.33 mole was introduced into C-5 of guaiacyl moieties via Lederer-

Manasse reaction. Lignin-phenolic resins were formulated by blending the

HMKL with phenol-formaldehyde (PF). A 50/50 blending of HMKL/PF resulted

in a bond strength of about 65 psi in laboratory boards made with sweet

gum flakes.

According to Mansouri, E. et. al (2006), lignin-based wood adhesives

are obtained to satisfy the requirements of relevant international standards

8
for the manufacture of exterior grade wood particleboard. The formulations

based on low molecular mass lignin and presenting an increase in the

relative proportion of reactive points yield better results than the higher

molecular mass lignin used in the past. These lignin allow a higher

proportion of hydroxymethylation during preparation of methylolated lignin.

These lignin based adhesives also yield acceptable results at particleboard

pressing times that are sufficiently low to be of industrial significance.

Based from the study of Akgül M. et. al (2008), the main objective of

this study was to investigate the potential of peanut husk (Arachis hypogaea

L.) as a fiber–peanut mixture to produce fiberboards for general purposes.

The chemical properties of peanut husk: holocellulose and lignin content,

alcohol–benzene, hot and cold water, and dilute alkali (1% NaOH) solubility,

were also determined.

As stated in the study of Brischke, C. et. al (2013), lignin has been

studied as an adhesive for more than 100 years, but there are only a few

industrial applications. The reason for the current interest is the high

availability and low price of lignin. Lignin is the main by-product of paper

pulping processes and is typically burned as fuel. Being the natural glue in

plants and having a phenolic nature made lignin an attractive replacement

for wood adhesives. An adhesive system for wood composites consisting

mainly of lignin has yet to be developed. Lignin has less reactive sites in the
9
aromatic ring than phenols, and the steric effects caused by the

macromolecular structure further hinder its reactivity.

According to Coyle (2019), improved lignocellulosic particleboard,

hardboard, and plywood are produced using a lignin sulfonate-phenol

formaldehyde glue system. Preferred products are secured by using Douglas

fir chips in combination with a unique technique of blending the lignin

sulfonate with a phenol and formaldehyde. A specific technique is to combine

lignin sulfonate with formaldehyde under the influence of caustic and heat

and then to combine the resulting compound with phenol formaldehyde resin

to secure a more effective final glue system.

Based from the literature of Qiming (2005), a modified lignin and gum

manufacturing method, relates to an adhesive and a manufacturing method

which is described below. The components were mixed together, placed in

reaction pot at a temperature of 40 ~ 80 ℃ after 4 to 8 hours and then

cooled to room temperature, the solid content of 30-50% was obtained for

the coating 4 cup viscosity measured at 25 deg.] C of 40 to 120 seconds, the

modified lignin plastic, the content of each component is: lignin 20-30wt%,

of 37% formaldehyde 25-35wt%, enhancers 10-15wt%, the catalyst 4-

8wt%, balance solvent. The lignin is a p-hydroxyphenyl group-containing

structure of the vegetation element or a mixture of lignin and woody

vegetation pigment

10
According to Songbai Z. et. al (2013), one method for preparing

formaldehyde-free adhesive lignin wood-based panels is the hot plate

method which uses lignin-based adhesive after the formation of gum waste

paper acetylated lignin particles in the air with the use of artificial stalks

formed in pulverization, pulverized and mixed. In particular, the use of lignin

acetylation using 4-dimethylaminopyridine and pyridine mixture (1: 1-3, V:

V) as a catalyst at ordinary temperature. The advantage of the present

invention is that: acetylated lignin adhesives do not contain formaldehyde,

and acetylation reaction was rapid at room temperature; wood-based panels

produced having higher physical strength, water resistance, and durability.

According to Jūan (2013), the invention relates to a method for

extracting lignin from peanut. The method comprises the following steps:

crushing peanut shells into powder with granularity of 30-50 meshes; drying

the crushed peanut shell in an microwave; putting the dried powder into a

reaction kettle, adding solid sodium hydroxide in a ratio of 20:1, mixing and

stirring, raising the temperature to 40 DEG C, and then adding water;

wherein the ratio of water and powder is 2:1; further raising the

temperature to 100-110 DEG C, and reacting for 6-8h; cooling and

separating the solution at a cooling temperature of 20-30 DEG C, and drying

the water-insoluble part at a temperature between 30 DEG C and 40 DEG C

to obtain lignin.

11
Chapter III

Methodology

Materials

Mortar and pestle

Microwave

25 grams peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells

1.5 grams Sodium hydroxide

10 grams flour

100 ml tap water

Procedure

Pulverize the peanut shells using mortar and pestle, crush into 30-50

mesh powder. Dry the pulverized peanut shells for 1 minute with a low

temperature in the microwave. Add 1.5 grams of solid sodium hydroxide in

the dried pulverized peanut shells. Add 100 ml of tap water then put it back

in the microwave with 100° C to continue heating for 1 minute. After

heating, mix it with 10 grams of flour. A cooling temperature of 30° C will be

obtained after the cooling separation. To obtain the lignin, let the insoluble

portion dry at between 30-40°C. Pour out the mixture into its final container.

Leave in a cool dry place.

12
Table 1: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Odor

Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative
Peanut Shell
Glue

Commercially
Available
Glue

Legend:

5 Fabric Conditioner

4 Soy Sauce

3 Vinegar

2 Fish Sauce

1 Bagoong

Table 2: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Color

13
Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative
Peanut Shell
Glue

Commercially
Available
Glue

Legend:

Table 3: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Stickiness


14
Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative
Peanut Shell
Glue

Commercially
Available
Glue

Legend:

5 The fingers can't be separated without extreme force

4 The fingers can be separated but it will take a minute

The fingers can be separated with a great force exerted


3

2 The fingers can be separated with a little force exerted

1 The fingers can easily be separated without any extreme

force used

15
Chapter IV

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

Alternative Glue Commercially Available Glue

2.2 3.7

Table 1: Average of Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms

of Color

This table shows that the alternative glue got an average of 2.2 while

the commercial glue got an average of 3.7, signifying that the alternative

glue’s color is similar to chocolate’s color while the commercial glue’s color is

similar with pale brown color. According to Schenk (1991), peanut shells

contain tannins, which diffuse from mechanical layer of peanut shell and are

later converted to an insoluble brown form.

4
3.5
3
2.5
2 Commercial Glue

1.5 Alternative Glue

1
0.5
0
Alternative Glue Commercial Glue

16
Figure 1: Graph showing the comparison of the mean between

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Color

According to Schenk (1991), the primary cause of the dark splotching

of the shell interior is the tannins. The extent of browning depends on the

amount of tannin produced by the shell and also the growth pressure of the

seed.

Sources Degree
of of Sum of Mean Computed Tabular Decision Interpretation
Degrees Squares F F
Variation Freedom
(0.05)

Between 1 26.46 26.46 14.8 4.4 Reject Null Significant


Groups Hypothesis

Within 18 4.1 0.277


Groups

Total 19 30.56

Table 2: Summary table for One- Factor Anova on the comparison of

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Color

17
Alternative Glue Commercially Available Glue

2.7 5

Table 3: Average of Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms

of Odor

This table shows that the alternative glue got an average of 2.7 while

commercial glue got an average of 5. The odor of the alternative glue, which

is mixed with vinegar, is stronger to the commercial glue’s odor, which is

similar to a fabric conditioner. According to Washington (2011), vinegar is a

strong acid with a pungent smell that can overwhelm other substances.

3 Commercial Glue
Alternative Glue
2

0
Alternative Glue Commercial Glue

Figure 2: Graph showing the comparison of the mean between

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Odor

18
According to Pelletier (2011), vinegar contains acetic acid that gives

both its acidity and its characteristic on pungent smell.

Sources Degree
of of Sum of Mean Computed Tabular Decision Interpretation
Degrees Squares F F
Variation Freedom
(0.05)

Between 1 11.25 11.25 14.8 4.4 Reject Null Significant


Groups Hypothesis

Within 18 0.76 0.042


Groups

Total 19

Table 4: Summary table for One- Factor Anova on the comparison of

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Odor

19
Alternative Glue Commercially Available Glue

3.1 3.5

Table 5: Average of Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms

of Stickiness

The alternative glue got an average of 3.1 while commercial glue got

an average of 3.5 in terms of stickiness. The stickiness of the alternative

glue can be compared to the stickiness of fingers being separated with great

force exerted while the stickiness of the commercial glue can be compared

to the stickiness of fingers being separated but lasted for a minute.

According to Tribota (2019), peanut shells are mostly composed of lignin, an

adhesive or sticky biopolymer.

3.5

2.5

2 Commercial Glue

1.5 Alternative Glue

0.5

0
Alternative Glue Commercial Glue

20
Figure 3: Graph showing the comparison of the mean between

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Stickiness

According to Brischke (2013), lignin is mostly present in plants. Lignin

is a p-hydroxyphenyl group-containing structure of the vegetation element

or a mixture of lignin and woody vegetation pigment; the enhancer is a

phenol or meta-cresol or resorcinol; the catalyst is sodium hydroxide or

potassium hydroxide or ammonium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, or

their mixture.

Sources Degree
of of Sum of Mean Computed Tabular Decision Interpretation
Degrees Squares F F
Variation Freedom
(0.05)

Between 1 0.8 0.8 0.93 4.4 Accept Not


Groups Null Significant
Hypothesis

Within 18 0.86 0.047


Groups

Total 19

Table 6: Summary table for One- Factor Anova on the comparison of

Alternative Glue and Commercial Glue in terms of Stickiness

21
Chapter V

Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation

Summary

The study intends to use peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells to create

an alternative glue. This research aims to give purpose to non-renewable

wastes such as peanut husks, which will also be helpful to students who use

glue because of its low price and can be made at home. The researchers

made an alternative glue using peanut husks, sodium hydroxide and water.

The researchers gathered the data that led to reject the null hypothesis. In

terms of color, alternative glue got an average of 2.2 while the commercially

available glue got an average of 3.7. In terms of odor, alternative glue got

an average of 2.7 while the commercially available glue got an average of 5.

In terms of stickiness, alternative glue got an average of 3.1 while the

commercially available glue got an average of 3.5.

Conclusion

In the light of foregoing findings, the following conclusions were

drawn:

1. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells can be used as an alternative glue

22
2. In terms of color, the alternative glue made out of peanut shells is

better than the commercially available one.

3. In terms of odor, the alternative glue made out of peanut shells is

better than the commercially available one.

4. In terms of stickiness, the commercially available glue is better than

the alternative glue made out of peanut shells.

Recommendation

For future researchers who are planning to conduct a parallel study on

the topic, the following are recommended by the researchers:

1. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells as an alternative pin board

2. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells extract as an alternative paint

3. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells as an alternative place matte

4. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) shells as an alternative paper

23
Appendix A

Plate no.1

1/4 kg of Peanut shells

Plate no.2

10 grams of Sodium hydroxide flakes

24
Plate no.3

Water

Plate no. 4

Flour

25
Plate no.5

Mortar and Pestle

Plate no.6

Microwave

26
Plate no.7

Weighing Scale

Plate no.8

Pulverizing the peanut shells

27
Plate no.9

Measuring of 25 grams pulverized peanut shells

Plate no.10

Mixing the pulverized peanut shells with a 1.5 g sodium hydroxide flakes

28
Plate no.11

Adding and mixing of 100 ml water to the pulverized peanut shells with

sodium hydroxide

Plate no.12

Put the pulverized peanut shells with the sodium hydroxide flakes and water

in the microwave for 1 minute

29
Plate no.13

Mixing of the extract of the pulverized peanut shells and the 10 g flour

Plate no.14

Comparing the appearance and color of alternative glue (A) and the

commercially available glue (B)

30
Plate no.15

Comparing the appearance and color of alternative glue (A) and the

commercially available glue (B)

Plate no.16

Comparing the odor of alternative glue (A) and the commercially available

glue (B)

31
Plate no.17

Comparing the odor of alternative glue (A) and the commercially available

glue (B)

Plate no.18

Comparing the stickeness of alternative glue (A) and the commercially

available glue (B

32
Appendix B

Table 1: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Odor

Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative
Peanut Shell 2 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 4 1
Glue

Commercially
3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4
Available
Glue

Legend:

5 Fabric Conditioner

4 Soy Sauce

3 Vinegar

2 Fish Sauce

1 Bagoong

33
Table 2: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Color

Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 2 3
Peanut Shell
Glue

Commercially 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Available
Glue

Legend:

34
Table 3: Comparison of Alternative Peanut Shell Glue and

Commercially Available Glue in terms of Stickiness

Respondents

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4
Peanut Shell
Glue

Commercially 4 3 5 4 4 4 3 1 4 3
Available
Glue

Legend:

5 The fingers can't be separated without extreme force

4 The fingers can be separated but it will take a minute

The fingers can be separated with a great force exerted


3

2 The fingers can be separated with a little force exerted

1 The fingers can easily be separated without any extreme

force used

35
Appendix C

36
37
38
CURRICULUM VITAE

AMADOR, DIVINE LESLIE S.

#0036 T. Conepcion St. Marulas, Valenzuela City

dlamador21@gmail.com

09079095768

Personal Information:

Age : 14

Sex : female

Height : 4’9 ft

Weight : 94 lbs

Religion : Born Again Christian

Civil Status : Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: Marulas Central School 2010-2017

39
Awards/Honors Received:

Copyreading and Headline Writing Grade 6 (2016)

Contest (RSPC) Participant

Copyreading and Headline Writing Grade 9 (2019)

Contest (DSPC) Participant

With Honors Grade 7-9 (2017-2019)

Character References:

Robinson C. Arnaiz Student

E2 402 Finihomes Marulas,

Valenzuela City

09218973491

Cherrie Mae J. Bulahan Student

#149 Sagittarius St. Marulas,

Valenzuela City

09451080282

Darylle Anne C. Bradecina Student

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon

City

09156424471

40
CURRICULUM VITAE

ARNAIZ, ROBINSON C.

E2 402 Finihomes Marulas, Valenzuela City

libag.master@gmail.com

09218973491

Personal Information:

Age : 14

Sex : Male

Height : 5’4 ft

Weight : 119 lbs

Religion : Catholic

Civil Status : Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: Marulas Christian School 2010-2017

41
Awards/Honors Received:

Most Generous Grade 3-6 (2013-2016)

MTAP Contestant Grade 8 (2018)

With Honors Grade 8-9 (2018-2019)

Character References:

Crisza Faye P. Canlas Student

#6186 Diamonds St. El Grande

Homes subdvision Brgy. Gen. T. De

Leon Valenzuela City

09667780757

Divine Leslie S. Amador Student

#0036 T. Concepcion St. Marulas

Valenzuela City

09079095768

Darylle Anne C. Bradecina Student

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon

City

09156424471

42
CURRICULUM VITAE

BRADECINA, DARYLLE ANNE C.

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon City

bradecindarylle@gmail.com

09156424471

Personal Information:

Age : 15

Sex : Female

Height : 5’ ft

Weight : 101 lbs

Religion : Catholic

Civil Status : Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: San Miguel Heights 2010-2017

43
Awards/Honors Received:

With Honors Grade 7-8 (2017-2018)

Collaborative Desktop Publishing Grade 7 (2017)

(RSPC)

Collaborative Desktop Publishing Grade 8 (2018)

(RSPC) 4th Placer

Character References:

Robinson C. Arnaiz Student

E2 402 Finihomes Marulas,

Valenzuela City

09218973491

Divine Leslie S. Amador Student

#0036 T. Concepcion St. Marulas

Valenzuela City

09079095768

Cherrie Mae J. Bulahan Student

#149 Sagittarius St. Batimana Comp.

Marulas, Valenzuela City

09451080282

44
CURRICULUM VITAE

BULAHAN, CHERRIE MAE J.

#149 Sagittarius St. Batimana Comp. Marulas, Valenzuela City

Cherriemaebulahan1@gmail.com

09451080282

Personal Information:

Age: 14

Sex: Female

Height: 4’9 ft

Weight: 99 lbs

Religion: Roman Catholic

Civil Status: Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: San Miguel Heights 2010-2017

45
Awards/Honors Received:

With Honors Grade 1-6 (2010-2017)

With Honors Grade 7-8 (2017-2019)

1st place Tagisan ng Talino Grade 5 (2015-2016)

Character References:

Robinson C. Arnaiz Student

E2 402 Finihomes Marulas,

Valenzuela City

09218973491

Divine Leslie S. Amador Student

#0036 T. Concepcion St. Marulas

Valenzuela City

09079095768

Darylle Anne C. Bradecina Student

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon

City

09156424471

46
CURRICULUM VITAE

CANLAS, CRISZA FAYE P.

#6186 Diamonds St. El Grande Homes subdvision Brgy. Gen.

T. De Leon Valenzuela City

Criszafaye30@gmail.com

09667780757

Personal Information:

Age : 14

Sex : Female

Height : 150 cm

Weight : 44 kg

Religion : Catholic

Civil Status : Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: Santiago A. De Guzman 2010-2017

47
Awards/Honors Received:

With Honors Grade 1-8 (2011-2018)

Best in Math Grade 1-6 (2011-2016)

Best in MAPEH Grade 1-6 (2011-2016)

Character References:

Robinson C. Arnaiz Student

E2 402 Finihomes Marulas,

Valenzuela City

09218973491

Lea Mae L. Sibayan Student

7.T. Concepcion St. Marulas

Valenzuela City

09499792769

Darylle Anne C. Bradecina Student

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon

City

09156424471

48
CURRICULUM VITAE

SIBAYAN, LEA MAE L

7.T. Concepcion St. Marulas Valenzuela City

yrlyel02@gmail.com

09499792769

Personal Information:

Age : 14

Sex : Female

Height : 5’2 ft

Weight : 114 lbs

Religion : Catholic

Civil Status : Single

Educational Background:

Secondary: Valenzuela National High School 2019-present

Elementary: San Miguel Heights 2010-2017

49
Awards/Honors Received:

Editorial Writing Contest (RSPC) Grade 6 (2016)

Participant

MTAP Contestant Grade 1-7 (2011-2017)

With Honors Grade 1-9 (2011-2019)

Character References:

Cherrie Mae J. Bulahan Student

#149 Sagittarius St. Batimana Comp.

Marulas, Valenzuela City

09451080282

Divine Leslie S. Amador Student

#0036 T. Concepcion St. Marulas

Valenzuela City

09079095768

Darylle Anne C. Bradecina Student

#5 F. Rivera St. Potrero, Malabon

City

09156424471

50
Bibliography

Akgul, Mehme, et. al "Utilizing Peanut Husk (Arachis Hypogaea L.) in the

Manufacture of Medium-density Fiberboards." Bioresource Technology.

December 11, 2007. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852407008942.

Brischke, C. et. al "Material of the Future or Waste of Research Energy?"

Material of the Future or Waste of Research Energy? 2013. Accessed July 5,

2019.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6437/40af65f10d8ab47b08abccefa257f2afc

3d1.pdf?_ga=2.45602532.1392798630.1562058464-

661210099.1562058464.

Coyle, Robert P. "US3931072A - Particleboard, Hardboard, and Plywood

Produced in Combination with a Lignin Sulfonate-phenol Formaldehyde Glue

System." Google Patents.2019. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3931072A/en.

G., Tran, et. al "Peanut Hulls." Feedipedia. 2017. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://www.feedipedia.org/node/696?fbclid=IwAR0xOo9Fno7h07jp2f7Ms2Y

fnb3D7w9PQOC6yAKj3XwSyDB46cOU6D7djzU

Juān, Xú. "CN104448336A - Method for Extracting Lignin from Peanut."

Google Patents. 2013. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://patents.google.com/patent/CN104448336A/en
51
Kalami, Somayyeh et. al "Replacing 100% of Phenol in Phenolic Adhesive

Formulations with Lignin - Kalami - 2017 - Journal of Applied Polymer

Science - Wiley Online Library." Journal of Applied Polymer Science. April 16,

2017. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/app.45124.

Mansouri, E. et. al "Lignin‐ based Polycondensation Resins for Wood

Adhesives - Mansouri - 2007 - Journal of Applied Polymer Science - Wiley

Online Library." Journal of Applied Polymer Science. November 08, 2006.

Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.25098.

MiziFan et. al "Lignin in Straw and Its Applications as an Adhesive."

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. September 27, 2013.

Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749613001383#!

Qiming, Liu. "CN100500786C - Modified Lignin Glue and Its Production."

Google Patents. 2005. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://patents.google.com/patent/CN100500786C/en?q=production&schola

Roberts, Scott. "Uses of Peanut Shells." Garden Guides. March 12, 2019.

Accessed July 05, 2019. https://www.gardenguides.com/uses-peanut-shells-

52
6023398.html?fbclid=IwAR2wJ7iXN5ApCWc3hAbxBnZRElUwNhUhjBOQIYLSL

_yo6bAaYZC8nYQDcRY.

Sain, Mohini, et. al "Lignin in Polymer Composites." ScienceDirect. 2016.

Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780323355650/lignin-in-polymer-

composites.

Sen, Tara, et. al "Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials

Engineering." Elsevier. 2016. Accessed July 05, 2019.

https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/sciencedirect/content/reference-

modules/materials-science-module.

Songbai, Zhu, et. al "CN103406967B - Method for Preparing Formaldehyde-

free Wood-based Panels Lignin Based Glue." Google Patents. 2013. Accessed

July 05, 2019. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103406967B/en.

Tribota, Amélie, et. al "Wood-lignin: Supply, Extraction Processes and Use as

Bio-based Material" European Polymer Journal January 04, 2019. Accessed

July 05, 2019.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014305718320597#!

Zao, Lin-wu, et. al "Utilization of Softwood Kraft Lignin as Adhesive for the

Manufacture of Reconstituted Wood." Taylor & Francis. 1994. Accessed July

05, 2019.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02773819408003090.
53

You might also like