0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views2 pages

Aldrin Score

This document contains an evaluation form for a candidate interview at St. Therese School of Marilao. The form rates the candidate on various criteria related to appearance, communication skills, body language, attitude, and responses to questions. The candidate, Aldrin Delos Santos, scored highest in appearance, greeting, posture/eye contact, and politeness. Areas for potential improvement included communication, body language, and showing more enthusiasm and confidence during responses. Overall, the evaluation assessed both strengths and opportunities for development in the candidate's interview performance.

Uploaded by

michael
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views2 pages

Aldrin Score

This document contains an evaluation form for a candidate interview at St. Therese School of Marilao. The form rates the candidate on various criteria related to appearance, communication skills, body language, attitude, and responses to questions. The candidate, Aldrin Delos Santos, scored highest in appearance, greeting, posture/eye contact, and politeness. Areas for potential improvement included communication, body language, and showing more enthusiasm and confidence during responses. Overall, the evaluation assessed both strengths and opportunities for development in the candidate's interview performance.

Uploaded by

michael
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ST.

THERESE SCHOOL OF MARILAO


CANDIDATE INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM

Candidate’s Name: ALDRIN DELOS SANTOS Date: MARCH 20, 2021

Criteria 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 Score


Appearance Overall appearance is Appearance is Overall neat Overall appearance is
untidy somewhat untidy appearance very neat
(** This should
relate to the Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is
core inappropriate for any job inappropriate (shirt acceptable for the appropriate for any job
concentration interview (torn, unclean, un-tucked, tee-shirt, type of interview interview
area and may
be industry
wrinkled) too much jewelry, etc.)
Well groomed (i.e. Very well groomed 7
specific) Poor grooming Grooming attempt is shirt tucked in, (hair, make-up, clothes
evident jewelry blends with pressed, etc.)
clothing, minimal
wrinkles) Overall appearance is
businesslike

Greeting Unacceptable behavior Used typical behavior Acceptable behavior, Professional behavior
and language and language – did well mannered, and language
modify behavior to fit professionalism (handshake, “hello”,”
Unfriendly and not the interview somewhat lacking thank you “, etc.)
courteous
Attempts to be Courteous to all Friendly and courteous
6
courteous to all in involved in interview to all involved in
interview setting interview

Communication Speaking is unclear – very Speaking is unclear – Speaking is clear with Speaks clearly and
difficult to understand lapses in sentence minimal mistakes in distinctly with no lapse
message of what is being structure and grammar sentence structure in sentence structure
said (i.e. mumbling) and grammar and grammar usage;

Volume is inappropriate
Volume is uneven
(varied) Volume is appropriate
speaks concisely with
correct pronunciation 5
for interview (i.e. spoke
too loudly, too softly) Volume conveys
business tone

Body Language Fidgeted – (i.e., constant Fidgeted –(i.e., Minimal fidgeting No fidgeting;
movement of hands and movement of hands (i.e., occasionally consistently used
feet); none or very poor and feet frequently); shifting); average use physical gestures, facial
use of physical gestures, minimal use of of physical gestures, expressions and body
facial expressions and physical gestures, facial expressions and movements in a
body movements
detracted from the
facial expressions and
body movements in a
body movements in a
manner which
manner which
enhanced the interview
5
interview process manner which enhanced the process
enhanced the interview process
interview process

Posture and Eye Does not look at persons Sits up straight; Sits up straight, good Sits up straight,
Contact involved in the interview average posture; posture; establishes excellent posture; looks
process; keeps head establishes eye contact eye contact with relaxed and confident;
down; minimal eye
contact; does not have
with interviewers
during the interview
interviewers during
the interview 80 -90%
establishes eye contact
with interviewers
6
good posture; slouching 70 -80% of the time of the time during the interview
90-100% of the time
Politeness Several times, the student Student interrupted or Student interrupted Student never
interrupted or hurried the hurried the or hurried the interrupted or hurried
person doing the interviewer 3-5 times interviewer 1-2 times the interviewer and
interviewing; forgot to
thank person(s)
during the course of
the interview, thanked
during the course of
the interview,
thanked them after the
interview
5
the person after the thanked the person
interview after the interview
General Lack of interest and Somewhat interested Shows basic interest Appropriately
Attitude enthusiasm about the
interview; passive and
in the interview; shows
little enthusiasm
in the interview;
shows some
interested and
enthusiastic about the 5
indifferent enthusiasm interview process
Responses to Answers with “yes’ or Gives well-constructed Gives well- Gives well-constructed,
Questions “no” and fails to elaborate responses, but sounds constructed confident responses 5
or explain; talks negatively rehearsed or unsure responses, does not that are genuine
about past employers sound rehearsed,
student somewhat
hesitant or unsure
Candidate Responses are Responses are Responses are Responses are all
Integrity inconsistent or somewhat inconsistent generally consistent consistent
contradictory. No or contradictory
concrete or specific Concrete and specific Concrete and specific
examples used Concrete and specific examples often used examples are used

Candidate provided no
examples occasionally
used Candidate provides Candidate provides
5
verifiable information for verifiable information verifiable information
claims, and/or claims may Candidate provides for most claims for all claims
be exaggerated or even some verifiable
appear manufactured information for claims
Overall Demonstration of poor Demonstrated limited Demonstrated Highly proficient;
Demonstration interview skills with little proficiency; limited average proficiency; appropriately utilized
of Interview confidence displayed demonstration of average interview skills in an
Skills competent interview
skills in a generally
demonstration of
competent interview
enthusiastic, motivating
and engaging manner
6
confident manner skills in a generally
confident manner
Total out of 80 points possible (10 topics x 8 max possible) Total
55

EQUIVALENT SCORES (HPS 15) EQUIVALENT SCORE : 10

76 – 80 15

71 – 75 14

66 – 70 13

61 – 65 12

56 – 60 11

51 – 55 10

46 - 50 9

41 – 45 8

40 below FAILED

Interviewed By:

MR. REYNER ADRIANO


Client Relationship Manager
VXI Global Solutions, INC.

You might also like