Lecture Notes - Microeconomics I - Week 4
Lecture Notes - Microeconomics I - Week 4
9 September 2021
Utility
an indicator of a person 's overall well being Utility is seen to describe preference
only way as a
-
Utility function , a
way of assigning
a number to
every possible consumption bundle such that more preferred -
bundles get
assign larger numbers than less preferred bundles
-
Monotonic transformation ,
a
way of transforming one set of numbers into another set of numbers in a
way that
> flu ) =3 u , adding any number ( e. g. flu ) = Ut 17 ) , raising u to an odd power (e. g. flu) = u
'
) , and so on
f flu 2) -
fl Un )
=
U Uz -
Un
> monotonic function always have a positive slope > always increasing
=
""
a
utility function that represents those same preferences
1. To that ulx, a) represents particular preferences Ulxn Xz ) > Uly , y , ) if and
only if ( i. ✗ a) Y LY, Yz )
that
say ,
✗ some means , ,
✗
,
3.
Therefore , flu 1×1 ,
✗ ill >
flu Lyn Yz ) if and only if
, 1×1 ,
✗ a) > ( Y , yz )
, ,
so the function flu) represents the preferences in the same
Monotonic transformation of a
utility function is a utility function that represents the same preferences as the
original utility
function .
• Cardinal utility
Theories of utility that attach a
significance to the
magnitude of utility the size of the
, utility difference between two bundles
of goods is
supposed to have some sort of significance
E-xp I like one bundle twice as much if I to twice I like bundle twice
. as another am
willing pay as much for it or one
as much as another if I am
willing to run twice as far to get it or to wait twice as
long or to gamble for it at
•
Constructing a
utility function
Not all kind of preferences can be represented by a
utility function intransitive preferences
, so that A > Btc > A is
impossible to construct a
utility function since A is ambiguous
Utility function is a
way to label the indifference curves such that higher indifference curves get larger numbers
line
Draw the
diagonal illustrated and label each indifference curve with its distance from the
origin measured along
-
the line
✗2
" " "" distance
"
from origin
" "
" Nearly any kind of reasonable preferences can
"
" be
represented by a
utility function
" "
"'t indifference
""o curves
in
given by : = ✗
a ✗2
K
Xz =
for K = 1,2 , 3 , - . -
✗
,
✗2
1<=1
1<=2
1<=1
×,
> Exp .
Utility function vlxn , ✗ a) = ✗ i ✗i
( X, ✗ a)
' 2
v14 , Xz ) =
Xi Xi = = Vlxn , ✗ a)
Perfect substitutes , all that mattered to the consumer was the total of goods ,
it is natural to measure utility by the total number of
goods
> for other than one to one case , the consumer would require two units of good 2 to compensate him for unit of
giving up one
good 1 ,
this means that good 1 is twice as valuable to the consumer as
good 2
the Ulxi Xz ) + ✗2
*
utility function ,
=
2×1
n
,
a s b are some positive
"
Positive numbers that measure the "
value of goods 1 and 2 to the consumer
%
Otis eek 4
9 September 2021
Perfect complements ,
the consumer
only cares about the number of pairs of goods they has , to choose the number of pairs
of goods the function
as
utility
> the number of
complete pairs of goods that
you have is the minimum of the number of good 1 you have (4) ,
and
> the
utility function UH, , ✗ a) = min { ✗i. ✗ } a
Exp if.
we have a bundle of good such as 110 , 10 ) and we add one more unit of good 1 so that we
get 111,101 this
,
will
leave us on the same indifference curve since min { 10,70 } = min { 11,10} = 10
So 41×1 ,
✗ 2) =
min { Xi , Xi } is a possible utility function to describe perfect complements
the number teaspoons of sugar
> if Xi is the number of cups of tea available S X, is of available then the utility function
'
will be Ula , ×, ) = min { ✗ i. -2×2 } since 1 Cup of tea requires 2 teaspoons of sugar
• we could
get rid of the fraction by multiply it by 2 ,
so the
utility function Ulxn will be , ✗ c) = min {2×11×1}
> the formula of perfect
complement utility function is given by ulxn ✗ 2) min { axiibxz } where Sb
-
positive
=
, a are
numbers that indicates the proportions in which the goods are consumed
Quasi linear preferences , all of the indifference curves are just vertically
"
shifted
"
versions of indifference curve
> the
height of each indifferent curve is some function of ✗
1, -
v14 ) + K
•
higher the value of K give higher indifference curves (the minus sign is only a convention )
✗2
,
,
consumer
A B
✗z
✗2
✗i
Xp
c- .
Yz D= 42 ( = Ys D= Ys
Cobb -
indifference curves
> Cobb -
Douglas preferences are the standard example of indifference curves that look well-behaved and the formula describing them
define a new a =
now write the v ,
✗ = ✗ ✗
,
•
Marginal utility
Marginal utility is the rate of change with
respect to good 1
U u ( ✗n t ✗a.✗ 2) -
U (✗n ,
✗ 2)
MU , = =
✗, ✗n
du
U = MY ×
, > Mu
,
=
2×1
U u (× , ,
✗z t Xz ) - U IX, ,
✗ 2)
MU 2 = =
✗ ✗2
z
U = M V2 ✗
2
the
magnitude of marginal utility depends on the magnitude of utility it depends
,
on the particular way that we
choose to measure
utility
•
if we multiplied utility by 2 , marginal utility would also be multiplied by 2 > represent the same preferences but
scaled differently
has behavioral
> marginal utility no content
aea
Marginal utility depends on the particular utility function that we use to reflect the preference ordering and its
•
Marginal utility and MRS
a
long the indifference curve
MU , ✗n t Mlk Xz =
U = 0
✗,
Mvz
✗2 MUI
MRS = = -
✗, MU 2
of utility
> often refers to the MRS by its absolute value (as a positive number )
> the MRS can be measured by observing a
person's actual behavior
if multiply
we
utility by >
marginal utility multiplied by
an
2 is 2
•
Utility for commuting
if a bundle of goods ✗ is chosen when a bundle of goods Y is available then ✗ must have a
higher utility than Y
consumers describe their behavior
>
by examining choices make we can estimate a
utility function to
•
Applied in the field of transportation economics to study commuter's behavior
Exp If (×,
.
, Xz ,
. . .
.
Xn ) represents the values of n different characteristics of driving and (Yn Yz , ,
. . .
. Yn ) represents the
the coeficients Bi , Bz ,
and so on are unknown parameters
> monotonic transformation of this utility function would describe the choice behavior equally well
[Link] c) ,
=
-0.147 TW -
0.0411 TT -
2.24C
TW =
total walking time to and from bus or car
C total cost
=
of trip in dollars
another
• the ratio of cost to travel time indicates the average consumer 's tradeoff between these two variables
an estimated utility function can be very valuable for determining whether or not it is worthwhile to make some
change in