J Jcs 2018 10 004
J Jcs 2018 10 004
Effect of annealing on the physico-chemical properties of rice starch and the quality of
rice noodles
Li Wang, Congnan Zhang, Zhengxing Chen, Xiaopei Wang, Kang Wang, Yongfu Li,
Ren Wang, Xiaohu Luo, Yanan Li, Juan Li
PII: S0733-5210(17)30925-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.10.004
Reference: YJCRS 2651
Please cite this article as: Wang, L., Zhang, C., Chen, Z., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, Y., Wang, R., Luo, X.,
Li, Y., Li, J., Effect of annealing on the physico-chemical properties of rice starch and the quality of rice
noodles, Journal of Cereal Science (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.10.004.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
a,b,c
3 Li Wang *, Congnan Zhang a,b,c,Zhengxing Chen a,b,c
, Xiaopei Wang a,b,c
,
4 Kang Wang a,b,c, Yongfu Li a,b,c, Ren Wang a,b,c, Xiaohu Luo a,b,c, Yanan Li a,b,c,
PT
5 Juan Li a,b,c
RI
6 State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Lihu
SC
b
8 National Engineering Laboratory for Cereal Fermentation Technology, School of
U
9 Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Lihu Road 1800, Wuxi 214122,
AN
10 China
c
11 Jiangsu Provincial Research Center for Bioactive Product Processing Technology,
M
*
13 Corresponding author: Li Wang
TE
16 E-mail: [email protected]
C
17
AC
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18 Abstract
19 The effects of annealing treatment on the properties of rice starch and the quality of
20 rice starch noodles was studied. The results demonstrate that annealing did not change
21 the granule morphology or the crystalline pattern of the rice starch but the relative
PT
22 crystallinity increased from 19.18% to 23.93%. Compared to native rice starch, the
RI
23 solubility and swelling power of annealed rice starch decreased significantly (P<0.05)
24 to 14.35% and 10.09 g/g, respectively. In addition, annealed rice starch had
SC
25 remarkably (P<0.05) lower values of pasting viscosity, breakdown and setback.
U
26 Apparent changes in the gel texture of rice starch were also observed, and these
AN
27 changes helped improve the qualities of the rice starch noodles. Furthermore, with
28 increasing annealed rice starch content in the blends, the sensory evaluation scores,
M
29 cooking qualities and texture properties of rice starch noodles increased gradually.
D
30 When 40% (w/w) of the native rice starch was substituted with annealed rice starch,
TE
31 the resulting noodles had the best overall qualities. Additionally, the properties of rice
32 starch showed good correlation with the qualities of rice starch noodles, so these
EP
33 properties could be practical indicator for suitability of a starch substrate for noodles.
C
35 starch noodles
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36 1. Introduction
37 Rice noodles are a popular traditional style of noodles, and they are widely
38 consumed in Asian countries. With the increasing demand for low-protein food for
39 people with kidney disease or in other special groups (Metzger et al., 2018; Perrone,
PT
40 1994), the development of low-protein foods has become a research hotspot.
RI
41 Therefore, as a new kind of low-protein food, rice starch noodles, which are made
42 from rice starch, are being studied by the rice noodle industry. Compared to
SC
43 preexisting low-protein products, including powders, granules and cookies, rice starch
U
44 noodles could not only meet the requirements of special customers but also be more
AN
45 accepted as a staple food.
46 Rice noodles primarily depend on the pasting and rheological properties of the
M
47 starch to form their structural network (Sandhu et al., 2010). A number of studies have
D
48 reported that rice starch with low swelling power, solubility and paste viscosity as
TE
49 well as elevated amylose content and gel hardness was more suitable for making rice
50 noodles (Ahmed et al., 2016; Bhattacharya et al., 1999). Furthermore, it has been
EP
52 commonly used to improve the overall qualities of the rice noodles (Seda and Arzu,
AC
53 2010; Wu et al., 2015). However, the rice noodle industry is facing problems with the
54 overuse of additives to enhance sensory and cooking qualities (Tan et al., 2009).
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
58 intermediate (>40%) moisture contents at a temperature above the glass transition but
60 2000). Annealing treatment could not only decrease the swelling power and solubility
61 but also increase the heat and shear stability of the starch by quickly improving
PT
62 crystallinity and strengthening interactions between starch chains (Jacobs et al., 1995;
RI
63 Tester and Debon, 2000). Hormdok and Noomhorm (2007) showed that the texture
64 qualities of rice noodles prepared from a blend of annealed and native rice powders
SC
65 were comparable to those of commercial noodles. Cham and Suwannaporn (2010)
U
66 optimized annealing conditions using RSM and found that annealed rice flour was
AN
67 suitable for fresh noodles. However, the effects of annealing treatment on the qualities
70 properties of rice starch were examined. The applicability of substituting rice starch
TE
71 with annealed starch in the preparation of rice starch noodles was also evaluated.
72 Finally, the correlation between the physicochemical properties of rice starch and
EP
73 qualities of rice starch noodles was analyzed. This study explored a new kind of
C
74 low-protein food and may generate new insight for further research into rice noodles
AC
78 Rice starch containing 22.05 g amylose/100 g starch was obtained from Wuxi
79 Jinnong Biotechnology Co. Ltd., China. It contained a very low quantity of protein
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
80 (1.02 g/100 g), and the damaged starch content was 1.90%.
82 temperature (40-60°C) and treatment time (8-24 h) were optimized using the
83 solubility, swelling power and gel hardness as indexes. The annealed rice starch was
PT
84 prepared under the optimum treatment conditions. The specific annealing procedure
RI
85 was as follows: the moisture content of rice starch was adjusted to 57.5% (w/w) and
86 then equilibrated at 4°C for 12 h. After that, the rice starch slurry was placed in a
SC
87 sealed bag and heated at 55°C for 16 h. Finally, the annealed rice starch was dried at
U
88 35°C until the moisture content of rice starch fell below 12 g/100 g.
AN
89 2.2 Properties of rice starch
91 The granule morphology of the rice starch was analyzed by SEM (Quanta-200
D
92 scanning electron microscope, FEI, USA). First, the rice starch was uniformly
TE
93 dispersed on the sample table with conductive double-sided adhesive, and then,
94 samples were coated with platinum under vacuum. Second, the sample was put into a
EP
95 dryer for a short time. Finally, the rice starch samples were placed under a scanning
C
97 morphology.
100 Discover XRD system (Bruker AXS Microanalysis Ltd., Germany) with a general
101 area detector diffraction system (GADDS), following the method described by Parada
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
102 and Aguilera (2012) with modifications. The rice starch was placed in a dryer with
103 100% relative humidity to equilibrate for 48 h, the sample was pressed into the groove
104 of the Lucite sample plate, and the surface of the rice starch was leveled to that of the
105 plate surface. The measurement conditions were set as follows: Cu target, tube
PT
106 voltage of 40 kV, tube flow of 40 mA, scanning speed of 12°/min, scanning step size
RI
107 of 0.05°, and scanning range of 4°-50°. Measurements were repeated three times.
SC
109 The gelatinization properties of rice starch were determined by differential
U
110 scanning calorimetry (DSC 8500, Perkin Elmer, USA). Rice starch (3 mg) was
AN
111 weighed accurately in an aluminum crucible, and twice the mass of deionized water (6
112 mg) was added. After that, the aluminum crucible was sealed and equilibrated at room
M
113 temperature for 24 h. The DSC program was set to heat in the range of 30-110°C and
D
116 Each sample of rice starch (0.8 g dry starch, W0) was mixed with 25 mL of
EP
117 distilled water in a pre-weighed centrifuge tube following the method described by
C
118 Collado and Corke (1997) with modifications. First, the starch suspensions were
AC
119 equilibrated at 25°C for 5 min, heated, shaken at 95°C for 30 min, cooled to room
120 temperature and centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 20 min. After centrifugation, the
121 supernatant was transferred to an aluminum box and dried at 105°C to until a constant
122 weight (W1) was reached, and the sediment in the centrifuge tube was weighed (W2).
123 The solubility (S) and swelling power (SP) of rice starch were calculated according to
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
W1
125 S% = × 100
W0
W2
126 SP% =
W0 × (100% − S % ) (1)
PT
127 2.2.5 Pasting properties of rice starch
128 The pasting properties of the rice starch were determined using an RVA-3D rapid
RI
129 viscosity analyzer (Newport Scientific, Australia) following the method described by
SC
130 Charutigon et al. (2008) with modifications. Each suspension of rice starch was
131 prepared on a 14 g/100 g moisture basis by mixing 3 g of rice starch sample with 25
U
132 mL of distilled water in an aluminum canister. The total time for the temperature
AN
133 profile was 13 min. The profile started at 50°C for 1 min; then, the temperature was
134 raised to 95°C at 12°C/min and held for 2.5 min. Finally, the sample was cooled to
M
135 50°C at 12°C/min and held for 2 min. Measurements were repeated three times.
D
137 Each suspension of rice starch with a 20 g/100 mL moisture content was stirred
and heated at 95°C for 20 min. Samples were then transferred to petri dishes,
EP
138
139 evaporated for 5 min, cooled to room temperature and aged at 4°C for 12 h. The gel
C
140 obtained had a dimension of 20 mm diameter. The texture properties of the rice starch
AC
141 gels were determined according to Han et al. (2011) with modifications using a
142 TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems Ltd, UK). Each gel was compressed
143 with a cylindrical probe (25 mm diameter) until reaching a compression ratio of 50%
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
146 The whiteness of the rice starch was determined by a digital display whiteness
147 meter (HY-BDY, Hua-yang Instrument Company, China). Rice starch was pressed
148 into the groove of a sample plate. Once the apparatus was calibrated using a white
149 board and a black board, the rice starch sample was measured. Measurements were
PT
150 repeated three times.
RI
151 2.3 Rice starch noodles
SC
153 Rice starch noodles were prepared using a twin-screw extrusion process (Thermo
U
154 Fisher Scientific, America). The extruder barrel consisted of 4 heating zones, with
AN
155 temperatures set to 50, 70, 92.5, and 85°C (zone 1, zone 2, zone 3, and zone 4,
156 respectively), and screws were operated at 95 rpm. Before extrusion, the moisture
M
157 content of the rice starch was adjusted to 38 g/100 g, and the samples were passed
D
158 through a 50-mesh sieve before being equilibrated at 4°C. After extrusion, the rice
TE
159 starch noodles were put in an incubator for 2 h under 85% humidity at 50°C to make
160 the starch undergo retrogradation. Then, the noodles were steamed for 10 min to
EP
161 complete gelatinization and returned to the incubator for 1 h under the same
C
162 conditions. Finally, the rice noodles were taken out and dried at room temperature for
AC
165 The cooking qualities were determined according to Wang et al. (2012) with
166 modifications. To determine the cooking loss, 5 g of dried rice starch noodles (5 cm
167 length) were boiled in 500 mL of distilled water for 6 min. After cooking, the noodles
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
168 were rinsed with distilled water (50 mL). Cooking loss was measured by evaporating
169 the cooking and rinsing water to dryness in a drying oven at 105°C for 12 h, and the
170 ratio of residue to dry weight of the uncooked noodles was reported as the cooking
171 loss. The broken rate was the percentage increase in broken cooked starch noodle
PT
172 strands compared to dried starch noodles.
RI
173 2.3.3 Sensory evaluation of rice starch noodles
174 The sensory properties of rice starch noodles were evaluated on a percentage
SC
175 point system (< 60 means poor, 61~80 means intermediate level, > 80 means
U
176 excellent) according to Guo et al. (2016) and Sung et al. (2004) with some
AN
177 modifications. The sensory panel was composed of 10 trained members who were
178 20-25 years old (including 4 males and 6 females). The panelists were not
M
179 professional, but they were trained by commercial rice noodle companies to acquaint
D
180 them with the skills needed for this evaluation method. All the cooked rice starch
TE
181 noodles were coded with random three-digit numbers. Meanwhile, water was
182 provided for the panelist to gargle before testing different rice starch noodles. The
EP
183 samples were evaluated using a 100 point scale and the sensory characteristics include
C
184 color (0~15 points), odor (0~10 points), tissue shape (0~15 points), firmness (0~20
AC
185 points), smoothness (0~20 points), and elasticity (0~20 points), then the total points
188 Texture profile analysis (TPA) of the rice starch noodles was determined
189 according to the method described in section 2.2.6. After cooking, the noodles should
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
190 be measured in 15min. Three cooked noodle strands were placed on the table and
191 pressed by a cylindrical probe (25 mm diameter) until reaching a compression ratio of
192 50% at a speed of 1.0 mm/s. All the measurements were repeated nine times. The
193 probe used to determine the shear properties was an A/LKB-F. In the same manner,
PT
194 three cooked noodle strands were placed on the table and pressed until reaching a
RI
195 compression ratio of 90% at a speed of 0.5 mm/s. All the measurements were repeated
SC
197 2.4 Statistical analysis
U
198 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare treatment means. The
AN
199 results were statistically evaluated by statistical Duncan’s analysis using the SPSS
200 19.0 software and P < 0.05 was considered significant difference. Pearson’s
M
201 correlation coefficients among parameters were calculated using SPSS v.19 software.
D
204 3.1.1 Effect of annealing treatment on the morphology of rice starch granules
EP
205 As shown in Fig. 1, there were slight changes to the granule morphology after
C
206 annealing. The surfaces of some granules were concave and blurred. Zavareze et al.
AC
207 (2010) observed that annealing slightly affected the morphology of medium- and
208 low-amylose rice starches, and the granules were more agglomerated compared to the
209 native starches. The overall structure of the rice starch granules was not destroyed.
210 This indicated that the degree of damage to the rice starch was low, which was
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
212 3.1.2 Effect of annealing treatment on the properties of rice starch crystallinity
213 The crystallinities of untreated and annealed rice starches were measured. As
214 shown in Table 1, four typical peaks were observed at 15°, 17°, 18° and 23.5° in both
215 untreated rice starch and annealed starch, and the presence of these peaks illustrates
PT
216 that crystalline pattern of rice starch did not change and was still type A after
RI
217 annealing. Additionally, the degree of crystallinity of the rice starch increased from
218 19.18% to 23.93%. Waduge et al. (2006) and others have also observed a similar
SC
219 increase in wheat starch and high-amylose barley starch after annealing. Meanwhile,
U
220 they reported that annealing was used to make the starch assume a more stable
AN
221 configuration than that of untreated starch. The increase in crystallinity was due to
222 realignment of the polymer chains within the non-crystalline and crystalline regions
M
223 of the granules. Another explanation for the rise in crystallinity following annealing is
D
224 the interplay of several factors, such as a decrease in imperfections in the crystal
TE
225 structure, the formation of new crystallites, and the increased in crystalline size and
228 As shown in Table 1, compared with untreated rice starches, To, TP, Tc and ∆H of
AC
229 annealed starch increased by 3.85°C, 0.43°C, 1.87°C and 4.49 J/g, respectively.
231 22.03°C to 20.04°C (P<0.05). This was consistent with that observed by Zavareze and
232 Dias (2011). According to Adebowale et al. (2005), these changes were due to the
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
235 limited the swelling power of starch, leading to delayed gelatinization and higher
237 reduction in imperfections in the crystalline structure and the formation of new double
PT
238 helices.
RI
239 3.1.4 Effect of annealing treatment on swelling power and solubility
240 As shown in Table 2, the swelling power and solubility of rice starch decreased
SC
241 significantly (P<0.05) after annealing (from 19.08±0.16 g/g to 10.09±0.2 g/g and from
U
242 23.96±1.32% to 14.35±0.14%, respectively). This was attributed to increases in the
AN
243 crystalline perfection and amylose-chain interactions, which limited the hydration of
244 the amorphous regions of starch and therefore also limited swelling capacity (Alimi et
M
245 al., 2016; Jacobs et al., 1995). Amm et al. (2005) found that the solubility of cassava
D
246 starch after annealing was lower because the strengthening of the bonds between
TE
248 Solubility was related to the degree of rice starch dispersion at high temperature.
EP
249 It was reported that the lower solubility, the smaller the cooking loss of rice noodles
C
250 (Qazi et al., 2014). Swelling power is a measure of water absorption by the starch
AC
251 after gelatinization, which is related to the taste quality of the cooked noodles. As
252 shown in Table 2, as the amount of annealed rice starch increased, the solubility and
254 The swelling power and the solubility decreased significantly (P<0.05) when the
255 annealed rice starch content was 10% (w/w), 20% (w/w) or 40 (w/w). However, when
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
256 the content of annealed starch reached 60% (w/w), there was no significant (P>0.05)
257 decrease. These changes were beneficial and improved the quality of rice starch
259 3.1.5 Effect of annealing treatment on the pasting properties of rice starch
PT
260 The pasting properties of unmodified rice starch and annealed rice starch are
RI
261 presented in Table 2. The pasting properties of starch were altered significantly by
262 annealing treatment. However, the results published to date have reported different
SC
263 effects of annealing treatment on pasting properties. The effects are dependent on the
U
264 treatment conditions and starch sources. In this research, annealed starch exhibited a
AN
265 lower paste viscosity than the native rice starch. These changes may be caused by the
266 increase in amylose content and degree of crystallinity, as well as the decrease in
M
267 swelling power and solubility. Gomes et al. (2004) and others also reported that
D
268 annealing treatment tended to increase the region of crystallinity as a result of the
TE
270 Replacement with annealed starch significantly affected paste viscosities (Table
EP
271 2). With an increase in the modified rice starch content, the viscosity values gradually
C
272 decreased. When the annealed rice starch content reached 10% (w/w), there was a
AC
273 remarkable decrease in the paste viscosity (P<0.05) and a moderate decrease in the
274 setback value. However, the decrease in the setback value was noteworthy once the
275 modified rice starch content reached 20% (w/w). The lower viscosity could enhance
276 the smoothness of the rice noodles, and the lower breakdown value indicated that the
277 starch was stable to heat and shear. Therefore, the decrease in the paste viscosities was
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
278 advantageous for the qualities of the rice starch noodles (Hormdok and Noomhorm,
279 2007).
280 3.1.6 Effect of annealing treatment on gel texture properties of rice starch
281 The gel properties of starch are important factors in controlling the texture of rice
PT
282 starch noodles (Bhattacharya et al., 1999). The gel texture properties of native rice
RI
283 starch and annealed starch are summarized in Table 2. There were obvious increases
284 in hardness, springiness and chewiness (P<0.05). Compared to the native rice starch
SC
285 (hardness, 516.71 g, and chewiness, 475.34 g), the hardness and chewiness of starch
U
286 blends containing 10% (w/w) annealed starch increased significantly (P<0.05) to
AN
287 703.89 g and 655.90 g, respectively. Furthermore, the springiness increased to its
288 highest level (0.98) when the annealed rice starch content reached 40% (w/w).
M
289 Hormdok and Noomhorm (2007) also observed an increase in the gel hardness of
D
290 annealed rice starch. According to Cham and Suwannaporn (2010), gel texture
TE
291 properties were affected by the higher in crystalline perfection of annealed starch
293 molecules, causing the decline of swelling power and solubility. This decline would
C
295 3.1.7 Effect of annealing treatment on the whiteness properties of rice starch
296 As shown in Fig. 1, the whiteness of the rice starch decreased markedly from
297 90.20 to 84.95 with an increase in the amount of annealed rice starch (P<0.05). When
298 starch is treated with heat and moisture, dehydration and degradation might occur. In
299 addition, under high temperature, the rate of the Maillard reaction increased, which
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
300 led to a decrease in the rice starch whiteness. For that reason, the color of the rice
301 starch noodles became obviously worse with an increase in the content of annealed
PT
304 3.2.1 Effect of annealing treatment on cooking and sensory qualities of rice starch
RI
305 noodles
306 The broken rate and cooking loss were two important indexes of the cooking
SC
307 qualities of rice starch noodles. As shown in Table 3, the broken rate and cooking loss
U
308 of noodles made from annealed starch (0.52% and 8.06%, respectively) was
AN
309 significantly lower (P<0.05) than that of noodles made from native starch (8.67% and
310 18.27%, respectively). When the amount of annealed starch reached 40% (w/w), the
M
311 broken rate (3.23%) and cooking loss (8.89%) of the noodles met the local standard
D
313 significant difference between noodles prepared in this study and that of commercial
314 rice noodles (broken rate, 2.22%; cooking loss, 9.34%) (P>0.05).
EP
315 The results of sensory evaluation are summarized in Table 4. As observed from
C
316 the results, the color points of the rice noodles decreased markedly (P<0.05) from
AC
317 13.50 to 9.50 with an increase in the amount of annealed rice starch (from 0% to 80%)
318 and there were no significant difference (P>0.05) in odor points and elasticity points.
319 While compared with noodles made from untreated starch, there were obvious
320 increases in the firmness and smoothness of noodles added annealed starch. In
321 addition, the total sensory evaluation were obviously improved with adding increasing
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
322 amounts of annealed starch, reaching a maximum at 40% (w/w) (92.00 points) and
323 decreasing above 40% (w/w). Furthermore, the total sensory evaluation were slightly
324 higher than that of commercial rice noodles (90.50 points) (P>0.05).
325 Briefly, as the annealed starch content in blends reached to 40% (w/w), rice
PT
326 starch noodles showed excellent sensory and cooking qualities, which were most
RI
327 comparable to commercial rice noodles.
328 3.2.2 Effect of annealing treatment on the texture properties of rice starch noodles
SC
329 The texture of cooked noodles was the most important property in determining
U
330 consumer acceptance of the products. In this study, aspects of noodle texture were
AN
331 measured using two methods, namely, TPA test and the shearing test; the results of
332 these tests are summarized in Table 3. As we can see, the hardness, springiness,
M
333 chewiness, firmness and work of shear all increased with increasing annealed rice
D
334 starch contents, which indicated that the texture properties of annealed rice starch
TE
335 noodles were better than that of noodles made from untreated starch. However,
336 Hormdok and Noomhorm (2007) found that the hardness of rice starch noodles was
EP
337 significantly increased after annealing at 55°C for 24 h; however, the difference in
C
338 chewiness was not significant and the tensile properties were only slightly decreased.
AC
339 This may be due to the different processing time of the annealing treatment.
340 Hardness is often regarded as an indicator of the overall texture quality. When
341 the content of annealed starch was 40%, the hardness and springiness of the rice
343 higher (P<0.05) than that of noodles made from untreated rice starch (760.74±22.86 g
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
344 and 0.96±0.01 g, respectively). In addition, when the content of annealed starch was
345 below 80% (w/w), the chewiness of rice starch noodles made from mixed starch was
347 The firmness of native starch noodles (153.79±9.53 g) was lower than that of
PT
348 commercial rice noodles (168.60±5.83 g). However, after the amount of annealed
RI
349 starch reached 10% (w/w), the firmness (163.44±9.25 g) was the same as that of
350 commercial rice noodles. When the amount of annealed starch increased to 20%
SC
351 (w/w), work of shearing (302.17±10.24) had increased significantly compared to that
U
352 of rice starch noodles (283.10±11.57) made from untreated starch (P<0.05).
AN
353 Those changes might be attributable to the changes in the rice starch properties
354 which resulted in more starch retrogradation during gel formation and consequently
M
355 strengthened the gel structure (Kawaljitsingh et al., 2010). In short, as the addition of
D
356 annealed starch increased to 40%, the texture qualities of rice starch noodles were
TE
358 3.3 Correlations between physicochemical properties of rice starch and qualities of
EP
360 Correlations between physicochemical properties of rice starch and the qualities
AC
361 of rice starch noodles were analyzed. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are presented
362 in Table 5. They illustrated that the physicochemical properties of rice starch had a
363 significant influence on the qualities of rice noodles. Solubilities and swelling powers
364 of the rice starches showed a significant highly positive correlation with cooking
365 qualities of rice starch noodles (P<0.01) and a highly negative correlation with
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
366 hardness, firmness and work of shearing (P<0.01). Similar results were reported by.
367 Fari et al. (2011). In addition, there were also significant positive correlations between
368 RVA paste viscosities and cooking qualities of rice starch noodles (P<0.01). This was
369 also consistent with what was observed by Ahmed et al. (2016). The correlations
PT
370 between RVA paste viscosities and sensory evaluation score and the texture properties
RI
371 of rice starch noodles were negative. Meanwhile, the setback values correlated well
372 with the cooking qualities of rice starch noodles (P<0.01), and they were positively
SC
373 correlated with the texture properties of the rice starch noodles.
U
374 The rice starch noodle properties, including the sensory evaluation score,
AN
375 cooking qualities and texture properties, correlated well with rice starch gel hardness,
376 springiness and chewiness. Additionally, the whiteness showed a highly significant
M
377 positive correlation with the cooking qualities of the rice starch noodles (P<0.01), and
D
378 a highly negative correlation with hardness, firmness and work of shearing (P<0.01).
TE
379 In summary, rice starch with lower swelling power, solubility and paste viscosity, as
380 well as higher gel hardness, springiness and chewiness was more suitable for making
EP
382 4. Conclusions
AC
383 As a new kind of low-protein food, rice starch noodles could be more suitable for
384 consumers with special dietary needs. This study demonstrated that annealing
385 treatment is an effective method for improving the qualities of rice starch, including
386 significant improvements in swelling power, solubility, and gel texture. As observed
387 from the results, when the amount of annealed starch was 40%, the qualities of rice
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
388 starch noodles were better than that of noodles made from pure native rice starch, and
389 there was no significant difference with that of commercial rice noodles. In addition,
390 the properties of rice starch were well correlated with the qualities of the rice starch
391 noodles, meaning that starch properties could be used to predict suitability for noodles.
PT
392 In conclusion, annealing treatment is a potentially effective physical starch
RI
393 modification technique desirable for some special food end uses such as noodles.
394 Acknowledgements
SC
395 Financial support for this research was provided by National Key R&D Program
U
396 of China (2017YFD0401100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.
AN
397 31471616), National Top Youth Talent for Grain Industry of China No. LQ2016301]
398 and national first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology
M
399 (JUFSTR20180203)。
D
400
TE
C EP
AC
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
401 References
402 Adebowale, K.O., Afolabi, T.A., Oluowolabi, B.I., 2005. Hydrothermal treatments of Finger millet
403 (Eleusine coracana) starch. Food Hydrocolloids 19, 974-983.
404 Ahmed, I., Qazi, I.M., Li, Z., Ullah, J., 2016. Rice Noodles: Materials, Processing and Quality
405 Evaluation. 53, 215-238.
406 Alimi, B.A., Workneh, T.S., Sibomana, M.S., 2016. Effect of Hydrothermal Modifications on
407 Functional, Pasting and Structural Properties of False Banana ( Ensete ventricosum ) Starch. Food
PT
408 Biophysics 11, 1-9.
409 Amm, G., Ce, M.D.S., Nmps, R., 2005. Effects of annealing on the physicochemical properties of
410 fermented cassava starch (polvilho azedo). Carbohydrate Polymers 60, 1-6.
RI
411 Bhattacharya, M., Zee, S.Y., Corke, H., 1999. Physicochemical properties related to quality of rice
412 noodles. Cereal Chemistry 76, 861-867.
SC
413 Cham, S., Suwannaporn, P., 2010. Effect of hydrothermal treatment of rice flour on various rice
414 noodles quality. Journal of Cereal Science 51, 284-291.
415 Charutigon, C., Jitpupakdree, J., Namsree, P., Rungsardthong, V., 2008. Effects of processing
416 conditions and the use of modified starch and monoglyceride on some properties of extruded rice
U
417 vermicelli. LWT - Food Science and Technology 41, 642-651.
AN
418 Collado, L.S., Corke, H., 1997. Properties of starch noodles as affected by sweetpotato genotype.
419 Cereal Chemistry 74, 182-187.
420 Fari, M.J.M., Rajapaksa, D., Ranaweera, K.K.D.S., 2011. Quality characteristics of noodles made from
421 selected varieties of Sri Lankan rice with different physicochemical characteristics. Journal of the
M
424 Annealing on the Physicochemical Properties of Unfermented Cassava Starch (“ Polvilho Doce ”).
425 Starch - Starke 56, 419-423.
TE
426 Guo, L.L., Zhou, X.Q., Xiong, N., Sun, T.L., Liu, L., Shan-Shan, N.I., Meng, H., Peng, Z.B., 2016.
427 Research on Sensory Evaluation Methods for Pressed and Fresh Rice Noodles. Modern Food
428 Science & Technology 32, 253-261.
EP
429 Han, H.M., Cho, J.H., Koh, B.K., 2011. Processing properties of Korean rice varieties in relation to rice
430 noodle quality. Food Science and Biotechnology 20, 1277-1282.
431 Hormdok, R., Noomhorm, A., 2007. Hydrothermal treatments of rice starch for improvement of rice
C
432 noodle quality. LWT - Food Science and Technology 40, 1723-1731.
433 Jacobs, H., Eerlingen, R.C., Clauwaert, W., Delcour, J.A., 1995. Influence of annealing on the pasting
AC
434 properties of starches from varying botanical sources. Cereal Chemistry 72, 480-487.
435 Kawaljitsingh, S., Maninder, K., Mukesh, 2010. Studies on noodle quality of potato and rice starches
436 and their blends in relation to their physicochemical, pasting and gel textural properties.
437 Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 43, 1289-1293.
438 Metzger, M., Yuan, W.L., Haymann, J.P., Flamant, M., Houillier, P., Thervet, E., Boffa, J.J., Vrtovsnik,
439 F., Froissart, M., Bankir, L., 2018. Association of a Low-Protein Diet With Slower Progression of
440 CKD. Kidney International Reports 3, 105.
441 Parada, J., Aguilera, J.M., 2012. Effect of native crystalline structure of isolated potato starch on
442 gelatinization behavior and consequently on glycemic response. Food Research International 45,
443 238-243.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
444 Perrone, R.D., 1994. The Effects of Dietary Protein Restriction and Blood-Pressure Control on the
445 Progression of Chronic Renal Disease — NEJM. N Engl J Med 330, 877-884.
446 Qazi, I.M., Rakshit, S.K., Tran, T., Javidullah, Khan, M.Z., 2014. Effect of blending selected tropical
447 starches with rice flour on the cooking quality and texture of rice based noodles. Sarhad Journal of
448 Agriculture 30, 257-263.
449 Sandhu, K.S., Kaur, M., Mukesh, 2010. Studies on noodle quality of potato and rice starches and their
450 blends in relation to their physicochemical, pasting and gel textural properties.
451 Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 43, 1289-1293.
PT
452 Seda, Y., Arzu, B., 2010. Effects of gelatinisation level, gum and transglutaminase on the quality
453 characteristics of rice noodle. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 43, 1637-1644.
454 Sung, W.C., Stone, M., Sung, W.C., 2004. Characterization of legume starches and their noodle quality.
RI
455 Chemische Berichte 127, 1171-1173.
456 Tan, H.Z., Li, Z.G., Tan, B., 2009. Starch noodles: History, classification, materials, processing,
SC
457 structure, nutrition, quality evaluating and improving. Food Research International 42, 551-576.
458 Tester, R.F., Debon, S.J.J., 2000. Annealing of starch — a review. International Journal of Biological
459 Macromolecules 27, 1-12.
460 Waduge, R.N., Hoover, R., Vasanthan, T., Gao, J., Li, J., 2006. Effect of annealing on the structure and
U
461 physicochemical properties of barley starches of varying amylose content. Food Research
AN
462 International 39, 59-77.
463 Wang, N., Maximiuk, L., Toews, R., 2012. Pea starch noodles: Effect of processing variables on
464 characteristics and optimisation of twin-screw extrusion process. Food Chemistry 133, 742-753.
465 Wu, F., Meng, Y., Yang, N., Tao, H., Xu, X., 2015. Effects of mung bean starch on quality of rice
M
466 noodles made by direct dry flour extrusion. LWT - Food Science and Technology 63, 1199-1205.
467 Zavareze, E.D.R., Dias, A.R.G., 2011. Impact of heat-moisture treatment and annealing in starches: A
D
470 heat-moisture treatment on rice starch of varying amylose content. Food Chemistry 121, 358-365.
471
C EP
AC
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
472 Table 1.
473 Effects of ANN on Crystallinity Properties and Thermal Properties of Rice Starch
URS ARS
o
crystallinity 2θ ( ) 14.88, 16.93, 18.30, 23.42 14.81, 16.98, 18.02, 23.18
a
properties Crystallinity (%) 19.18±0.12 23.93±0.20b
To (°C) 62.40±0.47a 66.25±0.30b
TP (°C) 74.57±0.15a 75.00±0.11b
PT
thermal
Tc (°C) 84.42±0.21a 86.29±0.06b
properties
Tc-To (°C) 22.03±0.47b 20.04±0.06a
∆H (J/g) 9.43±0.13a 13.92±0.15b
RI
474 URS, untreated rice starch; ARS, annealed rice starch; To, the temperature at the onset of gelatinization;
SC
475 Tp, the temperature at peak; Tc, the temperature at the end of gelatinization; Tc-To, the range of
477
U
Means followed by different letters in a rank are significantly different at P < 0.05
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
478 Table 2.
PT
479 Effects of annealing treatment on physicochemical properties of rice starch
RI
Solubility Swelling pasting properties gel texture properties
(%) power (g/g) PV (cP) HPV (cP) BD (cP) FV (cP) SB (cP) Hardness (g) Springiness Chewiness (g)
SC
f c d e c a a
URS 23.96±1.32 d
19.08±0.16 e
1822.00±21.21 869.50±10.41 952.50±1.62 1938.50±6.16 1119.00±4.14 516.71±3.02 0.95±0.01 475.34±7.15a
10%ARS 21.37±0.08cd 17.69±0.67d 1672.00±22.63e 777.50±10.41b 894.50±7.78c 1892.50±10.61d 1115.00±1.01c 703.89±9.69b 0.95±0.01a 655.90±8.15b
20%ARS 20.56±0.20c 16.05±0.11c 1575.00±7.07d 782.50±0.71b 792.50±6.36b 1813.00±5.41c 1030.50±0.71b 852.79±2.03c 0.96±0.02ab 714.68±8.44c
U
40%ARS 16.27±0.64b 13.07±0.04b 1543.50±10.61c 762.00±6.42b 781.50±10.61b 1797.00±7.07c 1035.00±7.07b 885.91±11.32d 0.98±0.02b 731.80±4.24cd
AN
60%ARS 15.99±0.52ab 13.05±0.33b 1505.50±0.71b 746.50±4.95ab 759.00±4.24ab 1742.00±8.25b 995.50±4.95ab 900.50±8.61e 0.98±0.02b 743.82±8.32d
a a ab a a e b
80%ARS 15.62±1.88ab 10.95±0.05a 1462.00±4.24 719.50±2.12 742.50±2.12 1689.50±3.54 970.00±1.41 903.88±7.70 0.98±0.03 769.89±6.37e
14.35±0.14a 10.09±0.27a 1432.50±0.71a 706.50±2.12a 723.50±2.12a 1676.50±2.12a 955.00±2.83a 924.85±7.78f 0.98±0.02b 794.17±6.94f
M
ARS
480 URS, untreated rice starch; ARS, annealed rice starch; 10%ARS, ARS : URS = 1 : 9 (w/w); 20%ARS, ARS : URS = 2 : 8 (w/w); 40%ARS, ARS : URS = 4 :
D
TE
481 6 (w/w); 60%ARS, ARS : URS = 6 : 4 (w/w); 80%ARS, ARS : URS = 8 : 2 (w/w); PV, peak viscosity; HPV, hot paste viscosity; BD, breakdown; FV, final
484
AC
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
485 Table 3.
PT
Cooking quality TPA Shearing
RI
Work of Shearing
Broken rate Cooking loss Hardness (g) Springiness Chewiness Firmness(g)
(g*sec)
SC
Commercial
2.22±0.00ab 9.34±0.16ab 830.20±14.10b 0.98±0.02b 639.96±14.88a 168.60±5.83b 307.00±19.80b
rice noodles
URS 8.67±0.14d 18.27±0.68c 760.74±22.86a 0.96±0.01a 635.72±17.48a 153.79±9.53a 283.10±11.57a
U
10%ARS 6.67±0.20c 16.29±0.26c 797.72±26.37a 0.97±0.02b 640.23±19.93a 163.44±9.25ab 287.88±14.21a
AN
20%ARS 5.00±0.36c 10.12±0.69b 802.01±28.64a 0.98±0.02b 639.75±19.45a 183.44±10.91c 302.17±10.24b
40%ARS 3.23±0.14b 8.89±0.55a 848.10±17.08b 0.98±0.01b 640.79±19.54a 196.34±10.06d 329.87±10.35bc
60%ARS 2.38±0.31b 8.38±0.51a 866.50±24.41b 0.98±0.01b 642.43±15.01a 209.15±8.59e 337.32±13.63c
M
80%ARS 1.85±0.14ab 8.51±0.56a 928.02±24.76c 0.98±0.02b 650.23±19.93ab 217.72±9.65e 350.54±9.79c
ARS 0.52±0.10a 8.06±0.42a 924.62±20.22c 0.98±0.03b 676.69±17.80b 221.09±14.33e 346.75±11.52c
D
TE
487 Means followed by different letters in a column are significantly different at P<0.05.
488
C EP
AC
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
489 Table 4.
PT
490 Effect of annealing treatment on sensory evaluation of rice starch noodles
RI
Color Odor Firmness Smoothness Elasticity Tissue shape Sensory evaluation
Commercial
SC
13.50 ± 1.71c 9.50 ± 0.41a 16.50 ± 3.47ab 18.70 ± 1.88b 16.50 ± 2.68a 14.30 ± 1.67b 90.00 ± 4.53b
rice noodles
URS 13.50 ± 2.41c 9.50 ± 0.71a 15.00 ± 2.63a 13.50 ± 3.78a 17.00 ± 3.63a 11.00 ± 2.55a 80.50 ± 3.63a
U
10%ARS 13.00 ± 1.85c 9.50 ± 0.64a 15.00 ± 1.87a 16.50 ± 2.55b 17.50 ± 2.34a 13.50 ± 1.08ab 85.50 ± 5.19ab
AN
20%ARS 13.00 ± 1.71c 9.50 ± 0.42a 17.50 ± 3.22ab 17.00 ± 2.16b 19.00 ± 1.08a 11.00 ± 1.78a 87.00 ± 3.93b
M
40%ARS 13.00 ± 2.16c 9.50 ± 0.37a 19.00 ± 1.41b 18.50 ± 1.47b 19.00 ± 1.41a 13.00 ± 2.94ab 92.00 ± 4.66b
60%ARS 12.00 ± 1.40b 9.30 ± 0.37a 18.00 ± 2.83ab 18.50 ± 1.78b 18.00 ± 2.16a 14.00 ± 1.41b 90.00 ± 3.59b
D
80%ARS 9.50 ± 2.68a 9.00 ± 0.91a 18.00 ± 1.63ab 17.50 ± 2.86b 19.00 ± 1.41a 14.00 ± 1.32b 87.00 ± 3.10ab
TE
ARS 10.50 ± 2.55ab 9.00 ± 1.08a 19.50 ± 0.71b 18.50 ± 1.82b 18.50 ± 1.22a 13.50 ± 1.47ab 89.50 ± 4.16b
EP
491 Means followed by different letters in a column are significantly different at P<0.05.
C
492
AC
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
493 Table 5.
PT
494 Correlations between physicochemical properties of rice starch and rice starch noodles qualities
RI
Swelling Pasting properties Texture properties
Solubility Whiteness
power PV HPV BD FV SB Hardness Springiness Chewiness
SC
sensory
-0.841* -0.741 -0.815* -0.764* -0.818* -0.686 -0.666 0.891** 0.818* 0.854* 0.541
evaluation
U
Broken rate 0.984** 0.985** 0.980** 0.941** 0.972** 0.980** 0.960** -0.932** -0.934** -0.928** 0.931**
Cooking loss 0.913** 0.900** 0.951** 0.945* 0.985** 0.915** 0.931** -0.972** -0.920** -0.920** 0.784*
AN
Hardness -0.937** -0.976** -0.915** -0.919** -0.882** -0.965** -0.922** 0.811* 0.876** 0.837* -0.970**
Springiness -0.841* -0.810* -0.936** -0.861* -0.949** -0.840* -0.839* 0.989** 0.806* 0.960** -0.691
M
Chewiness -0.657 -0.734 -0.673 -0.703 -0.639 -0.733 -0.717 0.537 0.515 0.606 -0.814*
Firmness -0.969** -0.985** -0.964** -0.909** -0.966** -0.992** -0.981** 0.906** 0.944** 0.891** -0.945**
D
Work of
-0.972** -0.984** -0.922** -0.870* -0.922** -0.963** -0.944** 0.858* 0.971** 0.835* -0.918**
TE
Shearing
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
497 Fig 1. Effect of annealing treatment on granule morphology and whiteness of rice
498 starch. A and B were the scanning electron microscopy microphotographs of rice
499 starch before and after annealing treatment, respectively; C was the whiteness of
PT
500 untreated rice starch mixed with annealed rice starch at different proportions
RI
501 including 0:10 (w/w), 1: 9 (w/w), 2: 8 (w/w), 4: 6 (w/w), 6: 4 (w/w), 8: 2 (w/w), and
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
503 Fig 1. Effect of annealing treatment on granule morphology and whiteness of rice
504 starch. A and B were the scanning electron microscopy microphotographs of rice
505 starch before and after annealing treatment, respectively; C was the whiteness of
506 untreated rice starch mixed with annealed rice starch at different proportions
PT
507 including 0:10 (w/w), 1: 9 (w/w), 2: 8 (w/w), 4: 6 (w/w), 6: 4 (w/w), 8: 2 (w/w), and
RI
508 10:0 (w/w).
U SC
AN
509
510
M
d
90
c C
c
D
c
Whiteness
88
TE
b
a
86
EP
84
10% 20% 40% 60% 80% ARS
C
URS
ARS ARS ARS ARS ARS
AC
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights
►Annealing treatment reduces the swelling power and solubility of rice starch
PT
►Annealing treatment improves the cooking and sensory qualities of rice starch noodles
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC