Indications and Utility in The Intensive Care Unit: Neuromonitoring
Indications and Utility in The Intensive Care Unit: Neuromonitoring
Neuromonitoring
Indications and Utility in
the Intensive Care Unit
CATHERINE HARRIS, PhD, MBA, CRNP
Information on the use of neuromonitoring in intensive care units is scattered but significant. Nurses who do
not care for neurologically impaired patients on a daily basis may not have a strong understanding of the util-
ity of various neuromonitoring techniques, why they are used, or how they are interpreted. Two main types of
neuromonitoring that are frequently seen but poorly understood are reviewed here: transcranial Doppler sono-
graphy and electrophysiology. Information on these 2 techniques tends to be either superficial with limited
applicability to the critical care setting or very technical. This review provides information about neuromoni-
toring to help guide critical care nurses providing care to neurologically impaired patients. (Critical Care Nurse.
2014;34[3]:30-40)
N
euromonitoring is an umbrella term used to describe the various invasive and nonin-
vasive techniques that are available for monitoring functioning of the central nervous
system. Neuromonitoring techniques are essential tools used in evaluating patients with neu-
rological injury in critical care settings. Neuromonitoring is typically used when a clinical neurological
examination is either difficult or not practical to perform, such as during an operative procedure or
when the patient’s mental status has deteriorated. Depending on the technique used, neuromonitoring
allows the health care staff to evaluate motor and sensory function, brain activity, blood flow, and
intracranial pressures. Nurses must be able to use various neuromonitoring techniques and interpret
their results to provide the best care for their patients. However, useful and user-friendly information
on the indications and utility of neuromonitoring is scarce. In this article, I review 2 pertinent types of
noninvasive neuromonitoring techniques encountered in intensive care units, transcranial Doppler
monitoring and electrophysiology, for their indications, use, and applicability to patient care. Invasive
monitoring such as intracranial monitoring is not covered here.
1. Describe neuromonitoring with transcranial Doppler monitoring and electrophysiology for the neurologically impaired patients
2. Identify normal and abnormal findings with transcranial Doppler monitoring and electrophysiology
3. Discuss the indications, use, and applicability of transcranial Doppler monitoring and electroencephalography in the neurocritical patient
ACA
MCA
ICA
1 PCA
Temporal window:
3
MCA
Transorbital
ACA, PCA Basilar artery
window:
ICA
Ophthalmic artery
4
Jaw angle window: Vertebral
ICA artery
ECA, CCA
Reprinted from Schell et al,7 with kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
L-EX-ICA 50 2
Mean
R-EX-ICA 50 2
Mean
Table 2 Normal findings on transcranial Doppler
-24.6 -23.5 imaging
Peak
Peak
-58.1 -56.2
Flow velocity,
L-EX-ICA 52 2 R-EX-ICA 50 2 Depth, mean (SD),
Mean
-23.5
Mean
-22.7
Window Artery mm cm/s
Peak Peak
-52.4 -60.1
Temporal Middle cerebral 30-60 55 (12)
L-OA 50 2 BA 80 2 R-EX-ICA 52 2
19.6 Mean Mean Temporal Anterior cerebral 60-85 50 (11)
Mean -27.7 -25.4
39.7 Peak Peak Temporal Posterior cerebral 60-70 40 (10)
Peak -57.4 -69.3
L-Siphon 60 2 BA 80 2 R-OA 50 2 Temporal Terminal internal 55-65 39 (9)
Mean Mean 18.1
32.7 -30.8 Mean
carotid
-20.4
Peak Peak 36.2
62.8
-43.1 -66.6 Peak
Orbital Internal carotid 60-80 45 (15)
L-Siphon 60 2 BA 80 2 R-OA 50 2 artery siphon
25.4 Mean 21.2
Mean -28.1 Mean Orbital Ophthalmic 40-60 20 (10)
53.5 Peak 38.1
Peak -68.1 Peak
Occipital Vertebral 60-80 38 (10)
L-MCA 50 2 R-Siphon 66 2
55.8 36.2
Mean Mean
Occipital Basilar 80-110 41 (10)
115 65.8
Peak Peak
Figure 2 Transcranial Doppler imaging output. After subarachnoid hemorrhage, TCD monitoring
Abbreviations: BA, basilar artery; Ex, external; ICA, internal carotid artery; may be ordered daily or twice daily to assess the mean
L, left; MCA, middle cerebral artery; OA, ophthalmic artery; R, right.
flow velocity. Primary providers who order TCD moni-
toring will be most interested in the mean flow velocity
more widely than the mean flow velocity. The mean flow of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), the anterior cere-
velocity is considered more stable and thus a more reli- bral artery (ACA), and the basilar artery because they
able indicator of blood flow in the brain, so it has been are the largest vessels and thus have the potential to
established as the criterion to follow.9 cause the most devastating strokes. They are also the 3
Label Depth Mean Peak Edv PI RI Label Depth Mean Peak Edv PI RI
2 MHz
L-EX-ICA 50 -24.6 -58.1 -14.9 1.73 0.74 R-EX-ICA 50 -23.5 -56.2 -4.21 2.21 0.91
L-EX-ICA 52 -23.5 -52.4 -14.2 1.61 0.72 R-EX-ICA 50 -22.7 -60.1 -4.17 2.40 0.92
L-OA 50 19.6 39.7 6.17 1.64 0.81 R-EX-ICA 52 -25.4 -69.3 -7.50 2.39 0.88
L-Siphon 60 32.7 62.8 18.1 1.34 0.71 R-OA 50 18.1 36.2 4.39 1.72 0.87
-20.4 -43.1 -5.87 1.68 0.77 R-OA 50 21.2 38.1 5.45 1.52 0.85
L-Siphon 60 25.4 53.5 7.09 1.79 0.85 R-Siphon 66 36.2 65.8 14.2 1.39 0.77
L-MCA 50 55.8 115 34.6 1.43 0.69 R-VA 60 -20.0 -34.6 -7.28 1.28 0.76
L-MCA 52 64.3 137 39.8 1.51 0.71 R-VA 62 -25.8 -65.8 -4.56 2.33 0.92
L-MCA 56 61.2 132 38.5 1.51 0.70 R-VA 66 -16.6 -57.4 -3.99 3.09 0.91
L-MCA 58 70.1 139 45.4 1.32 0.67 R-VA 66 -15.8 -58.9 -3.62 3.17 0.91
L-MCA 58 68.1 142 43.2 1.44 0.69 R-VA 66
L-MCA 58 73.2 139 46.6 1.26 0.66 R-MCA 50 42.7 89.3 25.4 1.47 0.71
L-MCA 58 62.8 133 39.1 1.48 0.70 R-MCA 52 33.9 69.3 14.5 1.58 0.78
L-MCA 58 70.8 139 44.1 1.33 0.68 R-MCA 54 40.8 79.7 22.3 1.39 0.71
L-MCA 60 66.6 134 44.3 1.34 0.67 R-MCA 54 55.8 104 29.0 1.29 0.70
L-MCA/ACA 66 71.6 184 44.1 1.95 0.75 R-MCA 54 65.8 131 41.2 1.34 0.68
-40.8 -67.4 -25.1 1.02 0.62 R-MCA 58 65.8 167 37.0 1.95 0.77
L-MCA/ACA 66 61.2 161 37.2 2.00 0.74 R-MCA/ACA 64 43.5 82.0 28.9 1.21 0.64
-40.0 -72.8 -25.9 1.16 0.62 -50.8 -97.4 -30.5 1.30 0.68
L-ACA 66 -42.4 -72.0 -28.0 1.03 0.57 R-MCA/ACA 66 46.6 85.5 26.6 1.20 0.66
L-ACA 66 -44.3 -77.8 -28.9 1.09 0.59 -37.0 -67.0 -20.4 1.23 0.68
L-ACA 70 -44.7 -80.1 -30.7 1.09 0.61 R-ACA 70 -43.1 -87.0 -27.4 1.36 0.68
L-T-ICA 50 23.1 62.0 3.05 2.50 0.94 R-ACA 68 -39.7 -75.5 -24.6 1.27 0.67
L-PCA P1 70 43.9 70.8 20.7 1.11 0.68 R-MCA 50 64.7 146 37.5 1.66 0.72
L-PCA P1 70 46.2 68.5 25.4 0.91 0.62 R-MCA 56 75.1 138 48.8 1.18 0.64
L-PCA P1 68 43.5 72.0 23.4 1.10 0.67 R-MCA 56 73.9 144 44.7 1.33 0.68
L-VA 60 -26.2 -76.6 -9.41 2.32 0.60 R-T-ICA 56 20.0 45.4 4.71 2.00 0.89
L-VA 64 -20.0 -30.4 -12.4 0.89 0.58 R-T-ICA 56 23.5 54.7 4.97 2.02 0.87
L-VA 60 -21.9 -31.2 -15.8 0.69 0.49 R-PCA P1 56 18.1 45.0 2.61 2.28 0.92
L-VA 64 -21.2 -30.0 -14.6 0.72 0.51 R-PCA P1 64 22.7 40.8 13.3 1.19 0.66
L-VA 66 -20.4 -32.0 -12.8 0.92 0.59 R-PCA P1 66 21.9 41.6 12.6 1.30 0.68
L-VA 66 -21.2 -31.2 -14.4 0.78 0.53 R-PCA P1 72 20.0 45.4 6.74 1.80 0.79
Status epilepticus
Burst suppression
Brain death
call from the epileptologist who is monitoring the patient providers will typically ask the nurses to titrate the med-
for clarification. ications to a certain number of bursts per minute. For
Burst suppression is evidenced by voltage attenua- example, in an induced coma, the order may read to
tion with bursts of generalized activity. Burst suppres- titrate either a pentobarbital or propofol infusion to 4 to
sion is seen in clinical states such as anoxic brain injury 6 bursts per minute. If a standard EEG screen displays 15
or prolonged resuscitation or it can be induced with seconds of information, the nurse should see a minimum
medications such as pentobarbital or propofol. When of 1 burst of electrical activity on the screen at any given
burst suppression is pharmacologically induced, time, but no more than 2. An accurate assessment of
Harris C. Neuromonitoring Indications and Utility in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Nurse. 2014;34(3):30-40.
1. Which of the following is an experimental use of transcranial Doppler 7. Which of the following is not a derivative of electroencephalography (EEG)?
(TCD) imaging? a. Bispectral monitoring
a. Assessment for collateral flow patterns b. Somatosensory evoked potentials
b. Assessment for cerebral blood flow c. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials
c. Detection of cerebral emboli d. Transcutaneous nerve stimulation
d. Evaluation of arteriovenous malformations
8. An EEG is the evaluation of spontaneous electrical activity in the brain
2. Which of the following is not a cranial window for TCD monitoring? used to guide which of the following?
a. Temporal a. Nutritional management
b. Orbital b. Seizure management
c. Parietal c. Vasopressor therapy
d. Occipital d. Hypothermia therapy
3. Which of the following velocities are established as the criterion to follow 9. Which of the following are the typical markings of status epilepticus on
to assess blood flow in the brain? the EEG?
a. Mean flow velocity a. Amplitude spikes
b. Peak flow velocity b. Latency spikes
c. Mode flow velocity c. Frequency spikes
d. Median flow velocity d. Delta spikes
4. A significant decrease in mean flow velocity may reflect which of the 10. What can an EEG help diagnose when there is cessation of any activity?
following complications? a. Level of sedation
a. Increasing severity of vasospasm b. Brain death
b. Impending or competed stroke c. Level of anesthesia
c. Increasing severity of hyperemia d. Brain hypoxia
d. Rupture of a cerebral aneurysm
11. What does the bispectral monitoring device indicate if the index range
5. The Lindegaard ratio examines the mean flow velocity in which of the number is 20-40?
following? a. Awake
a. Middle cerebral artery divided by the mean flow velocity in the ipsilateral b. Light to moderate sedation
internal carotid artery (ICA) c. General anesthesia
b. Anterior cerebral artery divided by the mean flow velocity in the ipsilateral d. Burst suppression
ICA
c. Posterior cerebral artery divided by the mean flow velocity in the ipsilat- 12. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials may show signal changes when the
eral ICA patient’s intracranial pressure is at what level?
d. Basilar cerebral artery divided by the mean flow velocity in the ipsilateral ICA a. 15-19 mm Hg
b. 20-24 mm Hg
6. A Lindegaard ratio of >3-6 indicates which degree of vasospasm severity? c. 25-29 mm Hg
a. None d. >30 mm Hg
b. Mild
c. Moderate
d. Severe
Test answers: Mark only one box for your answer to each question. You may photocopy this form.
1. a 2. a 3. a 4. a 5. a 6. a 7. a 8. a 9. a 10. a 11. a 12. a
b b b b b b b b b b b b
c c c c c c c c c c c c
d d d d d d d d d d d d
Test ID: C143 Form expires: June 1, 2017 Contact hours: 1.0 Pharma hours: 0.0 Fee: AACN members, $0; nonmembers, $10 Passing score: 9 correct (75%)
Synergy CERP Category A Test writer: Lynn C. Simko, PhD, RN, CCRN