Project Grudge Report Overview
Project Grudge Report Overview
.Co.aa41ac G8Ilerat
Alr Materiel 00.....
Wrlch,.;;[Link] Ail' J'OJ'CM . . . .
[Link]
~
/ JOM
,jJ/~v' J("(): \~~ ,\\~ t~
~rZER JR '\ ~ \ il':
!,;f;~
0
~
CO'-l. OI'C] ,. , ~
.. ' , '- :;AF .....
". ~;'::;"..• •
~ ...~
(\),-
. -" i-.
/.....,.'
t;,oout:;.; - \)<.).., U .,':')j ,!,_.
LJirecto;~te of ~~ilrerr~~'<>;
OFFICE SYMBOL
GRADE AND
SURNAME OF
COORDIN ATING
OFFICERS . n>
18-Z9242-2 u. S. GOVERNMENT 'RINTING OfFICE
Thi
sdocumenti
smadeavail
abl
ethrought
hedeclassi
fi
cat
ionef
for
ts
andr
esear
chofJohnGreenewal
d,Jr
.,cr
eatorof
:
T
heB
lac
kVa
ult
TheBlackVaultist
helargestonli
neFreedom ofI
nfor
mationAct(FOIA)
documentcl
ear i
[Link]
ort
shereare
responsi
blef
orthedec l
assi
fi
cati
onofhundredsofthousandsofpages
releasedbytheU. [Link]&Mi l
it
ary
.
Di
scovert
heTr
uthat
:ht
tp:
//
www.
thebl
ackvaul
[Link]
Col Harris/aws/52466
( Wrtn 11 Oct 50
UOIV-TC
OFFICE SYMBOL
SIONATURE OF
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER
INTERNAL OFFICE
COORDIlUTlON
-'--11-·-1- )6-29242-1 u. S. GOYUNMENT· PRINTING OfFICE
G8Nf'IDEN ,fAt AFOIV-TC
Col Harris/aws/52466
12 Oct 50
I PROBIEM
6 OCT 50 ...
DJR/INT
HQ USAF
'319.1
".25 Sept)950 .
,':;--"
f
~ ..r
~ .• ;
FRCIls
.J
Dept· of the Air Force .. ~~ u.s. ,Air Force
'.'
:,-Y',"
ros
fi"~~~,*~r'~f~f~;~'~~~~~·e~"r~~~i1.l~.~.st~~~~'~~~~u~~~~~~~<,j
......... ,.'"" .
''. .
. ','
... ·2 •.. Cop1eJLO~ .t.M.s .corresponci!mce are being prepared for forwarding to
Hq. AMC for further con~iderat1on under Project No. 10073.
,
~ . .. ~6'1'
c. Object moved at a constant angular rate and did not alter
'.
cour8e.i~ . ','
•...- ..........
.••• - . . . . . .
-
~.~ .. - .... ~
:.!;
.. - , . . - - . . ; . • - : / . •
-----.. •. ,.•.
. . . . .
,.:. ';:-: . .
--
:
.- ..
"Cij~;,~-'=······-:--··' -.'.
•
--_ . '
.
'.':" '_l"'_'=
., : . -",,":,"
\.' II _ ....
-·--e.""!
. .;. -.
~--
..-:......----- c •
---- ...
f- •.••
' ..
·... ~~\.~ ..
.......... _.-.-
e~-
... ~...
~:
~A'. ..
~ I·~,r.:. ,~ .
• - -........ ~- - ...iJ,...;(J..••
..--
.-:--.--
~.,
...... -~."' ... ~
·······~·T~··-~
"', . t. , . M • ...__ ._.-
··. ···~·rJ·-·-
-
AFOAI-D!
Maj Boggs/er/5867
Wrtn 9 Feb 50
PROBLEM:
AcrION RECCIWENDED:
5. Approval, 8ignatlilre, and forwarding.
• COORDINATION:
None.
Declassification lAW
EO 13$"2..(,-
by th8.~r, Fop Oeclasslflcatlon OffIce
Date:.111tl1LRevlewer#·_1,""",",12_ _
9E8RET -
c-o-p-y
CeNFIf!JEiq tIAL AFOAI-DA
Maj. Boggs/at/5867
Wrtn 29 Dec 49
[Link]
EO I~" s/JOHN M. SCl-lWEIZER, JR.
Colonel, USAF
by th~[Link] Declassification OffIce
Date:[Link]# 10 Directorate of Intelligence
PROl3LEM:
2. In September 19l19. the »/1 receiTed what was considered by Hq• .!MC
to be a fiDal report on the findings of Project Grudge (UDidentified aerial
objects). Since investigations and analyses did not reveal that so-called
"flying s&ncer-incidents involTed other than misidentifications of conTentional
objects, natUral phenomena, and some hoax, Hq. AXC asked. that the special
project activity on such reports be discontinued.
If.. "Both the Department of the Army and Department of the NaTY. through
the JIO, have concurred fully in the findings of Project Grudge and. concur
that the requirement for Project Grudge has been fulfille ...
2.
obj~etbels.c fl .
'the _"bur. of tba • •vv.," [Link] a poaa1 01 U~. of the
lighted ba1100a. ~ev., th1. [Link] . . _ ...
p1.ore4~enL'tJ'1 BaT_ was 1nterd"e• .a:.tt. C,010u1 Willis, 'f~lm1ofll
0.p"b111t1 .. Dr_ell. L~tJGHav. . .'ta.'\tdthah 'jet [Link] made
"i~[Link] cm his a1J'ol"att 0 . . . . ~&8i . . . . . . . .t e d . t .
lig~" had a. 8p8JlHl1'ailgelliuch gr•••r thaa·' ... j.e't ttgbt.... It .ppear"
toc1rol. hi. [Link] a. twrits... rag .1.pee4, ..,.a1f'[Link]$U.•"
i n , ; . . rata etol~ ....... tim.,.,,_'
btf fWU' 8000 I ..... percnuW_
Theretor ... it would llO'to..poadble to _1.,. 'hb ·lJlcidct a.a Ughted.
[Link] balloon. it, '1;M Q4JSR1ptian 1.eoIUll4wed'uour&".
$. It b1 'r~q_.'td tha,·th1a report be reYi~ ud crnluatioa
torward'ed to, th1.' [Link]..ta. ' .
It .Oo~..... OF nJ'.B QIllf' 0' af.u7.
/:
f..- 3 ~. t), ,:L H /1~.
I FROBLEM
1. To advise Col Watson, AMC, concerning proper procedure for
handling unidentified aerial object reports.
FACTS AND DISCUSSION
2. On 9 Oct 50, Gen Moore instructed Col Harris, AFOIV-TO, to
telephone Col Watson, !MC, and advise him that photographs of an
unidentified aerial object were to be evaluated by Intelligence Dept,
!Me, and not to be forwarded to D/I for evaluation.
98NfI8ENffAt·
~g~.~T~O~:~AF~O~IP;---------------S~~~~~~1i~~-~R;E~~~R~K;S~(C:O:nt~i~n:ue~d~)------------------l~
1. Forwarded for consideration'.s not ed in para 2 of II Jul 50
Comment No.1. DATE
2. Detailed studT has been made of attached letter and 2
iaclosures from Oontinental Air [Link]. Final analyses NO. ------------
were delayed awaiting receipt of twenty-four hour weather reports for 8 and 9 Mar
1950 for Selfridge AlB area.
3. Attention is invited to recommendation in para 5, page 2 of basic letter.
It is recommended that the following information be incorporated in reply to
Oontinental Air Oommand's recommendation:
a. Ooncur as follewB with conclusions reached by Oontinental Air Oommand
in regard to incident described in basic letter and it. inclosures:
(1) 'the magnitude of the velocity and [Link] of the three
dimensional movements of the 'object' reported are beyond the
capability of known heavier or lighter than air vehicles in
controlled flight. 1
(2) "supporting this is the fact that the 'obJect t was reported as
re..tning Itationary in free space for a mean-period of two
minutes. II
b. There is a conflict in data on the incident; one witness [Link] that
the incident occurred on 8 March (see Incl. 2, page 2, 1st para.) and other wit-
ness states incident occurred OD. 9 March (see Incl. 1, page 1, 1st para •.)
c. What is believed to have been a similar [Link], also observed by
radar (SOR-584) ,occurred at Wright-Patterson AlB on the morning of 8 March 1950.
At approximately 0745 two airline pilots reported that they had seen a long
slender body at about 10,000 ft approaching from the northwest. The object was-
icked by observers at the Vandalia control tower who observed the opject
n. TO: DATE
position of the 'object' but the pilot could see nothing a1.- -------7'""
though the control tower was still in visual contact with i"8.
Later, an F-51 attempted to track the ebject. It could not ----------------------
intercept it. Dlring this time radar had not been able to detect any strange
objects ef any sert. However, at about 1130 hours signals ef large [Link]
were being rec,eived on an SOR-584. An ,-eO was vectored to the approximate loca-
tion of the targets and reported back that strips of ice laden clouds running
--e northwest to southwest were visible at approximately 10.-600 ft. !'his informatien
concurred with plots obtained by the radar and gave COBc~8ive [Link] that the
radar targets were in fact reflections from the ice laden cleuds. !ke earlier
visual sightings were apparently due to the morning sun shining through the
ice laden cloud, causing an optical illusion •
.' d. .[Link]'ll€h the 'object 1 observed 011 radar at Selfridge .AJl3 was
~~ ..... r"lI.,terized br velocities ranging from zero to approximately 43) mph, and
rratic changes in altitude which Showed no intelligent maneuvering, the obser-
tions could easily have been the result of turbulent conditions in ice laden
sphere. A study of the weather in the Selfridge AFB area daring twenty-four
hour periods on 8 and 9 March shows that such turbulent conditions could have
prevailed. Such conditions are not unusual for that time of year.
e. As in the case of such [Link] examined in the past, there has
been no evidence that unusual observations have been the. rerut of a new te,,~..v .... UoK:'
lcal advancement by an alien pJ!er. In every case where there has been suffi-
cient usable data, it has been~~1 a seemingly unusual observation was the
result of misidentification.';> ft was for this reason tbat requirements for
special investigation of such incidents and the entire 'ProJect Gru4le l (unidenti-
fied aerial objects) were cancelled by Hq. USAF earlier tbis year. The discontin-
of speCial reporting and consideration has J8I; stopped the reports of such
•
SECOlW
.
COVER SHEET
, -
a. '"
RECORD OF BASIC CORRESPONDENCE OR REQUEST
W1WU lolfJIIUIJ:"
b. CLASSIFICATION:
FROM: DATE:
12 Apr 50
AFOIV TYPE:
* Ltr
SUMMARY:
ASGD BY _ _ _ _ _ _ __
(Use
DeclassificatIOn lAW
EoJ~
}
PERS
M& R ADMIN by ttI~eclasslflcaUOO Office
B& F Dat~:" II Revlewer# 7 D
CABLE
X Action
... ..
~
V Coordination
e. DATE REC'O BR DISPATCH FJ LE
ACTI ON ASGD TO DISPATCHED BY TO
SIGNED DATE DISPATCHED
9-17"8, A. ..
·sru !~'QiPlffAt
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FOROE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FOROE
WASHINGTON 25~ D. o.
[Link]-l
SUBJmT: Reporting of Information on Unconventional Aircraft
1:" The Unl ted States Air Foree has a conUnulng [Link] ~ll.
for the repol'ting and technical [Link] of obaerv'ations of [Link]~
vel'l.t1onal aircraft whioh might indicate a.n advanoe in technological
progress of a foreign power. An unoonventional aircraft, within
the meaning of this directive. is [Link] as any aircraft or air-
borne object whioh by perfox~ance, aerodynamic characteristics, or
unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft
type.
2. It is desired that information on unconventional aircraft
be reported in the following manner:
a. A separate report of each incident will be forwarded.
No information other thaxl that bearing on the unconventional air=
craft will be included in this report.
b Pri 01'1 ty of ·transm'. ad on [Link] the report will be
D
• KRAFTBROTHEHS - ILLUSTRATORS
Commanding Officer,
Office of Naval Intelligence
Navy Department
Washington, D. C.
Dear Sir:
I have fallen onto some information I hardly know what to do with,
and hesitate to say anything for fear of being laughed out of town.
Some months ago, I contacted a Pofessor Albert Hovings of Calga'Z'y
Alberta, Canada. He had some airplanes I was interested in buying.
During the course of negotiations he brings· in the idea that he has
in his possession' a flying saucer, and claims to have flown the
think over most of weatern canaaa and most of the United States_.
He claims it has now wings at all" has speeds from zero to suteen
hundred miles per hour and can land on either land or water. I
asked the Professor why he had not taken it to the RCAF and it
seems he bas a great hatred for tl'e english but mentioned that he would_
be interested in taling to U.S. officicals about it. InCidentally he
is a dutch immigrint and has been patenting under half a dozen
foreign countries_
I am a former Naval officer and do not consider myself a moron ••
as you may have sRspected by this time" I believe Hovings actually
has this contraption and that it has actually flow. I believe I
can get Hovings to show us the machine and actually demonstrate.
You may already have a line on this guy or the Canadians may know
about him" but I do believe he merits some investigation and perhaps
cultivating.
Sincery yours,
s/ W. K. Kraft
~BL1lM:
•
2. Letter. cited. 1a paracraph 1 refer to cla1JD Profenor AlDert
lU'Tings of'0alca!7. .Al'berta, Caaada. made to former uval officer re-
,g_rd1nc "f'17i1l« saucer" 1a which. Profenor HoviDgs BtJpposedl.T has been
o~erf17iag U.S. terri torT. Professor BoviDgs also has other aircraft.
• Jrene
88Nfl8ENTlAt
, " .
......,..0..
1DaMII·".ftI· •• , .•
".1..
''''''.' ,.. .
l'."'WI"..
' . " " . 'ott
••••
n1.,
••.,
.,..... 1-_._.-
1. "",11_
• _ . . , .
" :"",
, i ' .•...
*.,.......... . 0',...'.$8."
. .., ......
,.,..,' .
~.,.; " .... ,4",08••ir",..._, .,.~• •J..........
·........ •. . . . . ...,..atW
1011__
....-l·. .W , ......., • •
"""..., . .
.. . . . . , . ,. . . . llllaM.1. . .
" tb , ... ., . " '. .
AIJ~'''' ........ ., .
.
" .
»~:,.,
. . . . . .'.
... \ • . p..
. '".!
,
...._.11"
.")a.,..u-. . ,PI,-.•.,...
(1) .,.1... • . . . . ·tfta 114k" . . . . '1-.. ..... l.:
kU.
. ..
, ': p
,,;.
.•.
..".....
""~loa
.....
.........
,......... .
",u{\JA.
"' ..
; .. : .
f" '.
·.,(tl .rs....t
(.,(.) W,"",,,,,'
"',.a.
,
.,.......
. • -....~_t
(' ·;AIlU
hI_· ."'.PI 18'.....,
__
.U.... AiJo ............. '
('~.. ,.,....iI~..... . rs.w.,
'-l'f.
·dd. _ - . .
.~.A1.,.
,,.U.....le..
•
It. . . . . . . ., ·.~-II
.
..
y. _ . . . . .,
, .__" .. ·. . .r . . . . . . ..
~ ~
~ ,oA_...•..;....... . '. :a.u. . . . '... . ..
-.
, .•,....
. '.' .. ..L.. ".........
.'
·"'1-.""
'., An . . . . . . . . ue.....t. ..............
' .•..•.....f _ ................................
,.JI."...,.,...~ .. ,.,~•• ~~ ~.A.w,. .
.... ..,
" ...•.•..... ......
llhel
. ~""-'-',.
~ ~.~
' .."
Declassification lAW
E01~SLG.
bY~[Link];n.·..~[Link]
. Date. RevleW8r# 70.
'ce
PROBLEM:
5. Project Grudge has been concluded by the USAF but the micro-
film files are a record of discontinued activity; however, there is
no objeotion to their being used by AEC on a loan basis •. Most of
these records remain classified because of personal data on witnesses
collected by OSI investigators and will not be downgraded.
6. 1st Indorsement to basic letter has been prepared to Oommand-
ing General, AMO, instructing that microfilm files be furnished AEC
on a loan basis to be used under their present classification.
AOTION RECOMMENDED:
7. Approval, signature, and forwarding.
OOORDINATION:
None ~~C'i~mLAW
by th~lr;re Declassification OffIce
Date: II Revlawar# ?D
.. e8NPIDEit iIAL
,.
c c p cv
___
TO Com:nanding General
YJright-Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton, Chio
il TTl\T : . i,JeT
2. Since th(-: r·eferenc(~d 1etter is mor0. tYan tvvo ~1·ear5 old this
office desires to knm'i if con tinned compliance is still requ8s ted.
Declaaslflcatton lAW
EO 135ZJ." /s/ nOBER,l' P. BELL
by the ~r ~ DeclasslflcaUon OffIce
Date:-2/JJ1LR9vlewer# 7 D ';t/ ED BERT F. B'GLL
Colonel, esc
AC of S, G-2
_nBEIlftAL
"'_118'.s •
,
e
~ If\+e.({f~e+fT+i eY"\ ct ~e. H~L(i~1 i~i~e~'~ 1Ht~~if J=. ~oLedt'lL.
(tJ hlttfmiLss :"~rr I r~~:0 .~
wsed -.to
. 1
! ~
,
I
·1
i
I
I
! I I
, \
, \ l
f t
~.oJ~
tre~fc,lL; "3- ft tfft ~ fI-ru.5 -
~ .
i
, - i
• ,L¥
f \
,i
,
1
-,- I
~
:t
, .........___ .. _ _.. _J;;t;: ~_ _ __
1,
\
~)
-.
.
<!.-
V ftV\t,.