Hong Kong Baptist University
Department of Social Work
SOPY3065 Culture and Social Policy
Group Project Marking Criteria (30%)
Student Name: Student No.:
Criteria Max Score Your Score
Presentation (10%)
Source and relevance of the data (3%)
Sufficient sources of data, evidence and examples to support the arguments. All Excellent
Information is relevant to the logic of the topic. Disregards all of the information that is (3)
irrelevant. All information is also factual and correct.
Fairly good source of data, evidence and examples to support the argument. Most of Good
the information is relevant but some is irrelevant. Most of the information is factual (2)
and correct.
Almost with no data to support the opinion. Most of the information is irrelevant and Poor
incorrect. (0-1)
Outline of the presentation (4%)
The information is well organized with a logical structure appropriate to the topic. Very Excellent
good use of headings and sub-headings. (4)
Most of the information is well organized and with a logical sequence. Good use of Good
headings and sub-heading. (3)
The information is organized but there is room for improvement with the logical Fair
sequence. And the arrangement may lack of coherence and logic. (2)
Organization is not so good. Lack of logic and coherence. Poor
(0-1)
Teamwork (3%)
Shows a great work of team effort with good cooperation and division of the duties. Excellent
All team members are actively involved in the presentation. (3)
The cooperation is fair. Some of the duties are not fairly divided. Some members may Fair
not equally be so actively involved in the presentation. (2)
Cannot show a team work effort, and the duties are poorly divided. Some members are Poor
just minimally involved in the presentation. (0-1)
Paper Summary (20%)
Understanding of the Subject Matter (10%)
Paper topic is stated or defined precisely and concisely. It is presented Excellent
comprehensively from the presentation, delivering well organized relevant information (9-10)
necessary in a good written format.
Paper topic is precisely stated or defined. It is presented clearly so that understanding Good
is not seriously impeded by omissions. It is written in an organized written format. (7-8)
Paper topic is stated precisely but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities Fair
unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. (5-6)
Paper topic is stated without clear clarification or description. Below Average
(3-4)
Paper topic is not clearly stated or defined. Poor
(0-2)
Reflection (10%)
Review the process of the production of the presentation and the learning of the Excellent
substances in depth to reveal significantly changed perspectives about the topic, which (9-10)
provide foundation for expanded knowledge; professional growth and development
from the comments obtained from the class.
Review the process of the production of the presentation and the learning of the Good
substances in depth, revealing fully clarified meanings or indicating broader (7-8)
1
Last updated in Nov 2017
perspectives about the topic. And developed fully from the comments obtained from
the class.
Review the process of the production of the presentation and the learning of the Fair
substances with some depth, revealing slightly clarified meanings or indicating a (5-6)
somewhat broader perspective about the topic. And fairly developed from the
comments obtained from class.
Reviews the process of the production of the presentation and the learning of the Below Average
substances at a surface level, without revealing clarified meaning or indicating a (3-4)
broader perspective about the topic. Show little development from the comments
obtained from the class.
Brief description of the topic and does not demonstrate any reviews of the process of Poor
the presentation or learning related to the selected topic. And shows no development (0-2)
from the comments obtained from class.
Total Score: ______________ (Out of 30%)
Further comments (if needed):_______________________________________________________________________________
Signature of Lecturer: Date:
2
Last updated in Nov 2017
