To:

From: (Name)_______________________________________

(Address)___________________________________________ Legisla�ve District: _____________

Remonstrance by Affidavit
No�ce to Agent is No�ce to Principal and No�ce to Principal is No�ce to Agent

Comes now Affiant, _______________________, one of the People of the 50 states (as seen in Arizona
Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on2), Sui Juris, in this Court of Record, to correct and remove all viola�ons and
acts of violence against the People, as seen in the Arizona Cons�tu�on;
Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 2: Poli�cal Power; Purpose of Government
“All poli�cal power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their powers from the consent of
the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.”

Affiant states: The People remind all elected officials, you have consented to be governed by the
People. At the moment you took your oath of office, all elected officials agreed to a contract with the
People. This contract is binding and is further demonstrated by those elected officials receiving
reimbursement for services rendered;
Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition:
Contract: An agreement between two or more persons which creates an obligation to
do or not to do a particular thing. Its essentials are competent parties, subject matter,
a legal consideration, mutuality of agreement, and mutuality of obligation.
Express Contract: An express contract is an actual agreement of the parties, the terms
of which are openly uttered or declared at the time of making it, being stated in
distinct and explicit language, either orally or in writing.
Loyalty Oath: An oath requiring one to swear his loyalty to the state and country
generally as a condition of public employment. Such oaths which are not overbroad
have been upheld. Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11, 86 [Link].1238, 16 [Link].2d 321.
Employ: To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting
business; to commission and intrust with the performance of certain acts or functions
or with the management of one’s affairs; and, when in respect to a servant or hired
laborer, the term is equivalent to hiring, which implies a request and a contract for a
compensation.
Employee: A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or
implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and
direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed.
Bind: To obligate; to bring or place under definite duties or legal obligations,
particularly by a bond or covenant. To affect one in a constraining or compulsory
manner with a contract or a judgment. So long as a contract, an adjudication, or a
legal relation remains in force and virtue, and continues to impose duties or
obligations, it is said to be “binding.” A man is bound by his contract or promise, by
judgment or decree against him, by his bond or covenant, by an extopel, etc.

Affiant states: The government exists at the will of the People. All elected officials are employees of
the People for the purposes of doing the People’s will. Arizona Constitution Article 2 Section 2
indicates your employment as an elected official is to protect and maintain the individual rights of the
People and follow the will of those who elected you to office;
Maxim of Law - One lawfully commanding must be obeyed. Jenk. Cent. 120.

Affiant states: We, the People, in writing the many constitutions, retained specific rights to ourselves,
separate from the limited authority we gave elected officials to do the work related to government
duties. All 50 state constitutions are interchangeable and applicable to all the People;
Kentucky Bill of Rights Section 2:
“Absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a
republic, not even in the largest majority.”
Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 32: Cons�tu�onal Provisions Mandatory
“The provisions of this Constitution are mandatory, unless by express words they are declared to be
otherwise.”

Affiant states: We, the People, are to frequently remind you, our employees, of your duties and
responsibilities in order to ensure that you, the employees, preserve the People’s security. “Free
Government” is government that does not in any manner hinder the People’s freedom to pursue their
private lives and happiness forever;
1
Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 1: Fundamental Principles; Recurrence to
“A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is essential to the security of individual rights and the
perpetuity of free government.”

Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition: Perpetuity: Continuing forever.

Maxim of Law - Legal form is essen�al form. 10 Coke, 100.

CURRENT VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION

Affiant States: The People’s perpetuity of free government has been fully or par�ally compromised by
many “employees” of the People. Each of those “employees’ will be held accountable for their individual
ac�ons against the People.
Ka�e Hobbs, Governor
Ms. Hobbs failed to recuse herself from the 2022 elec�on. As the Secretary of State, she was to
oversee the func�oning of the elec�on. However, when she, herself, is a candidate in the elec�on, she
may not also oversee her own elec�on. This is a glaring viola�on of the protec�on of the People from
maladministra�on and malfeasance.
Ms. Hobbs further demonstrated her actual maladministra�on and malfeasance by actually
publicly threatening various county Boards of Supervisors with criminal penal�es if they should choose
to do what they were supposed to do to ensure fair and safe elec�ons.
Ms. Hobbs, in taking her oath of office as governor, has failed to protect the People of Arizona
from invasion on our southern border.
Ms. Hobbs has failed to ensure that ques�ons about ballots have been addressed openly and
transparently.
Ms. Hobbs has failed to sign lawfully legislated bills based on her poli�cal affilia�on rather than
what is good for the People of Arizona.

Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 21: Free and Equal Elec�ons

“All elections shall be free and equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to
prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.”

Adrian Fontes, Secretary of State

Mr. Fontes has participated in maladministration and malfeasance. He is personally responsible
for writing the programs used in the balloting machines. He has participated in violating Arizona
Constitution Article 2 Section 21 in several other ways-attempting to print unrequested mail-in ballots
and printing incorrect voting information culminating in a lawsuit before the Arizona Supreme Court.
Mr. Fontes, in his sensitive position, has allowed inappropriate use of voter’s private information
through the ERIC system. Mr. Fontes was also responsible for participation in the ERIC system, as the
County Recorder for Maricopa County.
Mr. Fontes has shown a total disregard for separation of himself from the actual voting process.
Mr. Fontes has used the influence of his office to perpetuate rather than end the controversy of
counting ballots with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.

Kris Mayes, Attorney General

Ms. Mayes has failed to address the invasion of Arizona’s southern border, though it is within her
prevue to intervene.
Ms. Mayes has failed to lawfully address the mul�ple cases of voter maladministra�on
evidenced in the 2020 and the 2022 elec�ons.
Ms. Mayes has failed to prosecute criminals responsible for complex financial crimes and those
related to conspiracies involving to illegal drugs.

Legislators in both the House of Representa�ves and the Senate-

Many legislators have funded uncons�tu�onal agencies that then violate the private,
cons�tu�onally protected, rights of the People. Statutes have been legislated impinging upon and
directly viola�ng the People’s cons�tu�onal rights to life, liberty and property, including, but not limited
to, the children of the People.
Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 4: Due Process of Law
“No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”

The House of Representatives have unlawfully removed a sitting member, without due process
of law.
Legislators in both houses have not exercised their investigative powers to determine voting
maladministration, fraudulent practices among the members, and private “deals” that only benefit
particular groups, but not the majority of the People of Arizona.

2
 Legislators in both houses have allowed themselves to be influenced by private interest groups
and lobbyists, rather than listening to, and acting upon, the voices of those who are their employers, the
People.
Legislators in both houses have authored and passed bills that compromise, limit, or remove
constitutional rights of the People, thus violating their contracts with the People.

[Marbury v Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) “A law repugnant to the Cons�tu�on is void. An act of Congress
repugnant to the Cons�tu�on cannot become law. The Cons�tu�on supersedes all other laws and the
individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly
designated beneficiary.”]
Sheriffs-
In most counties, the Sheriffs have compromised their position by pandering to various specialty
groups rather than focusing on their responsibilities to be answerable directly to the People.
Sheriffs have refused to protect the people from the invasion at the Arizona southern border.
Sheriffs have participated in unlawful agency actions, rather than protecting their People from
those actions.
Sheriffs have worked with federal agencies rather than protecting their People from
encroachments from those federal agencies.
Sheriffs have been unresponsive to the voice of the People, those who are the employers of the
sheriffs.

Judiciary-
Those in the judiciary have been compromised by agreements with private agencies and
individuals. Those agreements harm the People and are acts of maladministration and malfeasance.
Those in the judiciary allow themselves to be influenced by pressure groups, thus rendering
unlawful decisions in administrative tribunals rather than courts of record with jury trials. Jury trials are
a guaranteed constitutional right of the People. Courts of Record are required by the Arizona
Constitution.
Those in the judiciary have assumed dual roles as Superior Court judges and, simultaneously,
Commissioners in legislative tribunals. Holding two offices is unconstitutional.

Arizona Constitution Article 2 Section 23: Trial by Jury

The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. . .
Arizona Constitution Article 2 Section 11: Administration of Justice
Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without unnecessary delay.

Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition: Court: Classification:

Courts may be classified and divided according to several methods, the following being
the more usual: Courts of record and courts not of record. The former being those
whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory
and tes�mony, and which have power to fine or imprison for contempt. Error lies to
their judgments, and they generally possess a seal. Courts not of record are those of
inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or imprison, and in which the proceedings
are not enrolled or recorded. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher,
[Link]., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal. 225; Erwin v. U. S., [Link]., 37 F. 488, 2
L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.
A "court of record" is a judicial tribunal having atributes and exercising func�ons
independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it, and
proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings being
enrolled for a perpetual memorial. Jones v. Jones, 188 [Link]. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229;
Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc., Mass., 171, per Shaw, C. J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244
N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689.

Arizona Constitution Article 6 Section 30: Courts of Record

“A. The supreme court, the court of appeals and the superior court shall be courts of record. Other
courts of record may be established by law, but justice courts shall not be courts of record.
B. All justices and judges of courts of record, except for judges of the superior court and other courts of
record inferior to the superior court in counties having a population of less than two hundred fifty
thousand persons according to the most recent United States census, shall be appointed in the manner
provided in section 37 of this article.”
Arizona Constitution Article 6 Section 28: Justices and Judges; Dual Office Holding; Political Activity;
Practice of Law
“Justices and judges of courts of record shall not be eligible for any other public office or for any other
public employment during their term of office, except that they may assume another judicial office, and
upon qualifying therefore, the office formerly held shall become vacant. No justice or judge of any court
of record shall practice law during his continuance in office, nor shall he hold any office in a political

3
party or actively take part in any political campaign other than his own for his re-election or retention in
office. . . “

Affiant States: It has become apparent that there is no part of the government that is exempted from
violation of the Arizona Constitution. It is apparent to the People that their rights, secured by the
constitution, have been trampled. While there are a few who have upheld their oath and their contract
with the people, the many have not. Many appear to feel they may act with impunity. Nothing is farther
from the truth;

[Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603 "Where rights secured by the Cons�tu�on are
involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legisla�on which would abrogate them."]

Maxim of Law - Things bad [or corrupted] in principle at the commencement improves not by
lapse of �me [does not achieve a good end.] Broom, Max. 178; 4 Coke, 2.

Affiant states: No further maladministration and malfeasance will be tolerated. This affidavit is a written
warning that further behavior against the People will result in termination of employment. Your services
to the People will be terminated should you persist in your poor decision making;

Maxim of Law - A contract without considera�on, or upon a false considera�on, (which fails,) or
upon unlawful considera�on, cannot have any effect. Code. 3, 3, 4; Chit. Cont. (11th Am. Ed.)
25, note; Noy, Max. 24; 2 Bl. Comm. 445; 1 Story, Contr. s. 525.
Maxim of Law - Private contracts (or agreements) cannot derogate from public law or right.
Broom, Max. 695; 7 Coke, 23; Wing. Max. max. 201; Co. Litt. 166a; Dig. 50, 17, 45, 1.

REMEDY FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE PEOPLE

Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 33: Reserva�on of Rights

“The enumeration in this Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny others retained by
the people.”
Arizona Cons�tu�on Ar�cle 2 Sec�on 7: Oaths and Affirma�ons
“The mode of administering an oath, or affirmation, shall be such as shall be most consistent with and
binding upon the conscience of the person to whom such oath, or affirmation, may be administered.”

Maxim of Law - There is no stronger link or bond between men than an oath. Jenk. Cent. Cas.
126; Id. p. 126, case 54.

Affiant states: All elected employees, in taking the oath of office, swear to abide by and adhere to the
United States and Arizona Constitutions, as well as the will of the People. Violations of the oath of office
will result in violations of the People’s rights and a breach of contract. Those rights do not require
enumeration to be violated. Any infringements of rights is a violation of the oath of office and thus a
violation of the Arizona Constitution, both of which are trespasses against the People. Violations will
result in termination;

Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition:

Maladministration- Wrong administration,
Malfeasance- Evil doing; ill conduct,

[Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p.442 “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no
rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal
contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”]

Affiant States: Your failure to protect the People’s rights and freedoms is a breach of your
contract, your oath and job descrip�on, granted by the People. The People no longer have
confidence in your ability to adequately represent them in government. Your refusal to cease in
your ac�ons against the best interests of the People must be construed as inten�onal.
Affiant’s Remedy for your failure to protect the rights of the People is as follows: If you, man or woman,
who, standing against your Trust Indenture outlined in the State Cons�tu�on, knowingly trespassed
against the rights of the People you swore to protect, you further agree to pay $1,000,000 per
encroachment against the above-men�oned rights. Should you fail to respond with a sworn affidavit
within 5 (five) days, showing the Cons�tu�onal provisions authorizing you to trample the People's rights,
you further agree to all the above-men�oned facts and that no court shall re-examine this mater and
shall accept the above terms as truth and law. Failure to respond means that, by acquiescence, you
agree that all claims are true. Furthermore, you agree that this affidavit may be used as evidence of your
maladministra�on and malfeasance, and that Affiant reserves the right to take this affidavit before an
arbitrator of Affiant’s choice at your expense.

4
Affiant States: All monies that result from the service of this affidavit will fund the People’s independent
elec�on process in the state of Arizona. Any ini�ally unused funds will directly fund later elec�ons run by
the People. The People reserve the right to take control of the purse.

Verifica�on

I hereby declare, cer�fy and state, pursuant to the penal�es of perjury under the laws of the
United States of America, and by the provisions of 28 USC § 1746 that all of the above and
foregoing representa�ons are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, informa�on and
belief.
Executed in _____________________________, Arizona on this day of in
the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-three.

Autograph of Affiant
Notary as JURANT CERTIFICATE
JURAT
******************************************************************************
**********
State

County

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me

On this day of 2023(date) before me,

A Notary Public, personally appeared Name of Affiant, who proved

to me on the basis of sa�sfactory evidence to be the man/woman whose name is subscribed to
the within instruments and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her
authorized capacity, and that by his/her autograph(s) on the instrument the man/woman
executed the instrument.
I cer�fy under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the lawful laws of Arizona State and that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary /Jurat

Seal