Scribd
Upload
56 views2 pages

Anticipatory Bail Petition Denied

1) Four petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application in the Principal District and Sessions Court of Cuddalore District against an FIR registered by the police under sections 354A, 294B, 506(ii) of IPC and sections 4 of TNPWH Act and TNEI Act for an alleged occurrence on January 6, 2024. 2) The petitioners' counsel argued they had no connection to the offense and there was a love matter between the parties, requesting bail. However, the public prosecutor strongly objected, citing the FIR and incomplete investigation. 3) Considering the objections and incomplete investigation, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition.

Uploaded by

cute love edits
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views2 pages

Anticipatory Bail Petition Denied

1) Four petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application in the Principal District and Sessions Court of Cuddalore District against an FIR registered by the police under sections 354A, 294B, 506(ii) of IPC and sections 4 of TNPWH Act and TNEI Act for an alleged occurrence on January 6, 2024. 2) The petitioners' counsel argued they had no connection to the offense and there was a love matter between the parties, requesting bail. However, the public prosecutor strongly objected, citing the FIR and incomplete investigation. 3) Considering the objections and incomplete investigation, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition.

Uploaded by

cute love edits
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

CUDDALORE DISTRICT, CUDDALORE

Present: Thiru.S.Jawahar, B.L.,


Principal Sessions Judge,
Cuddalore.

Thursday, the 11th day of January 2024

Crl. Misc. Petition No. 304/2024

1. Abimannan @ Abimanna, age 61, S/o. Ramar


2. Kumar, age 57, S/o. Chellathambi
3. Naveen, age 27, S/o. Kumar
4. Elsan, age 28, S/o. Kumar >> Petitioners/Accused

.Vs.
S.H.O. Killai P.S.
Cr.No.3/2024 >> Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming for hearing before me on this day in the presence of
Thiru.K.Lenin, Advocate for the petitioners and of Public Prosecutor for the
respondent and this Court made the following
ORDER

Heard both sides.


This petition is filed U/s.438 of Cr.P.C, for seeking Anticipatory bail.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Accused has filed the


Anticipatory Bail application and stated that the Petitioners/Accused have been
charged by the Respondent Police U/Ss.354(A), 294(b), 506(ii) of IPC, R/w.4 of
TNPWH Act, R/w.4 of TNEI Act for the allege occurrence took place on
06.01.2024. FIR was registered on 07.01.2024.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Accused has contended that the
Petitioners/Accused are no way connected with the offence. There is love matter
between the parties. So there is case in counter. Hence, prays to allow the
petition.
Per contra, the Learned Public Prosecutor objected on the ground as per
FIR, the occurrence is made out. The investigation has not yet been completed.
Hence, he strongly objected to grant Anticipatory Bail to the
Petitioners/Accused.

Rival submissions of both sides considered. Upon considering the strong


objection of the learned Public Prosecutor, facts and circumstances of the case and
other facts and the investigation has not yet completed, this Court is not inclined to
grant Anticipatory bail to the Petitioners/Accused, hence the petition is dismissed.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 11th day of January 2024.


Digitally signed by S JAWAHAR
S JAWAHAR Date: 2024.01.11 18:19:26
+0530

PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE,


CUDDALORE.

To : The Judicial Magistrate No. I, Chidambaram Through


Copy to : S.H.O. Killai P.S. E-Mail only

You might also like