Marital Satisfaction Among Nigerian Nurses
Marital Satisfaction Among Nigerian Nurses
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the potential socio-
demographic characteristics (age, job experience, educational attainment and
length of marriage) that could contribute to marital satisfaction among
Nigerian nurses. Method: This study utilised a cross-sectional survey design
and data were collected from 181 (173 female and 8 male) respondents
selected through the purposive sampling technique at the University of Benin
Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. The mean age was 35.39 years (SD =
8.65, range = 21-59 years). Nurses completed a questionnaire consisting of the
Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (α = .62). Results: There was a significant
difference between the degree-holder nurses and the holders of each of the
other two certificates (Registered nurse and Registered Midwife) on marital
satisfaction. However, age, job experience, and length of marriage did not
significantly influence marital satisfaction. Conclusion: Educational
attainment is an important factor to be considered by employers of labour,
clinicians, guidance counsellors, family life educators and nurses
experiencing conflict between paid work and family life which affecting their
marital satisfaction.
13
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
basis. Some divorce cases in 2005 at Grade frequently affected by workplace stress and
“A” customary court, Somolu Local that this can affect their physical and mental
Government Area, Lagos showed that five health [15].
(5) of the eight (8) cases (62.5%) ended up
in divorce. One (1) of the eight cases Understanding the fundamental elements
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
(12.5%) did not end up in divorce; while that lead to marital satisfaction is essential
two (2) of the eight (8) cases (25%) were yet for identifying how to approach couples
to be decided [6]. This shows that marital seeking treatment for distress in their
relationships are in a serious mess. marriages [16]. Individuals go into marriage
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
14
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
husbands’ and wives’ marital satisfaction with their marriage than those with a high
[28]. school diploma [34]. Heaton found that
education negatively correlated with
It is widely accepted that, as we age, our divorce, unless the woman had more
marital relationships can offer emotional education than her spouse [43]. Heaton
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
support and operate as a priceless basis of furthermore found that women with
positive affect. Carstensen’s theory of education higher than their husbands’ had a
socio-emotional selectivity postulates that an greater probability to have marriage that
important goal of late life is to enhance ended in divorce [43]. As women become
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
emotional closeness in our significant more educated, they gain more power in the
personal relationships [29]. As a result; relationship and see more alternatives for
older individuals regulate their emotions their lives [44]. Broman discovered that
such that emotional benefits will increase. In wife’ educational level and having a higher
the study conducted by Weinstein et al. age income than their husbands’ among Blacks
was positively associated with marital is a factor commonly projected to affect
satisfaction, with age ranging from young marital quality [45].
adult to early middle age [30]. This is
consistent with a few other studies Zainah et al. found that the longer the
[31,32,33] who have found positive duration of marriage, the more satisfied the
association between age, as evident in individual was with his or her marriage.
length, and marital happiness. Their study claimed that couples who had
been married for 10 years and above
On the contrary, Edwards established that reported a better satisfaction in their
participants who were less than 45 years of marriage compared to couples who were less
age reported significantly greater than 10 years in marriage. These authors
satisfaction with their marriages than those assert that older couples in marriage may
who were more than 45 years old [34]. have passed the stage of adjustment and
However, a study among the newly wedded adaptation and will experience less
couples in Nigeria showed that age did not psychological problems and distress [46].
have a significant effect on marital
satisfaction [35]. Early cross-sectional surveys of marital
satisfaction suggested that marital
There are a number of studies suggesting satisfaction declines steadily during the first
that the quality of marital relationships is 10 years of marriage [47,48,49,50]. In view
positively associated with partners’ of these findings, a continuing decline in
education 36,37,38,39,40]. In the same vein, marital satisfaction over the course of
Adler found that educational level is not a marriage might be expected. However,
correlate of marital satisfaction [7], as more recent surveys, which included
measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale marriages of longer duration, revealed a
[41]. different picture. Marital satisfaction
appeared to follow a curvilinear path over
Creighton-Zollar and Williams found no the course of marriage [51,52,53,54],
association between education and marital starting high, dropping sharply after the
quality of Blacks [42]. Edwards, however, birth of children, reaching an all-time low
found that participants with less than a high level when children leave home and couples
school diploma reported greater satisfaction retire [55].
15
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
near newlywed levels in the later years of study were given a detached informed
marriage [56,57], other studies showed consent document that described the current
further stableness in marital satisfaction on a research, the minimal risks involved, and
high, moderate, or low level [58] or contact information on the investigators.
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
indicated that marital quality decreases with The participants were informed that taking
age [59]. part in the study was voluntary and that
precautions had been taken to ensure
Despite the growing attention to work and anonymity. Furthermore, the participants
family issues in the general occupational were told of their right to withdraw from the
health literature, there is paucity of research study at any time they feel like not
investigating these issues among health care continuing.
providers most especially the nursing
profession. This study aims to begin to fill Measures
this gap by examining the socio-
demographic characteristics as predictors of Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale: The
marital satisfaction among nurses in Benin Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale ((RDAS)
City, Nigeria. As a result of the above [60] is a self-report questionnaire that
discussions, the following hypothesis were assesses seven dimensions of couple
formulated and tested: there will be a relationships within three overarching
significant effect of age on marital categories, including consensus in decision-
satisfaction; nurses who have had longer making, value and affection, satisfaction in
period of job experience will exhibit higher the relationship with respect to stability and
marital satisfaction than other nurses who conflict regulation, and cohesion as seen
have had medium and shorter periods of job through activities and discussion. The
experience; nurses with university degree RDAS includes only 14 items on marital
will report significantly higher satisfaction satisfaction, each of which asks the
with their marriage than nurses with respondents to rate certain aspects of his/her
Registered Nurse and Midwife certificates; relationship on a 5- or 6-point scale. Scores
and nurses with longer length of marriage on the RDAS range from 0 to 69, with
will experience significantly greater marital higher scores indicating greater relationship
satisfaction than nurses with both medium satisfaction and lower score indicating
and shorter lengths of marriage. greater relationship distress. The RDAS
appears to have excellent test-retest
Methods reliability. For the total RDAS, Cronbach’s
Alpha was reported to be ’90. Construct
Participants and Procedure validity for the RDAS is supported by its
high correlation (.68, <.01) with a similar
One hundred and eighty one (181) married measure, the Locke-Wallace Marital
nurses were conveniently selected from the Adjustment Test (MAT). The coefficient
University of Benin Teaching Hospital alpha for this study was .62
(UBTH), Benin City, Nigeria, with age
16
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
Sciences (SPSS). The data was analyzed by reported demographics, 40 nurses had
use of descriptive statistics, percentages and Registered Nursing Certificate (n = 40),
means. Other analyses included reliability while 23 had Bachelor’s Degree in Nursing
assessment of the dependent scales (n = 23, 12.7%). With respect to self-
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
(Cornbrash’s alpha), and one way ANOVA reported job experiences, 109 had less than
to determine the influence of age, length of 10 years’ working experience (n = 109,
marriage, job experience and educational 60.2%); 54 had between 11 and 20 years’
level on marital satisfaction. working experience (n = 54, 29.8%); and 18
had more than 21 years’ working experience
Results (n = 18, 9.9%). A majority of the nurses (n
= 117, 64.6) had married for less than 10
The participants in this study were 181 years; 45 (24.9%) had been married for
married nurses who were staff at the between 11 and 20 years; while 19 (10.5%)
University of Benin Teaching Hospital, had been married for more than 21 years
Benin City. These nurses were attached to (Table 1).
The results of the hypotheses tested are The first hypothesis, which states that there
presented in this section. This study will be a significant effect of age on marital
examined the influence of socio- satisfaction, was tested using One-way
demographic variables (age, job experience, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). This is
educational attainment and length of because we wanted to determine whether
marriage) on marital satisfaction. The there were any significant differences
results are presented in this section. among the mean of the four age groups (<30
17
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
years, 31 to 40 years, 41 to 50 years and >50 statistically significant differences across the
years) in this study. As shown in Table 2, it four age groups used for this study. [F
can be ascertained that there was no (3,177) = .28, p >.05].
Table 2. Descriptive scores for all variables according to some demographic variables
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
Hypothesis two states that nurses who have Registered Midwife) on marital satisfaction
had longer period of job experience will [F(2,178) = 13.02, p < .01].
exhibit higher marital satisfaction than other
nurses who have had medium and shorter To determine the direction of significant
period of job experience. This hypothesis difference, a post hoc test (Duncan) was
was tested using One-way Analysis of carried out for marital satisfaction. The
Variance (ANOVA) and the result is result of the post hoc test showed that the
presented in Table 2. From this table, it can mean score of nurses with the university
be observed that there were no significant degrees ( X = 53.65) was significantly
statistical differences across the three higher in marital satisfaction than the mean
periods of job experiences used for this scores for those who were Registered Nurses
study [F(2,178) = .56, p > .05].
( X = 48.02) and Midwives ( X = 44.53).
The third hypothesis, which postulates that However, the mean scores for the holders of
nurses with university degree will report the other two certificates: Registered Nurse
significantly higher satisfaction with their and Registered Midwife were not
marriage than the nurses with Registered statistically different from each other on
Nurse and Midwife certificates, was tested marital satisfaction.
using One-way Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA). As shown in Table 2, the result The last hypothesis states that nurses with
indicated that there was a significant longer length of marriage will experience
difference between the degree-holder nurses significantly greater marital satisfaction than
and holders of each of the other two nurses with both medium and shorter lengths
certificates (Registered Nurse and of marriage. The result of the One-way
18
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) used to test regard to shift, long hours of duty and low
this hypothesis is also presented in Table 2. payment [13].
Based on the results in this table, it can be
concluded that there was no statistically Hypothesis three was confirmed. In line
significant difference across the three groups with the prediction, the results demonstrated
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
of length of marriage, [F (2,178) = .18, p > that nurses with university degrees reported
.05]. greater marital satisfaction than nurses with
either Registered Nursing certificates or
Discussion Registered Midwife certificates. According
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
19
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
that the longer the duration of marriage, the obtained could be used to improve existing
more satisfied the individual is with his or theories of marital satisfaction or could be
her marriage. Their study noted that couples added to current marital satisfaction models.
who had been married for 10 years and Practically, marital satisfaction studies are
above reported a better satisfaction in their extremely useful in improving the quality of
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
marriage than couples who were less than 10 life, happiness, contentment and satisfaction
years in marriage. They claim that older within marriage. Marital satisfaction has
couples in marriage may have passed the been considered to be the health, well-being,
stage of adjustment and adaptation and will and stability of marriage [67]. By pointing
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
experience less psychological problems and out the characteristics involved in increasing
distress [46]. or decreasing marital satisfaction, employers
of labour, clinicians, guidance counselors,
This study is not without limitations. The family life educators and individuals
sample is not representative of the Nigerian experiencing conflict between paid work
population; therefore, the results may not be and family life can work towards reducing
confidently generalized to the population at or promoting them. An example would be to
large. Also, only those nurses working in have family groups for these couples to
government hospitals were selected to be express their problems and concerns as well
included in the sample. If significant as find healthy and effective ways to deal
differences exist between nurses working with their negative marital relationships.
with government and nurses working with in
private hospitals/clinics was not explored. References
This study also did not distinguish between
dual-earner and single-earner families, and [1] Schoen R, Astone NM, Rothert K,
such structural differences can affect the Standish NJ, Kim YJ. Women
type of work-family conflict experienced employment, marital happiness and
[66]. divorce. Social Forces 2002; 81:
643-62.
Another limitation of the study is that it was
cross-sectional in nature and it sampled only [2] Shek DTL. Gender differences in
one part of the participants’ lives. Thus, marital quality and well-being in
causality could not be determined. Also, Chinese married adults. Sex Roles
marital satisfaction levels might change 1995; 32: 699-715.
depending on what the individual
experiences throughout his or her life. [3] Stutzer A, Frey BS. Does marriage
Moreover, the survey method was to obtain make people happy, or do happy
data from participants in this study. Inherent people get married? Int. J. Soc.
in all survey methods is the possibility that Econs 2006; 35: 326–47.
participants might give untruthful answers to
conform to social norms or show social [4] Kreider RM, Fields JM. Number,
desirability. timing, and duration of marriages
and divorces: 1996. In Current
Implication of findings Population Reports (No. P70-80).
Washington, D. C.: U. S. Census
This study has some theoretical and practical Bureau, 2002.
implications. Theoretically, the results
20
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
[5] Snyder DK, Heyman RE, Haynes [12] Talmage WC. “Marital sexuality‟.
SN. Evidence-based approaches to In L. L‟Abate (ed). The handbook
assessing couple distress. Psychol. of family psychology and therapy,
Assess 2005; 17: 288-307. Vol. 1 (1). Homewood, IL: The
Dorsey Press, 1985.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
[7] Alder ES. Age, Education Level, [14] Shree RM. Worklife balance &
and Length of Courtship in Relation marital satisfaction of critical care
to Marital Satisfaction (Master's nurses in private hospitals at
thesis, Pacific University). Coimbatore. International Journal of
Retrieved from: Management and Social Sciences
http://commons.pacificu.edu/spp/14 Research (IJMSSR), 1(2) 2012; 18 –
5; 2010. 24.
[10] Hetherington EM, Kelly J. For [17] Bernard J. The future of marriage.
better or for worse: Divorce New York: Bantam Books, 1972.
reconsidered. New York: Norton &
Company, 2002. [18] Fowers B. His and her marriage: A
multivariate study of gender and
[11] Cummings EM, Davies PT. Marital marital satisfaction. Sex Roles 1991;
conflict and children: An emotional 24: 209-21.
security perspective. New York:
Guilford Press, 2010. [19] Mickelson KD, Claffey ST,
Williams SL. The moderating role
of gender and gender role attitudes
21
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001. together, marital quality, and the
risk of divorce. J Fam Issues 2003;
[21] Umberson D, Williams K, Powers 24: 21–50.
DA et al. You make me sick:Marital
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
quality and health over the life [29] Carstensen LL. Social and
course. J. Health Soc. Behav 2006; emotional patterns in adulthood:
47: 1–16. Support for socio-emotional
selectivity theory. Psychol Aging
[22] Myers SM, Booth A. Marital strains 1992; 7: 331–38.
and marital quality: The role of high
and low locus of control. J Marriage [30] Weinstein L, Powers J, Laverghetta
Fam 1999; 61: 423–436. A. College students' chronological
age predicts marital happiness
[23] Whiteman SD, McHale SM, Crouter regardless of length of marriage.
AC. Longitudinal changes in marital Coll Stud J. 2010; 44(2).
relationships: The role of offspring’s
pubertal development. J Marriage [31] Brubakar T. Families in later life: A
Fam 2007; 69: 1005–20. burgeoning research area. In A.
Booth (ed). Contemporary Families:
[24] Kamp Dush CM, Taylor MG, Looking Forward, Looking Back.
Kroeger RA. Marital happiness and National Council on Family
psychological wellbeing across the Relations, Minneapolis, 1990.
life course. Fam. Relat 2008; 57:
211–226. [32] Levenson RW, Cartenson LL,
Gottman JM. Long-term marriage:
[25] Stevenson B, Wolfers J. The Age, gender, and satisfaction.
paradox of declining female Psychol Aging 1993; 8: 301-13.
happiness. Working Paper 14969,
National Bureau of Economic [33] Umberson D, Williams K, Powers
Research, Cambridge, MA. DA et al. As good as it gets? A life
Retrieved from course perspective on marital
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14969 quality. Soc. Forces 2005; 84: 487-
, 2009. 505.
[26] Broman CL. Marital quality in [34] Edwards NN. Marital Satisfaction:
Black and White marriages. J Fam Factors for Black Jamaicans and
Issues 2005; 26: 431–41. African Americans Living in the
United States. PhD Thesis. Child,
[27] Kurdek LA. Gender and marital Family and Community Sciences in
satisfaction early in marriage: A the College of Education at the
22
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
[37] Sayers SL, Kohn CS, Heavey C. [44] Dillaway H, Broman C. Race, class,
Prevention of marital dysfunction: and gender differences in marital
Behavioural approaches and satisfaction and divisions of
beyond. Clin Psychol Rev 1998; 18: household labor among dual-earner
713-44. couples: A case for intersectional
analysis. J Fam Issues 2001; 22:
[38] Silliman B, Stanley S, Coffin W et 309-327.
al. Preventive intervention for
couples. In H Liddle, D Santisteban, [45] Broman CL. Race differences in
R Levant, J Bray (Eds.), Family marital well-being. J Marriage Fam
psychology: Science-based 1993; 55: 724-32.
interventions (pp. 12-146).
Washington, DC: American [46] Zainah AZ, Nasir R, Ruzy SH et al..
Psychological Association, 2001. Effects of Demographic Variables
on Marital Satisfaction. Asian Soc
[39] Halford W, Markman H, Kline G et Sci. 2012; 8: 46 – 9.
al. Best practice in couple
relationship education. J Marital [47] Blood RO, Wolfe DM. Husbands
Fam Ther 2003; 29: 385-406. and wives: The dynamics of married
living. New York: Free Press of
[40] Stanley SM, Amato PR, Johnson Glencoe, 1960.
CA et al. Premarital
education,marital quality, and [48] Dentler RA, Pineo PC. Sexual
marital stability: Findings from a adjustment, marital adjustment and
personal growth of husbands: A
23
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
panel analysis. Marriage and Family [58] Weishaus S, Field D. A half century
Living 1960; 22: 45-8. of marriage: Continuity or change? J
Marriage Fam 1988; 50: 763-74.
[49] Pineo PC. Disenchantment in the
later years of marriage. J. Marriage [59] Lee GR, Shehan CL. Retirement
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
[52] Rollins BC, Cannon KL. Marital [61] Tampieri A. Sex and the Uni:
satisfaction over the family life Higher Education Effects in Job and
cycle: A re-evaluation. J Marriage Marital Satisfaction. Working
Fam 1974; 36: 271-82. Paper: 10/07, 2010.
[53] Thurnher M. Midlife marriage: Sex [62] Osiki JO. Marital duration, age &
differences in evaluation and childlessness as they affect marital
perspectives. Int J Aging Hum Dev happiness. Nigeria Journal of
1976; 7: 129-35. Clinical and Counseling Psychology
1995; 1: 34 – 42.
[54] Anderson SA, Russell CS, Schumm
WA. Perceived marital quality and [63] Broderick CB. Marriage and the
family life-cycle categories: A Family (3rd ed). New Jersey:
further analysis. J. Marriage Fam Prentice Hall, 1988.
1983; 45: 127-39.
[64] Huston TL, McHale SM, Crouter A.
[55] Dougherty W, Jacobson N. When the honeymoon’s is over:
Marriage and the family. In BB Changes in the marriage relationship
Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of over the first year. In: Glimour R.
developmental psychology (pp. 667- Duck S. editors. Hillsdale, NJ:
680). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaun, 1986; pp. 109 – 32.
Prentice Hall, 1982.
[65] Glenn ND. Quantitative research on
[56] Rhyne D. Bases of marital marital quality in the 1980s: A
satisfaction among men and women. critical review. J Marriage Fam
J Marriage Fam 1981; 43: 941-55. 1990; 52: 818-31.
[57] Quadagno J. Aging and the life [66] Galambos N, Walters BJ. Work
course. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1999. hours, schedule inflexibility and
24
Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry, June 2018, Vol. 27, No. 1
stress in dual earner spouses. Can J [67] Knoblach LK.. The content of
Behav Sci 1992; 2: 290–302. relational uncertainty within
marriage. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh 2008;
25: 467- 95.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/mjp by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWn
Corresponding Author
Dr. Olaide N. Koleoso
Department of Mental Health,
University of Benin Teaching Hospital,
YQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 06/07/2023
Email: [email protected]
25