0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views23 pages

Rock Mass Classification Systems Explained

Uploaded by

Alfa Gusti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views23 pages

Rock Mass Classification Systems Explained

Uploaded by

Alfa Gusti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Rock Mass Classification

Background
• Rock mass strength classification is fraught
with difficulty.
– Anisotropic rock strength
– Varying porewater/groundwater conditions
– Influence of joint set orientations
– Joint spacing variation within rock mass
• Several classification systems have been
developed to help quantify rock mass
strength.
– We will utilize three this week.
Geomechanics Classification a.k.a.
Rock Mass Rating
• Developed by Bieniawski (1976, 1989)
– Originally developed for tunnels, later adapted for
slopes and foundations.
– Utilizes 6 parameters:
• Uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock material
• Rock Quality Designation (RQD)
• Spacing of discontinuities
• Condition of discontinuities
• Groundwater conditions
• Orientation of discontinuities
1) Intact Rock Strength

• Best: Actual Unconfined


Compressive Strength
(UCS) test results.

• Next Best: Point load


strength results.

• Next Best: Schmidt


Hammer UCS
estimation.

• Worst: 
2) and 3) RQD and Discontinuity Spacing

• Best: Actual RQD value


from core.

• Just as good: If no core


generated RQD value is
available, it can be
estimated using:
RQD = 115 – 3.3 Jv

Jv = number of joints per m

• Not much worse: From


discontinuity spacing 
4) Condition of Discontinuities
5) Groundwater Conditions

6) Orientation of Discontinuities
What does it all mean!
Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q
• Devised by Barton et al. (1974) based on
several underground excavation case
histories.

• Logarithmic scale, values vary from 0.001


to 1,000
Q continued…
• Uses six factors that make up three parameters:
Block Inter-block
shear Active
size Stress
strength
 RQD   J r   J w 
Q        
 J n   J a   SRF 

RQD = Rock Quality Designation


Jn = Joint set number
Jr = Joint roughness number
Ja = Joint alteration number
Jw = Joint water reduction factor
SRF = Stress reduction factor
RQD and Jn

 RQD 
 
 Jn 
Jr
 Jr 
 
 Ja 
Ja

 Jr 
 
 Ja 
Jw

 Jw 
 
 SRF 
SRF

 Jw 
 
 SRF 
Correlation between RMR and Q
• Most popular:

RMR  9 ln Q  44

  RMR  44 
 
Qe  9 
Geologic Strength Index (GSI)
• Introduced by Hoek in 1994.
– Much more qualitative than RMR or Q
– Values range from 0 - 100
– Serves as a number which when combined
with rock strength and other parameters can
provide insight into rock mass strength.
• Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion
GSI for
Homogeneous
Rock Masses
GSI for Heterogeneous Rock Masses
Clar Compass

You might also like