Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Judging Criteria For Poster and Oral Presentation

The document outlines judging criteria for poster and oral presentations with percentages allocated to each criterion. For poster presentations, criteria include first impressions (10%), layout (5%), readability (5%), title (5%), identification (5%), aims/objectives (10%), methods (10%), results (10%), conclusions (10%), recommendations (10%), and scientific content (5%). For oral presentations, criteria are focus and alignment (15%), relevance and usability (15%), technical writing/organization (10%), impact of study (10%), mastery and answering questions (30%), and communication skills (20%). Both provide guidelines to evaluate various aspects of presentation quality and content.

Uploaded by

Roland John Marzan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Judging Criteria For Poster and Oral Presentation

The document outlines judging criteria for poster and oral presentations with percentages allocated to each criterion. For poster presentations, criteria include first impressions (10%), layout (5%), readability (5%), title (5%), identification (5%), aims/objectives (10%), methods (10%), results (10%), conclusions (10%), recommendations (10%), and scientific content (5%). For oral presentations, criteria are focus and alignment (15%), relevance and usability (15%), technical writing/organization (10%), impact of study (10%), mastery and answering questions (30%), and communication skills (20%). Both provide guidelines to evaluate various aspects of presentation quality and content.

Uploaded by

Roland John Marzan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

JUDGING CRITERIA FOR POSTER PRESENTATION

(Adapted in the Division Memorandum No.49, s. 2019)

CRITERIA INDICATORS PERCENTA


GE
How difficult is it to read the poster?
How are color schemes used, are they easy on
the eye?
First How crowded is the poster?
10
Impression Is there a good flow of information (logical, layout
of information)?
Does the poster stimulate interest and
discussion?
Is the poster visually jumbled?
Layout How easy is it to follow the sequence in the 5
poster?
Is font size or style easily readable?
Readability How much text does the poster contain? 5
Are there any grammar or spelling mistakes?
How specific/adequate/long/short is the title?
Title Is the title interesting to the reader? Gets the 5
attention of the reader? Or convincing?
Can the author(s) be easily identified?
Is contact information available
Identification 5
(Section/Strand/Contact Number/Email
address)
Aims/ Are they clearly stated?
10
Objectives
How detailed, appropriate, and original are the
Methods 10
methods and is there enough explanation?
How clear and well-labeled are graphs and
figures?
Results 10
How complex are graphs?
How well are the results presented?
What was the impression it leaves on the reader?
Conclusions Did the researcher summarize the main idea 10
briefly?
Did the recommendation offer solution to the
Recommenda problem? 10
tion Are the recommendations stated in a positive
way?
Was the research put into a broader context/
justification for research?
Scientific
Was the content suitable for experts and non- 5
content
experts alike?
Was there a sufficient scientific explanation?
How much do the student’s explanations
Student demonstrate knowledge/ ownership/ 15
enthusiasm for his/her work?
Total 100%
JUDGING CRITERIA FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
(Adapted in the Division Memorandum No.49, s. 2019)

CRITERIA INDICATORS PERCENTAGE


Alignment of research questions to the main
Focus and
problem identified. Baseline data, facts and 15%
Alignment
arguments to support the choice of topic.
Relevance Timeliness of the topic (the study answered
15%
and Usability currently emerging problems)
Technical Logical, grammatical and coherent
Writing/Orga presentation of parts 10%
nization
Impact of the Use of conclusions and recommendations in
10%
Study addressing the problems
Mastery and ability to answer question 30%
Communication skills during the delivery 20%
Total 100%

You might also like