3 AGROFORESTRY AND ECOSYSTEM
SERVICES
INTRODUCTION,
Rates of deforestation and land degradation, and losses of biodi rersity and
ecosystem services, continue to rise globally and the international community is faced
with the challenge of finding land use interventions that can alleviate or reduce the
impact of these environmental concems. Cultivation of trees in the agricultural systems is
‘one of the major primeval practices in the tropical regions of the world. It is characterized
by an intensive integration of forest trees, agricultural and horticultural crops, and shrubs
with a basic objective to ensure sustained availability of multiple products as direct
benefits such as food, vegetables, fruits, fodder, fuel, manure, medicine and raw materials
for agricultural implements. Other indirect benefits and services such as omamentals,
shading, live-fencing and shelterbelt or windbreaks are also derived. Such intermixing of
species of agriculture and forestry, often termed as ‘agroforestry’ came into international
prominence as a potential source of solutions of many interrelated problems of
production and conservation disturbing land use systems in the tropical and subtropical
regions.
Rescarchers all over the world realized that this age old conventional practice of
integrating trees on farm land has the potential for providing rural livelihoods and
habitats for species outside formal forest lands, connecting nature reserves, and easing
Tesource use pressure on conservation areas. In the recent few decades, there has been «
‘growing interest in agroforestry because of its deliverable goods and services. A recent
global assessment of tree cover found that 43 per cent of the world’s agricultural land had
at least 10 per cent of tree cover which indicates that trees are increasingly being planted
as part of farming systems throughout the world (Zomer et al 2009). The integration of
trees, agricultural crops, and/or animals into an agroforestry system has the potential 10
enhance soil fertility, reduce erosion, improve water quality, enhance biodiversity
increase aesthetics and sequester carbon (Garrett and McGraw 2000; Garrity 2004,
Williams-Guille et al 2008; Nair et al 2009). It has been well recognized that thes:sity. and
y is faced
reduce the
systems i
acterized
cd shrubs
sas direct
~ materials
amentals,
“ining of
national
Sleme of
joreopical
tice of
ods and
and easing,
s been a
A recent
land had
lanted
ration of
‘ential to
odiversity,
ty 2004;
hat these
35
“Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services
services and benefits provided by agroforestry practices occur over a range, of spatial and
temporal scales (Jose 2008). Many of these ecasystem services originated at farm level
are being enjoyed by the society at local or regional or total landscapes.
Important realized ecosystem services of agroforestry are well documented and the
sajor ecosystem services delivered by agroforestry systems are categorized into:
© Agroforestry for Microclimate Modification
«Agroforestry for Soil Enrichment
«Agroforestry for Soil Stabilization and Erosion Control
‘© Agroforestry for Flood Mitigation
‘© Agroforestry for Water Yield and Quality
‘© Agroforestry and Pest Control
Agroforestry for Pollination Improvement
‘© Agroforestry for Carbon Sequestration and Air Quality
Agroforestry for Climate Change Mitigation
«Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation
«Agroforestry for Aesthetics and Cultural Services
AGROFORESTRY FOR MICROCLIMATE MODIFICATION
simultaneous growing of trees on farm land along. with agricultural crops has the
avi to modify ae wmeroclimatic conditions including temperature, ‘tt vapour
aetitent and wind speed, improvement of crop-Walet efficiency and energy balance which
conpave beneficial effects on crop growth and animal welfare Brenner 1995; Tse 69
Sood), Microclimatic modifications in agroforestry 1° manifested through soil moisture
2004), Microcrature relations resulting primarily from the use of trees for shade, or as
and sol toned tive fences, or windbreaks and shelterbelts. The shade of trees on farm
Inna ropics eauses a net effect of complex interactions which extend far beyond the
simple reduction of heat and light (Willey 1975). In crop produetion system, temperut
umigity and movement of air, as well as temperature and moisture ofthe sll directly
ieet photosynthesis, transpiration and the energy balance of associated crops
Rosenberg et al 1983) and the net effect of which may translate into increased yields.
Sree et tres on farm land would have blanket effect on soil surface. In general,
Shading causes a reduction of temperature and temperature fluctuations as well as the
‘vapour pressure deficit under tropical conditions.
‘Barradas and Fanjul (1986) compared shaded and open grown coffee plantations in
Mexico and found that, ina coffee plantation under the shade of Inga spp. (205 trees/ha:
Average tree height 14m), the average maximum temperature was 54°C lowes and the
aaeiegm temperature 15°C higher, and that both vapour pressure deficit and evaporation
were substantially reduced as compared to open-grown coffee. The minor temperature56 Agroforestry : Theory and Practices
fluctuations under shade could be ascribed to reduced radiation load on the coffee plants
during the day and reduced heat loss during the night. The lower vapour pressure deficit
was probably caused by a higher water input through the trees’ transpiration stream in
combination with the lower temperatures. Similar results, indicating a buffering effect of
the trees on the microclimate beneath them, were also reported for a combination of
coconut and cacao in India (Nair and Balakrishnan 1977) and for an alley cropping
system of millet and Leucaena in India (Corlett et al 1989). A reduction of vapour
Pressure deficit will cause a consequent reduction in transpiration and, hence. less
probability of water stress for the under storey or shaded crop (Rosenberg et al 1983).
This is highly useful during short periods of drought and would result least reduction in
yield due to water stress which was found in the study of Neumann and Pictrowicz
(1989) wherein the bean plants associated with. Grevillea robusta trees in Rwanda
showed no signs of wilting in hot afternoons, whereas those grown on a field without
trees did.
hheat based farming system of Punjab (India), yield reduction due to higher
ea during reproductive stage is often mitigated through introduction of trees on
farm land, Tree row orientation and distance influence the growth behaviour of the crop
but the effect of sun angle (which changes with season) can modify this influence. Lower
heat load during grain filling and subsequent increased duration of grain filling can
igate the effect of quantitative reductions in radiant energy and of poor quality light
al stages of crop growth (Kohli and Saini 2003). In this context, the use of
deciduous trees such as Dalbergia sissoo, Trewia nudiflora, Populus deltoides and Salix
alba with leaf fall coinciding with the vegetative stage of the crop could be a good
proposition for agroforestry. Tree canopy pruning as a management tool can also be
advocated to provide a favourable microclimate to the intercropped wheat,
Reduction of wind on farm land has significant effect on farm production. Wind
Speed reductions can extend to 30 times the height of tree belts on the leeward
(Tamang et al 2010). The resultant reduction in wind erosion effects can have multiple
benefits for crops including increased growth rate and quality, protection from
windblown soil, moisture management and soil protection. Furthermore, higher air and
soil temperatures in the leeward of a shelterbelt can extend the growing season, with
carlier germination and improved growth at the start of the season (Brandle et al 2004). In
hhot and dry environments, the primary effect of windbreaks may be on modifying crop
water use efficiency by reducing the turbulent transfer of heat and water vapour and
therefore reducing evapotranspiration. The primary effect of trees on crop energy balance
is through the interception of radiation and the reduction of wind speed. The specific
elements that may be affected by modifying the crop energy balance are: radiation and
photosynthesis and its rate and duration; temperature and plant development;
transpiration and its consequences on soil water use and water use efficiency (Messing
and Noureddine 1991).
‘Thus agroforestry, under any given set of environmental eénditions, can improve the
microclimatic conditions when proper selection of tree species, optimizing the tree
pee aebues Reon ieee ct
RRAce plants
e deficit
siream in
effect of
nation of
cropping
vapour
nee, less
without
higher
Fees on
he crop
Lower
ng can
y light
use of
Salix
balance
pecific
1 and
Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services 7
spacing and proper root pruning as well as shoot pruning are made a part of the
technology for crop growing in agroforestry.
AGROFORESTRY FOR SOIL ENRICHMENT
Land degradation and declining soil fertility pose a major peril to agricultural
production. Use of artificial or synthetic fertilizers to augment soil nutrient status could
hot succeed to afford satisfactory result because majority of the commercial fertilizers are
expensive or unavailable in majority of poor developing countries in” tropics.
Incorporation of trees in the farm land can facilitate the sustenance of the nutrient pool
‘and enhance soil fertility both under sequential and simultaneous agroforestry (Young
1997), Intermixing of trees that are able to fix nitrogen biologically along with crops is
fairly common in tropical agroforestry systems. Non N-fixing trees can also enhance soil
physical, chemical and biological properties by adding significant amount of above and
belowground organic matter and releasing and recycling nutrients in agroforestry systems
(Jose 2009). Influence of trees in enhancing the soil fertility status has been described by
several researchers (Young 1997; Nair and Latt 1997; Schoth and Sinclair 2003; Jose et
al 2004). Agroforestry promotes closed system with intemal recycling of nutrients,
whereby nutrients are accessed from lower soil horizons by tree roots and retumed to the
soil through lea fall, agroforestry systems enhance soil nutrient pools and tumover and
reduce reliance on external inputs.
“Trees on farm land play a crucial role in improving soil physical and biological
properties (Rao et al 1998). One of the important roles of trees in agroforesy is the
eevichment of organic matter in the system. Role of organic matter in enhancemett of
soil physical properties such as sol structure, aggregation, porosity, moistre Te
so eeyon resistance is well documented. Apart from enrichment of soll nuien! ia
a erositiem land can reclaim the degraded soils. Tejwani (1994) reported that sat
‘ifeeted farm lands could be reclaimed through agroforestry. Introduction of tees on
sree Tands significantly enhanced diversity of birds, insects, and earthworms nettaSet
am Jaanie earbon content and NN cycling; and improved soil health (Thevathasan an
Gordon 2004).
Incorporation of litter and pruned materials of trees in the farm land improves soil
fenllity through release of nutrients and addition of organic materials to soil. The amount
of nutrient released and organic matter added to soil is governed by quantity and quality
of litter or pruned material added, climatic conditions, field conditions and soil type
(Hegde 1995; Kumar 2008). Introduction of nitrogen fixing trees like Dalbergia sissoo in
agroforestry significantly increased nutrient pool, organic biomass, and activities of
‘enzymes-hydrogenases and alkaline phosphatise in the soil (Chander et al 1998). Seiter et
al (1995) reported that in alley cropping system of maize and red alder (Alnus rubra), 32-
'58 per cent of total N in maize was obtained from N fixed by red alder and interestingly
the nitrogen transfer increased with proximity between trees and crops. Trees can also
significantly manipulate nutrient embellishments through intercepting rainfall, via
throughfall and stemflow. Zhang (1999) reported that stemflow and throughfall togetherAgroforestry : Theory and Practices
contributed 10.99 and 15.22 kg N ha" yr in hybrid poplar and silver maple systems
respectively.
“Arbuscular mycorthizal (AM) fungi enhance plant mutrient uptake and growth, soi
stability and soil aggregation, liter decomposition rates, and could potentially enhance
trop yields while reducing the need for chemical fertilizer input. It has been reported that
agroforestry systems might enhance AM fungal richness compared 9 ‘monocropped
systems (Chifflot etal 2008). In nut shell, the mechanisms by which trees in agroforestry
improve soil physiochemical and biological properties are as follows:
‘© Release of nutrients from tree litter and prunings
«Nitrogen input through biological nitrogen fixation (through N-fixing tees)
«Phosphorus input through mycorrhizal associations
‘= Reduced soil erosion and nutrient leaching
‘S _ Nutrient capture from the subsoil through deep-rooted trees
roots of some trees
Redistribution of nutrients through lateral
AGROFORESTRY FOR SOIL STABILIZATION AND EROSION ‘CONTROL
sry systems, and in both tropical and
Soil management is a key feature of agrofor a :
temperate estes, agroforestry systems are designed and implemented to counter soll
eoon and degradation, and improve soil du ‘and health. Trees on farm land play ¢
croeial role in soil stabilization and erosion ‘control. The probable role of trees in sol
‘Conservation can be perceived in the following way
«Increase of soil cover, by litter and prunings,
‘¢ Provision of partly permeable hedgerow barriers
| Lead to the progressive development of terraces, through soil accumulation
upslope of hedgerows
«s _Increase soil resistance to erosion, by maintenance of organic matter
‘¢ Stabilization of earth structures by root systems
«Make productive use of the land occupied by conservation works
‘The replacement of natural forest and scrublands by eroplands and grasslands devoid
of trees on susceptible soils has resulted in increased run-off and accelerated erosion in
hany agricultural areas. Whereas most agroforestry syseins tre capable of maintaining
reat ganic matter at levels higher than under pure agriculture, ‘and organic matter is the
major variable factor controlling resistance ‘on, Presence of trees on farm land is
useful in increasing structural sta i
land improve water storage by increas 5 °
armel surplus surface watet flow and allow air and mols to move into the soil. I=
cane sine risk of sol erosion is reduced. Tree roots and trunks also act as physica!
barriers to reduce surface flow of water and sediment (Udawatta et al 2008). In Newsystems
wth, soil
enhance,
orted that
scropped
oforestry
ces)
ROL
ical and
ater soil
play a
's in soil
ulation
ievoid
on in
ining,
is the
and is
ration
rapidly
oil. In
nysical
n New
Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services 59
Zealand, widely-spaced poplars reduced pasture production losses due to landslides
during a cyclonic storm by 13.8 per cent with, on average, each tree saving 8.4 m? from
failure (Hawley and Dymond 1988). Mature willow and poplar trees at 12 m spacing can
reduce mass movement by 10-20 per cent (Hicks 1995).
AGROFORESTRY FOR FLOOD MITIGATION
Changes in climate and weather patterns are having a dramatic impact on ecosystem
based livelihoods, especially in agriculture, a key source of income for majority of the
countries in tropics. One factor contributing to household vulnerability is the use of
monoculture production systems, which lead to reliance on one crop for income.
Agricultural diversification, particularly when undertaken in relation to environmental or
economic risks, has the potential to increase household adaptive capacity under climate
change (Smit and Skinner 2002) and contribute to agrobiodiversity and the sustenance of
vital functions, structures, and processes in agroecosystems (Mijatovic et al 2011)
The integration of trees into cultivated land, ot agroforestry, is one approach to
agricultural diversification that has been shown to provide a range of potential benefits,
‘Agus et al (2003) found that tree-based farming systems maintain most of the flood
mitigation capacity exerted by forest. Trees, undergrowth and woody debris on farm land
‘would increase “hydraulic roughness” of the flood plain slowing down the passage of
flood flow. On farm land, trees and woody debris could direct or concentrate flows
forming multiple channels and back water floods enhancing flood storage that could
result in nt effet of delayed and reduced sizeof foo peak: Ths, risk of fash flooding
i wy rainfall could be reduced in agroforestry systems, wit
ea ane ete permeable barriers to reduce sediment and debris loading
tree roots and trunks a
into rivers following floods.
AGROFORESTRY FOR WATER YIELD AND QUALITY
zat th began by felling trees, further development and
wave iat Or ton seule eleatng natal Torest fo grow crops ot 10 build
infrastructure to human habitation. In the recent past, most of the developmental activities
in tropical countries are being undertaken at the cost of natural forests. Clearance of
forests for expansion of agriculture, development of infrastructure for industry and
human settlements, and urbanization resulted in reduction of water that enters the soil and
increase in the overland mud stream flow. Scarcity of land in certain regions lead to
building on floodplains and wetlands which can reduce water storage and buffer capacity
and put the new developments at risk of flooding. Additionally, human habitation and
industry can lead to streams becoming polluted while increasing the demand for clean
water. Thus, the need to increase water productivity and quality is a growing global
concern asthe demand for water will increase every year
Many developing countries in tropics are experiencing unstable water supplies,
wherein small decreases in rainfall induce much larger reductions in stream flow (UNEP
2006). Rapid degradation of water catchments and climate change are major factors60 “Agroforestry : Theory and Practices
responsible for decreasing water supplies in many parts of the world. Vital water
Catghinents have been lost or are being degraded, creating concerns about the loss of
hydrological functions and increasing competition for scarce water resources between
agriculture, urban centres, industry and wildlife. Apart from these, the quality of the
water is also a major concern in several developing countries including India. The
Challenge is to ensure the availability of adequate quality water at the landscape or river
basin level, especially for the rapidly growing populations in many developing ‘countries.
‘Trees on farm land increase the water-holding capacity of the soil, reduce soil
evaporation, increase water infiltration into the soil (Nair 1993), and efficiently capture
fainwater compared with traditional agricultural practices (Lott et al 2003). Jackson et al
(2000) reported that the initial recharge of the soil profile following hheavy rain was
greater in aproforesc westerns an selene o oe re ones a Maes
greater in aero ecause percolation of wat down wvouth Fehrs et
i Kens oes Pew ye as ne ad Sl rem
al 2006). In Midwestern USA. 2 multispecies buffer that included . 2 era i
increased infiltration rates to five times Y ie Cer and ae ott by 9 per cent
2008). Agroforestry strips in Missouri, USA, 1 mal
.ars of establishment, compared with a ‘control watershed (Udawatta et a!
oe eee ral wa cone a
02 ve increase water infiltration and water storage. Furthermore on abovegroune
stems, leaf litter and pruning debris in agroforestry systems can reduce runoff aaa
thereby enhancing sedimentation within the agroforestry strip and increasing infiltratios
(Seobi et al 2005). .
“Trees on farm land are useful in reducing the water requirement of the production
aystenn The shade provided by the ees requires the plants being Bon beneath them to
Perr a lese, Als, the presence of tree on farm land reduces loss of water through
cevapotranspiration from the farm land. Trees can increase the quantity of water used on-
farm for tree or crop transpiration and may also improve the productivity of the water that
is used by increasing the biomass of trees or crops produced per unit of water used.
Recently, it has been proposed that trees can efficiently increase water productivity
particularly under semiarid regions (Ong and Swallow 2003; Ong et al 2007).
‘Trees also help to clean fine particulates from the water through their root systems
and hold water for keeping the soil moist. Because root systems are helping to keep the
soil in place and maintaining soil water levels, farming can be done in areas that would
be at risk of erosion otherwise. Streams are then not as susceptible to being overrun with
eat or by flash flooding. Agroforestry can also help in improving water quality by
erets levels of pollution and soil erosion and thus landscape amlioraicn 7s 2s
‘Graetz 2004; Schultz et al 2004). For example, riparian buffer zones, if well designed and
Sropery located, can be very helpful in this direction (Dosskey 2001), ‘These buffers help
jh reducing the transport of polluted runoffs to the rivers and streams ‘Agroforestry also
improves water-use efficiency and increases environmental sustainabi
Combination of tres with agricultural crops in agricultural production system ca
contribute considerable hydrological services wherein the hydrological function Istices
ul water
loss of
between
of the
lia, The
ries.
uuce soil
y capture