Hello, I spent many years thinking about something that had a

very simple solution. And I've made many videos about it, the
reconciliation of light and matter. Since Mother Nature is so
simple and she doesn't have a calculator and a slide rule, she's
just a simple chick with dreadlocks and muddy feet and hairy
armpits, right? Not complicated at all. What about the
reconciliation of light and magnetism?
Everything current science believes or understands about
magnetism is entirely wrong, and all of quantum, by their own
admission, is based upon their understanding of the nature of
light. That's what quantum is based upon, which of course is
atomism. Now when you're a hammer, everything is a nail.
When you're an atomist, everything is a particle. The notion of a
photon is completely arbitrary and nonsensical. That's not just
my premise, it's also the premise of Nikola Tesla, the great
masters of field theory. Steinmetz, Heaviside, , Eric Dollard.
Now let me quote Nikola Tesla for you who specifically said
that light can be nothing other than a sound wave in the ether.
Now, sound has a speed, but nobody emits sound. What we do is
we set up a disturbance in the air. When I speak or when I hear
the sound.
the sound occurs, we set up a perturbation. And that perturbation
has a rate of induction. Now the speed of sound, quote unquote,
changes depending on whether the air is very dense, whether it's
cold or whether it's hot. And also too, we can reconcile sound
and light vis-a-vis the Doppler effect of sound. It has the exact
same occurrence in light. We call that redshift and blueshift.
Now let's talk about a couple things here and explain light
really, really simply. So simple to Einstein himself said, if you
can't explain something so simply that a barmaid can understand
it, then you really don't understand it. Yes, I actually quoted
Einstein there. But he's right on that. Just as a broken clock, it
was right twice a day. So let's try to reconcile light and
magnetism very, very simply. Let's first take a look at this. And
this is a fact of science, and this is undeniable, that the smaller
the space is from my book,
the missing secrets of magnetism, which is a free download on
archive.org, by the way, it's in its third edition. The smaller the
space, the higher the capacitance. Now, I'm about to tell you
here in a few minutes that the reconciliation of light and matter,
of course, is divinely simple, just as I figured out the
reconciliation of light and matter was extremely simple, and of
course was right in front of my face all the time. Mother Nature
is a simple chick. You only have the conjugate geometry of the
magnetic and the dielectric, and that's like saying,
ice and water. It's like, well ice and water are the same thing,
aren't they? Yes, they are. Human beings love to pigeonhole
things. We see something different. Well, that's something
different. We need to call it something different. An advanced
alien race, if they were to land, they said, well, magnetism is not
something different from dielectricity. It's the exact same thing.
Magnetism is the dielectric field. Just as we could say, ice or
steam is the field modality of water. Of course, ice is not a, or
water is not a field, but we could use that analogously for a
mental image of aha, I underand that now. The smaller the space
the higher the capacitance. In other words when me move to red
light, towards ultraviolent, and of course eventually towardas x
rays and gamma rays, we have a smaller capacitance, a smaller
space. The higher the capacitance, the smaller the space. When
we move up in EV in actual power, of course theres gamma
rays. Gamma rays act exactly like atomic nuclei, that’s why they
destroy our DNA, that’s why gamma radiation is so dangerous.
Because its extremely close to what a nucleal particle would be,
its extremely, extremely tiny, as compared to red light or green
light, or yellow light. So when we increase the dialectric, we are
increasing the capacitance, cause dialectric is capacitance, and it
has a much smaller space, yes? And this girlfriend, yes, is the
reason why, and this is a really really powerful N50 gauss
neodymium iron boron. You see this huge black space at the
center, you see the actual outline of the physical magnet out
here. On a normal magnet like an n35 n42, 45 gauss, the
dialectric black center would be a third as big as this. People
say, and people have bought really powerful magnets, they say
why is the field so small. Its because when you increase the
capacitance, you decrease the spatial foorprint. Magnetism is the
dialectric field, they are not two different things. The conjugate
geometry of the entire universe, when you make a magnet more
powerful you are not making the magnetism more powerful,
well you kinda are in this very small perfipheral zone, what
youre doing is increasing the dielectric. Yeah? Ive kind of given
the analogy before, about the shower input in your bathtub, as
opposed to the drain, well imagine in the case of our magnet,
when you increase the outflow of the shower head pressure,
what youre also unwittingly doing, wshowers don’t work this
way but magnets do, what youre unwittingly doing is creating
this stronger and stronger vaccum suction at the bottom where
the water drains down. Showers don’t work like that, but our
magnets do work lke that. This is the reason very powerful
magnets have smaller spatial footprints of magnetic fields. Like
I said all of quantum is based on their conception of the nature
of light, im going to quote captain goofy. “Einstein” “We are
faced with a new kind of difficulty, we have two contradictory
pictures of reality, separately the particles and wave neither fully
explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.” Now
theres no such thing as a photon, this is an arbitrary concept.
There are no dualities in nature, as that implies an inherent
contradiction, and Mother Nature don't do contradictions.
Completely impossible, illogical, implausible, ridiculous,
absurd, nonsensical. And I've given this drop analogy. It's
particle versus wave because there's no such thing as a wave.
Let's just establish that right now. OK, let's repeat after me.
There is no such thing as a wave, yeah? There's no such thing as
a shadow either. Well sure there is. Everybody knows a shadow,
if I'm standing in shadow you feel cold.
shadow can have attributes when you stand in a shadow you feel
cold but a shadow is not a thing a shadow is a conceptual
reification and a philosophical fallacy it has no principality it is
a posterior attribute as a privation said of the absence of
something else a wave is not a thing a wave is what something
does there's no such thing as a wave and you can find wave in
the dictionary as a noun but of course a wave is not a principle
nor is it a thing so what is light
of course I've spoken endlessly about light on countless videos
and also too in my free book that I mention it's free that the light
is a coaxial circuit and it depends on how you look at it if we
look at the cross section of light we actually see electromagnetic
radiation and I use my little diagram from my book kind of
simple yes it's hand-drawn and kind of crude but I mean all
scientists on earth would agree with this we actually have this
transverse circuit we're looking actually at it from a slightly
cross section now what have we looked at it end on and we
compare that to magnetism because to speak simply about light
we could speak of it as now it's not propagating in the sense of
something moving but it is a like someone like I said up
someone in a pond flapping their arms creating waves or
disturbance in the water they're creating a perturbation in the
field or the medium that they're in the that they're in the middle
of of course we're talking about the ether here they're only ever
been too presumed of ultimate reality one has been atomism ie
materialism which is completely impossible and untenable
doesn't explain instantaneous action at a distance it doesn't
explain light speeding back up after it leaves glass or water
which of course would break the law of conservation of energy
therefore making atomism completely impossible EPR paradox
there's a thousand different things that make the notion of you
know the universe being particle based and that's not a denial of
nuclear particles and atoms in no way shape or form it's the
entire principle of atomism, its completely untenable and
impossible. So here we are looking at a cirtuit of light, we
actually have these pulse perterbations. But what is is, is like a
propagating bloom, not that light is technically propagating, its
manifesting and demanifesting, kind of like a wrinkle in the
fabric of the aether itself. A disturbance in the menium of the
water,m like the person flapping their arms in the preverbial
pool or pond. Okay, here we can take a look at it in a very
simple fashion, a disturbance in the water, here we take a look at
the resultant transverse phenomena, This is looking at its side
on. We'll take a look at Walter Russell's version of it straight on,
or head on. Now we could say, kind of drawing to a close here
in the conclusion, and we'll talk about this in a second, is that a
magnet is nothing other than a non-propagating physical bloom.
Yes? Now a magnet does have geomagnetic precession, and of
course magnetism follows this Lamor frequency s curve this
three dimensional force vector or the three dimensional s curve
necessitates this Magneto dielectric conjugate geometry around
the non propagating bloom if you will We see the particle in the
wave I think we all understand this when we drop something in
the water it creates this perturbation in the medium But also to
you know this particle rises up. Okay, so an actual particle itself
But we can call this a particle in a way, but there's no such
things as waves. We're talking about one in the same thing
There's not electromagnetic around light itself, and this photon
particle in the middle, that’s completely ridiculous, that is just
completely antithesis of occams razor and the simplicity of
nature, the magnetic and the dielectric and the so called
presumed, I have here P, the so called photon are one and the
same thing, because magnetism is the dielectric field, electricity
is phi times psi equals planck of electrification, in other words
electricity is the hybrid of magnetism and dielectricity. So we
are looking at ice water and steam when we are talking about the
coaxial circuit of light, to say that over here we have the
transverse induction of magnetism, and here 90 degrees we have
the transverse induction of electricity. And along that path is this
imaginary photon thing that we have going on here you know,
you have light it is an emission, it has a speed, and its emitting
photons, well its completely ridiculous. Human beings love to
reify and conceptualize. Even a child knows that ice water and
steam are just different temperature and pressure modalities of
water, are they not? Well,coaxial circuit IE light itself, are not
three different things,”well we have the magnetic, the electrical,
and along the path of propagation we have light! That’s
completely untenable, illogical and impossible and it’s a
complete contradiction to Occam’s razor, its totally totally
impossible its absurd we are an intellectually unevolved species
of hairless apes to even think such nonsense. light is one thing
and one thing only. It is a blooming propagating, in a sense a
propagating, not in the literal sense, since light is not moving.
Neither is sound an emission, will sound is a speed. When I
speak I emit sound. No, you don't emit sound. This is the reason
why Nikola Tesla said, light can be nothing other than a sound
wave in the ether. Well, sound is not an emission, it's a
disturbance or perturbation of nitrogen and oxygen, i.e. the air.
Light is nothing other than a sound wave in the ether exactly as
Nikola Tesla said, which is a disturbance and perturbation, a
coaxial circuit, in the ether. And this is all light is. This is what
human beings would consider to be a photon over here on the far
left. We have the dielectric bud, if you will, and we have this
blooming transverse circuit, and we have the bloom where the
petals would be the electrical and magnetic, which of course is
nothing other than the dielectric. We have the conjugate in
several geometry of the magnetic and the dielectric of the entire
universe. So what we have is a propagating, field perturbation of
the medium i.e. the ether just like a bloom or a flower. Now let's
take a look at Walter Russell's diagram and basically everything.
And what we're looking at, even though he doesn't say this
anywhere that I know of in this diagram, is that we're looking at
everything created from the one and we have the disappearance
into the one. Or the dielectric, i.e. the plane of inertia, i.e.
counter space, i.e. zero point energy. I don't care what you call
it. Mother Nature doesn't care what stupid
human beings call it. But we're looking at light end on. We
actually have this manifestation and demanifestation, and we
have the exact same thing in light. We're looking at it from a
different angle here. This is Walter Russell's view of it from
head on. If you're looking down the field perturbation, like
looking down the pointy end of a rod, if you will, as opposed to
looking at the side end of the rod of light. Of course, it's not a
rod, but we're looking at a different angle of the exact same
thing here in this diagram, which, of course, all modern science
agrees with, exept they think that these are three different things,
well light is composed of the magnetic and the dielectric
transverse with frequency and wavelength, and we have of
course photons along this path, just kind of like a, string of
pearls, which completely ludicrious, completely absurd, but
superficial observance would tell us that’s the case, but of
course that’s not the case. You know, what we have out here on
the waves of the drop opf water is not something different, and
waves are not things, waves don’t exist, they are a disturbance
of something else, wavs are not what things are, waves ar wwhat
things do. This drop is no different than the waves around it,
these are not three different things, we don’t have electrical and
magnetic and here we have a photon. No, its all the water, and
water is being disturbed, yes? The emission of light is the
release of energy, specifically as a coaxial cirtuit of emission.
Lets take a look at a, this is my ferrocell, one of my ferrocell
videos. We are looking at the exact same thing we see in walter
russels diagram, exact same thing, we are looking at this, except
here, yeah? This is a magnet, underneath the supercell, yes? You
think we are seeing anything different than walter russels
diagram? Well of course, we are absolutely not, we are looking
at the exact same thing. No difference whatsoever. We are
looking at a stationary bloom in the case of the magnet. The
magnet is a physical object which has an incommensurable field
geometry around it. But we're looking at the exact same thing
here. If we turn those drops and waves and the disturbance of
the water side on side and replicate them, we're looking at the
exact same thing here. Transverse-electrical magnetic and these
quote on quote drops are nothing other than dielectric
condensates, the so-called photon is nothing other than an
attributional side principle of the coaxial circuit of light itself,
these aren’t different things, they are once and the same thing.
Mother nature doesn’t create light, we got three components of
light, the electrical, and magnetic, which are transverse to this
propagating string of pearls or photons. Well its completely
ludicrious, this is the exact same reason why a powerful magnet
has a much smaller magnetic field, it’s the exact same reason
why, light as it becomes more powerful, has a smaller space and
therefore a higher capacitance, okay, it’s a conjugate inseperable
geometry, theres not magnetism over here, and dialectricity over
here, NO, theyre exactly one and the same thing, if we look at
the cross section of light, this is the cross section not at light, but
we are looking at light of course, we are looking at the side
image of a north pole and a south pole of a magnet, I can tell,
over here(to the right) is the south pole cause it’s a deeper
darker, no actually this is the north pole since its red shifted over
here, its blue shifted, even though its yellow, so looking at the
south pole on the right, it actually shifts light, just like red shift
and blue shift, just like the doppler effect of sound, we’re
looking at a cross section of light, exept in this case we are
looking at the magnet underneath a supercell. But right here
along this, you see this black line here, if I duplicate this image
about a thousand times, each little part right hre where the black
line is, would be where the dielectric condensate occurs, where
magnetism is not. That would be where scientists would call the
photon, but theres no such thing as a photon, its nothing other
than a dielectric condensate. The inverse of the manifestation
and the demanifestation of the magnetic and the dielectric,
which are the modalities of the dielectric itself. Right here is the
null point where magnetism doesn’t exist, you see this black line
here In the center? The plane of intertia, counterspace, zero
point energy, yes? This is exactly where scientists came up with
this notion of the photon. Where magnetic and dielectric are
demanifest, the dielectric condensate is manifest. For the
dielectric condensate, or so called photon is demanifest when we
have thr transverse electrical magnatic at set freqwuncy or
wavelength, and this coaxial circuit are not three things, its one
and the same thing. The reconciliation of light and magnetism is
as simple as the reconciliation of light and matter.
We're looking at nothing other than the simplex modalities of
one and the same thing, lacking of which in human
understanding and comprehension the simplicity, the absolute
irreducible divinity of how ungodly simple it is. Mother Nature
does not have a calculator. She only understands force and
motion, inertia and acceleration. She doesn't understand
anything other than pressure mediation. That's all Mother Nature
does understand is pressure mediation. That's it. She doesn't
understand anything other than that. Force and motion, inertia
and acceleration, capacitance, resistance, permeability,
permittivity. Mother Nature is simple. She's a dreadlocked
Hippy chick with muddy feet. She doesn’t do dualities, doesn’t
do photons, electricity, and magnetism. Its all a conjugate
geometry, like ice water and steam are the same thing. Stupid
PHD’s say, “well no we have a photon here, and we have the
electric over here, and the magnetic over here! That’s light! And
its moving at xyz speed and its propagating and it has, you
know, a duality, this is where Einstein came up with, its not my
idea, All of quantum is based upon by their own admission. This
notion of duality in nature. You know, we can't explain light
unless we come up with this duality because Mother Nature
doesn't deal in dualities where we have faced with no kind of
difficulty. Too contradictory. Not contradictory. The
contradiction is only in the mind of the fool, a la the materialists
and the atomists, who said, “we have two contradictory pictures
of reality”, mother nature is not contradictory, its comepletely
impossible and untenable, completely
This wave particle duality, yah yah yah.
Well no, light doesn’t have a speed, light isn’t moving, it’s a rate
of induction or hysteresis of the aether, its not a particle, its not a
wave, waves don’t even exist. Waves are not things at all, yeah?
Does anybody on this earth with half a brain think that the
waves around this water droplet are something different than the
water droplet. What are these waves? Are they a disturbance of
the water? We call a wave, yes? This particle wave, waves and
particle. Look what we have here, we have waves and particle.
The waves are just disturbances of the water. This is a different
type of disturbance than the droplet, lets make this really freally
simple, this water droplet is a type of disturbance, its water,
these waves around the droplet, are a different type of
disturbance, we can say the waves around this droplet are
magnetism, and we call this droplet the photon, we can call it the
dielectric, we can call it the manifestation of the plane of interia,
and of course all the power exists right here, most of it anyway
does. These are not two different things, they are one and the
same thing. Just like ice water and steam. Mother nature is that
simple, human beings are just that unintelligent. I hope you like
this video. I hope I made things really simple, because that's all
magnetism is. What is it? Magnetism is a human being.
a non-propagating bloom a la the magnet. And light is a, of
course it's not propagating the sense of moving, it's the actual
hysteresis or the rate of induction just like sound is, sound is a
disturbance. And the rate of induction we call the speed of
sound, but sound is not an emission at all, it's a setting up a
disturbance, like a person flapping their arms in the middle of
the water. That's all light is, is this propagating bloom and de-
bloom. Yes? This would be the dielectric or the so-called photon
over here,
the manifesting transverse electrical magnetic which would be
of course analogous to the petals of the bloom. So you have this
opening, closing, opening, closing, de-manifestation. Now who
would think that these petals are different than different than the
bloom? Yeah? The current science says, well these petals are
something different than the bloom. Over here we have the
photon, but over here we have the electrical lens and magnetic.
No, it's all the bloom. You goofy, goofy, unintelligent, you
know, troglodytic neophytes.
It's good to use big words like that. Asailing unintelligent belief
systems. And that's what current science and atomism relativity
is. It's not facts, logic, or follows Occam's razor. It doesn't
follow simplicity. Mother Nature has no dualities. It's just that
simple. Anyway, I hope you liked this video. I hope I didn't talk
too long, and have a lovely day.