CAP 785 Approval Requirements For Instrument Flight Procedures For Use in UK Airspace
CAP 785 Approval Requirements For Instrument Flight Procedures For Use in UK Airspace
CAP 785
www.caa.co.uk
CAP 785
22 March 2010
CAP 785 Approval Requirements for Instrument Flight Procedures for Use in UK Airspace
All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be reproduced for personal use, or for use within a
company or organisation, but may not otherwise be reproduced for publication.
To use or reference CAA publications for any other purpose, for example within training material for
students, please contact the CAA at the address below for formal agreement.
Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) on behalf of the UK Civil Aviation Authority.
Contents
References
Abbreviations
Glossary of Terms
Chapter 1 Introduction
Background 1
Purpose 1
General Guidelines 1
Environmental Considerations 1
Overview 1
Criteria for the Approval of IFP Designers 1
Application for CAA Approval to Design IFPs 2
Design Privileges 3
Issue of Approval 3
Duration and continued validity 3
Audits 3
Transferability 4
Chapter 2 Fees
Approval Fees 1
Chapter 1 Process and Criteria for the Submission of IFP Designs for
Approval
Design Process 1
Design Criteria 1
Design Submission – Format and Content 2
External Data and Information 2
Drawings 3
Calculations 3
Submissions 3
Rejected Submissions 3
Responsibilities 1
Maintenance 1
Safeguarding 1
References
Reference Documents
Reference Title
ICAO
EuroControl
UK
Abbreviations
NOTE: Reference to PANS-OPS is used for convenience throughout this document and
refers generically to ICAO Document 8168, Volume II or the criteria contained therein.
Glossary of Terms
Instrument Flight Procedures Designer (IFPD) – For the purposes of this document an
Instrument Flight Procedures Designer shall be considered to be either:
• An organisation employing one or more suitably qualified individuals.
• A suitably qualified individual.
Approved Procedure Designer (APD) – An APD is an instrument flight procedures designer
who has met the competency requirements laid down by the CAA and holds an approval for
the design of instrument flight procedures for aerodromes or heliports, which are under the
jurisdiction of the CAA. (CAA)
'Flyability' of an IFP – An assessment that the IFP is flyable by the anticipated range of aircraft
types in various weight, speed and centre of gravity configurations, and in various weather
conditions (temperature, wind effects and visibility). It is also designed to assess that the
required aircraft manoeuvring is consistent with safe operating practices, and that flight crew
workload is acceptable. (CAA)
Independent Approved Procedure Designer (IAPD) – An APD who has not been involved in
the design of the IFP which is being validated, but can be part of the same organisation. (CAA).
Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) – A series of predetermined manoeuvres by
reference to flight instruments, with specified protection from obstacles, from a specified
point to a point from which a landing can be completed and thereafter, if a landing is not
completed, to a position at which holding or other obstacle clearance criteria apply. (CAA)
Instrument Flight Procedure (IFP) – A standard instrument arrival, an instrument approach
procedure, or a standard instrument departure. (CAA)
Sponsor – Aerodrome licence holder or representative from an Aerodrome acting on the
Licence holder’s behalf, or an ANSP, who proposes a new design, changes to, or withdrawal
of an IFP. (CAA)
Standard Instrument Arrival (STAR) – A designated IFR arrival route linking a significant
point, normally on an ATS route, with a point from which a published IAP can be commenced.
(ICAO)
Standard Instrument Departure (SID) – A designated IFR departure route linking the
aerodrome or a specified runway of the aerodrome with a specified significant point, normally
on a designated ATS route, at which the en-route phase of a flight commences. (ICAO)
Chapter 1 Introduction
1 Background
1.1 Single European Sky (SES) legislation came into force in April 2004 and requires a
formal, functional split between the Regulation and service provision of air navigation
functions. This separation is intended to improve the clarity of focus and
effectiveness of both the Regulator and the provider of the service.
1.2 Instrument Flight Procedure (IFP) design is regarded as a function of service provision
and as such, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is required to take steps to separate
this activity from its regulatory functions. Notwithstanding the SES requirements, the
CAA considers such a split to be necessary and appropriate.
1.3 In order to manage a transition of the functions from the CAA to industry, a two-year
transitional period has been planned from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2012.
2 Purpose
1.1 The Civil Aviation Act (1982) established the CAA and provides the framework for its
regulatory powers. Furthermore, the Air Navigation Directions 2001 require that the
CAA develop national policy for design criteria, rules and guidelines in relation to the
supporting infrastructure for air navigation.
1.2 The Act enables further legislation, the ANO and General Regulations to be made in
order to permit the CAA to fulfil its regulatory obligations.
1.3 The ANO contains articles, each dealing with a particular subject.
1.4 The CAA publishes Civil Aviation Publications (CAP), which provide details of means
of compliance that are acceptable to the CAA.
1.5 The Controlled Airspace Section, Directorate of Airspace Policy, within the CAA is
responsible for the formulation of policy relating to the design of IFPs. The
responsibility includes regulatory oversight of external agencies engaged in the
design of IFPs for subsequent use in the UK FIR and at UK civil airports. Regulation is
achieved, as appropriate, through the application of requirements as laid out in the
relevant articles to the ANO by the CAA.
1.6 The aim of CAA regulation is to ensure that IFPs:
• are designed to the required standard as stipulated in Section 3, Chapter 1,
paragraph 2;
• are safe and flyable;
• meet Air Traffic Management requirements; and
• are environmentally acceptable.
1 General Guidelines
2 Environmental Considerations
Generic guidance is given by the Department for Transport in Guidance to the CAA
on Environmental Objectives Relating to the Exercise of its Air Navigation Functions
(DTLR January 2002), which can be found online at:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/7/DTLREnvironmentalGuidance.pdf
Detailed guidance is also given in CAP 725 available on the CAA website at
http://www.caa.co.uk/CAP725
Practically, the policy is to contain rather than spread noise with tracks being routed
away from centres of population where safety and operational considerations permit.
1 Overview
2.1 Procedure Designers seeking approval to design IFPs for use in UK airspace must
provide evidence of the following:
• Specialist PANS-OPS/IFP design training;
• Practical Application of Theoretical Knowledge;
• References;
• Aviation Experience; and
• Quality Management System (QMS).
2.2 Specialist Training: Proof of attendance and successful completion of a PANS-
OPS training course based upon ICAO Pans Ops Doc 8168. A typical PANS-OPS
course is based on 4 to 8 weeks training, or equivalent part-time basis, given by an
experienced lecturer, who is well grounded in procedure design and all aspects of
PANS-OPS. However, where no formal training course has been completed, it may
be acceptable to the CAA to provide evidence of a comprehensive “apprenticeship”
under the supervision and training of an approved designer.
2.3 Practical Application of Theoretical Knowledge: The ability of an applicant to
demonstrate practical application of theoretical knowledge is required. Applicants are
expected to provide:
a) Proof of recent IFP design work; this should include details of specific designs
that have been completed and over what period of time. Where possible,
examples of the design process should be provided.
b) Aviation Experience: It is generally accepted that a high level of aviation
experience is an important attribute for successful IFP design, ideally as aircrew or
air traffic controller. It is not considered essential to hold a current licence nor to
distinguish between a civil or military background. Procedure Designers who have
undergone an “apprenticeship’, in lieu of aviation experience, should provide
evidence that supports a minimum of three years PANS-OPS, on-the-job design
training;
c) References: Applicants should be prepared to provide details of previous
sponsors/employers; and
4 Design Privileges
4.1 The holder of a design approval certificate shall be entitled to design IFPs within the
scope of the Approval.
4.2 Other privileges may include;
a) Approval to submit IFP changes on F933 on behalf of the sponsor of an IFP;
b) Approval to submit F933 for new procedures.
5 Issue of Approval
6.1 A design approval shall be issued for an unlimited duration. It shall remain valid unless:
a) the designer fails to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements; or
b) the CAA is prevented by the designer, or any of its partners or subcontractors,
from performing its investigations; or
c) the designer no longer meets the eligibility requirements for this approval; or
d) the certificate has been surrendered or revoked.
6.2 Upon surrender or revocation, the certificate shall be returned to the CAA.
7 Audits
8 Transferability
Chapter 2 Fees
1 Approval Fees
Fees associated with obtaining CAA approval to design IFPs for use in UK airspace
are available from the CAA website at:
www.caa.co.uk/ors5
1 Design Process
1.1 The design process is initiated by a Sponsor’s requirement for a new or change to an
existing IFP. The Sponsor shall notify the CAA of his intention to establish or amend
an IFP using the form available from the CAA website at:
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=7&pagetype=90&pageid=2368
1.2 Formal notification to the CAA, once completed, shall be sent to:
Head of Controlled Airspace Section
Directorate of Airspace Policy
Civil Aviation Authority
CAA House K6
45-59 Kingsway
London
WC2B 6TE
United Kingdom
1.3 Following receipt of the form, an acknowledgement will be sent to the Sponsor within
5 working days, naming the DAP case officer, who will act as the point of contact for
the project.
1.4 Sponsors applying for new procedures must consider the processes involved when
establishing realistic implementation dates (See flowchart at Appendix A). These
considerations include the following:
• Design period (Negotiated between Sponsor and Designer);
• Associated regulatory activity by CAA staff including allowance for amendments
and corrections to original submission (Approx 1-2 Months);
• Production of a chart suitable to allow AIS to produce a chart for the AIP;
• Flight calibration of navigation aids if required;
• Ground/flight/simulator/navigation database validation, as required; and
• AIRAC promulgation (Approximately 3 months from submission of charts to AIS to
effective date of procedure).
2 Design Criteria
2.1 The criterion for IFP design in UK airspace is based on the following document:
ICAO Doc 8168-OPS/611, Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Aircraft
Operations Volume II, Construction of Visual and Instrument Flight Procedures
(PANS-OPS Vol II)
2.2 In accordance with the latest ICAO policy, significant national differences to Doc 8168
are notified in the UK AIP. Where further guidance is required, the DAP case officer
should be approached for clarification.
3.1 IFP designs submitted for evaluation and approval by the regulator are to provide:
• A complete record of the design process including copies of all source data,
information, calculations and drawings used in the project;
• A record of Quality Assurance and Quality Control;
• A statement of compliance with PANS-OPS from an IAPD;
• A report demonstrating how the original requirement has been satisfied;
• A narrative, which unambiguously describes the procedure in textual format and
table showing all tracks in degrees True to 1/100th degree;
• A graphical representation which accurately reflects the content of the narrative
provided;
• Relevant signed Validation reports;
• A comprehensive design rationale in text format, including references to PANS-
OPS Volume II and UK policy where a deviation from the standard criteria or policy
has been employed; and
• The Approval fee as promulgated on the CAA website.
4.1 External data used in the design process must be submitted in source format as well
as any modified formats created by the designer. The data handling process used by
the designer must be documented, including all quality management processes and
procedures to provide demonstrable proof of data quality and integrity. A full
reference to any maps or charts is required. Copies of paper maps used will be
required unless electronic versions are available.
4.2 Where any maps or charts have been scanned or digitised, such scans or digitised
drawings must be included in the submission, subject to copyright.
4.3 IAPs will only be included in the UK AIP where the runway served by the procedure
has been assigned an instrument runway designation in accordance with CAP 168
Licensing of Aerodromes.
4.4 Current survey data and information are crucial to the design of safe IFPs. CAP 232
Aerodrome Survey Information details the survey requirements and presentation
required by the CAA for obstacle and aerodrome data. Aerodrome surveys used for
IFP design purposes must comply with CAP 232. Any change to the survey will
require an assessment as to the impact upon current IFPs.
4.5 Sponsors are responsible for ensuring that the survey and subsequent IFP activities
are controlled and monitored to an appropriate standard. Quality assurance and
quality control processes set out in ISO 9001:2008 aimed at service provision are a
recommended benchmark.
5 Drawings
5.1 CAD is not a prerequisite for design submission. However, if CAD is employed any
appropriate tool can be used as required by the sponsor and the designer. When CAD
drawings are submitted to the CAA they should be in a generic format (e.g. *.dwg or
*.dxf).
6 Calculations
6.1 The results and calculations shall be presented in a manner that enables the Regulator
to follow and trace the logic and resultant output including:
• A record of all relevant calculations kept in order to prove compliance with or
variation from the criteria;
• Formulae used during calculation should be the standard formulae as declared in
PANS-OPS and related ICAO publications; and
• Units of measurement and conversion factors must be in accordance with ICAO
Annex 5 taking into account any applicable UK differences.
7 Submissions
8 Rejected Submissions
8.1 Where the CAA is unable to approve an IFP design, consultation between the CAA,
aerodrome and designer will be encouraged to explore all possible solutions.
1 Responsibilities
For the purposes of this document, the CAA considers that responsibility for IFPs is
held as follows:
• IAPs and SIDs are managed by the aerodrome licence holder; and
• STARs are managed by the en-route ANSP.
The CAA is responsible for overall regulatory oversight of IFPs. Individual
responsibilities are detailed below.
1.1 IFP Sponsor
The Sponsor of an IFP is either the aerodrome licence holder or their nominated
representative or an ANSP; the sponsor is responsible for:
a) maintenance of an IFP;
b) initiating any new design or change to an IFP;
c) ensuring that any new design or change to an IFP is undertaken by an APD;
d) ensuring the validation as required of any new/changed IFP;
e) ensuring that the F933 is submitted; and
f) ensuring compliance with CAP 725 when consultation is required.
1.2 Approved Procedure Designer
The APD is responsible for:
a) providing a statement of compliance;
b) documenting the rationale for any non-compliance;
c) adherence to UK design policy;
d) ensuring that the design is documented against declared QMS;
e) ensuring that the design meets the requirements of the Sponsor; and
f) providing advice to the sponsor on all aspects of IFP design.
1.3 Directorate of Airspace Policy
DAP is responsible for:
a) ensuring the provision of IAPs as appropriate;
b) granting approval to design;
c) granting approval to IFP designs; and,
d) providing guidance to Sponsors and APDs as appropriate in developing IFPs.
1 Maintenance
2 Safeguarding of IFPs
1. These are the three airports presently designated under section 80 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 for the
purposes of section 78 of that Act, giving rise to the descriptor “designated airports”. Section 78 empowers
the Secretary of State (and, in Scotland, the Scottish Ministers) to regulate noise and vibration connected
with aircraft taking off or landing at designated airports.