HLTH 022
HLTH 022
Foreword 1
Acknowledgements 4
Executive summary 5
An integrated framework for the sustainable development goals and the post-2015
development agenda 7
Introduction 8
Three interlinked principles for sustainable development 9
Building on existing internationally agreed environmental goals and targets 14
Universal concerns, differentiated responses 15
Targets and indicators 16
Eradicating extreme poverty and inequality and providing decent employment through an inclusive
green economy 18
Sustainable water and energy services 21
Health, chemicals and the environment 23
Food security through maintaining and repairing our life-support system 25
Sustainable consumption and production and economic growth 29
The rural-urban continuum, sustainable cities and infrastructure 32
Environment for resilient and peaceful societies 35
CONCLUSIONS 45
Endnotes 47
ii
Foreword
Achim Steiner
UN Under Secretary General and
UNEP Executive Director
2
‘UNEP is committed with the
support of all partners and
stakeholders, to making this
vision a reality.’
© Zurijeta / Shutterstock
3
Acknowledgements
4
Executive summary
© jonson / Shutterstock
Introduction
E xtensive consultations
undertaken by Member States,
the United Nations system and
promote sustainable patterns of
consumption and production1.
new vision would integrate – in
a balanced way – the economic,
social and environmental
a wide range of civil society Development ambitions cannot dimensions. Integrated solutions
stakeholders have identified be met without integrating can generate structural and
key challenges that should be the environmental risks and transformative change, and will
addressed in the post-2015 opportunities. help to ensure that the post-
development agenda. Priorities 2015 development agenda will
in the social, economic and Integration will be essential to the be aspirational, inclusive and
governance areas include: access post-2015 development agenda as universal in nature, as agreed at
to basic services and resources, a key reference point not only in the United Nations Conference on
social protection, health, terms of the three dimensions of Sustainable Development.
education, poverty eradication, sustainable development, but also
employment, food security, in terms of the integration of the
inclusive prosperity, technology, Millennium Development Goals Development ambitions
peace and security, rule of law,
cannot be met without
in the sustainable development
integrating the environmental
human rights, the combating of goals framework. A compelling risks and opportunities
corruption, and transparency. A
new development agenda should
carry forward the achievements
of the Millennium Development
Goals. However, it has also been
recognized that the Millennium
Development Goals fell short by
not integrating the economic,
social and environmental
aspects of sustainable
development as envisaged in
the Millennium Declaration, and
8 by not addressing the need to © Lee Prince / Shutterstock
Three interlinked principles for sustainable
development
An integrated approach can be
defined through three interlinked
principles, which simply put are:
(a) Leave no one behind;
(b) Live within the Earth’s safe
operating space;
(c) Leave assets behind for future
generations.
10 © johnnychaos / Shutterstock
Sustainable consumption is not
about reducing
consumption, it is
Sustainable consumption about consuming
is not about reducing better – about what
consumption, but about
consuming better we buy and how
we live in an
intelligent and
environmentally
sustainable way. Shifting
consumption patterns should
not slow down growth, but rather
should generate new jobs and
© xuanhuongho / Shutterstock markets, stimulate sustainable
innovation, transfer savings
developing countries. Ultimately, better with less, can fuel and resources to productive
the poorest will suffer the most innovation and local-level enterprises, and address hunger
as they generally have the least solutions. It will also need and reduce obesity.
capacity to deal with negative accompanying behavioural
impacts. Ensuring prosperity changes that influence Country responses are likely to be
today and in the future will require consumption and bring about differentiated depending on the
that economic growth no longer more societal cohesion. current and projected economic
degrades the environment. Growth Transitioning to a green economy circumstances and lifestyles of
can be delinked (decoupled) and sustainable consumption individuals and communities.
from increasing material and and production can strengthen With “relative decoupling”,
resource use, and from the economic growth in countries production and consumption
environmental and social impacts by shifting from traditional increases, but overall resource
of unsustainable consumption consumption-led growth models use and pollution increase at a
and production, through a shift with overdependency on imports slower rate than that at which the
towards an inclusive and resilient and consumer expenditure, economy expands. With “absolute
green economy.1 and an entrenched reliance decoupling”, production and
on unsustainable patterns of consumption increase, while
Moving towards living consumption and production, resource use and pollution
within the global safe operating towards more sustainable actually decrease in absolute
space, and doing more and economic growth strategies. terms. While absolute decoupling 11
Build stronger, cleaner and can also ensure intergenerational
more durable infrastructure equity and resilience to social,
economic, political and
environmental shocks and
disruptive change.
Investing in long-lasting
infrastructure, buildings and
© D. Hammonds/ Shutterstock consumer products increases
resource efficiency, reduces
is possible, it is generally harder Invest to achieve greater material intensity and secures
to achieve in technological terms, resilience and secure future services for future generations.
and often requires more financial generations’ livelihoods
investment and better institutional Ecological restoration has multiple
frameworks. As such, absolute Investment to produce more benefits including in many cases
decoupling is more immediately and better natural capital, social a net profit for public and private
achievable for wealthier societies, capital and economic capital sector investment. Currently, 60
which are expected to lead the (e.g., infrastructure and the built per cent of the Earth’s ecosystems
way to achieving sustainable environment) provides the means are degrading, augmenting the
consumption and production, to achieve the multiple aspirations impact of natural disasters, and
as enshrined in the 10-year of sustainable development. lowering the productivity of land
framework of programmes on Building more capital secures the and marine ecosystems.6 In some
sustainable consumption and assets of future generations and, scenarios, loss of ecosystem
12 production patterns. if done with longevity in mind, services is projected to result in
a 25 per cent loss in the world’s that the cost of restoration is means of mechanical chillers was
food production by 2050.7 much lower than the long-term 15 to 30 times higher than the cost
Investment in restoration can costs of the alternatives, and of establishing riparian forests to
range from hundreds to hundreds can generate profit. For example, shade the water and augmenting
of thousands of United States in South Africa, investment in stream flows with releases from
dollars per hectare, and has restoring wetlands has led to upstream reservoirs.9
therefore been daunting for public increased employment, higher
or private entities to undertake. crop and reed productivity, more
However, the world can no longer grazing for livestock and more A major effort is needed
afford to ignore the destruction water for domestic use. 8 The cost over the coming decades to
of its ecological infrastructure or of reducing thermal pollution repair and restore the Earth’s
life-support systems for
to leave it as a legacy for future in the Tualatin River of Oregon, today’s needs and for future
generations. Evidence is mounting United States of America, by generations
© jessicahyde / Shutterstock 13
Building on existing internationally agreed
environmental goals and targets
A t the United Nations
Conference on Sustainable
Development, Heads of State
and Government recognized
the significant contributions to
sustainable development made
by the multilateral environmental
agreements10 and requested
that the future sustainable
development goals build upon
commitments already made. 11
There are many globally agreed
goals contained in both binding The future goals and
and non-binding multilateral targets should be at least
as ambitious as those that
instruments, especially in the
already exist, and preferably
environmental sector.12 Since more so
2012, governments, through their
participation in the multilateral © [Link]
environmental agreements,
have encouraged all partners to Sustainable development goal wealth, would support the
consider existing goals as the targets on renewable energy, Aichi Biodiversity Targets as
basis for future goals. energy efficiency and low‑carbon they address the drivers of
development trajectories would unsustainability. The new goals
The future goals and targets reinforce the objectives of the and targets could highlight
should be at least as ambitious United Nations Framework emerging issues, and they
as those that already exist, Convention on Climate Change could set a vision for renewing
and preferably more so. The without duplicating its processes. commitments to agreements
inclusion of selected existing Integrating biodiversity and whose terms will expire in the
targets would underscore the ecosystem values into indices coming decades.
14 urgency of existing commitments. of poverty, prosperity and
Universal concerns, differentiated responses
T he post-2015 development
agenda cannot be a zero-
sum game; benefits or gains to
widespread support (e.g.,
eradicating extreme poverty).
development trajectory by adopting
a more resource-efficient and less
polluting pathway, which avoids
one group or sector should not It is also important to recognize that future costs. Countries’ pathways
translate into losses for another.13 even countries that have achieved will depend on their reconciliation
Goals should be complementary certain goals are vulnerable to of short-term versus long-term
and consistent; no goal should reversal of such gains from future priorities.
be achieved at the expense of environmental, economic and
another goal. Universality can be social shocks. Responses can
defined in several ways: be differentiated through choice Some countries are able
to leapfrog the usual
(a) Issues that are of common of development pathways and
development trajectory
concern (e.g., the global according to national circumstances
commons, or the global and priorities. Some countries
financial system) that require are able to leapfrog the usual
common action;
(b) Issues that do not affect
countries and peoples in
the same way or to the same
degree, but require common
action to address them in a
globalized interdependent
world (e.g., food security,
the illicit trade in wildlife,
managing chemical waste,
unsustainable lifestyles or
regional dust storms);
(c) Issues that may not be
significant everywhere, but
are recognized as requiring
© Cris Kelly / Shutterstock 15
Targets and indicators
S olution-oriented targets
represent the best means of
capturing an integrated vision
The nature and scale of means
of implementation (e.g., finance,
policies and institutions) is
cross-sectoral collaboration.
Indicators could be direct or
proxy, and could be disaggregated
while at the same time being better assessed and committed to capture gender, equity, age,
actionable. For example, a target when targets and indicators are disability status and regional
on reducing poverty may not be as actionable.14 differentiation.
effective in fostering an integrated
approach to implementation as Capacities should be built for
a target on increasing access to new forms of measurement, such
green and decent unskilled jobs, as integrated indices, that can Targets and their associated
which aims to reduce poverty. become an incentive for greater indicators should be
scientifically credible
16 © auremar / Shutterstock
Evidence from integrated solutions
17
© CHEN WS / Shutterstock
Eradicating extreme poverty and inequality
and providing decent employment through an
inclusive green economy
A n overwhelming majority of Redefining poverty and security, natural capital, energy,
the 3 billion poorest people economic growth will provide and formal or informal means of
in the world live on smallholder the transformation required for production. Similarly, measures of
farms, around forests or in coastal sustainable development. When wealth and growth focus only on
area and depend on the productive national savings are adjusted for a few economic indices, whereas
capacity of nature (such as soil, the depletion of natural resources, recent indices, such as the
forests, fish, and water). they show a decline since the late Inclusive Wealth Index measure
1990s, almost to zero in 2008. a full range of assets such as
It is estimated that ecosystem The degradation of the productive manufactured, human and natural
services and other non-marketed assets of the poor, compounded capital.
environmental goods account by a lack of access to modern
for between 47 and 89 per cent sustainably built infrastructure, Public and private investments in
of the “GDP of the poor”. Current financing and markets, creates green and decent jobs will provide
policies and investment choices a poverty trap, which leads to the foundation for sustainability.17
have resulted in the degradation a reinforcing loop of further Redefining poverty and economic
of resources, extreme poverty for degradation and worsening growth would show the true state
some and inequality for others. poverty. of a nation’s wealth and the
sustainability of its growth.
Estimates show that 8 per cent of Redefining poverty and economic
the world’s population earns half growth would show the true state These include jobs related
the world’s income, and the richest of a nation’s wealth and the to nature-based activities,
85 people in the world own as sustainability of its growth.16 environmental technologies for
much as the poorest half of sanitation, energy, ecological
the world’s population.15 More Income-based poverty measures restoration and waste-recycling
than two thirds of the world’s are too narrow in focus. Poverty activities that provide good
people live in countries where is made of many other assets, working conditions, are
income disparities have risen including education and skills, meaningful and socially protected.
18 since 1980. health, sanitation, water, shelter, But it is also necessary to invest
Integrated
solutions
Left to right: Row 1: Vladislav Gajic / Shutterstock, somchai rakin / Shutterstock, Lisa F. Young / Shutterstock, biletskiy / Shutterstock; Row 2: Calvin Chan / Shutterstock,
tanewpix / Shutterstock, Denis Mironov / Shutterstock; Row 3: Zeljko Radojko / Shutterstock, Pati Photo / Shutterstock, Lasse Kristensen / Shutterstock, Valeriy Velikov /
Shutterstock; Row 4; Violetkaipa / Shutterstock, Moreno Soppelsa / Shutterstock, michaeljung / Shutterstock, Zeljko Radojko / Shutterstock 19
in improving the sustainability huge potential for reducing wastes training suitable for the rural and
of agriculture, fisheries, forestry and environmental impacts from urban job markets, reskilling
and animal husbandry so as to material-intensive processes and and retooling the workforce,
protect existing jobs, reduce hazardous chemicals. A severe and training teachers. Public-
rural-to-urban migration, and shortage of skills has, however, private partnerships could
protect the ecological foundation been evident in some fast-growing be encouraged to include
of our societies. Innovations in sectors such as renewable energy sustainability commitments
resource productivity, resource and energy efficiency. There is a and build necessary skills and
substitution, biomimicry and need for better defining education capacities.
green chemistry are generating a policies, strengthening vocational
A combination of nationally
appropriate green economy
Innovations will be measures at macro, meso and
needed, e.g. resource microeconomic levels (e.g.,
substitution, biomimicry and
macroeconomic reforms,
green chemistry
correcting misallocation of capital,
increasing trade opportunities
for the poor through appropriate
policy measures, use of economic
instruments, triple bottom line
reporting for corporations, use
of sustainability standards for
supply chains, investing in natural
capital, and use of sustainability
principles for other investments
and insurance) and social policy
tools (e.g., safety nets, access to
productive assets, to justice and
security, and investing in skill-
building, education, health and
other social sectors) offers a viable
pathway for reducing extreme
poverty, increasing inclusiveness
and addressing environmental and
20 © Shutterstock economic risks.
Sustainable water and energy services
© Curioso / Shutterstock 31
The rural-urban continuum, sustainable
cities and infrastructure
S trong urban-rural linkages for
regional infrastructure and
ecosystem services, smart and
low-carbon cities and balanced
territorial development will
ensure sustainable economic
growth. For the first time in
history more than half the world’s
population live in urban areas
and this is expected to rise to
nearly 70 per cent by 2050.33 The
majority of population growth
in cities is the result of natural
increase, rural-to-urban migration
and the reclassification of formerly
non-urban areas. Significant
Infrastructure choices made
future urban growth is expected © Alex Pix / Shutterstock
today will have critical
in developing countries, most implications for the future
notably in African and Asian infrastructure, and lack the world. sustainability of cities across
cities.34 Many cities are struggling capacity to manage the waste Slum the world
to secure basic resources such as generated by their industries and dwellers’ lack
food, energy and water needed residents. 35 of durable
to support current and future housing,
residents. Urban areas currently Furthermore, wealth and poverty secure tenure and access to
account for 60–80 per cent of are increasingly segregated in basic services – including
global energy consumption, 75 cities, especially in the spatial health services, adequate food,
per cent of carbon emissions, trap of slums. There are now education and employment
and more than 75 per cent of roughly one billion slum dwellers opportunities, decent transport,
the world’s natural resources. worldwide, including one third of credit and the rule of law – often
32 They have insufficient or aged the population of the developing further entrench them in poverty.36
The urban future could provide opportunities for a range of social migration to cities, with many of
inclusive, sustainable economic and cultural activities, and are the jobless ending up in slums.
growth, strengthened social critical for innovations in science, The improvement of slums is
cohesion and improved technology and education.38 not keeping up with this trend.
environmental outcomes. Well- Experience from countries across
planned, compact cities that Cities draw widely upon the all income levels suggests that
offer a mix of land uses, building resources – material, human strong urban-rural linkages,
typologies, transport and jobs and environmental – in their especially around economic
generally also offer higher levels hinterlands and offer much development, employment,
of well-being at lower rates of – employment, services, and regional infrastructure and
resource use and emissions.37 infrastructure – in return. Poverty ecosystem services, are important
Urban centres provide in rural areas is fuelling rapid to achieving sustainable
© auremar / Shutterstock
embracing the ideas of using opportunities to detect changes rooted largely in the use of causal
big data and near real‑time in the environment and human models and statistical sampling.
information that supports a populations. The trend towards Other fields of endeavour, such
transformation in societal using large data streams has as epidemiology and security,
behaviour. Massive increases always been present in the Earth’s have already begun to shift away
in the volume and speed of observation, and in climatology from the traditional statistical
data gathering are providing us and meteorology, but the approach of identifying causality
42 with unique and unparalleled analytical paradigm has remained in anticipating probable events
towards big-data approaches.
For example, by using vast data
gathering and search procedures
combined with fuzzy logic and
new algorithms, disease control
centres can anticipate the spread
of a flu virus in a matter of hours
rather than weeks.
© grafvision / Shutterstock
A new post-2015 development
agenda demands a new vision
and a responsive framework with
Innovative, affordable and
sustainable technologies
and integrated solutions that
will not be enough to solve
the multiple social, economic
and environmental challenges;
sustainable development at its generate green and decent instead, sustainable and inclusive
core. The “business as usual” jobs can achieve the objective growth must replace it.
scenario is not affordable, either of leaving no one behind. The
socially or environmentally, or, in needs of a growing population Solutions need an enabling
the long run, economically. The could be reconciled with a environment. Efforts therefore
integration of economic growth, resource base that is shrinking also need to focus on changing,
social protection and justice, and through inefficient and wasteful reforming and retooling
environmental stewardship should use if political commitment, governance structures at all
be at the core of the sustainable economic incentives, and social levels for greater integration,
development goals and the post- accountability are brought to transparency and accountability,
2015 development agenda. bear to leverage a shift towards and leveraging multiple
sustainable consumption and stakeholders into action.
Addressing issues in silos will production. Sustaining growth
not lead humankind along a
pathway towards sustainable
development. In order to fully
integrate the three dimensions
of sustainable development, the
interlinked problems need to
be understood and responses
developed that provide multiple
benefits across the three
dimensions. The discussion no
longer needs to focus on trade-
offs but on the most intelligent
choices in order to maximize
multiple benefits. The present
background paper provides a solid
evidence base to demonstrate that
integrated solutions do exist and
are being practised around the
46 world today. © Tukaram Karve / Shutterstock
Endnotes
1
High-level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda (2013). A new global
partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. Available from
[Link]/sg/management/pdf/HLP_P2015_Report.pdf.
2
UNEP Post-2015 Note No. 1, “Integrating the three dimensions of sustainable development: how to achieve
a balanced, ambitious and inclusive framework”, March 2014. Available from [Link]/post2015/
Publications/UNEPPost-2015Note1/tabid/133049/[Link].
3
For example, the joint UNEP and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) report, entitled Human Rights and the Environment, to the United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), available from [Link]/delc/Portals/119/
[Link].
4
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report, March 2014, chap. 13. Available from
[Link]
5
UNEP Post-2015 Note No. 2, “Sustainable consumption and production and the SDGs”, March 2014.
Available from [Link]/post2015/Publications/UNEPPost-2015Note2/tabid/133050/[Link].
6
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005): Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Island Press,
Washington, D.C.). Available from [Link]/maweb/documents/[Link].
7
The Environmental Food Crisis: The Environment’s Role in Averting Future Food Crises (UNEP rapid response
assessment, 2009). Available from [Link]/publications/rr/food-crisis.
8
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. Available from
[Link]/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/national-and-international-policy-making.
9
Schmidt, R., Mulligan, J., 2013. Demonstrations of the Business Case. In Gartner, T., J. Mulligan, R.
Schmidt, and J. Gunn, eds. 2013. Natural Infrastructure: Investing in Forested Landscapes for Source Water
Protection in the United States. World Resources Institute. Available from [Link]/publication/natural-
infrastructure.
10
General Assembly resolution 66/288, annex, para. 89.
11
Ibid., para. 246.
12
See United Nations Technical Support Team (TST) (2014), “Compendium of existing goals and targets under
the 19 focus areas being considered by the OWG SDG”. Available at: [Link]/post2015.
13
P. Caballero, P. Hazelwood and K. Van der Heijden, 2013, “Setting a new course: universality as an integral
part of the post‑2015 development agenda” (discussion note). 47
14
Embedding the Environment in Sustainable Devel1opment Goals, UNEP Post-2015 Discussion Paper
2013, No. 1 (version 2, 19 July 2013). Available from: [Link]/pdf/UNEP_Post_2015_Discussion_
Paper_1_%28Version2%[Link].
15
Working for the Few: Political Capture and Economic Inequality (Oxfam Briefing Paper No. 178, 2014).
16
Inclusive Wealth Report 2012: Measuring progress toward sustainability (UNU-IHDP and UNEP, 2012).
17
UNEP Post-2015 Note No. 4, “Green and decent jobs for poverty eradication”. Available from [Link].
org/post2015/Publications/UNEPPost-2015Note4/tabid/133133/[Link].
18
“Sanitation” (UN-Water factsheet). Available [Link]/fileadmin/user_upload/unwater_new/
docs/[Link].
19
World Energy Outlook 2012, International Energy Agency, (Paris, IEA/OECD, 2012), p. 282.
20
UNEP Post -2015 Note No. 3, “Human health and the environment”. Available from [Link]/
post2015/Publications/tabid/133031/[Link].
21
The Environmental Food Crisis: The Environment’s Role in Averting Future Food Crises (UNEP rapid response
assessment, 2009).
22
World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision, ESA E Working Paper No. 12-03. Available from
[Link]
23
Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth (UNEP, 2011). Available
from [Link]/resourcepanel/publications/decoupling/tabid/56048/[Link].
24
Avoiding Future Famines: Strengthening the Ecological Foundation of Food Security through Sustainable
Food Systems, a UNEP synthesis report (2012), available from [Link]/publications/ebooks/
avoidingfamines/portals/19/UNEP_Food_Security_Report.pdf; and United NationsTST Brief, “Food security
and nutrition”, available from [Link]/content/documents/1804tstissuesfood.
pdf.
25
Save Food: Global Initiative on Food Losses and Waste Reduction, FAO/UNEP 2014. Available from www.
[Link]/save-food/key-findings/en.
26
Ibid.
27
Pastoralism and the Green Economy, IUCN and UNEP (forthcoming).
28
See [Link]/newscentre/[Link]?DocumentID=2760&ArticleID=10692.
29
“Food loss, food waste”, UNEP Rapid Response Assessment (forthcoming).
30
Pastoralism and the Green Economy, IUCN and UNEP (forthcoming).
31
United Nations TST Brief, “Oceans”. Available from [Link]
documents/2311TST%20Issues%20Brief%20Oceans%20and%20Seas_FINAL.pdf.
48
32
10-year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production patterns, sustainable
public procurement programme. Available from [Link]/10yfp/Portals/50150/downloads/
Brochure_SPP%20Programme_10YFP.pdf.
33
An overview of urbanization, internal migration, population distribution and development” (UN/POP/
EGM‑URB/2008/01).
34
State of the World’s Cities: Bridging the Urban Divide (UN-Habitat, 2010).
35
City-Level Decoupling: Urban Resource Flows and the Governance of Infrastructure Transitions (UNEP, 2013)
(International Resource Panel report of the Working Group on Cities).
36
United Nations TST Brief, “Sustainable cities and human settlements”. Available from http://
[Link]/content/documents/2306TST%20Issues%20Brief%20Cities_FINAL.pdf.
37
Ibid.
38
Sustainable, Resource Efficient Cities: Making it Happen (UNEP, 2012). Available from http://
[Link]/content/documents/[Link].
39
“Question and answer on sustainable cities and human settlements in the SDGs”, UN-Habitat, 2014.
40
Kennedy, C. and J. Corfee-Morlot (2012), “Mobilizing investment in low carbon, climate resilient
infrastructure”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 46. Available from [Link]
org/10.1787/5k8zm3gxxmnq-en.
41
“Sand rarer than one thinks”, UNEP, 2014. UNEP Global Environmental Alert Service, March 2014. Available
from [Link]
42
See, for example, [Link] http://
[Link]/digital-agenda/living-online/smart-cities.
43
UNEP Post-2015 Note No. 5, “Environmental dimensions of resilient and peaceful societies”. Available from
[Link]
44
The International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) was launched at the Third High-level Forum on Aid
Effectiveness, held in Accra in 2008, and was specifically designed to support donors in meeting their
Accra commitments on transparency as set out in the Accra Agenda for Action. The Busan Partnership
for Effective Development Cooperation, adopted at the Fourth High-level Forum on Aid Effectiveness,
was released on 1 December 2011, and includes a specific reference to IATI, committing all those who
endorsed the Partnership to: “Implement a common, open standard for electronic publication of
timely, comprehensive and forward looking information on resources provided through development
cooperation, taking into account the statistical reporting of the OECD DAC and the complementary
efforts of the International Aid Transparency Initiative and others. This standard must meet the needs of
developing countries and non-state actors, consistent with national requirements”. Available from www.
[Link].
49