0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views2 pages

Coca-Cola's Strategy: In-House Production

Coca-Cola faces declining market share in China due to changing consumer preferences toward healthier beverages. The document evaluates two alternatives: merger and acquisition (M&A) or in-house production of innovative healthier products. M&A is unlikely to succeed due to government restrictions. In-house production allows full control over healthier product development and leveraging of Coca-Cola's strong distribution channel to meet shifting consumer needs. The recommendation is for Coca-Cola to pursue in-house production of new products to maintain its brand while adapting to market changes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views2 pages

Coca-Cola's Strategy: In-House Production

Coca-Cola faces declining market share in China due to changing consumer preferences toward healthier beverages. The document evaluates two alternatives: merger and acquisition (M&A) or in-house production of innovative healthier products. M&A is unlikely to succeed due to government restrictions. In-house production allows full control over healthier product development and leveraging of Coca-Cola's strong distribution channel to meet shifting consumer needs. The recommendation is for Coca-Cola to pursue in-house production of new products to maintain its brand while adapting to market changes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Arekta BizComp Team HSBC Intra IBA Case Competition 2023

Abstract
With a long history of operating in the Chinese market, Coca-Cola has acquired a significant market
share in the beverage industry. However, in the face of changing consumer preferences, growing
competition, and government regulations restricting power moves, Coca-Cola needs to decide on
whether they want to continue towards merger and acquisition or opt for In-house production for
innovative product alternatives.

SWOT Analysis

Strength: Strong Distribution Channel (40% Weakness: The product itself (carbonated
Market Share in the Carbonated Beverage beverage) (Drop in Market Share from 18.4%
Market), Brand Image as we are the market in 2012 to 13.9% in 2014), the existing brand
leader in the carbonated segment. image of high sugar content beverages.

Opportunity: Using the strong distribution Threat: Government Policies and Regulations
channel to leverage the consumer mindset shift posed limitations (Failed M&A attempt with
towards consuming healthier beverages and Huiyuan), fast growing competitions inside
having an active lifestyle (Growth in Revenue China
in every healthier alternative market)

Market Trends

Trends Inferences

Healthier Life-Style resulting in a shift towards Drop in percentage consumption of carbonated


healthy drinks. drinks

Local companies like Wahaha & global


Growing trend of Merger & Acquisitions companies like Pepsi tried to get into M&A
but most ventures ended in failure

Entrance of new local companies with a Every beverage company started developing a
diversified product portfolio diversified portfolio of healthier alternatives.

Identification of Problem

Symptoms Core Issue

Fall in market share of carbonated soft


drinks

Rise in the demand for healthier drink


Consumer mindset and preferences
options
shifting towards a healthier lifestyle
Entrance of new competitors to leverage the
change in consumer perceptions and utilize
the gap

1
Arekta BizComp Team HSBC Intra IBA Case Competition 2023

Evaluation Of Alternatives

Alternatives
Factors
M&A In-house

Mitigating the fall of the No to minimum control over Full Control over the health risk
carbonated soft drinks the product of the acquired mitigation factor by offering lower
market company, leading to no sugar content products (i.e. Coke
Quality Control Assurance Zero, Diet Coke, etc)

Leveraging the growing As Government won’t allow As we have a strong distribution


demand of healthier a merging or acquisition of channel in the already established
beverage options market leaders of the carbonated beverage product, we
healthier beverage can use that to streamline our
alternatives the marginal inhouse healthier beverage
benefit of this option is not alternatives
significant

Competition of new We have to work with the We get to invest in R&D to procure
companies existing portfolio of the healthier alternatives based on the
merged/acquired company shifting consumer preference

Recommendation
In-house product development will allow Coca-Cola full control over the production and
innovation of healthier alternatives, by leveraging the existing strong distribution channel to keep
up with the shifting consumer preferences.
As all 3 of these factors address the symptoms of our core issue, and in-house product
development provides a more convenient path toward producing healthier beverage
alternatives, in-house production is our recommended alternative.

Plan of Action

1. Conducting market research to understand 2. Investing in R&D to produce a prototype of


consumer preference(i.e. Taste, texture, the product and packaging
consistency, etc.)

3. Market Testing, Feedback & Product 4. Proper Distribution Channel & marketing
Finalization communication

Conclusion
Standing at the point of an inevitable shift in consumer preference, Coca-Cola needs to take
immediate steps to hold tight to the brand’s legacy and evolve with the customers. Coca-cola must
face the challenges thrown towards the brand from China and potentially in other countries in the
future. We believe that Coca-cola must choose the In-house production alternative as its next course
of action to keep true to the brand’s core values.

You might also like