0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views6 pages

Pad Foundation Design Calculations

This document provides calculations for the pad foundation and column support of a house. It includes details of the foundation and column dimensions and loads. A summary table shows the results of checks for uplift, sliding, bearing pressure, reinforcement requirements, and shear strength, all of which pass. Soil properties, load combinations, and calculations for bearing capacity, sliding resistance, and base pressure under different load combinations are also shown. The calculated bearing pressure is well below the presumed bearing capacity of the soil.

Uploaded by

sinu_email
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views6 pages

Pad Foundation Design Calculations

This document provides calculations for the pad foundation and column support of a house. It includes details of the foundation and column dimensions and loads. A summary table shows the results of checks for uplift, sliding, bearing pressure, reinforcement requirements, and shear strength, all of which pass. Soil properties, load combinations, and calculations for bearing capacity, sliding resistance, and base pressure under different load combinations are also shown. The calculated bearing pressure is well below the presumed bearing capacity of the soil.

Uploaded by

sinu_email
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 1
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

PAD FOUNDATION EXAM PLE


Foundation analysis in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 + A1:2013 incorporating corrigendum February 2009 and
the UK National Annex incorporating corrigendum No.1
T edds calculation version 3.3.05

Summ ary table


Description Unit Allowable Actual Utilisation Result
Uplift kN 45.1 43.5 0.964 Pass
Sliding kN 30.6 17.4 0.569 Pass
Base pressure kN/m 2 175 45 0.257 Pass
Description Unit Provided Required Utilisation Result
Reinforcem ent x-direction mm2 1018 748 0.735 Pass
Reinforcem ent y-direction mm2 1583 727 0.459 Pass
Description Unit Allowable Actual Utilisation Result
Shear x-axis kN 206 2 0.009 Pass
Shear y-axis kN 212 2 0.008 Pass
Punching shear N/m m 2 4.488 0.124 0.028 Pass

Pad foundation details


Length of foundation; L x = 1200 m m ; W idth of foundation; L y = 1200 m m
Depth of foundation; h = 450 m m ; Depth of soil over foundation; h soil = 600 m m
Level of water; h water = 0 m m ; Density of water; γ water = 9.8 kN/m 3
Density of concrete; γ con c = 24.5 kN/m 3

2.5 kN/m2 45 kN/m2

2.5 kN/m2 45 kN/m2


Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 2
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

Colum n no.1 details


Length of colum n; lx1 = 300 m m ; W idth of colum n; ly1 = 300 m m
position in x-direction; x 1 = 600 m m ; position in y-direction; y 1 = 600 m m
Soil properties
Density of soil; γ soil = 20.0 kN/m 3; Net ultimate bearing pressure; n f = 175 kN/m 2
Friction angle; δ k = 19.3 deg

Foundation loads
Self weight; F swt = 11.0 kN/m 2 ; Soil weight; F soil = 12.0 kN/m 2
Colum n no.1 loads
Perm anent load in x-dir; F Gx1 = 1.0 kN; Perm anent axial load; F Gz1 = 17.0 kN
Variable load in x-dir; F Qx1 = 1.6 kN; Variable axial load; F Qz1 = 13.0 kN
W ind load in x-dir; F Wx1 = 11.0 kN; W ind axial load; F Wz1 = -29.0 kN
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; F dx = 13.6 kN; Force in z-direction; F dz = 34.2 kN
M om ents on foundation
Moment in x-direction; M dx = 26.6 kNm ; Mom ent in y-direction; M dy = 20.5 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-axis; e x = 179 m m ; Eccentricity in y-axis; ey = 0 m m
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-axis; e x = 179 m m ; Eccentricity in y-axis; ey = 0 m m
Pad base pressure
q 1 = 2.5 kN/m 2; q 2= 2.5 kN/m 2 ; q 3 = 45.0 kN/m 2 ; q 4 = 45.0 kN/m 2
Minim um base pressure; q min = 2.5 kN/m 2 ; Maxim um base pressure; q max = 45.0 kN/m 2
Presum ed bearing capacity
Presum ed bearing capacity; P bearin g = 175.0 kN/m 2
PASS - Presumed bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Com bination1
Partial factor set; A1
Perm anent action; γ G = 1.35; Variable action; γ Q = 1.50

Partial factors for spread foundations - Com bination1


Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; γ R.v = 1.00; Sliding; γ R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; F dx = 1.0 kN; Force in z-direction; F dz = 87.2 kN
M om ents on foundation
Moment in x-direction; M dx = 52.8 kNm ; Mom ent in y-direction; M dy = 52.3 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-direction; ex = 5 m m ; Eccentricity in y-direction; ey = 0 m m
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 1190 m m ; Effective width; L'y = 1200 m m
Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 3
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

Effective area; A' = 1.428 m 2


Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fd z = 61.1 kN/m 2
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; F dx = 20.3 kN; Force in z-direction; F dz = 6.7 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation; H = 20.3 kN; Sliding resistance; R H.d = 40.0 kN
H / R H.d = 0.506
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item : Check sliding summ ary

Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Com bination2
Partial factor set; A2
Perm anent action; γ G = 1.00; Variable action; γ Q = 1.30

Partial factors for spread foundations - Com bination2


Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; γ R.v = 1.00; Sliding; γ R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; F dx = 1.0 kN; Force in z-direction; F dz = 67.1 kN
M om ents on foundation
Moment in x-direction; M dx = 40.7 kNm ; Mom ent in y-direction; M dy = 40.2 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-direction; ex = 7 m m ; Eccentricity in y-direction; ey = 0 m m
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 1187 m m ; Effective width; L'y = 1200 m m
Effective area; A' = 1.424 m 2
Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fd z = 47.1 kN/m 2
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; F dx = 17.4 kN; Force in z-direction; F dz = 12.5 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation; H = 17.4 kN; Sliding resistance; R H.d = 30.6 kN
H / R H.d = 0.569
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item : Check sliding summ ary

Partial factors for uplift lim it state - Table [Link].15


Perm anent unfavourable action; γ G.d st = 1.10; Perm anent favourable
action; γ [Link] = 0.90
Variable favourable action; γ Q.d st = 1.50

Uplift lim it state verification


Vertical force; F dz.u = 1.6 kN
Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 4
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by uplift

PAD FOUNDATION EXAM PLE


Foundation design in accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 + A1:2014 incorporating corrigenda January 2008,
Novem ber 2010 and January 2014 and the UK National Annex incorporating National Am endm ent No.1 and No.2
T edds calculation version 3.3.05

Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deform ation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class; C30/37; [Link] [Link] strength; fck = 30 N/m m 2
Partial factor for concrete; γ C = 1.50; Maxim um aggregate size; h agg = 20 m m
Design com pressive strength; fcd = 17.0 N/m m 2; Design tensile strength, plain; fctd,pl = 1.1 N/m m 2
Reinforcem ent details
Characteristic yield strength; fyk = 500 N/mm 2 ; Partial factor for reinforcm ent; γ S = 1.15
Design yield strength; fyd = 435 N/mm 2 ; Nominal cover to top; c nom_t = 30 m m
Nom inal cover to bottom ; c nom_b = 30 m m ; Nominal cover to side; c nom_s = 30 m m
Shear diagram , x axis (kN)
20.7

1.6
-1.8

-21.8

M om ent diagram , x axis (kNm )


3.7

6.1
6.6

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)


Design bending m om ent; M Ed .[Link] = 3.7 kNm ; K = 0.001; K' = 0.176
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
[Link] ent required; A [Link] = 748 m m 2
[Link] ent provided; 9 No.12 φ bars bottom (140 c/c); A [Link] = 1018 m m 2
2
[Link] of reinforcem ent; A [Link] = 748 m m ; [Link] of reinforcem ent; A [Link] = 19872 m m 2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Lim iting crack width; w max = 0.3 m m ; Maxim um crack width; w k = 0.004 m m
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)
Design shear force; abs(V Ed .[Link] ) = 1.8 kN; Design shear resistance; V Rd .c = 205.9 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 5
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

Shear diagram , y axis (kN)


21.2

1.7
-1.7

-21.2

M om ent diagram , y axis (kNm )


3.6

6.4

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)


Design bending m om ent; M Ed .[Link] = 3.6 kNm ; K = 0.001; K' = 0.176
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
[Link] ent required; A [Link] = 727 m m 2
[Link] ent provided; 14 No.12 φ bars bottom (85 c/c); A [Link] = 1583 m m 2
[Link] of reinforcem ent; A [Link] = 727 m m 2; [Link] of reinforcem ent; A [Link] = 19296 m m 2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Lim iting crack width; w max = 0.3 m m ; Maxim um crack width; w k = 0.003 m m
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)
Design shear force; V Ed .[Link] = 1.7 kN; Design shear resistance; V Rd .c = 211.6 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Punching shear (Section 6.4)
Maxim um shear resiastance; v Rd .max = 4.488 N/m m 2 ; Punching shear resistance; v Rd .c = 0.427 N/m m 2
Colum n No.1 - Punching shear perim eter at colum n face
Punching shear perim eter; u 0 = 1200 m m ; Area within shear perimeter; A 0 = 0.090 m 2
[Link] shear force; V Ed .max = 39.7 kN
Punching shear stress factor; β = 1.500; [Link] shear stress; v Ed .max = 0.124 N/m m 2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress
Colum n No.1 - Punching shear perim eter at 1d from colum n face
Punching shear perim eter; u 1 = 3726 m m ; Area within shear perimeter; A 1 = 1.080 m 2
Design punching shear force; V Ed .1 = 10 kN
Punching shear stress factor; β = 1.500; Design punching shear stress; v Ed .1 = 0.010 N/m m 2
PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds increased design punching shear stress
Project Job no.

OLG Engineering Calcs for Start page no./Revision


On Line House 6
Pelham Road
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
Imm ingham , North East Lincolnshire, DN40
C 24/07/2023
1AB

14 No.12 φ bars bottom

9 No.12 φ bars bottom

You might also like