Challenges in Mastering Shorthand Skills
Challenges in Mastering Shorthand Skills
2 October 2020
Abstract
Shorthand is one of the courses offered at all levels of the secretarial studies. A
greater percentage of secretarial students have always performed very poorly in
shorthand. This situation has resulted in a number of students calling for either the
reduction of credit load allocation to shorthand or total removal of the course from
the OTM/Secretarial Studies curriculum. Various reasons have been advanced as
causes of the disturbing rate of failure which include teachers and student's factors,
lack of interest, accidental entry into the programme, assessment procedure, lack of
qualified teachers, population of students, lack of facilities and equipment. Although
some of the factors are being adequately addressed, there are some other very
serious factors that contribute to student's inability to achieve shorthand objectives of
the programme. The study adopted the survey research design. The population of the
study was 15 lecturers/Instructors and eighty-five HND IFT and HND II FT students
in OTM department of Federal Polytechnic, Ede. The instrument for data collection
used was a 4-point Likert Rating scale titled “Evaluation of Mastery of Shorthand
Skills Questionnaires for students (EMSSQS) and “Evaluation of Mastery of
Shorthand Skills Questionnaire for lecturers (EMSSQL). The reliability of the
instrument was determined using crombach alpha with a co-efficient value of 0.86.
The data generated was analyzed using mean and standard deviation. The findings of
the study revealed that the objectives of shorthand programme/course are not being
adequately met and that many strategies are employed by teachers to give the
students the false impression that they are doing well. It was concluded that lecturers
should encourage their students to work hard and students should disabuse their
minds that shorthand is no longer used in offices because shorthand skill is the only
skill that differentiate them from other students. It was recommended that the number
of hours allocated to Shorthand should be increased and that lecturers should use
various methods of teaching to impart the skill to the students.
Introduction
Shorthand as a cornerstone course of business education falls within the secretarial
programme and office option of business education. It is offered in both secondary
and post-secondary levels in our private and public institutions. It is also offered in
some of the registered and unregistered commercial institutes abound our cities. At
the Junior Secondary Schools, it is offered as an integral part of Business Studies as a
subject while at the Senior Secondary School, it is offered as a subject. Shorthand is
taught as a major course in Office Technology and Management Department of
Polytechnics, it is also a core course in Office Option of Business Education
Department of Colleges of Education, while at University level, it is one of the course
offered in the Business Education Department.
The concept “Shorthand” has been variously defined by scholars. Canning (1981)
defined Shorthand as the art of representing spoken words in a faster way. Davies
and Oladunjoye (1990) opined that Shorthand means the art of writing symbols
that represent sounds. According to Pitman (1975) an inventor of Pitman
Shorthand which was published in 1837 defined Shorthand as the art of
representing spoken sounds by writing signs”.
There are numerous Shorthand systems. According to Davies and Oladunjoye
(1990), Crank, Anderson, Peterson, (1982) said that a lot of individuals have tried
to invent new systems or perfect older systems which they thought would reduce
the learning difficulty associated with earlier Shorthand System. Crank et. al gave
the list of such Shorthand systems and their publication dates thus: Pitman (1837;
Gregg (1883), Machine Shorthand (1910); Speedwriting (1923); Stenoscript
(1950); Forkner (1972); Stenospeed (1953); Briefhand (1957)' Century 21 (1974);
and Quickhand (1974). Out of these Shorthand systems mentioned by Crank et.
al. Pitman Shorthand is the most widely used presently by vast majority of
Shorthand writers.
Shorthand could be said to be a subject which is designed to enable the beneficiaries
to keep pace with the speakers of the readers and record accurately words spoken or
read. It is a system of writing rapidly and speedily by substituting strokes (light or
heavy, horizontal, vertical or curve strokes) dots (light or bold), dashes (light or bold)
and signs in abbreviation for words, letters or figures pronounced.
Another uniqueness of Shorthand skill is employment opportunity. Oladunjoye
(1988) had observed that today, armed with good shorthand skills, the world is
indeed in the armpit of shorthand writers and secretaries. However, whether this
assertion is appreciable today is difficult to substantiate. Also, Aina and Anyaduba
(1989) reported that Shorthand is the answer and insurance against unemployment.
When graduates of other courses would be looking for jobs, jobs would be looking
for proficient shorthand writers. These assertions are fundamentally true and the
position of the secretary with adequate shorthand skills are in demand and
everywhere and a look through daily papers in Nigeria today confirms this. Up till
this present moment, various organisations still advertise in the newspapers for the
position of various categories of secretaries stating the speeds based on the cadre of
secretaries they want. On the part of the students, most of them reported back to
confess that they were made to take dictation and transcribe anytime they have the
opportunity to go for the interview. It is against this background that the researcher
discusses challenges militating against students' mastery of Shorthand skills and the
strategies to be adopted for effective teaching and learning in the classroom.
The Office Technology and Management (OTM) programme was designed by the
National Board for Technical Education (NBTE) to replace the Secretarial Studies
programme which had been on stream since 1989. According to NBTE (2006)
Curriculum, the programme was designed to equip its graduates to acquire
vocational skills in OTM and socio-psychological work skills for employment in
various fields of endeavour.
As a result of this change, much emphasis was laid on computer related courses while
Shorthand as a course was de-emphasized in which just four contact hours was
allocated for the teaching of the course per week. Ever before the introduction of the
new curriculum, nearly everybody especially students have been agitating for the
removal of the course from the curriculum. The reason for this desire was that
Shorthand is a difficult subject, a hard nut that is difficult to crack. High failure rate is
another reason why students always agitating for the removal of the course. Some
reasons were also advanced for the high failure rate in Shorthand which have been
expressed in various ways ranging from lecturer's personality, incompetence in
English Language, inappropriate teaching method, lack of instructional facilities,
school environment, textbooks to mention a few are discussed below:
A teacher is the central point of learning in a classroom situation. This is because he
decides whether the subject will be of interest to the students or not. A student may
like a particular subject very well but because of the poor teaching method of the
teacher such a student may lose interest in such a subject (Adedokun, 2014). There
are many factors that influence the teachers and students relationship towards the
teaching and understanding of shorthand such as aptitude, attitude, subject mastery,
teaching methodology, personal characteristics, the classroom environment, general
mental ability, personality, relationship with the students, preparation and planning,
effectiveness in presenting subject matters, relationship with other staff, self-
improvement, relationship with parents and community, poise, intellect, teaching
techniques, interactions with students, teaching competence demonstrated,
motivational skills, fairness in grading and teachers' attitude towards the students etc.
In Nigeria, English Language is the official language of communication and it is used
as a second language. It is the language of instruction at primary, post primary and
post-secondary levels. The importance of English Language a medium of expression
and instruction cannot be over-emphasized. According to Ademiluyi (1998), Pitman
shorthand especially was accidentally discovered while Pitman was working on
English phonetics. Thus, shorthand is an advanced, twisted form of the written
English Language. Anyone who has attained mastery in English Language is well on
the way to mastery in Shorthand. Not only must a student understand all the laws of
grammatical construction, the student must have a rich stock of English vocabulary.
Teaching is a process by which a learner is led to understand and acquire the
knowledge, which he is expected to have. Ekpenyong (1990) stated that teachers'
contribution in the high failure rate in shorthand has been expressed in various
ways ranging from inappropriate teaching method to non-teaching of essential
aspects of shorthand such as transcription and penmanship. The lecturer requires a
variety of methods and instructional materials to enrich his instruction and the
students learning process. There are varieties of methods and each has its own
strengths and weaknesses.
Oyinloye and Oluwalola (2014) described instructional facilities used in Office
Technology and Management as various office machines, equipment and devices for
the purpose of imparting knowledge and training to students. According to NBTE
(2004), Onah and Okoro (2010), instructional facilities for teaching OTM courses
include lecture rooms, digitalized laboratories, workshops, model offices, projectors,
player recorders, digital cameras, phones, modem, compact disks, radio and
television, personal computer etc. The use of instructional facilities does not only
help to facilitate teaching and learning but also results in more cooperative
(EMSSQL). The questionnaire for the students consisted of 29 items which were
meant to answer the research questions 1 and 2 while questionnaire for the
lecturers comprise 25 items meant to answer the research questions 1 and 2. The
respondents were made to answer separate questions based on the study. The
reliability of the instrument was determined using crombach alpha with a co-
efficient value of 0.86. The data generated was analysed using mean and standard
deviation. To answer research questions 1 and 2, the respondents were provided
with a 4-point rating scale of Strongly Agree = 4 points, Agree = 3 points,
Disagree = 2 points and Strongly Disagree =1 point. As basis for decision, any
item with mean that is 2.5 and above was considered positive and accepted while
any item with less than 2.50 will be considered negative or rejected.
A total number of 103 questionnaires were administered to the students and 15
questionnaires were distributed to the lecturers and instructors. 103 questionnaires
distributed to the students were filled and returned while 13 questionnaires out of
15 questionnaires distributed were retrieved from the lecturers and instructors.
The decision rule was that any item with 2.50 and above was regarded as Agreed
while any item with mean score of less than 2.50 was regarded as Disagreed.
Table 1: Mean and Standard Deviation of Students' Response on factors
militating against the Mastery of Shorthand Skills
S/N Items Mean S.D Remark
1. Student's lack of interest 3.02 0.006 Agree
2. Poor knowledge of English Language 3.00 0.009 Agree
3. Late admission of students affect the students 2.90 0.039 Agree
4. Strike action affect the students 3.00 0.009 Agree
5. Inadequate number of hours allocated to the course per week 2.50 0.357 Agree
6. Lack of penmanship 2.83 0.072 Agree
7. Lack of practice and drill 2.68 0.175 Agree
8. Lack of constant drilling 4.16 1.129 Agree
9. Lack of concentration on the part of the students 3.31 0.045 Agree
10. Lack of mastery of shorthand Principles 3.21 0.013 Agree
11. Inability to sound spell 3.07 0.001 Agree
12. Overcrowded students in class 2.99 0.012 Agree
13 Lecturers teaching shorthand are too harsh/strict 3.93 0.692 Agree
14 Inadequate facilities e.g. Digitalized Shorthand Laboratories/
lecturerooms etc. 3.12 0.001 Agree
15. Poor implementation of curriculum and policies 2.75 0.121 Agre
Source: Field Survey 2019
Table 1 above which shows the factors militating against the students' mastery of
shorthand skills. All the items 1-15 show a significant result since their mean
scores are all above 2.5
Table 2: Mean and Standard Deviation of Lecturers' Response on factors
militating against students' Mastery of Shorthand Skills
S/N Items Mean S.D Remark
1. Lecturers reduce speed without letting the students know 3.31 0.421 Agree
Marks are not fully penalized as required by NBTE marking
Scheme 3.54 0.773 Agree
3. Marks are sometimes awarded across boards 2.83 0.028 Agree
4. Transcription time is increased 2.69 0.001 Agree
5. Invigilator is not strict with students copying themselves 2.31 0.123 Disagree
6. Shorthand outlines are not checked against the transcript 1.92 0.549 Disagree
Lecturers who are not skilled in shorthand are appointed as
external examiners or moderators 2.00 0.437 Disagree
8. External Examiners pass those who fail in order to be retained 2.08 0.338 Disagree
9. Students buy grades from lecturers and clerks 1.79 0.759 Disagree
The objective of 95% accuracy set for students are not strictly
adhered to 2.92 0.067 Agree
11. Number of hours allocated to the course per week is inadequate 3.15 0.239 Agree
Laziness on the part of the students isanother important factor
for not meeting shorthand speed 0.85 0.036 Disagree
Student's failure to buy additional textbooks apart from
Shorthand Anniversary 3.46 0.638 Agree
Inability on part of the students to master short forms, phrases,
intersections etc. Affects the students' performance and prevent
them from mastering the skill 3.76 1.208 Agree
15. Non-mastery of English Language which is the second language 3.31 0.421 Agree
Source: Field Survey 2019
Table 2 above which focuses on the lecturers' response on factors militating against
the students' mastery of shorthand indicates all the variables affect the teaching and
learning of Shorthand. The results in Table 3 showed that items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 had
mean above 2.50, this indicated that respondents considered the items acceptable.
While items 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 had mean below 2.50, which indicated that the
respondents considered those items insignificant. This means that these variables
does not have anything to do with students' mastery of shorthand.
Discussion of Findings
From the findings, it was found out that the respondents agreed with all the items all
the factors militating against the mastery of shorthand skills, having the mean score
of 2.5 except items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12 which indicated that the respondents
considered those items insignificant. The results agreed with the opinion of Ehirheme
(2019) that lack of interesting the part of students, poor knowledge of English
Language, inabilities of the students to practise regularly and drill, laziness due to
negligence at their work, cane of nomenclature of Secretarial Studies to Office
Technology and Management programme delayed admission process into tertiary
institutions, inadequate facilities and over-population, are all factors militating
against the mastery of shorthand skills. While the respondents disagreed with the
opinion that invigilators are not strict, shorthand outlines were not checked against
the transcript, lecturers' wo were not skilled in shorthand were appointed as external
examiners/moderators, external examiners pass those who failed in order to be
retrained, students buy grades from lecturers and clerks and tat laziness on the part of
the students is another factor for not meeting shorthand speed.
The results of research question two revealed the possible solutions to the problems
of teaching and learning Shorthand. The respondents agreed with all the items 1-10
receptively. These include English Language trouble reading of novels and
development of grammatical ability, mastery of shorthand principles, reduction of
student's population, hiring of qualified lecturers, proper implementation of the
Summary of Findings
The result of data collected in respect of the 2 research questions formulated for
this study were analysed using the arithmetic mean and Standard Deviation
revealed the following major findings:
Student-teacher relationship has a significant effect in the effective
teaching and learning of Shorthand
Personality of the teacher goes a long way in effective management of
classroom in teaching and learning of Shorthand.
Arousing the students' interest by the teacher enhances effective teaching
and learning of Shorthand.
Professional lecturer should be employed in the teaching of Shorthand.
Adoption of appropriate method of teaching enhances effective classroom
management in the teaching and learning of Shorthand,
Utilisation of appropriate instructional facilities enhances effective
classroom management in the teaching and learning of Shorthand.
Period allotted and proper seating arrangement enhances effective
classroom management in the teaching and learning of Shorthand.
Conclusion
From the findings of this study it can be concluded that there are many factors
militating against students' mastery of shorthand skills. Since the objective of the
teaching and learning process is to bring about behavioural changes in the
learners, therefore, proper attention and consideration must be given to eliminate
all factors that can hinder effective teaching and learning processes as well as
effective classroom management.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are made to reduce the factors militating against
mastery of shorthand skills in the classroom: