0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 69 views23 pagesMonitoring & Targeting
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Chapter 9
Energy
Monitoring and
Targeting
Learning Objectives
In this chapter you will learn about
o
oO
o
a
Importance of energy monitoring and
targeting
Elements of monitoring and targeting
systems
Relating energy consumption and
production
Using graphical tools for trends and
projections
CUSUM technique
Energy management information system9, ENERGY MONITORING AND TARGETING
Defining monitoring and targeting, Elements of monitoring and targeting, Data and informa-
tion analysis, Techniques-energy consumption and production, Cumulative sum of differences
(CUSUM), EMIS.
9.1 Introduction
It is possible to establish the existing energy consumption of a facility or organization through an
energy audit, However, this only produces a ‘picture’ of past energy consumption. In order to keep
control of subsequent energy consumption, itis necessary to initiate a monitoring programme, However,
monitoring programme alone has limited value as it simply records energy consumption. To achieve
improvements in energy performance, a targeting programme, in which targets are set, must accompany
the monitoring process and planned improvements made.
Energy monitoring and targeting (M&T) is primarily a management technique that us
information as a basis to eliminate waste, reduce and control current level of energy use and improve
the existing operating procedures, It is based on the principle “you can’t manage what you don’t
measure”. It essentially combines the principles of energy use and statistics.
s energy
By using M&, all plant and building utilities such as fuel, steam, refrigeration, compressed air, water,
effluent, and electricity are managed as controllable resources in the same way that raw mate
finished product inventory, building occupancy, personnel and capital are managed.
Monitoring and Targeting (M&T) programs have been so effective that they show typical reductions
in annual energy costs in various industrial sectors between 5 and 15%.
9.2 What is Monitoring & Targeting?
Monitoring is the process of establishing the existing pattem of energy consumption and explaining
deviations from existing pattern. Its primary goal is to maintain existing pattern by providing all the
necessary data on energy consumption and key related data such as production.
Targeting is the identification of desirable energy consumption level and working towards achieving
them, Targets are based on the historical (average or best) data acquired during the monitoring as well
as benchmarking with energy performance of similar organizations.
9.3 Setting up Monitoring & Targeting
Before initiating M&T, it is important to establish Energy Account Centers (EACs) within an
organization. These may be departments, processes or cost centers. Operational managers should be
accountable for the energy consumption of the EACs for which they are responsible.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2139, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
It is important that any proposed M&T programme be designed to suit the needs of the particular
organization. From an energy point of view, organization can be characterized in various ways. Typical
classifications are by the number of sites covered and the level of metering adopted as follows:
Y Single site with central utility metering
Y Single site with sub-metering
Y Multi-site with central utility metering
Y Multiple-site with sub-metering
‘Single site with central utility metering are probably best treated as a single FAC, while the introduction
of sub-metering enables such site to be broken-up into a number of separate EACs. Where the
organization has a number of separate sites, each with central utility meters, the sites should be treated
as separate FACS. If the organization has multiple sites, each containing sub-metering, then it should
be possible to divide each site into a number of separate EACS,
9.4 Key Elements of Monitoring & Targeting System
‘The key elements of M&T system are:
¥ Recording -Measuring and recording energy consumption of each EAC within an organization,
This involves setting up procedures to ensure regular collection of reliable energy data,
¥ Analysing & Comparing Relating energy consumption to a measured output, such as production
quantity for 12-24 months of historical data to obtain standard energy performance for each
EAC. Standard energy performance is established through regression analysis of past data. If
these data do not exist, then it will be necessary to conduct an energy audit to establish standard
energy performance. Standard Energy Performance provides a base line for the assessment of
future performance, It can also be used as an initial target.
Y Setting Targets -Setting energy targets for each EAC. Energy cost savings can be consistently
achieved if improvements ate made on standard energy performance. Achievable targets should
therefore be set which improve on standard energy performance. Targets can be set based on
external benchmarking with other similar organization or historical achievement of least energy
consumption in the same organization.
Y Monitoring -Comparing actual energy consumption to the set target on a regular basis
Y Reporting -Reporting the results to management including any variances from the targets which
have been set and related performance problems in equipment and systems. Energy management
reports should be produced for each EAC on a regular basis. These reports provide the stimulus
for improved energy performance, and should also quantify any improvements that are achieved,
Y Controlling -Implementing management measures to correct any variances, which may have
courted
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2149, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Particularly M & system will involve the following:
+ Checking the accuracy of energy invoices
+ Allocating energy costs to specific departments (Energy Accounting Centres)
+ Determining energy performance / efficiency
+ Recording energy use, so that projects intended to improve energy efficiency can be checked
for results,
+ Highlighting performance problems in equipment or systems
Benefits of M&T
The ultimate goal is to reduce energy costs through improved energy efficiency and management
control measures. Other benefits include:
¥ Identify and explain an inerease or decrease in energy use
Draw energy consumption trends (weekly, seasonal, operational)
Y Improve energy budgeting corresponding to production plans
¥ Observe how the organization reacted to changes in the past
¥ Determine future energy use when planning changes in operations
Y Diagnose specific areas of wasted energy
Y Develop performance targets for energy management programs / energy action plans
Y Manage energy consumption rather than accept it as a fixed cost that cannot be controlled.
9.5 Data and Information Sources
Information related to energy use may be obtained from following sources:
¥ Plant level information can be derived from financial accounting systems—utilities cost centre
¥ Plant department level information can be found in comparative energy consumption data for
a group of similar facilities, service entrance meter readings ete.
¥ System level (for example, compressor house) performance data can be determined from sub-
metering data
Y Equipment level information can be obtained from nameplate data, run-time and schedule
information, sub-metered data on specific energy consuming equipment.
All of these data are useful and can be processed to yield information about facility performance.
9.6 Data and Information Analysis
There are a wide variety of statistical and mumerical techniques which can be used to understand why
energy is consumed in a particular way. Some of the analysis techniques are fairly simple and can be
done with hand calculator, the others are more complex and may require use of information technology.
The various analysis techniques are explained as follows:
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2159, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
Annual Energy Consumption
‘The simplest analysis is to produce percentage breakdown of annual energy consumption and cost
data. This is a useful technique which enables to assess overall energy performance of a plant or
building quickly and easily. The analysis of annual energy consumption should be carried out as
follows:
1. Convert all the energy consumption data into standard units (usually the keal) using the
standard energy conversions shown in Table 9.1
2. Compile the data as shown in Table 9.2 showing the annual energy consumption and cost for
various fuel and energy types.
3. Compile the above information to produce percentage breakdown of the total energy
consumption and cost of each energy type (Table 9.3).
4, Produce pie-charts similar to those shown in Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.2 to show graphically the
energy and cost contribution of each energy type
Similar procedure can be followed for previous years to identify trends.
Table 9.1 Standard Energy Conversions
Blectricity kW 360
HsD kg 10,500)
Furnace Oil kg 10,200)
LPG) kg 12,000)
‘Table 9.2 Annual Energy Consumption and Cost for Various Fuels and Energy Types
‘Thermal Energy Electrical Energy
Pope TJ tet
Toa Ta
Moh Toul oat | eseey
Frac sp | Tema | fe | Blciy | Maximum | 7!
fon EPG] HSD | Ctume | Thema! | Dey | Nike | Cortine | "Demand | Elemsty | Bill
pues pen
weal | keal | eat} eat | s.takn | wa | ewe | kwh | kva | retake | RE
1
2
3
2
Subs
Tea
%
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2169. Energy Monitoring and Targeting
‘Table 9.3 Example of % Breakdown of Energy Consumption & Costs
Energy | Purchased | Consumption Cost
‘Type units keal % | Rs. | %
Electricity is70_| 1350200 | 18 | 6280 | 20
SD) 36 378000 | 5 | 1620 | 5
Fumace Oil 456 | 4651200 | 62 [ 20520 | 66
110 1320000 | 15 | 2750 | 9
ee Electricity Electricity
18% 20%
Hso
5% HsD
5%
Furnace Oil Fumace Oil
62% 66%
Figure 9.1 % Share of Energy Figure 9.2 % Share of Cost
It may be noted that this simple analysis identifies energy consumption and cost breakdown and trends
and does not make any allowance for variable factors which may influence energy consumption e.g.
climatic zones or occupancy for buildings. Hence, this analysis cannot be used as a comparison tools
between different organizations.
Annual Energy Consumption Using Bar Chart
124 months of energy data is collated, the annual energy consumption can be represented in form of
bar chart. The most common bar chart application used in energy management is one showing the
enetgy per month for current year and previous year (see Figure 9.3) — however, this chart does not
tell us clearly about any trends in energy consumption,
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 279. Energy Monitoring and Tergeting
Energy, kWh
‘Time-dependent Energy Analysis
If monthly energy consumption data is collected, it is possible to produce a simple graph in which
energy consumption is plotted against time (Figure 9.4). Through this simple time-dependent analysis,
it is possible to identify general trends and seasonal patterns in energy consumption, This enables
exception to the norms to be identified immediately.
‘The limitations of this tool are that it is difficult to find out why certain trends occur or if particular
trend is there or not. Although, this tool is useful, it can be used only as a comparative tool and not an
absolute one.
Consider Figure 9.4, the time dependent graph shows monthly electricity consumption for the years
2008 and 2009. It can be seen from the graph that:
+ Electricity consumption during the months of January, February and March of 2009 is
consistently less than in the corresponding period of 2008.
+ The base load electricity consumption is approximately 10,500 kWh/month,
+ Energy consumption during the months of November and December 2009 and January 2010
appears to have increased significantly compared with the corresponding 2008 figures. This
tends to indicate loss of control over electricity consumption,
However, itis impossible to identify why the energy consumption for January, February and March
2009 is lower than for the same period in 2009. In order to do so, further analysis is needed.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 218.9, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
It is possible to plot more than one variable using this chart, for example, oil consumption along with
electricity consumption data
70000
60000
= 50000
5
Bai
# 40000
0000
> 20000
= 10000
a OF +
gee EERE P SRR E ESE
és fi2253723 8 3 BS
Month
Figure 9.4 Monthly Electricity Consumption
Norm Chart
‘The norm chart isa sequential plot of actual energy consumption overlaid on a plot of target consumption,
Itis ofllttle value as an analytical tool, but can be useful for highlighting exceptions and communicating,
these to managers. Because norm charts represent a historical record of energy consumption, senior
and operational managers find them relatively easy to understand. Refer Figure 9.5.
e000.
0000
act
2
§ 00m
von \
5 cee
=
Decy 3
eb. Mar, Aprll May June Ju Aug, Sept, Oct. Nov, Dec, Jan,
Figure 9.5 Norms Chart for Gas Consumption
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2199, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
Deviance Chart
Deviance charts plot the difference between target and actual energy consumption (see Figure 9.6). If,
in any one month, energy consumption is above the target value, then the consumption is plotted as a
positive value; by contrast a negative value is returned if actual consumption is lower than predicted.
When producing a deviance chart it is useful to show on the graph limits of normal operation, since
this helps to distinguish between normal limits and serious deviations from the norm. Deviance charts
are particularly good at highlighting problems, so that remedial action can be taken. They can also be
used to initiate detailed exception reports.
14000)
12000. — Deviance
— Upper Limit
110000.
Lower Limit
3000
6000
4000
2000.
n in Electricity Consumption (kWh)
= 2000
4000)
a
Figure 9.6 Deviance Chart for Gas Consumption
Relating Annual Energy and Production using Bar Chart
Ifrelated production data is also available for the same 24 months period, we know that the levels of
production may have effect on energy consumption and hence specific energy consumption can be
calculated and plotted as bar chart as shown in Figure 9.7. The chart shows some trends — an all time
low in December followed by rising trend in specific energy consumption.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2209, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Figure 9.7 Monthly Specific Energy Consumption
If production levels are added to SEC chart as in Figure 9.8, the features of the chart become clearer.
For example, the very low SEC occurred when there was a record level of production. This indicates
that there might be fixed energy consumption —i.e. consumption that occurs regardless of production
levels
i gig?
Figure 9.8 SEC with Production
Moving Annual Total
Another way of representing energy and production data is in form of a Moving Annual Total. If 12
months of energy and production data are available, we can plot the chart. For this chart, each point
represents the sum of previous 12 months of data. In this way, each point has full range of the seasons,
holidays. The technique also smoothes out errors in the timings of meter readings,
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2219, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
If energy and production are plotted in the same chart and are tracking each other as shown in Figure
9.9, it suggests that there is no cause for alarm. Any deviations in energy line has to be watched so as
to identify carly warning of energy waste or to confirm that energy efficiency measures are making
positive impact.
ae Production
i Pi baPiaiPPiTg a
Figure 9.9. Moving Annual Total - Energy and Production
Linear Regression Analysis
Linear regression analysis is a statistical technique which determines and quantifies the relationship
between variables. It is a widely used energy management tool which enables standard equations to
be established for energy consumption, often from data which would otherwise be meaningless.
Regression analysis overcomes the limitation of time.
lependent analysis by removing the “time”
clement from the analysis and focusing instead on the variables which influence energy consumption.
It is a versatile technique which can be used to analyse a wide variety of applications. When used as
an energy management tool, the variables commonly compared are:
‘+ Fumace Oil consumption versus the number of units of production.
+ Electricity consumption versus the number of units of production.
+ Water consumption versus the number of units of production,
+ Electricity consumed by lighting versus hours of occupancy.
Regression analysis is very much dependent on the quality of the data used. It should therefore be
treated with care, Ifan analysis indicates the absence ofa significant relationship between two variables,
it does not necessarily mean that no relationship exists. The significance of results depends on the
quantity and quality of the data used, and indeed, on the variables used in the analysis. Table 9.4 shows
a selection of factors which can influence energy and water consumption
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2229. Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Table 9.4 Factors which influence Energy Consumption
Electricity Air compressors Air volume delivered
Furnace oil Steam raising in boilers ‘Amount of steam generated
Steam Production process Production volume
a) Single Independent Variable
XY Scatter Diagram
XY Scatter Diagram provides more understanding of relationship between energy and production. A
sample XY Seatter Diagram is shown in Figure 9.10.
‘This chart shows a low degree of scatter indicative of a good fit. If data fit is poor, it indicates poor
level of control and hence a scope for energy savings. If data fit is poor and if it is known that there
should be a relationship, it indicates @ poor level of control and hence a potential for energy savings.
In producing the production/energy relationship chart a relationship relating production and energy
consumption is obtained
Energy vs Production
0
00
Energy
Production
Figure 9.10 XY Chart for Energy-Production Relationship
For example if energy consumption in tones of oil equivalent (i. a dependent variable) and production
in Metric tonnes (i.e. an independent variable) in a foundry furnace are plotted against each other on
a graph some sort of relationship between the two can be obtained.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 239, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
This relationship is in fact linear and it is possible to derive an equation for the best-fit straight-line
curve through the points plotted on the graph. The best-fit straight-line curve is determined by summing
the squares of the distances from the straight line of the various data points. Once established, this
linear equation can be used to predict future energy consumption. In addition, it ean be used as
standard performance equation for energy monitoring and targeting purposes.
The generic equation for a straight-line graph can be represented as:
yrotme
Where y is the dependent variable (e.g. energy consumption), x is the independent variable (e.g.
production), cis the value at which the straight-line curve intersects the ‘y” axis, and m is the gradient
of the straight-line curve.
In other words
Energy consumed for the period = C > m x production for the same period.
Ifthe straight line y = c + mx is best fitted to a set of data sample points; it can be shown that
(x ¥) Op ¥,) (XY)
and
en + m3x = Ey
hx + mE x= Bry
Where n is the number of data points
‘These equations are known as the normal equations of the problem and they can be used to establish
the values of ¢ and m, as illustrated in the following Example 9.1
Example
Consider a foundry which during a monitoring programme produces the following sample data:
Month 1 |2 |3 [4 Js Jo |7 |s Jo |
Production, Tonnes/month, x | 380 | 440 | 460 | 520 | 320 | 520 | 240 | 620 «00 |
So 230 | 50 | 300 [ao [20 [8 [|
‘imonth, y | 340
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2249, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Therefore:
n x Y » y
1 380 | 340 | 144400 | 129200
2 440 | 340 [193600 | 149600
3 460 | 380 [ 211600 | 174800
4 520 | 380 | 270400 | 197600
5 320 | 300 | 102400 | 96000
6 520 | 400 | 270400 | 208000
7 240 | 280 | 57600 | 67200
8 620 | 424 | 384400 | 262880
9 600 | 420 | 360000 | 252000
4100 | 3264 | 1994800 | 1537280
Therefore, the normal equations become
9 + 4100m = 3264
4100¢ + 1994800m = 1537280
Therefore
© = 3264 — 4100m
9
Therefore
4100 (3264-4100my/9 + 1994800m = 1537280
1486933 — 1867778m \ 1994800m = 1537280
127022m = 50347
m= 04
and © = 180
The best fit straight line equation is therefore:
y= 180+ 0.4%
From this equation, it can be seen that the theoretical base load for furnace is 180 mtoe.
The same relationship can be obtained by plotting in a graph as shown in Figure 9.11
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2259, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
Bay-0.4 PH180
P Production(tmonth
Figure 9.11 Energy-Production Relationships for Foundry
Correlation Coefficients
The regression analysis method described in Section 4.5.1 enables a best-fit straight line to be determined
for a sample data set. However, in some circumstances the sample data points may be very scattered
with the result that the derived equation may be meaningless. It is therefore important to determine
cll the hest-fit line correlates to the sample data. This can be done by calculating the Pearson
correlation coefficient, which gives an indication of the reliability of the line drawn. The Pearson
correlation coefficient is a value between | and 0, with a value of I representing 100% correlation,
The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) can be determined using equation (4.4),
Lee - DY - 5)
VEG = 3FZG - 97]
how
Where x, y are the x and y values, and ¥, are the average of x and y values. Example 4.3 illustrates how the
correlation coefficient may be calculated
x y_& =x) (-¥) &«- wy - x= xP (yy)?
380-340 -75.56 -22.67 1712.59 $708.64 513.7778
440 340 15.56 -22.67 352.59 241.98 513.7778
460 3804.44 17.33 71.04 19.75 300.4444
520 380 64.44 17.33 1117.04 4153.09 300.4444
320 300 -135.56 -62.67 8494.81 1837531 3927.11
520 400 64.44 37.33 2405.93, 4153.09 1393.778
240-280 -215.56 -82.67 17819.26 © 46464.20 6833.78
620 424 164.44 61.33 10085.93 2704198 3761.77
600 420 144.44 97.33 8281.48 20864.20 3287.11
4100 3264 0 0 '50346.67___127022.22_20832.00
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2269, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Therefore,
r= __S0346.67 =0.98
(127022.22 x 20832)"
Table 9.5 shows minimum acceptable correlation coefficients for given numbers of data samples,
It can be seen from the Table that the correlation coefficient in Example 9.1 is very good.
Table 9.5 Minimum Correlation Coefficients (r)
‘Number of data samples | Minimum correlation coefficient (r)
10 0.767
15 0.641
20 0561
3B 0506
30 0.464
35 0.425
40 0.402
45 0.380
50 0362
b) Multi-variable analysis
Often energy consumption can be influenced by several different variables. When this is the case
the relationship can be described by the equation
VR CH Mx Hmph to Mg,
where, x,,x).....X,,are the variables that influence y.
Itis difficult to solve multivariable analysis by hand calculation, Itis therefore advisable to use specialist
computer software which can be employed to determine the statistical relationship between the variables.
CUSUM Charts
CUSUM is an acronym for Cumulative Sum of differences. CUSUM charts can be particularly useful
why diagnosing why energy is occurring. This is principally because they identify the date of any
change in energy performance. It can be particularly helpful to know when a problem first occurred
as this helps to pin-point the problem and further analysis can then be made to determine its root cause.
First step is to establish standard energy performance equation through analysis of data (energy and
related variable e.g. production) collected during monitoring period before any interventions are made.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2279, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
Itcan be used to establish target or baseline against which actual energy consumption can be compared,
Second step is to calculate the differences between the standard energy consumption and actual energy
consumption. Third step is determining CUSUM which is cumulative summation of differences between
actual energy consumption and targets or baseline
CUSUM values, when plotted against time, not only helps us to know the trends, but also helps to
calculate energy savings or losses when performance changes. A typical CUSUM graph follows
trend and shows random fluctuation of energy consumption and oscillation around zero (baseline or
standard). This trend will continue until something happens to alter the pattern of consumption such
as the effect of an energy saving measure or, conversely, a worsening in energy efficiency (poor control,
housekeeping or maintenance).
CUSUM chart (see Figure 9.12) for a generic company is shown. The CUSUM chart shows what is
really happening to the energy performance. From the chart, it can be seen that starting from year
2000, performance is better than standard, Performance then declined (Line going up) until April, and
then it started to improve until July. However, from July onwards, there is a marked, ongoing decline
in performance — line going up.
When looking at CUSUM chart, the changes in direction of the line indicate events that have relevance
to the energy consumption pattern, Clearly, site knowledge is needed to interpret better events related
to energy consumption, For example, if there are planned changes in energy systems, adverse change
in performance can be attributed to lack of control, poor housekeeping or improper maintenance.
a
i” Z
i i fi iid
Figure 9.12 Typical CUSUM Chart
Example : CUSUM Technique
Energy consumption and production data were collected for furnace in a foundry over a period of 18
months, During month 9, a heat recovery system was installed. Using the plant monthly data, estimate
the savings made with the heat recovery system. The plant data is given in Table 9.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2289, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Meat | PCa | "Comer
1 340 380
2 340 440
3 380 460
4 380 320
6 400 520
7 280 240
8 24 620
9 420 600
nl 360, 440
1 320 360
8 340 420
14 372 480
15 380 540
16 280) 280
17 280 260
18 380 500
*toe = tonnes of oil equivalent,
Steps for CUSUM analysis
1. Plot the E1
ave
Compute CUSUM
Draw the best fit straight line
‘These steps are shown in the Table 9.7.
7. Plot the CU
M graph
ergy ~ Production graph for the first 9 months
Derive the equation of the line (Equation derived is E = 0.4 P + 180)
Calculate the standard energy consumption based on various production based on the equation
Calculate the difference between actual and standard energy consumption
8. Estimate the savings accumulated from use of the heat recovery system.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency
2299, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
P 7m E- cusuM
(0.4 P+ 180) ‘se: Fuse | (Cumulative Sum)
1 | 340 | 380 332, 8 +8
2/340 | 440 -16 8
3 | 380 | 460 364 +16 +8
4 | 380 | 520 388, 8 0
5 | 300] 320 308 8 8
6 | 400] s20 388, +2 6
7 | 280 | 240 276 4 2
8 | 424] 620 428 4 6
9 | 420 | 600 420 0 6
10 | 400 | 560 404 4 -10
11 | 360 | 440 356 +4 6
12 |320| 360 324 4 -10
13 | 340 | 420 348, 8 “18
14 |372| 480 372 0 “18
15} 380 | s40 396 -16 34
16 | 280 | 280 292 “12 -46
17 | 280 | 260 284 4 -50
18 | 380 | s00 380 0 -50
E_- Actual Energy consumption E., - Standard energy consumption
From the Figure 8.10, it can be seen that the CUSUM graph oscillates around the zero line for several
‘months and then drops sharply after month 11. This suggests that the heat recovery system took almost
two months to commission and reach proper operating conditions, after which steady savings have
been achieved. Based on the graph 9.10 (see Table 8.4), savings of 44 toe (50-6) have been accumulated
in the last 7 months. This represents savings of almost 2% of energy consumption.
CUSUM chart for last 18 months is shown in Figure 9.13.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency
230)9, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
2°13 14 15 16 17 18
cusum
8
Months
Figure 9.13 Example CUSUM Graph
9.7 Energy Management Information System (EMIS)
‘The use of specially designed information system software is advisable when operating an M&T
programme. Computers should not be seen as a replacement for the energy manager, but simply as
tools which enable large amounts of dats to be stored and analysed in a short period of time. A number
of energy management software packages are commercially available, with varying degrees of
complexity. They all tend to share the following generic features:
Y A database facility, which is capable of storing and organizing large quantities of data collected
over a long period of time.
Y The ability to record energy data for all utility types, including data taken from both meters and
invoices.
Y The ability to handle complex utility tariff. Tariffs vary from place to place, and are becoming
increasingly complex as competition is introduced into the utilities sector.
Y The ability to handle other related variables such as degree days and production data,
¥ A data analysis facility. This is achieved by incorporating statistical analysis software into the
energy management software.
Y Axeporting facility, which is eapable of quickly producing energy management reports.
Y With the more sophisticated energy management packages itis possible to interface the software
with Building Management Systems (BMS), so that energy data can be automatically recorded
on a regular basis (e.g. hourly),
One of the great advantages of computer-based systems is their database facility, which enables
historical data and data from many sources to be instantly compared, This facility is particularly useful
when comparing site energy costs on a utility basis and enables energy managers quickly to assess the
relative performance of Various EACs. In this way EACs which are underperforming can be quickly
identified and remedial action taken.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2319, Eneray Monitoring and Targeting
Designing Information Reporting Systems
One of the major outputs of any M&T programme is the production of energy management reports
These reports perform the vital role of communicating key information to senior and operational
managers, and are therefore the means by which action is initiated within an organization, In order to
ensure that prompt action is taken to minimize wasteful practices, reports should be as simple as
possible and should highlight those areas in which energy wastage is occurring, Reports should be
published regularly so that energy wasteful practices are identified quickly and not allowed to persist
for too long, Reports should be succinet, and conform to a standard format which should be generated
automatically by a computer. This minimizes preparation time, and also familiarizes managers with
the information being communicated,
Most M&T programmes require reports to be published weekly or monthly. Monthly reports are usually
applicable to large organizations with many sites, with weekly reports being more suitable to complex
high energy consuming facilities. In applications where energy consumption is particularly high, reports
may be produced daily. Ifthe reporting period is too long, energy may well be needlessly wasted before
managers are notified of the problem and remedial action is taken. Yet, if the reporting period is too
short this will lead to an over-complex M&T system in which too much irrelevant information requires
consideration
The primary purpose of energy management reports is to communicate effectively with senior and
operational managers. They should therefore be tailored to suit the needs of their readers, with different
managers within organizations requiring different levels of report. Operational managers may need
weekly reports, whereas senior management may only require a quarterly review. Figure 9.14 illustrates
the relationship between reporting frequency and managerial status,
One big disadvantage of producing a large number of regular reports is that they can swamp operational
managers with what may appear to be irrelevant information, One good way to get around this problem
is to adopt a reporting by exception system, in which reports are only generated when energy
performance falls outside certain predetermined limits. This system has the great advantage that
managers only receive reports when energy performance is either poor or very good. In addition,
everyone involved in the reporting process benefits from a reduced workload
Level
Report trea
Senior
management
‘Annval | [Bvarten
EAC
manager Annual weedy
Ener
Tranever [Annual] [Buareny] [Montniy] [ Wookiy
Figure 9.14 Relationships between Managerial Status
And Report Frequency
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 2329, Energy Monitoring and Targeting
Solved Example:
The Energy- production data (for Jan-June, 2011) of an industry follows a relationship:
ulated energy consumption = 0.5 P+220.
‘A Waste heat recovery system was installed at end of June 2011 and further data was gathered up to
December 2011
Using CUSUM technique, calculate energy savings in terms of ton of oil equivalent (toe) and the
reduction in specific energy consumption achieved with the installation of waste heat recovery system,
The plant data is given inthe table below.
‘Actual Energy “Actual production,
2011-Month | Consumption, toe/month ton/month
Jan 620 760
Feb 690 960
Mar 635 790
‘Apr 628 830
May 545 610
Jun 540 670
July 590 760
‘Aug 605 820
Sep. 670 940
Oct 582 750
Nov S12 610
Dec 540 670
Ans:
The table below gives values of actual energy consumption vs, calculated (predicted) energy
consumption from July Dec. 2011
Specific energy consumption monitored vs. predicted for each month. The variations are calculated
and the Cumulative sum of differences is calculated from Jan-June-2011
cal
2011-Month_| Bact. _| 0.5P+220 | _Eact-Ecal
uly 590 600 =10
‘Aug 605 630
Sept 670 690
et. 582 595
Nov. 312 525
Dec! 340 555
Energy savings achieved = 96 toe
Reduction in specific energy consumption = 96/4550 = 0.021 toe/tonne of production (Production for
6 months = 760+820+940+750+610+670 = 4550 tonnes).
Bureau of Energy Efficiency 233