Full Text 1
Full Text 1
ABSTRACT: Self-cleaning wool has been realized by the wettability of wool has been modified using different
treatment with a colloidal sol of anatase nanocrystals. nonionic wetting agents, in an attempt to shorten the wet-
However, the mechanical properties of wool have been ting time during dip-coating and the absorption rate was
significantly deteriorated following the self-cleaning func- compared. The effect of wetting agents on the functionali-
tionalization treatment. To minimize the undesirable side- zation process and the photocatalytic activity was exam-
effects induced by the nanocoating, a silicone surface mod- ined. The synchronized effect of wettability and silicone
ification post-treatment has been introduced. The change surface modification on the self-cleaning functionalization
in mechanical properties of TiO2-coated wool after modifi- of wool was also studied. V
C 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl
cation with silicone was examined, and the effect of this Polym Sci 112: 235–243, 2009
process on the photocatalytic activity and its stability was
assessed by a degradation test of food stains. Moreover, Key words: nanotechnology; biopolymers; self-cleaning
TABLE I
Tearing Strength of Pristine and Coated Wool with
and Without Silicone Modification
Pristine fibers S0 S1 S2 S3 S4
Elmendorf Tearing Tester (Thwing-Albert Instru- soaking the sample into the titanium dioxide sol.
ment Co., USA) with a standard capacity of 6400 g The wetting time reported is the average of five
in accordance with ASTM D 1242-96. The bending measurements for each test sample.
rigidity of the samples was obtained on Kawabata
Pure Bending Tester—KES-FB2 (KATO Tech. Co.,
Japan) according to the Kawabata Evaluation System RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
for Fabrics (KES-F). Silicone surface modification
Mechanical properties
Photocatalytic purification performance From our previous work, it was found that the self-
The photocatalytic degradation of food stains, such cleaning coating treatment causes damage to fibers,
as concentrated coffee and red wine stains, was eval- which is probably attributed to the acid content in
uated using Suntest solar simulator—XenotestV
R the titanium dioxide sol and to the alteration of the
Alpha LM Light Exposure and Weathering Test fiber surface after the deposition of titanium dioxide
Instrument (Atlas Material Testing Technology LLC, nanoparticles. Hence, the tearing strength and bend-
Germany) with the irradiance of 45–95 mWcm2 for ing rigidity of coated fibers were measured before
8, 20, and 40 h. and after a surface modification post-treatment with
silicone. The tearing strength of pristine, coated and
coated and silicone-modified wool fibers are shown
Reproducibility of photocatalytic in Table I. Compared with pristine wool fibers, S0
purification performance showed the greatest deterioration in tearing strength
of 37% after self-cleaning coating treatment. On the
A stability test was performed to study the effect of other hand, the lost tearing strength was signifi-
different treatment processes on the reproducibility cantly recovered after the post-treatment. Of the four
of the self-cleaning performance. The stain degrada- treated samples, S1 showed the least drop in tearing
tion activity of modified self-cleaning fibers were strength (14%) followed by S2, S3, and S4, indicating
compared before and after repeated solvent washing that S1 had the best recuperation of tearing strength.
according to ISO 105-D01 using petroleum ether as The recovery of the lost tearing strength is probably
solvent. attributed to the change of frictions. Because surface
friction of wool fibers can be altered by silicone
treatments,24 silicone-based polymers may act as
Wettability and absorption rate
lubricant to ease the interfiber and interyarn frictions
The samples absorption rate of sols prepared with leading to an improvement in tearing strength.
and without wetting agents was observed. The wet- The change of bending rigidity of coated fibers
ting time required by a sample to thoroughly absorb before and after post-treatment with silicone is
the sol was recorded by stopwatch instantly after shown in Table II. The pliability is directly affected
TABLE II
Bending Rigidity of Pristine and Coated Wool with
and Without Silicone Modification
Pristine fibers S0 S1 S2 S3 S4
2
Warp (g cm /cm) 0.143 0.383 0.167 0.171 0.171 0.167
Weft (g cm2/cm) 0.092 0.142 0.110 0.108 0.109 0.108
Average (g cm2/cm) 0.118 0.263 0.139 0.140 0.140 0.138
Overall change (%) 123.40 17.87 18.72 19.15 17.02
TABLE III
Absorption Time of Pristine and Coated Wool with and
Without Silicone Modification
Pristine fibers T80A T80B X100A X100S
Reproducibility of photocatalytic
Figure 6 Stain degradation of concentrated coffee on S1 purification performance
(a) before stability test and (b) after stability test. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available Considering the results discussed in sections Me-
at www.interscience.wiley.com.]. chanical Properties and Photocatalytic Purification
Performance, S1 showed the best improvement in
especially on red wine stain. This signifies that the mechanical properties with no significant adverse
photocatalytic efficiency is affected by the level of effect on the purification performance. Therefore, the
silicone concentration used in the post-treatment. It stability testing was conducted on S1 only. The
was found that a concentration ratio of 10 : 1 is reproducibility of the photocatalytic ability of S1 is
more favorable for TiO2-coated fibers. Of the two demonstrated in Figures 6 and 7. In contrast to S1
coated fibers treated with 10 : 1 ratio, both S1 and S2 before washing, the shape of the stains on S1 after
possessed similar self-cleaning performance as S0 washing was unevenly spread on the fiber surface,
did; nevertheless, S1 is more favorable because of and the stain area was smaller. This denotes that the
the lower silicone concentration applied. Moreover, hydrophilicity of the titanium dioxide coating
the shape and size of the stains varied between
TiO2-coated and silicone-treated TiO2-coated wool.
Stains on S0 were spread in a circular shape over a
large area on fibers surface, whereas the area and
shape of stains in S1, S2, S3, and S4 were smaller
and irregular. This implies that the silicone-treated
TiO2-coated wool is comparatively more hydropho-
bic than TiO2-coated wool. This change in surface
wettability after treatment with silicone is attributed
to the hydrophobic nature of silicone. It is believed
that the hydrophobic alkyl groups of silicone altered
the chemical structure through H-bonding between
Figure 7 Stain degradation of red wine on S1 (a) before Figure 8 Stain degradation of concentrated coffee (a)
stability test and (b) after stability test. [Color figure can T80A, (b) T80B, (c) X100A, and (d) X100S. [Color figure
be viewed in the online issue, which is available at can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
www.interscience.wiley.com.]. www.interscience.wiley.com.].
CONCLUSIONS
The self-cleaning functionalization of wool via tita-
nium dioxide coating has been modified by wettabil-
ity promotion using nonionic surfactants and surface
modification with silicone. The TiO2-coating-induced
drop of wool mechanical properties can be substan-
tially recovered with minimal adverse effect on the
self-cleaning performance. The initial deterioration
on tearing strength and bending rigidity caused by
TiO2-coating has notably been offset, particularly
when 2% amino-modified silicone emulsion was
used in a concentration ratio of 10 : 1. Although the
Figure 13 Stain degradation of red wine after silicone
modification (a) T80A, (b) T80B, (c) X100A, and (d) X100S.
[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at www.interscience.wiley.com.].
References
1. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Nature 1972, 238, 37.
2. Fujishima, A.; Zhang, X. C R Chim 2006, 9, 750.
3. Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H. J Am Ceram Soc 2004, 87, 953.
4. Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H. Chem Commun 2005, 2110.
5. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T. N.; Tryk, D. A. J Photochem Photobiol
C-Photochem Rev 2000, 1, 1.
6. Mills, A.; Lee, S. K. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem 2002, 152,
233.
7. Yang, H.; Zhu, S.; Pan, N. J Appl Polym Sci 2004, 92, 3201.
8. Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H.; Zhang, Y. H. Surf Sci 2005, 599, 69.
9. Anpo, M.; Shima, T.; Kodama, S.; Kubokawa, Y. J Phys Chem
1987, 91, 4305.
10. Oppenläender, T. Photochemical Purification of Water and
Air; Wiley-VCH: Germany, 2003.
11. Kaneko, M.; Okura, I. Photocatalysis: Science and Technology;
Kodasha-Springer: Tokyo, 2002.
12. Rincón, A. G.; Pulgarin, C. Appl Catal B-Environ 2004, 49, 99.
13. Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H.; Zhang, Y. H.; Qi, K. H. J Non-Cryst
Solids 2005, 351, 1486.
Figure 15 Stain degradation of red wine after silicone 14. Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2004, 29, 25.
modification and stability test (a) T80A, (b) T80B, (c) 15. Bozzi, A.; Yuranova, T.; Guasaquillo, I.; Laub, D.; Kiwi, J. J
X100A, and (d) X100S. [Color figure can be viewed in the Photochem Photobiol A-Chem 2005, 174, 156.
online issue, which is available at www.interscience. 16. Langlet, M.; Kim, A.; Audier, M.; Herrmann, J. M. J Sol-Gel
wiley.com.]. Sci Technol 2002, 25, 223.
17. Meilert, K. T.; Laub, D.; Kiwi, J. J Mol Catal A-Chem 2005,
237, 101.
18. Yuranova, T.; Mosteo, R.; Bandara, J.; Laub, D.; Kiwi, J. J Mol
self-cleaning ability toward both concentrated coffee Catal A-Chem 2006, 244, 160.
and red wine stains remained unchanged, its repro- 19. Bozzi, A.; Yuranova, T.; Kiwi, J. J Photochem Photobiol A-
ducibility after stability test was slightly impaired. Chem 2005, 172, 27.
20. Qi, K. H.; Daoud, W. A.; Xin, J. H.; Mak, C. L.; Tang, W. S.;
Moreover, the absorption rate of TiO2 sol by fibers Cheung, W. P. J Mater Chem 2006, 16, 4567.
was greatly increased with good photocatalytic self- 21. Daoud, W. A.; Leung, S. K.; Tung, W. S.; Xin, J. H.; Cheuk, K.;
cleaning activity by using different wetting agents. Qi, K. Chem Mater 2008, 20, 1242.
However, only TritonVX-100 modified TiO2-coated
R
22. Tung, W. S.; Daoud, W. A. J Colloid Interface Sci 2008, 326,
possesses good and reproducible photocatalytic ac- 283.
23. Tung, W. S.; Daoud, W. A. Acta Biomater 2009, 5, 50.
tivity. This study demonstrates that improving fibers 24. Kim, M. S.; Kang, T. J Textile Res J 2002, 72, 113.
wettability during TiO2 coating and the ability to 25. Simončič, B.; Rozman, V. Colloid Surf A 2007, 292, 236.
recover fibers mechanical properties following TiO2- 26. Alexeev, V. L.; Ilekti, P.; Persello, J.; Lambard, J.; Gulik, T.; Ca-
coating using a surface modification treatment with bane, B. Langmuir 1996, 12, 2392.