NCM113 Midterm Topics Reviewer
NCM113 Midterm Topics Reviewer
Survey
made up of a series of questions for systematic collection of information from a sample
of individual or families
Informant interview
purposeful talks with either key informants or ordinary members of the community.
o Structured interview- the nurse directs the talk based on an interview guide.
o Unstructured interview- the informant guides the talk
Community forum
an open meeting of the members of the community (ex. Pulong pulong sa barangay)
Besides data gathering, the community forum may also be used as a venue for informing
the people about secondary data, for data validation, and for getting feedback from the
people themselves about previously gathered data.
Focus group
A focus group differs from a community forum in the sense that the focus group is made
up of a much smaller group , usually 6- 12 members only(Maurer and Smith, 2009).
Example: first- time pregnant woman
R.A 7160(Local Government Code) assigned the function of civil registration to local
governments and mandated the appointment of local (City/municipal) Civil Registrars.
The PSA serves as the central repository of civil registries and the Civil Registrar General
of the Philippines.
The FHSIS Manual of operations lists and describes the following recording tools:
Summary table
is accomplished by the midwife. It is a 12-column table in which columns correspond to
the 12 months of the year. This record is kept at the BHS and has 2 components: Health
Program Accomplishment and Morbidity/ Diseases.
The reporting forms, as enumerated in the FHSIS manual of Operations are the
following:
Monthly forms
are regularly prepared by the midwife and submitted to the nurse, who then uses the data
to prepare the Quarterly forms.
o Program report (M1)- contains indicators categorized as maternal care, child care,
family planning, and disease control.
o Morbidity report (M2)- contains a list of all cases of disease by age and sex.
Quarterly forms
are usually prepared by the nurse. There should only be one quarterly form for the
municipality/ city.
o Program report(Q1)- contains the three month total of indicators categorized as
maternal care, family planning, child care, dental health, and disease control.
o Morbidity report(Q2)- is a 3- month consolidation of morbidity report(M2)
Annual forms
A- BHS
is a report by the midwife that contains demographic, environmental, and
natality data.
o Annual form 1 (A-1) is prepared by the nurse and is the report of the RHU or
health center. It contains demographic and environmental data, and data on
natality and mortality for the entire year.
o Annual form 2 (A-2) prepared by the nurse, is the yearly morbidity report by age
and sex.
o Annual form 3 (A-3) also prepared by the nurse, is the yearly report of all deaths
(mortality) by age and sex.
C. Disease Registries
A listing of persons diagnosed with a specific type of disease in the defined population.
Data collected through disease registries serve as basis for monitoring, decision- making,
and program management.
D. Census data
a census is a periodic governmental enumeration of the population. During a census,
people may be assigned to a locality by de jure or de facto method. De jure assignment is
based on the legally established place of residence of people, whereas de facto is
according to the actual physical location of the people(NSCB, 2012).
Line graph
to have a visual image of trends in data over time and age.
Pie Chart
to show percentage distribution or composition of a variable, such as population or
households.
Scatter plot or diagram
to show correlation between two variables. The values of both variables in subjects are
plotted in a graph with an x-axis and a y- axis.
Community Diagnosis
Community Diagnosis
The process of determining the health status of the community and the factors responsible
for it. The term is applied both to the process of determination and to its findings(WHO,
2004)
It is a quantitative and qualitative description of the health of citizens and the factors that
influence their health. Community diagnosis allows identification of problems and areas
of improvement, thereby stimulating action(WHO, 1994)
OHAMA SYSTEM
The Ohama System has been used as a framework for the care of individuals, families,
and communities by nurses, nursing educators, physicians, and other health care
providers.
It is a comprehensive and research- based classification system for client problems that
exists in the public domain, meaning, it is not held under copyright.
The Ohama classification system has three components that are to be used
together:
Environmental Domain: Material resources and physical surroundings both inside and outside
the living area, neighborhood, and broader community.
Income
Sanitation
Residence
Neighborhood/workplace safety
Psychosocial Domain: Patterns of behavior, emotion, communication, relationships, and
development.
Communication with community resources
Social contact
Role change
Interpersonal relationship
Spirituality
Grief
Mental health
Sexuality
Caretaking/parenting
Neglect
Abuse
Growth and development
PRIORITY SETTING
THIS STEP PROVIDES THE NURSE AND THE HEALTH TEAM WITH A
LOGICAL MEANS OF ESTABLISHING PRIORITY AMONG THE IDENTIFIED
HEALTH CONCERNS.
WHO has suggested the following criteria to decide on a community health concern for
intervention:
o Significance of the problem- based on the number of people in the community
affected by the problem or condition.
o Community awareness- when people are aware of the risk arising from a
condition pervasive in the community, they are likely to have the motivation to
deal with the condition and give it a priority.
o Ability to reduce risk- it is related to the availability of expertise(Shuster and
Goeppinger, 2004) among the health team and the community itself.
o In determining cost of reducing risk, the nurse has to consider economic, social,
and ethical exquisites and consequences of planned action.
o Ability to identify the target population for the intervention is the matter of
availability of data sources such as FHSIS, census, survey reports, and/ or case-
finding or screening tools.
o Availability of resources to intervene in the reduction of risk entails technological,
financial, and other material resources of the community, the nurse, and the health
agency.
Goals
are the desired outcomes at the end of interventions, whereas objectives are the short-
term changes in the community that are observed as the health team and the community
work towards the attainment of goals.
Objectives
serve as instructions, defining what should be detected in the community as interventions
are being implemented. Defines the desired step- by- step family responses as they work
toward a goal.
Specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time- bound (SMART) objectives provide a solid
basis for monitoring and evaluation.
SPECIFIC- the objective clearly articulates who is expected to do what
MEASURABLE- observable, measurable, and whenever possible, quantifiable
indications of the family’s achievement as a result of their efforts toward a goal provide a
complete basis for monitoring and evaluation.
ATTAINABLE- the objective has to be realistic and in conformity with available
resources, existing constraints, and family traits, such as style and functioning.
RELEVANT- the objective is appropriate for family need or problem that is intended to
be minimized , alleviated or resolved.
TIME-BOUND- having a specified target time or date helps the family and the nurse in
focusing their attention and efforts toward the attainment of the objective(Doran, 1981)
Standards of evaluation
Types of evaluation:
Formative evaluations
are used primarily to provide information for initiative improvement by examining the
delivery of the initiative, its implementation, procedures, personnel, etc.
Summative evaluations
in contrast, examine the initiative's outcomes and are used to provide information that
will assist in making decisions regarding the initiative's adoption, continuation or
expansion and can assist in judgments of the initiative's overall merit based on certain
criteria.
Comprehensive evaluations
combine both process and outcome questions.
Planning
The relevant questions during evaluation planning and implementation involve
determining the feasibility of the evaluation, identifying stakeholders, and specifying
short- and long-term goals.
COMMUNITY ORGANIZING
COMMUNITY ORGANIZING
Community organizing as a process consists of steps or activities that instill and reinforce
the people’s self- confidence on their own collective strengths and capabilities(Manalili,
1990)
Community development
is the end goal of community organizing and all other efforts towards uplifting the status
of the poor and marginalized.
will have to be defined and visualized by the community members and their participation
is crucial in the attainment of this vision.
CO is people- centered
the basic premise of any community organizing endeavor is that the people are the means
and ends of development, and community empowerment is the process and the outcome.
(Felix, 1998)
CO is participative
the participation of the community in the entire process- assessment, planning,
implementation and evaluation- should be ensured.
CO is democratic
it is a process that allows the majority of people to recognize and critically analyze their
difficulties and articulate their aspirations.
CO is developmental
CO should be directed towards changing current undesirable conditions.
CO is process- oriented
The CO goals of empowerment and development are achieved through a process of
change.
People’s empowerment
through the process of CO, people learn to overcome their powerlessness and develop
their capacity to maximize their control over the situation and start to place the future in
their own hands.
Community Development
The United Nations defines community development as a “process where community
members come together to take collective action and generate solutions to common
problems.”
A holistic approach grounded in principles of empowerment, human rights, inclusion,
social justice, self-determination and collective action (Kenny, 2007)
CD programs are led by community members at every stage – from deciding on issues to
selecting and implementing actions, and evaluation.
Self-determination
people and communities have the right to make their own choices and decisions.
Empowerment
people should be able to control and use their own assets and means to influence.
Collective action
coming together in groups or organizations strengthens peoples’ voices.
Respect
Respect for your community and others is so important in this process. Without it, the
change that’s needed will not be possible. Focusing on solidarity and being respectful of
others is a large part of the process.
Strengths-based assets
A goal of community development is to strengthen the overall strength of the community
and its residents.
Integrity
No good work can be accomplished without integrity. We need honest, dutiful people
who value their community and actively seek out positive change for everyone.
Hope
There’s no more important quality for community development than hope. Change starts
with individuals, then it grows as we work together with hope for a better, more fruitful
future.
Physical improvements, such as roads, housing, sanitation, drainage, system and farming
etc. Functional activities are health, education, protection, recreation etc. Social activities
including group discussion cooperation, work together, self-reliance etc.
Objectives/goals:
deepen the decentralization process
set the National and Local Community Development agendas and support the
communities to understand them
People:
It’s the people of the community who generates solutions to common problems that
improve the economic, social, environmental and cultural wellbeing of the community
The control of community people over the amount, quality and benefits of development
activities helps make the process sustainable.
Strategy:
useful, in guiding daily actions and prioritizing and reviewing established goals, and for
measuring progress.
aim to provide a focus on specific needs which have an impact across the whole
community.
identifies long and short-term goals the community wants to achieve
Technology:
a catalyst for social change
gives power and a voice to people within the larger ecosystem
WELFARE APPROACH
the immediate and/or spontaneous to ameliorate the manifestation of poverty especially
on the personal level
assumes that poverty is God-given; destined, hence the poor should accept their condition
since they will receive their just reward in heaven
believes that poverty is caused by bad luck, natural disasters and certain circumstances
which are beyond the control of the people
MODERNIZATION APPROACH
assumes that development consists of abandoning the traditional methods of doing things
and must adopt the technology of industrial countries
believes that poverty is due to lack of education, lack of resources such as capital and
technology
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
this is the process of empowering/transforming the poor and the oppressed sectors of
society so that they can pursue a more just and humane society
believes that poverty is caused by prevalence of exploitation, oppression, domination and
other unjust structure
Strategies of HRDP
Strengthening the integration of PHC, COPAR, Adult teaching learning concepts,
strategies and methodologies in the health science curricula
Systematization of the student’s exposure program
Development of CHO which can sustain health development program
Community – capability building through leadership and skills trainings.
Provision of health services by the faculty, students and the trained Barangay Health
Workers
History of HRDP
was developed and sponsored by the Philippine Center for Population and Development
(PCPD)
PCPD is a non-stock, non – profit institution, which serve as a resource center assisting
institutions and agencies through programs and projects geared toward the social human
development of rural and urban communities
to make health services available and accessible to depressed and underserved
communities in the Philippines.
Community organizing as the main strategy to be employed in preparing the communities
to develop their community health care systems and the establishment of community
health organization to manage the community health programs.
Organizing work in the communities were done in 3 phases
Participatory Action Research as fascinating strategy for maximum community
involvement through collective identification and analysis of community health
problems and collective health action
Available funds to finance community initiated projects
HRDP I
Trained the faculty, medical/nursing students to provide health care services to the far
flung barrios because of lack of man power for health services at the same time that
similar activities fulfilled the curricular requirements of the students for public health
The PCPD provides seed money for the income generating projects
Short-term service
HRDP II
The 2nd cycle uses the same strategy but the program could not be sustained by the
schools or hospitals and the income-generating projects eventually become the hindrance
to the goal of achieving the health program because the people tend to be more interested
in the income generated by the projects
Both HRPD I and HRDP II have brought about some changes in the community life of
the people
Established basic health infrastructure; basic health services were increased; there were
trained workers and organized health groups to take care of the need of the community
HRDP III
PCPD refined the program and resulted to what is now called HRDP III, which has these
unique features:
Comprehensive training of the staff and faculty of the participating agency in which the
community work was initiated
Periodic training program and regular assistance to the participating agency were
provided to strengthen the health outreach program to become community oriented
PHC as the approach with which all nursing / medical students, their CI’s and indigenous
health workers are trained for community health work and around which all other project
inputs will revolve
Definition
A social development approach that aims to transform the apathetic, individualistic and
voiceless poor into dynamic, participatory and politically responsive community
A collective, participatory, transformative, liberative, sustained and systematic process of
building people’s organizations by mobilizing and enhancing the capabilities and
resources of the people for the resolution of their issues and concerns towards effecting
change in their existing oppressive and exploitative conditions (1994 National Rural
Conference).
A process by which a community identifies its needs and objectives, develops confidence
to take action in respect to them and in doing so, extends and develops cooperative and
collaborative attitudes and practices in the community (Ross 1967).
A continuous and sustained process of educating the people to understand and develop
their critical awareness of their existing condition, working with the people collectively
and efficiently on their immediate and long-term problems, and mobilizing the people to
develop their capability and readiness to respond and take action on their immediate
needs towards solving their long-term problems (CO: A manual of experience, PCPD).
Process
The sequence of steps whereby members of a community come together to critically
assess to evaluate community conditions and work together to improve those conditions.
Consciousness Raising
through experiential learning
is central to the COPAR process because it places emphasis on learning that emerges
from concrete action and which enriches succeeding action
Structure
Refers to a particular group of community members that work together for a common
health and health related goals.
Emphasis
Community working to solve its own problem.
Direction is established internally and externally.
Development and implementation of a specific project less important than the
development of the capacity of the community to establish the project.
Consciousness raising involves perceiving health and medical care within the total
structure of society.
Importance
COPAR is an important tool for community development and people empowerment as
this helps the community workers to generate community participation in development
activities.
COPAR prepares people/clients to eventually take over the management of a
development programs in the future.
COPAR maximizes community participation and involvement; community resources are
mobilized for community services.
Principles
People especially the most oppressed, exploited and deprived sectors are open to change,
have the capacity to change and are able to bring about change.
COPAR should be based on the interest of the poorest sector of the community.
COPAR should lead to a self-reliant community and society.
Phases of COPAR
Pre-Entry phase
Is the initial phase of the organizing process where the community organizer looks for
communities to serve and help. Activities includes:
Site Selection
Initial networking with local government.
Conduct preliminary special investigation.
Make long/short list of potential communities.
Do ocular survey of listed communities.
Entry phase
sometimes called the social preparation phase. Is crucial in determining which strategies
for organizing would suit the chosen community. Success of the activities depend on how
much the community organizers has integrated with the community.
Key Activities
Community Health Organization (CHO)
preparation of legal requirements
guidelines in the organization of the CHO by the core group
election of officers
Research Team Committee
Planning Committee
Health Committee Organization
Others
Formation of by-laws by the CHO
Key Activities
Training of CHO for monitoring and implementing of community health program.
Identification of secondary leaders.
Link aging and networking.
Conduct of mobilization on health and development concerns.
Implementation of livelihood projects.
Phase-out
The phase when the health care workers leave the community to stand alone
This phase should be stated during the entry phrase so that people will be ready for this
phase
The organizations built should be ready to sustain the test of the community itself
because the real evaluation will be done by the residents of the community itself.
SOCIAL INVESTIGATION
A systematic process of collecting, collating, analyzing data to draw a clear picture of the
community.
Also known as community study
GROUNDWORK
Going around and motivating the people on something or an issues
A time to spot and develop potential leader
The entry phase or sometimes called the social preparation phase
MEETING
Core group formation
People collectively ratifying what they have already decided individually
The meeting gives the people the collective power and confidence
Problems and issues are discussed
ROLE PLAYING
To act out the meeting that will take place between the leaders of the people and the
government representatives
It is a way of training the people to anticipate what will happen and prepare themselves
for such eventually
MOBILIZATION OF ACTIONS
Actual experience of the people in confronting the powerful and the actual exercise
power
EVALUATION
Determines whether the goal is met or not
The people reviewing the steps 1- 7, so to determine whether they were successful or not
in their objectives
REFLECTION
Dealing with deeper, on-going concerns to look at the positive values Community
workers are trying to build in the organization
It gives the people time to reflect on the stark reality of life compared to the ideal
ORGANIZATION
The result of many successive and similar actions of the people
Occurs when the community organization has been established and the community
members are already participating in a community wide undertaking