Republic of the Philippines

North Eastern Mindanao State University

Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

TITLE PAGE
The stories behind figures: A Student Perception on Faculty Evaluation

System

(ACTION RESEARCH)

Adahan, Joice
Balili, Claudine L.
Cerro, Judy Ann A.
Claros, Deseree O.
Dela Helba, Joseph
Diaz, Jay B.
Galindez, Jollen Angel C.
Hinampas, Roland A.
Huerta, Ericka Mae V.
Loyola, Johndell L.
Maitel, Ariane A.
Mallas, Jerlyn L.
Napala, Ailene T.
Oderio, Chrestell-Ann
Orias, Jennifer D.
Salinas, Edelito
Silvoza, Ara Jane B.
Tejero, Jovelyn P.

DONALD L. MONTENEGRO, Ph.D

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR I
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We, the researchers, would like to acknowledge the help of many individuals

who makes this research possible most especially, to the Almighty God for giving us

guidance, knowledge, power, courage, inspiration, and wisdom all throughout the

completion of this research study

We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to Mr. Donald L.

Montenegro, Ph.D, our research adviser, for providing us with the opportunity to

conduct this research and for offering vital assistance during this process. We have

been tremendously moved by his enthusiasm, vision, genuineness, and motivation.

He taught us how to conduct research and present our findings in the clearest and

concise manner possible. Working and studying under his direction was a wonderful

honor and privilege.

Lastly, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to our family and friends

for the motivation and support. To all people who assessed and corrected the

research study, and to those who were not listed but were critical to study’s

accomplishment, we owe a debt of gratitude to each and every one of you.

 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

DEDICATION

As well as everything that we do, we would be honor to dedicate this

compilation to our parents. The two person that gave the tool and values necessary

to be where I am standing today. Our parents support us on every step we make,

and decision we take; but is necessary to understand that they let us take our

decisions alone in order for us to learn from our personal mistake and as the father

of my classmate says to “learn and grow from each seatback.” We’re so graceful

with them from trusting us that we would do a good job in the university and letting

us come to achieve a higher education.

So that’s why I dedicate this research study to our parents, whom expect our

individual efforts on everything that we do, and I think that this compilation is the

perfect image and reflection of our efforts and hard work in Banking and Financial

Institutions. To our parents, I hope that we make you proud, the same way that we’re

proud of having a both of you as our parents and as the compass of our life.
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

ABSTRACT

This study presents a faculty evaluation system that incorporates

comprehensive student feedback, aiming to enhance the assessment process and

promote faculty development. A set of questionnaires and personal interviews are

used for the data gathering for this study. Quantitative method and theoretical

framework are used in the study about the stories of respondents from their own

personal experiences.

The students in North Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU)

experienced different challenges in terms of the teaching style, teaching strategies

and teaching effectiveness in their specific subjects and instructors. In terms of

students rating, it provides helpful and valid feedback that improve the instructors

teaching and the delivery of quality education to their students.

This study generally aimed to evaluate and determine the effectiveness od the

instructional material to provide valuable feedback on the effectiveness of teaching

and promotes continuous improvement in the quality of education in North Eastern

Mindanao State University (NEMSU)

 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Table of Contents

TITLE PAGE ......................................................................................................................................... 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT ........................................................................................................................ 2

DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................................ 3

ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................... 4

l. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1

ll. Review Related Literature ........................................................................................................... 3

FOREIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 3

LOCAL ............................................................................................................................................... 7

III. Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................................... 10

IV. Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................................ 12

V. Research Design and Methods ............................................................................................. 14

Research Methodology............................................................................................................... 14

Research Design .......................................................................................................................... 14

Research Locale ........................................................................................................................... 14

Research Respondents .............................................................................................................. 14

Sampling Design .......................................................................................................................... 15

Research Instrument ................................................................................................................... 15

Validation of Instrument ............................................................................................................. 15

Survey ................................................................................................................................................. 16

Profile of the respondents ......................................................................................................... 16

 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Vl: Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................... 24

Vll. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................. 36

References ......................................................................................................................................... 38

FOREIGN ........................................................................................................................................ 38

LOCAL ............................................................................................................................................. 40

RESEARCHER’S PROFILE ............................................................................................................ 42

 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

List of Figures

Figure 1 Demographic Profile of the Respondents as to Age ______________________ 24

Figure 2 Demographic Profile of the Respondents as to Sex ______________________ 26

Figure 3 Demographic Profiles of the Respondents as to Blocks __________________ 27

Figure 4 Teaching Strategies- Guidance _________________________________________ 28

Figure 5 Teaching Strategies- Relevance ________________________________________ 29

Figure 6 Teaching Effectiveness- Instructional Quality____________________________ 30

Figure 7 Teaching Effectiveness- Content _______________________________________ 31

Figure 8 Teaching Style- Student Satisfaction ____________________________________ 32

Figure 9 Teaching Style- Student Engagement ___________________________________ 33

 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

l. Introduction

The ultimate mission of universities is to provide a world-class and high-

quality education to students. In order to attain this, the university needs a pool of

competitive and professional faculty who will deliver quality education. Faculty

evaluation is essential to improve the quality teaching and learning delivered by the

faculty. It helps them to know their strengths and weaknesses based on the

observations and experiences of the students they have handled. Thus, evaluations

help them improve their teaching and the delivery of quality education. Student

ratings can provide helpful and valid feedback. Feedback from students, colleagues,

and other sources lets faculty know how a class went and where changes might be

needed or attempted. Also feedback is integral in letting concerned parties to (1)

know the progress of a class, (2) areas of strength, (3) weaknesses and those that

need improvement. This doesn’t just apply to instructors whose performance is

shaky or weak, in fact even the best teachers can benefit from student feedback.

Alix et.al (2022) state that the evaluation process to teachers is a method to

ensure that instruction quality has been delivered to various stakeholders. Assessing

the performance of faculty members is now an integral part of the educational

system as it aims to assess faculty performance using sets of criteria and provide

necessary academic intervention program anchored in the development of

comprehensive faculty development program. With this, the researchers developed

faculty evaluation system integrating decision support mechanism that can provide

automatic report generation in terms of evaluation. Further, most universities and

colleges throughout the world use student ratings of instruction as part of their

1
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

evaluation of teaching effectiveness. A study by Cantwell and Drury (2016) explored

the impact of faculty evaluation systems on faculty members’ professional

development. The authors found that effective faculty evaluation systems can

encourage faculty members to engage in continuous professional development,

leading to improvements in teaching, research, and service. A study by de Oliveira

and de Sousa (2017) examined the effectiveness of a faculty evaluation system

based on the Balanced Scorecard approach. The authors found that this system was

effective in evaluating faculty performance in multiple areas, including teaching,

research, service, and institutional contribution.

The students of North Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU)

sometimes get confused and concerns about how Faculty Evaluation System works.

Some of the confusions are the (1) Purpose of the Faculty Evaluation System, (2)

how Faculty Evaluation System discipline the students and (3) how can describe the

potential equity consequences for the diversity of the Faculty workforce. That is why

some of the students answer it without being serious about it, and some answer it

seriously to provide either good or bad feedback towards the faculties. It also makes

the faculty confused about whether the responses of the students in the evaluation

are true or valid. Thus, there is a gap in the perception of the students in the faculty

evaluation system.

This paper proposes a theoretical framework to analyze the feedbacks of

students about the Faculty Evaluation System. It elaborates on the main components

of a comprehensive faculty evaluation systems and it enables the determination of

improvements and helps to evaluate the suggestions of the students for the

2
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

effectiveness of the implementation of the faculty evaluation system. However, this

paper is expected to gather data about the perceptions of students to identify its

concerns and different views in the faculty.

ll. Review Related Literature

This page presents numerous numbers of related works by local and

foreign authors, other researchers, developers and studies derived from the books,

articles, and other references such as the internet which are all necessary for the

study. And to achieve a deeper and better understanding of the present study, these

related literature and studies were read and analyzed thoroughly.

FOREIGN

Students’ perceptions of the faculty evaluation system are broad, and it affects

some factors, like how they view their teacher’s skills in teaching. Thus, this process,

with its merits and demerits, has long been a matter of criticism by many scholars

and educationists; nonetheless, it also has the potential to yield useful information on

the improvement in any deficient area of teaching that might be (Dev & Qayyum,

2017). A Student evaluation of teaching and learning are playing an increasingly

important role in the delivery of high-quality, student-centered education. Insights

into student perceptions of their learning experience provide important information

that can be used to inform course design and development (Steyn et.al 2018).

Faculty evaluation reflects neoliberal values and the logic of the market, with

corresponding diminution of academic logic and the traditional values of the

3
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

academy, particularly academic quality, through market-oriented competition (Gu,

Jianxiu & Levin, John S., 2020).

According to the study of K. Hartford (2017), entitled “The Effect of Student

Evaluations on Faculty Performance” was to understand the behavior of professors

as a consequence of receiving student evaluations. The study was a descriptive

phenomenology because it describes an experience instead of interpreting it. Data

was collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews, document and literature

review, and analysis of field notes and journals. Evaluating teachers’ performance

and impact is critical for ensuring the educational quality and efficacy. Any

framework or model used to evaluate instructors’ and teaching’s quality must place a

premium on the resulting effect on students (Clinton, Janet 2017). Teacher

evaluation systems are associated with teacher quality, accountability, performance

observations, and support. These systems are typically composed of multiple

measures including at least observations of teaching and student performance data

reflecting teacher impact (Williams, Kathleen & Hebert, Dustin, 2020). A Student

evaluation of teaching and learning are playing an increasingly important role in the

delivery of high-quality, student-centered education. Insights into student perceptions

of their learning experience provide important information that can be used to inform

course design and development (Steyn et.al 2018).

The study entitled “Teacher evaluation that’s meaningful” by Gerber, N.

(2019), provides a short review of teacher evaluation trends and practices in the

United States that directly or indirectly are related to making the purposes of teacher

evaluation meaningful. Included in the review are findings related to teacher

4
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

evaluation rating categories, frequency of evaluations, and use of observations,

evaluation components, and student growth measures. Through a case study of

university pandemic responses in the United States, the summarize key components

of how colleges and universities shifted evaluations of faculty labor in response to

COVID‐19, including suspending teaching evaluations, implementing tenure delays,

and allowing for impact statements in faculty reviews (Mickey, Ethel L et.al 2023).

The findings in the research by Chan (2018), suggest that students’

perceptions of learning and learning styles may shape their conceptions of excellent

teaching and exemplary teachers. This research not only sheds valuable new light

on interrelationship between teacher’s personal characteristics, teaching methods,

and teacher-student relationship, but also yields practical implications for school

administrators, teachers, and teacher trainers. According to Linse (2017), most

institutions student ratings are also used in personnel decisions such as annual

reviews, merit raises, tenure and promotion, post-tenure review, and for hiring and

re-appointment of “tenure exempt” faculty. The challenge of appropriate use of

student ratings data will be with us as long as we continue to use them. In the study

of Deale (2020), entitled “A Team Approach to Using Student Feedback to Enhance

Teaching and Learning” investigated how one type of student evaluation of teaching

(SET) tool and a team approach to evaluating a course helped to provide feedback

in an online, synchronous and asynchronous course and an in-person, face-to-face

course through a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) study. According to

Ryalls, Ken and Benton, Stephen (2018), student ratings of instruction (SRI) can

provide meaningful student feedback for improving teaching. However, SRI data are

5
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

often underutilized for formative purposes and overemphasized in summative

decisions.

According to Martina, F., Ritzhauptb, et.al (2019), based on the interviews,

faculty recommended using a variety of assessments, using traditional and authentic

assessments and used rubrics to assess students, course templates and quality

assurance process and surveys, learning analytics, and peer reviews for assessment

and evaluation. The evaluation process to teachers is a method to ensure that

instruction quality has been delivered to various stakeholders. Assessing the

performance of faculty members is now an integral part of the educational system as

it aims to assess faculty performance using sets of criteria and provide necessary

academic intervention program anchored in the development of comprehensive

faculty development program (Alix, et.al 2022).

The study of Shindu, L. et. Al (2019) entitled “Aspect-Based Opinion Mining on

Student’s Feedback for Faculty Teaching Performance Evaluation” is a first attempt

that uses deep learning approach for performing aspect based sentiment analysis on

students’ feedback for evaluating faculty teaching performance. Students’ feedback

is crucial for academic institutions in order to evaluate faculty performance.

According to A. Kumar, R. Jain (2018) the proposed system is more flexible and

versatile than the existing feedback evaluation system of teachers where students

evaluate the teachers on predefined aspects decided by experienced and senior

faculty and administrators.

Parker, E. and Trolian, T. (2019), examine the association between students’

interactions with and perceptions of faculty in college and their perceptions of the

6
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

climate for diversity at research universities. Results revealed that frequently

communicating with a faculty member by e-mail or in person, experiencing equitable

and fair treatment by faculty members, and being satisfied with access to faculty

members outside of class were positively associated with positive perceptions of the

climate for diversity. The study of Muhammad, A. (2019) entitled “Relationship

between Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement

at Secondary School Level”, examine the relationship between student achievement

and student perception of teacher effectiveness. And the study provides evidence of

validity and reliability of STEQ leading the idea that secondary school students can

validly measure teacher effectiveness scores. It is possible that the evaluations,

instead of being a measure of ‘good’ or ‘effective’ teaching as commonly conceived,

are actually a measure of a student-perceived construct similar to likability (Clayson,

D., 2021). According to Ryalls et. Al (2018), student ratings of instruction (SRI) can

provide meaningful student feedback for improving teaching. However, SRI data are

often underutilized for formative purposes and overemphasized in summative

decisions.

LOCAL

The Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) provides insights for evaluating

university faculty according to the specific courses they teach, and more broadly, the

performance of academic programs. Through the SET, the university gains insights

into the achievement of course and learning objectives, and valuable feedback and

suggestions from students (University of the Philippines Diliman, 2023). Evaluating

faculty effectiveness is important in every institution of higher education. Assessing

7
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

teaching performance enables one to gauge the quality of instruction represented by

the institution and facilitate better learning among students (Patimo, 2020). Teaching

effectiveness of the faculty is one of the most critical areas that need to be

considered. The success of the students will depend to a great extent, upon how well

the teachers have trained them (Agsalud, P. L., 2017).

According to Anay, Joshua P. et.al (2021) The evaluation process is one

means by which students can reflect on their own learning experience while

providing feedback on the courses they are taking and the faculty members who

handle these courses. Based on the gathered data by Alvarez, Ma. Olga DC (2021),

the research revealed that technology adoption of online performance evaluation for

faculty as perceived by the respondents is acceptable, thus the system using web

application should be implemented. Furthermore, it is recommended that the web

application will be deployed at Golden Success College in order to improve the

teaching performance of the faculty which is essential to school operation.

Performance evaluation is one way to assess the employees during work time. For

school institutions, faculty performance evaluation is normally done to assess or

measure the effectiveness of faculty members or teachers. These days, higher

education institutions are now gathering and keeping huge amounts of data,

analyzing these data can help the institution in data-driven decision making (Dela

Fuentea,Rodelio O. & Dela Fuentea, Romel O. 2022). According to Nuñez, J. (2023)

Students have built preferences on their professors even before the pandemic

began.

8
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Teaching performance evaluation is a necessary step in ensuring good

instruction. Traditionally teaching performance evaluation is used as a tool to apprise

teachers on how they are doing their job. Performance is defined as a set of

outcomes produced during a certain period of time, and does not refer to the traits,

personal characteristics or competencies of the performer (Magsumbol, Christian

et.al 2019). According to Sobejana, Noel (2017), The evaluation for teachers using

traditional ways is being used mostly in institutions where there are no available tools

because of its easy implementation as per used from the past. According to Malig, J.

et.al (2019), Faculty evaluation is essential to improve the quality teaching and

learning delivered by the faculty. It helps them to know their strengths and

weaknesses based on the observations and experiences of the students they have

handled. Thus, evaluations help them improve their teaching and the delivery of

quality education. Evaluation is widely understood to be the most effective tool to

improve the quality of instruction in schools. Timely and accurate information is

useful in virtually every stage of the decision making process (Andaya, Glendale M.

et.al 2017) Assessment of specific practices of each and every faculty help

determine if it commensurate expectations from students, academic stand point, in

relation to program’s objective

A faculty performance evaluation instrument is developed in response to the

changing modalities of delivering the lessons to students. Faculty performance

evaluation provides formative and summative feedback to administrators as a guide

for decision making and the faculty for career development (Medallon, M. C.,

Dimaculangan, G., 2022). Obtaining faculty feedback from students in schools or

9
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

colleges is an important component of any academic institution. Typically, faculty

evaluation systems have been questioned based, with each student receiving a

predesigned questionnaire form. Students are responsible for assessing each

question for each teacher using a predetermined grading system (Mendoza, A.,

2021). Students are capable of making valid and reliable judgements about

classroom teaching performance given the fact that they have longer exposure to

instructional experience (Reyes, J. et.al 2017)

III. Theoretical Framework

This study is anchored from the theoretical support of the three models on

the perception of students in Faculty Evaluation System by Alok Kumar and Renu

Jain (2018) examined the use of technology in Faculty Evaluation System. The study

thought that technology can improve the efficiency and accuracy of these system

that can works through teaching style of every faculty member, but it should be used

in conjunction with other evaluation methods to ensure fairness and transparency.

The idea of Ahmadi, M. et.al (2017) is another theory that is relevant to this

study, entitled “Business Student’s Perception of Faculty Evaluations”. The paper

describe how some professors consider student assessment to be invalid, wondering

whether students who are not familiar with the course topic can fairly assess the

class or its teaching strategies. The ideal way to include student assessment in

evaluating a faculty member’s performance appears to be under debate among

administrators as well. As a result, the study’s main objective is to determine the

validity of student ratings. The students gave the perception to identify and

10
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

comprehend the exists performance of Faculties in North Eastern Mindanao State

University.

In the study done by De Oliveira and De Sousa (2017) it examined the

effectiveness of a Faculty Evaluation System based on the “Balanced Scorecard

Approach “. Gathering information on student’s perspectives on the teacher’s

evaluation system will allow researchers to ascertain students’ ideas and opinions. It

basically states that academic institution relies on student’s feedback to evaluate

Faculty Performance. By assessing student’s perception, the faculty system will be

improved. This system was effective in evaluating Faculty Performance in multiple

areas, including Teaching, Research, Service and Institutional Contribution. As a

result, survey is essential for identifying perceptions.

In relation to this study, the researchers gathered the information examined

the student’s comments in order to establish the validity of the student’s perceptions.

The study thus focused on the goals of the students and effort they make in

responding to the evaluation papers. By doing this, the data will be used to

determine its seriousness and effectiveness, allowing the accuracy of the student’s

perceptions of the faculty evaluation system be proven.

11
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

IV. Statement of the Problem

The study generally aimed to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of the

instructional material to provide valuable feedback on the effectiveness of teaching

and promotes continuous improvement in the quality of education in North Eastern

Mindanao State University (NEMSU).

Specially, it seeks to answer the following questions:

1. How may the profile of the respondents be described in terms of:

1.1 Name (Optional)

1.2 Age

1.3 Sex

1.4 Year

1.5 Block

2. What is the level of evaluation of the Instructional Material in improving

faculties in terms of :

2.1. Teaching Strategy

2.1.1 Guidance

2.1.2 Relevance

2.2. Teaching Effectiveness

2.2.1 Instructional quality

2.2.2 Content

12
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

3. What is the level of teacher skills of the faculties in North Eastern Mindanao

State University (NEMSU) in the control and theoretical individuals based on

their teaching and quality of education in terms of:

3.1. Teaching Style

3.3.1. Student Satisfaction

3.3.2. Student Engagement

13
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

V. Research Design and Methods

Research Methodology

This part of the research unveils and discusses the Research Design,

Research Locale. Research Respondents, Sampling Design, Research Instrument,

Validation of the Instrument, Data Gathering Procedure, and the Statistical

Treatment that were used for the realization of the study.

Research Design

To attain the purpose of the study, the paper used quantitative research

design through descriptive approach to determine the Student’s Perception on

Faculty Evaluation System with the information that were collected from conducting

surveys. Quantitative research seeks to find answers to questions starting with how

many, how much, how long, to what extent, and the like. Answers to these questions

come in numerals, percentages, and fractions, among others.

Research Locale

This study was conducted at North Eastern Mindanao State University

(NEMSU). A person who is one of the students there, will be the target of the study.

Research Respondents

The chosen respondents of this study were the students of the 2nd year of

BSBA-Financial Management at North Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU).

They were chosen because the student’s perception of the faculty evaluation system

was essential and necessary to the completion of the research paper.

14
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Sampling Design

The research sampling technique that was used in this study is Stratified

Random Sampling. In a Stratified Random Sampling Technique is done by dividing

the entire population into homogeneous groups. The criteria were used in order to

allows researchers to obtain a sample population that best represents the entire

population being studied. The respondents that took part in the study were based on

the set criteria by the researchers.

Research Instrument

The tool that was utilized in the data collection were the researchers- made

survey questionnaire. The questionnaire contained the statements or indicators

parallel to the subject matter of this research paper. Survey questionnaire were

significantly helpful in determining the Student’s Perception on Faculty Evaluation

System. It has a text/questions that is expand validation.

Validation of Instrument

To assure that the questionnaires are relevant and reliable, the researchers

asked validation to the people who have expertise on this field. Since it is a

researcher-made questionnaire face and content validation and verification from the

validators were essential and necessary. Their recommendations, comments and

suggestions were taken into consideration in creating the final questionnaire.

15
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Survey
Profile of the respondents
1. Name (optional):

1.1 Age:

 Below 17

 18-21

 22-25

 25-29

 30 and above

1.2 Sex

 Female

 Male

1.3 Block- BSBA/Financial Management

 2FMA

 2FMB

 2FMC

 2FMD

 2FME

16
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Direction: Each of the statements below please checks the appropriate

columns corresponding to your response in each item using the following

scale:

5- Never

4- Rarely

3- Sometimes

2- Often

1- Always

5- Never (You somewhat strongly disagree with the statement.)

4- Rarely (You somewhat disagree with the statement.)

3- Sometimes (You somewhat neutral with the statement.)

2- Often (You somewhat agree with the statement.)

1- Always (You somewhat strongly agree with the statement.)

17
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

2.1 Teaching Strategies – This category varies greatly depending on the educator’s

preferences, the subject being taught, and the needs of the students.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

2.1.1 Guidance- The following questions address concerns in every aspect of

education, particularly in securing an important place in the field of guidance meant

for students.

5 4 3 2 1

INDICATORS

1.Does the Instructors respond to student

feedback or suggestions for making the
course material more relevant and interests?

2.Faculty Evaluation System is helpful in

addressing concerns of the students towards
the teachers.

3.Instructors help the students to enhance

their cognitive skills and change their
perception in life to be professional.

4.Faculties consider the concerns of the

students when/in developing their teaching
skills.

5.Instructors assess every students when

they have a questions related to their class
program.

18
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

2.1.2 Relevance- The following questions address concerns about critical factors in

maintaining student interest and motivation in terms of class participation and the

effectiveness of instructors’ teaching.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1

1.How often does the Instructors use

technology or multimedia resources to
make the course material more
engaging and relevant?

2.How often does the Instructors

encourage every students to share
their own experiences and
perspectives in class discussions and
activities?

3.Faculty Evaluation System enables

instructors to create innovative
solutions to problems that the faculty
may encounter.

4.Faculty Evaluation System is one of

the factors used to measure teachers’
effectiveness in teaching.

5.Faculty Evaluation System enhances

the system of the school when it
comes to their individual feedback.

19
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

2.2 Teaching Effectiveness- This category varies with the ability of an educator to

facilitate learning and help students achieve desired educational outcomes.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

2.2.1 Instructional Quality- The following questions address the effective use of

instructional strategies and focus on creating meaningful learning experiences that

promote student achievement and success.

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1

1.The Instructors collaboratively think on

resolutions to promote successful
learning.

2.Do you believe that Online Faculty

Monitoring and Evaluation System would
be more efficient than a paper-based
system?

3.Does the Instructors ensure that the

school activities are well-maintained and
meet regulatory requirements.

4.Does the Instructors give a accurate

modules with regards in their subject.

5.Does the Instructors have a great

spoken strategies to how he/she explains
the every lessons.

20
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

2.2.2 Content- The following questions are addressed depending on the specific

subject area and lessons should align with the learning objectives of the subject.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1

1.How often does your faculties use

technology or multimedia resources to
make the course material more
engaging and relevant?

2.How often the school staff has good

knowledge in their areas of teaching?

3.Does faculties learning activities in

the classroom leads to better and
accurate understanding.

4.Instructors provide the best

structures to equipped their every
students.

5.How often the instructor provides a

good and informative quality of
modular to every students.

21
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

3.1 Teaching Style- This category varies according to the approach or method used

by an educator to facilitate learning and engaging students in the classroom.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

3.3.1 Student Satisfaction- The following questions measure how the instructors

facilitate the students’ learning and how the learning environment meets students’

needs and expectations.

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1

1.Students who perceive healthy interaction

with teachers are more likely to engage in
academics resulting in increased
participation and overall academic.

2.Instructors have a larger influence on

students’ curiosity to explore and learn than
instead of relying on parents or friends.

3.The teachers are equipped with

knowledge, competence and skills that that
make students intelligent.

4.The students give productive feedback,

develop learning strategies and opportunities
when their instructor teach them well.

5.Student satisfaction is affected if the

assessment criterions for the study is well
explained.

22
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

3.3.2 Student Engagement- This following question involves students being

emotionally invested and their active participation in their learning experiences.

(Put a check if you are Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Always on the

following statement.)

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1

1.Students’ engagement in classroom

is viable for their upcoming
activities/quizzes.

2.The students who’s engaging outside the

school is critical for students’ learning
beliefs and behaviors.

3.Interaction between instructor and

students carries immense significance
inside the school as it contributes to
students’ learning.

4.Student-Faculties interaction strengthens

a sense of belongingness and cohesion for
engagement in learning.

5.Instructor engaged and display the

activities and skills for learning of students.

23
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Vl: Results and Discussion

This chapter presents the results and discussion that the researchers have

gathered through the process of conducting survey of the study in student perception

on Faculty Evaluation System in North Eastern Mindanao State University. The

sequence of discussion was according on what was stated in the statement of the

problem, found in the Chapter lV of the study.

The purpose of the questionnaire was to determine their response with regards to

their own experiences in every faculty they encountered. Of the student population

(164) randomly selection, (116) are expected to participate in the survey.

Figure 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents as to Age

Age
3% 3% 0.9%

29% Below 17
19-21

64.7% 22-25
26-29
30 and above

As what depicted in the graph containing the demographic profile of the

respondents in terms of age, it can be identified that majority of the respondents are

aged 19 to 21 years old, comprising 64.7 % or 65% in 75 respondents out from the

24
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

sample. Taking 29% of the whole sample was from the age bracket between 22 to

25 years old, consisting of 34 respondents. The age bracket ranked third out of the

five participating age groups was from 26 to 30 years old and above, involving 6

respondents which were 6% of the whole population. Meanwhile, the least age group

who participated in the study is coming from below 17 years old consisting 0.9% in 1

respondent.

According to Jackson et al. (2017), college students are mostly older than 19

years old. This literature encompasses every university and college and shows that

females are more likely to engage in online activity characterized by communication

and exchanging information. In relation to this study, it is evident that females

dominate more responses than males. Thus, we can determine that females are

more likely to exchange opinions on the faculty evaluation system.

The researchers recognize that the majority of the students who responded

were between the ages of 19 and 21 years old. The survey was distributed to all

2nd-year financial management students. Researchers comprehend that the

population consisted of more female students than male students and examine how

the students at North Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU) were involved in

the online activity, specifically in the Faculty Evaluation System.

25
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Figure 2. Demographic Profile of the Respondents as to Sex

Sex

30.2%

Male
69.8%
Female

Figure 1.2 shows the sample of males and females based on the

demographic profile of respondents. It shows that out of the selected 116

respondents, more than half of the respondents garnering 69.8% of the population

are females or 81 respondents, while 35 are males taking only 30.2% of the whole

population. From this result it is evident that the number of female (FM students) who

participated in the study were significantly higher compared to the males.

According to Heine and Maddox (2018), female students are mostly inclined

to give up their free time to cooperate in online activities such as the Faculty

Evaluation System. In addition, it shows that females are taking more time to fill up

on any kinds of online activities.

The researchers notice disparities in gender distribution within the field of

financial management. The data reveals that there is a significantly larger population

of women compared to men. This disparity becomes even more apparent when the

researcher examines the graph, which vividly illustrates that the proportion of female

26
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

respondents surpasses This means instructors need to understand and address this

gender disparity as crucial steps towards fostering a more inclusive and diverse

financial industry.

Figure 3. Demographic Profiles of the Respondents as to Blocks

Blocks

16% 26%
2FMA
2FMB
30% 2FMC
18%
2FMD
9%
2FME

Apparently, the graph above shows the demographic profile of each block in 2 nd

year- Financial Management in terms of their feedbacks towards in Faculty

Evaluation System. Most of the Block-2FMD, gained a percentage of 30% and is

composed of 35 respondents. It is followed by Block-2FMA, garnering a percentage

of 26% and is composed of 30 respondents. Block-2FMB ranked third, involving 21

respondents which is 18% of the whole population. Meanwhile, Block-2FME gained

19 respondents which is equivalent to 16%. Lastly, Block-2FMC collected 11

respondents with a percentage of 9%.

27
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

The graphs below are based on the information gathered by the researchers.

(The data used in this study are obtained through Google Form.)

Figure 4. Teaching Strategies- Guidance

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 33% 35% 42% 33% 44%
Often 32% 36% 31% 37% 27%
Sometimes 16% 13% 10% 16% 15%
Rarely 30% 21% 27% 24% 26%
Never 5% 11% 6% 6% 4%

The graph above shows that always gained a higher response based on the

student’s experience. It is evident that the faculties are very responsive in

accommodating to their students. Meanwhile, the 5- Never gained a lowest response

in the survey.

According to Verecio, R. (2017), female students have a stronger motivation

to take part in online inquiry than their male counterparts. This study also indicates

that females exhibit a greater likelihood of engaging in a broader range of school

activities compared to males. Some students dislike some school activities, such as

the faculty evaluation system or online evaluations.

The researchers distinguish the results of the survey in terms of guidance.

Researchers viewed that being 1-Always ranked first means the faculties at North

28
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU) are very responsive to accommodate

their students. Meanwhile, the researchers establish the 5-Never evident that the

faculties are the least responsive to their students in terms of possessing concern

with their advisory.

Figure 5. Teaching Strategies- Relevance

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 29% 28% 30% 41% 34%
Often 29% 33% 34% 21% 31%
Sometimes 25% 18% 19% 20% 17%
Rarely 25% 31% 27% 25% 29%
Never 8% 6% 6% 92% 7%

As the results in the survey, the graph above shows that 5- Never have a

higher response in question 4 which explains that every faculty rarely/never consider

the concerns of every student and some of the instructors are helping their students

to ace in there subject. In contrary, the 5-Never is the lowest response in every

questions.

According to Deale, C. S. (2020), the faculty evaluation system has a bigger

impact on determining an instructor’s effectiveness in the classroom. Academic

performance evaluation in every university and college has been a constant practice

in the Philippines, especially at North Eastern Mindanao State University (NEMSU).

29
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

In addition, the instructor’s visibility in all aspects yields a positive impact on

students' interest and motivation in learning.

The researchers noticed that instructor’s positions do not necessarily indicate

that they downplay the significance of assessing instructors' efficacy; rather, they

promote the use of thorough and all-encompassing assessment techniques that go

beyond the constraints of a single evaluation system and consider a variety of

aspects of excellent teaching.

Figure 6. Teaching Effectiveness- Instructional Quality

45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 33% 17% 23% 29% 35%
Often 30% 27% 42% 31% 29%
Sometimes 20% 38% 20% 28% 18%
Rarely 27% 25% 26% 26% 26%
Never 6% 9% 5% 2% 8%

The graph above conveys that every students responds in the survey are

most 2- Often which explains that the faculties in North Eastern Mindanao State

University are ensure the school activities with regards in their subjects. In this graph

it reveals that some student believes that the Online Faculty Monitoring System is

very effective.

30
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

According to the study of Gerber, N. (2019) the effectiveness of teaching and

learning process are efficient to the student benefits that help them to the various

factors such as student-instructor’s interactions and use of appropriate teaching

strategies.

The researchers found that the majority of respondents believe that the online

faculty monitoring system is very useful for them. The result indicates that the use of

an online monitoring system has improved instructor’s experiences. In addition, it

has proven effective in a variety of tasks related to the instructor's duties.

Figure 7. Teaching Effectiveness- Content

40%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 30% 17% 23% 30% 25%
Often 22% 27% 38% 29% 36%
Sometimes 29% 23% 22% 24% 19%
Rarely 28% 32% 28% 24% 26%
Never 7% 3% 5% 9% 8%

The graph shows that 2- Often have the highest response in teaching content

which means the faculties almost hit the perfect spot in getting the very effective

teaching. In addition, some students respond to 1- Always means the faculties

should improve their teaching style with regards to their content.

31
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

The findings in the research by Blazar, D. et al (2017) examines the impact of

teacher characteristics, practices, and instructional quality on student attitudes and

behaviors. It stated how teachers' skills, classroom management, and relationship-

building with student’s influence student engagement, motivation, and socio-

emotional outcomes.

Researchers determined the enhancement of the teaching abilities of

instructors in the graph. The content’s arrangement and structure and the breadth of

information displayed throughout the instructions show that the instructors need to

boost student engagement and ultimately enhance the learning process by

concentrating on improving the way the faculties communicate their content.

Figure 8. Teaching Style- Student Satisfaction

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 3% 6% 6% 6% 6%
Often 19% 20% 19% 21% 18%
Sometimes 13% 16% 16% 16% 11%
Rarely 36% 38% 35% 39% 45%
Never 45% 36% 40% 34% 36%

The graph reveals the highest response are between 4- Rarely and 5- Never.

It means that some students are rarely appreciated their instructors for having a

good teaching in their subject. Meanwhile, some of them response 1- Always, 2—

Often and 3- Sometimes intending to not favor in the teaching style of their instructor.

32
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

According to Agsalud, P.L. (2017) stated that the success of the student will

depend to a great extent on how well the instructors have trained them. Additionally,

based to Gillet et al. (2019), environmental and social factors are significant in

satisfying the need for belongingness in the classroom, which consequently

influences the motivation and performance of every student.

Researchers noticed that the respondents experienced disengagement with

their instructors, pointing to a worrying trend. They also expressed displeasure with

the lecturer’s performance and criticism of their teaching strategies. The result shows

that in order to enhance their students' overall learning experience, instructors must

address their weaknesses and act promptly.

Figure 9. Teaching Style- Student Engagement

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
Always 3% 5% 3% 6% 5%
Often 20% 21% 22% 20% 20%
Sometimes 8% 15% 9% 10% 8%
Rarely 43% 40% 47% 46% 44%
Never 42% 35% 35% 34% 39%

The graph conveys some students responds into 4- Rarely and 5- Never. It

figures that the students are not usually engaging in doing interaction with their

instructors. In addition, some of the students are responds to the 1- Always, 2- Often

and 3- Sometimes means that they are active in socializing to the faculties.

33
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

A study by Skinner, E. et al. (2009 presents a motivational perspective on

student engagement, emphasizing the importance of behavioral and emotional

participation in academic activities that connect in the graph above, which explains

the measurement tool for assessing students' engagement and disaffection in the

classroom is to explore the associations between engagement, academic

achievement, and classroom functioning.

The researchers noticed a lack of student involvement, where there is

typically little interaction between students and instructors and vice versa. Students

frequently choose not to actively participate in discussions, raise questions or ask

their lecturers for clarification. In the same way, instructors are not allowed to

approach students or contact with the personally outside of the required academic

environment.

34
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Discussion

The result is clearly provided by the students' accurate response through the

Google Form. There are three categories in every question that have two types of

topics. In the first category, "teaching strategies" such as guidance and relevance

Figure 2.1 shows 44 percent of responses based on the student’s experience. It is

evident that the faculties are very responsive and accommodating to their students.

The faculties of NEMSU are responsible for the guidance they give each of their

students.

Meanwhile, the "never" group gained the lowest response in the survey; it is

possible that these students are not motivated and encouraged by their strategy.

Figure 2.2 shows that "never" has a higher response in question 4, which explains

that every faculty member rarely or never considers the concerns of every student,

and some of the instructors are helping their students to ace their subject. However,

some of the students agreed with the other statement: 41% voted for "always." In

sum, the higher response would be "always.

On the contrary, "never" is the lowest response to every question based on

the result. In the second category, "teaching effectiveness," such as instructional

quality and content, both types show the higher response "often," which is mostly of

the students who agreed to the statement accordingly. In the 3 rd category, "teaching

style," such as student satisfaction and student engagement, is likely to show a

higher response of "never and "rarely," which speaks up that the majority of the

students are not satisfied with the learning style they have implemented in their

classes as well as with the result of students’ engagement in their studies. Hence,

35
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

these results testify to how the students react to the actions of their instructors.

Through their feedback, the instructors will also know or notice how they can

enhance their communication strategy with their students.

Vll. Conclusion

As a result of the survey, it reveals that the students at North Eastern

Mindanao State University are fond of the Faculty Evaluation System because it

guides the instructors in improving their teaching skills and teaching strategies and

provides a way for instructors to be held accountable for their teaching. It showed the

majority of students have a positive view of the evaluation process in terms of the

faculty evaluation system, which leads to the students being encouraged by their

instructors to be active in their class; however, some of them are not inspired by their

strategies, resulting in a vote for "never and rarely".

Hence, this study will also benefit the faculties, as they will be flexible in every

aspect and more accessible and responsive to their students' concerns. Since it is

helpful to the faculty to know if they teach well, the students' feedback indicates the

need to improve communication channels and strategies to ensure that the students

feel supported and heard by their instructors. As it leads to higher levels of

engagement, better academic performance, and overall satisfaction with their

education experience.

36
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

The faculty evaluation system recognizes the instructor’s strengths and

improvement in all areas that are significant to the students. Fostering transparency,

communication, and continuous improvement in teaching practices at North Eastern

Mindanao State University (NEMSU). In addition, it serves as a valuable tool for both

students and faculties that empowers students and enhances the teaching methods

of the instructors, promoting a fair relationship between students and instructors by

providing effective learning.

37
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

References

FOREIGN
Ahmadi, M. Helms, M. & Raiszadeh, F. (2017) Business’s Perception of Faculty
Evaluations

Alix, A. L., Datul, D. J., Fernando-Raguro, M. C., Lagman, A. C., and Adao, R. T.
(2022) “Faculty Evaluation System Platform with Decision Support Mechanism”
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9779033

Alok Kumar and Renu Jain (2018) Use of technology in Faculty Evaluation
System.

Blazar, D., & Kraft, M.A (2017) “Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’
Attitudes and Behaviors.”

Cantwell and Drury (2016) “Impact of faculty evaluation systems on faculty

members’ professional development”

Chan, W. (2018) Teaching in HIGHER education: Students’ perceptions of

effective teaching and good teachers. Social Sciences and Education Research
Review (5) 1 40-58

Clayson,D. (2021) The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the
evaluations actually measure. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350901614_The_student_evaluation_of
_teaching_and_likability_what_the_evaluations_actually_measure

Deale, C. S. (2020) A Team Approach to Using Student Feedback to Enhance

Teaching and Learning.

De Oliveira and de Sousa (2017) “Effectiveness of a Faculty Evaluation System

Based on the Balanced Scorecard approach”
Dev, S. S. & Qayyum, N. (2017). Major factors affecting students’ perception
towards faculty evaluation of teaching (SET) . Journal of Social Studies
Education Research , 8 (3) , 149-167 . Retrieved from
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/32449/360849

Gerber, N. (2019) Teacher evaluation that’s meaningful. Washington, DC:

National Council on Teacher Quality. https://www.nctq.org/blog/Teacher-
evaluation-thats-meaningful
Gu, Jianxiu;Levin, John S. (2020) “Tournament in academia: a comparative
analysis of Faculty Evaluation System in Research universities in China and
USA”

38
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Hartford, Kenneth M. (2017) “The Effect of Student Evaluations on Faculty

Performance”
https://eric.ed.gov/?q=primary+AND+data+AND+collection&pg=2&id=ED576154

Kumar and R. Jain, ‘‘Faculty evaluation system,’’ Procedia Computer Sci.,

vol.125,pp. 533–541, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.069

Linse, A. R. (2017). “Interpreting and Using Student Ratings Data: Guidance for
Faculty Serving as Administrators and on Evaluation Committees.” Studies in
Educational Evaluation 54: 94–106.

Martina, F., Ritzhauptb, A., Kumarb, S., Budhrania, K. (2019) Award-winning

faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and
facilitation. https://socialscience.msu.edu/_assets/docs-online-
teaching/52_IHE2019_AwardWinningOnlineTeachingPractices.pdf

Mickey, Ethel L; Misra Joya; Clark Dessie (2023) “The persistent of neoliberal
logic in Faculty Evaluation System amidst COVID-19: Recalibrating towards
equity “

Muhammad A. (2019) Relationship between Students’ Perceptions of Teacher

Effectiveness and Student Achievement at Secondary School Level.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1229453.pdf

Parker, E. T. and Trolian, T. L. (2019) Student Perception of the Climate for

Diversity: The role of Student-Faculty Interactions.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/TeniellTrolian/publication/334685259_Stude
nt_perceptions_of_the_climate_for_diversity_The_role_of_student-
faculty_interactions/links/5d76e35592851cacdb2defc6/Student-perceptions-of-
the-climate-for-diversity-The-role-of-student-faculty-interactions.pdf

Ryalls, Ken and Benton, Stephen (2018). “Evaluating How We Evaluate

Teaching,” Academic Chairpersons Conference Proceedings.
https://newprairiepress.org/accp/2018/assessment/8/

Shindu, I. Daudpota, S. Muhammad. Badar, K. Bakhtyar, M. Baber, J. and

Nurunnabi, M. (2019) “Aspect-Based Opinion Mining on Student’s Feedback for
Faculty Teaching Performance Evaluation”
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8763969

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T.A, & Furree, C.J. (2019) “Motivational perspective
on engagement and disaffection of student.”
https://scholar.google.com.ph%2Fscholar%3Fq%3DSkinner%252C%2BE.%2BA.
%252C%2BKindermann

39
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Steyn, C., Davies, C. & Sambo, A. (2018). Eliciting student feedback for course
development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among
business research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1466266

Williams, Kathleen; Hebert, Dustin (2020) “Research Issues in Contemporary

Education” https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1255555

Zhao L, Xu P, Chen Y and Yan S (2022) A literature review of the research on

students’ evaluation of teaching in higher education. Front. Psychol. 13:1004487.
Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487

LOCAL
Agsalud, P. L. (2017). Teaching effectiveness of the teacher education faculty
members in Pangasinan State University Asingan Campus, Philippines. Asia
Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 16-22

Andaya, Glendale M.Ebora, Isaiah Daniel D.Macunat, Lyka B. (2020) LAN-

BASED EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR FACULTY, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS,
AND SCHOOL STAFF OF AMA COMPUTER COLLEGE -CAVITE CAMPUS
DR. NOEL SOBEJANA (2017) “ Teachers’ technology-based evaluation. A
challenge to a formal classroom observation on instructional supervision”
https://www.grin.com/document/958049

Jayrome N.(2023).Professional and Personal Traits of a Professor: A Study on

Filipino Students’ Preferences.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2023&q=The+stories+behind+figures:
+A+Student+perception+on+Faculty+Evaluation+System+in+this+Philippines&hl
=en&as_sdt=0,5#d=gs_qabs&t=1676944197749&u=%23p%3DiJniTHUKTXoJ

Joshua P. Anay; John Kenneth A. Avila; Raymark A. Diaz; Ian E. Santiago (2021)
Faculty Evaluation System for San Pedro City Polytechnic College.

Ma. Olga DC Alvarez (Feb2021) “Technology Adoption of Online Performance

Evaluation System for Faculty” Published in International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd)

Magsumbol, Christian; Martinez, Jose; Ragiles, Kristopher (March 2019) “ AMA

Computer College Lipa: Paperless Faculty Performance Evaluation System”

Malig, J.,Ognita, S., Samonte N. (2019) “Web-based Faculty Evaluation System

For Central Luzon State University Testing and Evaluation Center (CTEC)”

40
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

Medallon, M. C., Dimaculangan, G. (2022) DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

OF A FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN A FLEXIBLE LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT: A STUDENT INSTRUMENT

Mendoza, A. (December 2021) Online Faculty Monitoring and Evaluation System

https://www.uniselinus.education/sites/default/files/2022-
04/Analise%20Mondoza.pdf

Patimo, D. (2020) FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF

STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN THE PHILIPPINE EASTERN
VISAYAS REGION.

Reyes, J., Ariraya, A., Guerzon, R., & Solis, A., (2017). The Perceived Impact of
Online Student Evaluation to the Performance Among Faculty from PUP
Branches and Campuses: Basis for Policy Review and Implementation. DOI:
10.18502/kss.v3i6.2409

Rodelio O. Dela Fuentea, Romel O. Dela Fuentea (2022) “Faculty Performance

Evaluation System With Application Of Data Analytics”

Verecio, R., Devine, G., Cinco, J., Laurente, M., Gotardo, M., Caluza, L.,
Quisumbing, L., (September 2017) “Faculty Performance Evaluation in A
Philippine University Information Technology Program”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334415462

University of the Philippines Diliman(,2023) Student Evaluation of Teaching

https://oat.upd.edu.ph/student-evaluation-of-teaching-set-2

41
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

RESEARCHER’S PROFILE

42
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Jay B. Diaz
Sex: Male
Date of Birth: Prosperidad , Agusan del Sur - 8500
Age: 21
Civil status: Single
Address: Prk. Mangga, brgy Bioto,
Tandag City Surigao del Sur - 8300
Nationality Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father’s Name: Lito A. Diaz
Mother’s Name: Hermelyn A. Briones

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: East Prosperidad Central Elementary school
S.Y 2013 - 2014
Junior High school: Prosperidad National High school
S.Y 2017-2018
Senior High School: Agusan del sur national high school
S.Y 2019 - 2020
Collage: North Eastern Mindanao State University – Main Campus

43
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Ailene T. Napala
Sex: Female
Date of Birth: October 15 2001
Age: 21
Address: Prk. 14 Poblacion Properidad,
Agusan Del Sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father: Antonio S. Napala
Mother: Rose T. Napala

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: East Prosperidad Central Elementary School
S.Y 2014-2015
Junior High: Prosperidad National High School
S.Y 2018-2019
Senior High: Mt. Carmel College Inc.
S.Y 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

44
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Johndell L. Loyola
Sex: Male
Date of Birth: January 31, 2004
Age: 19
Address: Purok Cabugan Brgy. Bag-ong Lunsod,
Tandag City
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father: Rito D. Loyola
Mother: Elena L. Loyola

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Tandag Pilot Elementary School
Bag-ong Lunsod Tandag City
S.Y. 2014-2015
Junior High: Jacinto P. Elpa National High School
S.Y. 2018-2019
Senior High: Tandag National Science High School
Tabon-tabon, Quezon, Tandag City
S.Y. 2020-2021
Collage: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

45
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Claudine L. Balili
Sex: Female
Date of Birth: July 15,2002, 2002
Age: 20
Address: Purok Mahayag Block 2, Unidad,
Cagwait, Surigao Del Sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Chatolic
Father: Cenon O. Balili
Mother: Estrella L. Balili

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Unidad Elementary School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2014-2015
Junior High: Unidad National High School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2019-2020
Senior High: Unidad Senior High School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

46
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Jovelyn Perez Tejero
Sex: Female
Date of birth: January 12,1993
Age: 30
Address: Caras- an ,Tago , Surigao Del Sur
Civil status: Married
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Evangelical Bible Church
Father: Danny S. Tejero
Mother: Elvie P. Tejero

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Caras- an Elementary school
Tago, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2008-2009
Highschool: Jacinto P.Elpha National High school
Tandag City ,Surigao del sur
S.Y 2010-2011
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

47
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Judy-ann A. Cerro
Date of Birth : September 10, 2001
Place of Birth : Badong Tago, Surigao Del Sur
Civil Status : Single
Present Address : Prk. Kanal Badong, Tago, Surigao del Sur
Father : Alborto L. Cerro Jr.
Mother : Rosalie A. Cerro

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary : Badong Elementary School
Badong Tago Surigao del sur
S.Y. 2013-2015
Junior High : Badong National High School
Badong, Tago, Surigao del Sur
S.Y. 2017-2018
Senior High : Badong National High School
Badong, Tago, Surigao del Sur
S.Y. 2019-2020
College : North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

48
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Joseph D. Dela Helba
Sex: Male
Date of Birth: May 20, 2003
Age: 19
Address: Prk. 2, La Paz, Bayabas,
Surigao del Sur
Civil status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father: Domingo A. Dela Helba
Mother: Nelia D. Dela Helba

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: La Paz Elementary School
La Paz, Bayabas, Surigao del Sur
S.Y 2014-2015
Junior High: Clarence Ty Pimentel National High School
Sumo-sumo, Tago, Surigao del Sur
S.Y. 2018-2019
Senior High: Clarence Ty Pimentel National High School
Sumo-sumo, Tago, Surigao del Sur
S.Y 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main campus

49
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Chrestel Ann D. Oderio
Sex: Female
Birthdate: October 22, 2002
Age: 20
Address: Baras, San Miguel Surigao del sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father's Name: Neptale E. Oderio
Mother's Name: Marites D. Oderio

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Baras Elementary School
San Miguel Surigao del sur
S.Y 2013-2014
High School: Poblacion National High School
San Miguel Surigao del sur
S.Y 2017-2018
Senior High School: St. Theresa College
Tandag City
S.Y 2019-2020
College: Northern Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

50
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Jerlyn L. Mallas
Sex: Female
Date of Birth: February 9,2000
Age: 23
Address: Purok Mars, Barangay Telaje,
Tandag City Surigao Del Sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Mother’s Name: Junita Mallas
Father’s Name: Guillermo Mallas

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Catalunan Pequeño Elementary School
Davao City
S.Y. 2013-2014
Junior High: Cateel Vocational National High
Cateel, Davao Oriental
S.Y. 2017-2018
Senior High: Cateel Vocational National High School
Cateel, Davao Oriental
S.Y. 2019-2020
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University– Main Campus

51
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Jollen Angel C. Galindez
Sex: Female
Date of birth: October 20, 2002.
Age: 20
Address: Claver, Surigao del Norte
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father’s Name: Joel G. Galindez
Mother’s Name: Lea C. Galindez

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Claver Central elementary school
Claver, Surigao del Norte
S.Y. 2014-2015
Junior high: Claver National High school
Claver, Surigao del Norte
S.Y. 2018-2019
Senior high: Claver National High school
Claver, Surigao del Norte
S. Y. 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

52
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Joice S. Adahan
Sex: Female
Date of birth: October 12, 1996
Age: 26
Address: Purok Bombils, Kinabigtasan,
Tago, Surigao Del Sur
Civil Status: Married
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father’s Name: Emelio Q. Silvoza
Mother’s Name: Cecelia M. Silvoza

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Kinabigtasan Elementary School
Junior high: Gamut National High School
Senior High: N/A
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

53
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Ariane A. Maitel
Sex : Female
Date of birth : November 14, 2002
Age : 20
Address : P-9 taglatawan, Bayugan City
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Roman Catholic
Father’s Name : Ariel C. Maitel
Mother’s Name : Mary ann A. Maitel

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: East Bayugan Central Elementary School
P- 8 Taglatawan Bayugan City

Junior high: Bayugan National Comprehensive High School

Narra Ave. Poblacion Bayugan City

Senior High: Bayugan National Comprehensive High School- STEM

Narra Ave. Poblacion Bayugan City

College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

54
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Deseree O. Claros.
Sex: Female.
Date of birth : June 17, 2003
Age: 19 yrs old
Address: Purok Mahayag Block 4,
Unidad Cagwait Surigao del Sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Christian
Father’s Name: Antonio A. Claros
Mother’s Name: Gemma O. Claros

EDUCATION BACKGROUND
Elementary: Unidad Elementary School
Unidad, Cagwait Surigao del Sur
S. Y. 2014-2015
Junior High: Unidad National High School
Unidad, Cagwait Surigao del Sur
S. Y. 2019-2020
Senior High: Unidad National High School
Unidad, Cagwait Surigao del Sur
S. Y. 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

55
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name: Jennifer D. Orias
Sex: Female
Date of birth: April 27, 2002
Age: 21
Address: Purok Mahayag Block 2,
Cagwait Surigao del sur
Civil Status: Single
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Jehova's witnesses
Father’s Name: Joel P. Orias
Mother’s Name: Alona F. Sindo

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Unidad Elementary School
Unidad, cagwait surigao del sur
S.Y 2014-2015
Junior High: Unidad national High school
Unidad Cagwait Surigao Del sur
S.Y. 2019-2020
Senior high: Unidad National High School
Unidad Cagwait Surigao Del sur
S.Y 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main campus

56
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Roland A. Hinampas
Sex : Male
Date of Birth : January 3,1997
Age : 26
Address : Purok 4, Amag, Bayabas, Surigao Del Sur
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Roman Chatolic
Father’s Name: Rufo L. Hinampas
Mother’s Name: Lorna S. Hinampas

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary : Amag,Elementary School
Amag, Bayabas, Surigao del Sur
S.Y 2012-2013
Junior High : Solomon P. Lozada, National High School
Amag, Bayabas, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2019-2020
Senior High: Solomon P. Lozada Senior High School
Amag, Bayabas, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2020-2021
College: North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

57
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Ericka Mae Huerta
Sex : Female
Date of Birth : July 18, 2003
Age :19
Address : Prk. Nangka, Bacolod,
Cagwait Surigao del Sur
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Roman Catholic
Mother’s Name : Ritchel Huerta
Father’s Name : Rodolfo Huerta

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary : Bacolod Elementary School
S.Y. 2013-2014
Junior High : Jose Sanvictories Sr. National School
S.Y. 2017-2018
Senior High: : San Antonio School
S.Y. 2019-2020
College : North Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

58
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Ara Jane B. Silvoza
Sex : Female
Date of Birth : July 15, 2003
Address : Prk. Mahayag, Unidad,
Cagwait, Surigao del sur
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Roman Catholic
Father's Name : Agustin D. Silvoza
Mother's Name : Alicia J. Banaybanay

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary : Unidad Elementary School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao del sur
S.Y 2014-2015
High School : Unidad National High School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao del sur
S.Y 2019-2020
Senior High : Unidad National High School
Unidad, Cagwait, Surigao Del Sur
S.Y 2020-2021
College : Northern Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

59
 Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao Del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : Edelito R. Salinas

Sex : Male
Date of Birth : August 22, 1999
Address : Mararag, Marihatag,
Surigao del Sur
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Pentecostal Church
Father's Name : Rusalie R. Salinas
Mother's Name : Eddie S. Salinas

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary : Mararag Elementary School
S.Y 2013- 2014
High School : Mararag National High School
S.Y 2016-2017
Senior High : Mararag National High School
S.Y 2018- 2019
College : Northern Eastern Mindanao State University- Main Campus

60