0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views9 pages

Design of A University Campus by Homer Leroy Puderbaugh: Done by Dilna P T 17 S8 Barch

The document discusses key factors to consider when designing a university campus, including purpose, planning, space, orientation, circulation, and relationships between buildings. It explains that campus design requires balancing many priorities and compromises. The arrangement of buildings and spaces must satisfy functional needs while also creating an environment that meets aesthetic and experiential needs of students and faculty. Proper campus planning is an exercise in managing spatial relationships between all elements to form a cohesive composition.

Uploaded by

Fathima Zuhra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views9 pages

Design of A University Campus by Homer Leroy Puderbaugh: Done by Dilna P T 17 S8 Barch

The document discusses key factors to consider when designing a university campus, including purpose, planning, space, orientation, circulation, and relationships between buildings. It explains that campus design requires balancing many priorities and compromises. The arrangement of buildings and spaces must satisfy functional needs while also creating an environment that meets aesthetic and experiential needs of students and faculty. Proper campus planning is an exercise in managing spatial relationships between all elements to form a cohesive composition.

Uploaded by

Fathima Zuhra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DESIGN OF A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS

BY HOMER LEROY PUDERBAUGH

DONE BY
DILNA P T
17
S8 BARCH
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
• Born May 14, 1929 in Henrietta, MO; died February 11, 2020 in Lincoln.
• He received his BA and MA in Architecture from Kansas State University.
• Post-graduate work at Iowa State, UNL, Michigan State, and L’Ecole des Beaux
Arts
in France.
• Prof of Architecture at UNL; Chairman of Dept of Architecture 1970-81 & 1990-94
retired. Interim asst Dean College of Architecture 1982-1983; Dir. School of
Architecture 1969-1970. Received Distinguished Architect Award in 1993.
• During his 36 years as an educator, he initiated and developed enrichment
programs
for students, including the Summer Intern Program and the annual Architecture
workshop for High School students.
• He was a registered professional architect in Kansas from 1952-2001 and in
Nebraska from 1969-2004. Professor Emeritus of Architecture at UNL.
• Numerous awards, honors, and recognition for his contributions in architecture
from: AIA, Professional organizations, University of Nebraska, Kent State University,
Iowa State University, Oklahoma State University, the Dublin Institute of Technology
in Ireland.
• This book says about the basic 6 factors that need to be considered while planning a campus. The author
explains each factors easily where anyone who isn’t in this field too can also understands .That the campus
is more than the functional arranging of buildings.

• The first factor he mentioned is the purpose of the design, where he explains how there should be basic
relationship between buildings , buildings and surround , spaces in building etc .

• The second factor is planning , where he says about how buildings are effected due to overcrowdings , too
little land space etc. .

• The third factor is the space , where he states the basic ideas that an architect should have before
designing the spaces.

• The fourth factor is the orientation , where he listed the facts that need to be considered before fixing the
orientation of building.

• The fifth factor is the circulation of both vehicular and pedestrian.

• The last factor is about the buildings as a group and their relations and how they effect to each other and
works all together
PURPOSE
• To establish a basic of space relationships between buildings and building groups as a criteria of design and
• second is the relations to other design elements.
• The arrangements of buildings into groups and the composition of groups into a final unity must include many
complementary and conflicting factors and the final solution will be a compromise of density , enrolment , sex
ration educational funds ,land , context etc.
• The clear idea before designing a campus is that the need of user group and come with a design where we
can include and solve the needs to design .

PLANNING
• It shouldn’t be one groups idea or the
purpose but need to consider
everyone’s need who is going to be
part of it .
• He says that there are many living
existence of poorly planned
campuses with over crowded
classrooms, too little land space
unrelated and randomly located
buildings etc
SPACE

• The arrangement of building is an exercise in spatial considerations.


• It’s a dynamic condition and so the ideas conceiving it are in a dynamic static .
• Architects must have the knowledge of spaces before solving them.
• Man , space and architecture the triad which can’t function alone , except in unit.
• He says that a space can only be defined when it have a combination of these triad.
ORIENTATION

• Rules and formulas for proper orientation are of limited use as the final decision will be a compromise
between orientation and other important facility but orientation will also depends on geographical
consideration , climate, the site under consideration .
• The view the existing landscaping and the basic functions of the structure itself.
• The orientation need to planned only after studying the impact of sunlight , heat radiation , use of material ,
shape , climatic response , ventilation and circulation on the site
CIRCULATION
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PARKING
• There are basically two types of considerations in evaluating the necessity of campus traffic and parking
facilities, which are student facilities and public transportation .
• While planning the circulation he states that some factors are to be looked into like topography , maintenance
and cost.

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
• Pedestrian flow and movements is the means by which students move from one building to another , one area
to other and from one building group to another .
• It includes interior , exterior horizontal and vertical combination of those .Major walks should lead from group to
group and minor walls leading from buildings within the groups
RELATION
• Relationship between buildings and building groups are mentioned here to establish that they must be
recognized , utilized and appreciated to complete and physical design .
• There are certain essentials , necessities and desirable that no group of inter related buildings can be
conceived and planned or can properly function without due consideration for the whole , the same
considerations that would be given any single building .
• To establish unity it is a necessary to have a clear understanding of the nature and function of the
composition.
• To accept a composition as having unity one must know and recognize the functions of the parts as they
serve and become functions of the whole.
BUILDING GROUPS
• An analysis of functions show 4 primary groups : academics, public , service and housing. Academic grouping
• includes building and structures to serve students, teachers etc. Public groups contain administration
,auditorium
• etc.
• Service groups should include all service-type buildings like power plant, maintenance, fire stations etc.

CONCLUSION
• Campus planning is primarily an exercise in space relations .
• The space arrangement of the physical structures must satisfy not only the functions of shelter but must create
an environment of containment.
• The desire for physical definition needs to be satisfied in all structures and physical compositions .
• The planner of a campus must recognize the aesthetic needs of the individual and provide , through planning
, designing and constructions , the arrangement that will best provide and fulfil this aesthetic need .
• The final conclusion is recognition that campus is mire than functional arranging of buildings ; it’s a spatial
composition based on physical desires and concluded on aesthetic needs

You might also like