Assignment #2
Assignment #2
sciences
Article
Geo-Accumulation Index of Manganese in Soils Due to Flooding
in Boac and Mogpog Rivers, Marinduque, Philippines with
Mining Disaster Exposure
Cris Edward F. Monjardin 1,2,3,4 , Delia B. Senoro 1,2,3,4, * , Jeffersen James M. Magbanlac 3 ,
Kevin Lawrence M. de Jesus 1,3,4 , Carlito B. Tabelin 5 and Pablito M. Natal 3,6
Abstract: This paper presents the effects of flooding on the accumulation of manganese (Mn) in soils
within proximity of the Boac and Mogpog rivers in Marinduque of The Philippines. Marinduque,
Citation: Monjardin, C.E.F.; Senoro, an island province in the Philippines, experienced two catastrophic tailings storage facility (TSF)
D.B.; Magbanlac, J.J.M.; de Jesus, failures in the 1990s that released sulfide-rich tailings into the two major rivers. The Philippines
K.L.M.; Tabelin, C.B.; Natal, P.M. experiences 21–23 typhoons every year, 11 of which pass thru Marinduque that causing inundation
Geo-Accumulation Index of of floodplain areas in the province. A flood hazard map developed using LiDAR DEM was utilized
Manganese in Soils Due to Flooding for the Boac and Mogpog rivers for an accurate representation of flooding events. A portable X-ray
in Boac and Mogpog Rivers, fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF) and a Hannah multi-parameter device were used for the on-site
Marinduque, Philippines with
analyses of Mn concentration and water physico-chemical properties, respectively. Spatial grid
Mining Disaster Exposure. Appl. Sci.
mapping with zonal statistics was employed for a comprehensive analysis of all the data collected
2022, 12, 3527. [Link]
and processed. Correlation analysis was carried out on Mn concentrations in soil and surface water,
10.3390/app12073527
electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, temperature, curve number (CN), and
Academic Editors: Mariagrazia flood heights. The curve number indicates the runoff response characteristic of the Mogpog-Boac
D. Emilio and Maria Ragosta River basin. The results show that 40% of the total floodplain area of Boac and Mogpog were
Received: 22 February 2022 subjected to high hazards with flood heights above 1.5 m. The Mn content of soils had a statistically
Accepted: 26 March 2022 significant moderate positive correlation with flood height (r = 0.458) and a moderate negative
Published: 30 March 2022 correlation with pH (r = −0.438). This condition suggested that more extensive flooding promotes Mn
contamination of floodplain soils in the two rivers, the source of which includes the mobilization of
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
Mn-bearing silt, sediments, and mine drainage from the abandoned mine pits and TSFs. There is also a
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
strong negative correlation between pH and Mn concentrations in surface water, a relationship attributed
iations. to the solubilization of Mn-bearing precipitates based on geochemical modeling results. Using Muller’s
geo-accumulation index, 77.5% of the total floodplain of the two rivers was identified as “moderately
contaminated” with an average Mn soil content of 3.4% by weight (34,000 mg/kg). The Mn contamination
map of floodplain soils in the Mogpog and Boac rivers described in this study could guide relevant regional,
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. national, and local government agencies in planning appropriate intervention, mitigation, remediation,
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
and rehabilitation strategies to limit human exposure to highly contaminated areas.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
Keywords: flood; heavy metal geo-accumulation; manganese contamination; spatial grid; zonal
conditions of the Creative Commons
statistics; mining disaster
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
[Link]/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1. Introduction
The Philippines is located within the pacific ring of fire, where earthquakes, vol-
canic eruptions, and typhoons occur frequently. Agence France-Presse [1] listed ten of
the deadliest natural disasters in the country, and 5 of them were typhoon and flood-
related. According to Tropical Cyclone Information, the country is struck by an average of
20 typhoons annually, 70% of which occur from July to October [2]. The Philippine Statistics
Authority [3] released a more comprehensive record of all the major disasters in the country
from 2010 to 2019, and the results showed flooding as the most frequently experienced
disaster at 387 occurrences that induced tremendous economic losses. Data and records
proved how flood-prone the country is, and this trend is expected to worsen in the future
considering the effects of climate change [4].
Marinduque is one of the most beautiful islands in the country, located in Region IV-B
of Luzon. The province’s total land area is 952.58 square kilometers and has a total popula-
tion of 239,207 as of 2020 [5]. The island is also often visited by typhoons, as presented in
Figure 1a. Figure 1b shows that many typhoons passed the province, particularly in May,
September, and December, suggesting that these are the months when typhoon-induced
flooding events are most likely to occur in the area.
Figure 1. Typhoon Occurrences in Marinduque Province (a) Typhoon Tracks and (b) Number of
typhoons that visited the island per month from 1948 to 2017.
Last 2014, Marinduque experienced one of the strongest typhoons to hit the island,
which caused the three major rivers on the island, the Sta Cruz, Boac, and Mogpog rivers,
to overflow. The maximum flood height in Boac was 2.52 m during typhoon Glenda last
July 2014 [6]. Another typhoon event was experienced in 2020, swelling the same rivers [7]
due to intense rainfall. With these frequent and disastrous flooding events in the area, a
government project entitled Phil-Lidar 1 created hazard maps to identify flood-prone areas
and predict how extensive flooding would be regarding different rainfall return periods.
The Boac and Mogpog rivers have a watershed area of 214 km2 and 58 km2 , respectively.
About 36.1% of the municipality of Boac, and 18.4% Mogpog, are prone to flooding [6].
Another dilemma of the people in the area is the contamination of surface water and
soils by hazardous heavy metals from the abandoned open mine pits and tailings storage
facilities (TSFs) located upstream of the two rivers. Marinduque province is home to the
porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposit, a 372-million-ton orebody containing 0.55%
copper, 0.004% molybdenum, 0.11 g/t gold, and 0.7 g/t silver [8]. Major mining activities
commenced in 1969 and ran smoothly until 1997. The mining operation stopped after
two mining incidents that occurred in 1993 and 1996. In December 1993, the company’s
Maguilaguila TSF embankment collapsed and flooded the town of Mogpog [9]. Because of
this incident, twenty-one barangays in Mogpog were buried in tailings and toxic floodwater.
The second disaster, one of the worst mining and environmental disasters in the Philippines,
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 3 of 22
occurred on 24 March 1996 when the concrete drainage tunnel “plug” of the Tapian pit
gave way, releasing more than 1.6 million cubic meters of toxic mine tailings into the Boac
River [10]. The Tapian pit is a decommissioned open pit, which was repurposed by the
company as an in-pit TSF from 1989 for their San Antonio mine site.
These two mining disasters contaminated the two rivers and their surrounding en-
vironments with heavy metals via two pathways: (1) release and dispersion of sulfide
minerals like pyrite (FeS2 ), chalcopyrite (CuFeS2 ), galena (PbS), and sphalerite (ZnS) found
in the tailings; and (2) formation mine drainage contaminated with heavy metals in the
abandoned mine sites. Acid mine drainage (AMD) is formed when sulfide-rich minerals in
the TSFs, waste rock dumps, and open-pits are exposed to the atmosphere with a sufficient
amount of oxygen and water [11–13]. David and coworkers [14–16], for example, reported
that the elevated heavy metals concentrations of the Boac and Mogpog rivers could be
attributed to mine drainage from the abandoned Maguilaguila TSF located upstream of
both rivers. More recently, a previous study of the authors [17] detected eight heavy metals
such as chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn),
nickel (Ni), and copper (Cu) exceeding the allowable environmental limits for soils. Among
them, Mn had the highest measured concentration at 68,620 mg/kg, a 65-fold increase from
1998 measurements (~1060 mg/kg) [14,17].
Manganese is naturally occurring in soils and is necessary for the normal nutrition
and development of plants. At high concentrations, however, it is toxic to plants and
humans [18,19]. Excessive Mn exposure of humans causes damage to the central ner-
vous system exhibiting similar symptoms as lead (Pb) poisoning [20,21]. Manganese is
also a problematic contaminant because of its high solubility, similar to Cu and Zn in
the pH range of surface and ground waters (i.e., pH 6–9) [22], which makes it highly
bioavailable. Bio-accumulation of Mn in food crops, for example, has been reported in
Marinduque with rice samples harvested in Boac and Mogpog containing around 16.0 and
7.12 mg/kg of Mn [23]. Previous studies have also reported elevated Mn concentrations in
the island not only in sediments [13] and soils [16] but also in crustaceans and tilapia [24],
string beans, sweet potatoes, eggplant, and bitter melon [25], and corals [14]. United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) stated that humans could only consume
0.14 mg/kg-day of Mn to avoid toxicity. Environmental challenges related to Mn contam-
ination will also become critical due to the clean energy transition and decarbonization
because Mn, together with lithium and cobalt, is an essential metal used in rechargeable
batteries essential to renewable energy systems and clean storage technologies [26].
Previous studies have shown that flooding is a major contributor to the increase
of heavy metals content in soils [27–30]. Han et al. [27] reported higher Mn levels in
the floodplain after a major flooding event caused by Hurricane Harvey. In Poland,
Ciesielczuk et al. [28] noted that river flooding events facilitated the migration of heavy
metals from sewage treatment plants, landfill leachates, and industrial areas into arable
soils. In areas with historic mining operations, soil contamination is exacerbated during
flooding events because of overflows from upstream mining areas [29]. Ponting et al. [30]
recently reviewed how flooding affects the mobility of heavy metals in floodplain soils and
noted five key parameters: (i) soil redox potential, (ii) pH, (iii) dissolved organic matter
(DOM), (iv) Fe and Mn hydroxides, and (v) sulfate and metal sulfides. Another factor
promoting heavy metal accumulation in soils in flooded areas is the soil infiltration capacity.
Antoniadis et al. [31] demonstrated the significant relationship between the permeability
of the soil and heavy metal accumulation by developing a centrifuge infiltration setup
to quantify metal mobility in soils. Also, the curve number was the parameter used in
the study to represent permeability. This is a dimensionless number that indicates runoff
response on land-based soil type and land use. These previous studies suggest that the
accumulation of Mn in the soils near the Boac and Mogpog rivers is likely promoted by
frequent typhoon-induced flooding events.
One way to determine the extent of soil contamination is to calculate pollution indices
by comparing heavy metal contents of the study area to a reference or “background” site.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 4 of 22
Figure 2. A map of the Philippines and Marinduque superimposed with surface water and floodplain
soil sampling locations and location of Boac (red) and Mogpog (blue) rivers.
2.2. Sampling, Collection, and Storage of Surface Water and Soil Samples
Two media types were collected in the study: (i) surface waters, and (ii) soils. Samples
were collected across the island, but mostly from the Boac and Mogpog rivers. Data
collection was conducted in October when frequent flooding events occur [3]. Surface
water was collected using plastic bottles following the operating protocol developed by
USEPA No. SESDPROC-201-R4 [43]. Similarly, soil samples were collected based on USEPA
No. LSASDPROC-300-R4 and stored in plastic bags [44]. Physicochemical properties of
water samples like pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and total dissolved solutes (TDS) were
measured on-site using a HANNA Multiparameter device.
Soil and surface water samples were collected in 21 and 20 sampling points, respec-
tively. The sampling locations are illustrated in Figure 2 and were selected based on the
simulated flood hazard maps of the two rivers.
maps were produced at different return periods regarding rainfall intensities that passed
through the area historically.
CP = a wi Ci (1)
}
i=1
1
di
wi = N
(2)
o
{
1
a di
}
i=1
where CP denotes the unknown concentration data, Ci signifies the known data, N is
the number of sampling stations, wi is the weighting of individual stations, and di is the
distance from every station to the unknown point.
The flood hazard map used in this study was developed by Phil-Lidar 1 using Lidar
technology to accurately derive elevation data and define the floodplain terrain of the area.
Flood depths identified by the hazard map were then used to identify whether these events,
specifically flood heights, affect or stimulate Mn accumulation in soils near the two rivers.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 7 of 22
where Cn is the measured concentration of the element in the environment and Bn is the
geochemical background value in soil.
Shown in Figure 3 is the research diagram of the study. The data sampling was carried
out first, followed by testing its properties using the HANNA multi-parameter and XRF
scanner. Measured data then underwent interpolation to create spatial maps using the
IDW method. These spatial maps combined with other geospatial data such as CN. Flood
hazard maps were processed and then subjected to correlation analysis to determine the
degree of relationship of the identified parameters with the continuous elevation of Mn
concentration in soil. Geo-accumulation index was also computed to determine the level of
contamination in the area by comparing the current concentration with the background
concentration of Mn in the area.
the IDW method. These spatial maps combined with other geospatial data such as CN.
Flood hazard maps were processed and then subjected to correlation analysis to deter-
mine the degree of relationship of the identified parameters with the continuous elevation
of Mn concentration in soil. Geo-accumulation index was also computed to determine the
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 level of contamination in the area by comparing the current concentration with the8 ofback-
22
ground concentration of Mn in the area.
Contamination
Level 𝐼
Figure 3. Research
Figure Diagram.
3. Research Diagram.
3. Results
3. Results
3.1. Flood Hazard Map
3.1. Flood Hazard Map
The LiDAR DEM used in the flood hazard map has an accuracy of 1 × 1 m pixel size,
a verticalThe LiDAR
of ± 15 cm,DEM usedbased
and was in theonflood
5, 50,hazard
and 100 map hasreturn
years an accuracy
periods.ofA1 higher
× 1 m pixel size,
return
vertical of 15 cm,
period denotes a higher intensity of rainfall but has a low likelihood of happening [Link]-
a and was based on 5, 50, and 100 years return periods. A higher
turnstudy,
In this perioda denotes a higher
5-year return intensity
period of rainfall
was selected but hasthis
because a low
kindlikelihood
of event ofhashappening
a 20%
annually. In this study, a 5-year return period was selected because
probability of happening annually [62]. Shown in Figure 4 are areas colored yellow, this kind oforange,
event has
andared
20%that
probability
illustrateof happening
low, moderate, annually
and high [62]. Shownhazards,
flooding in Figure 4 are areasAreas
respectively. colored yellow,
within
loworange,
hazardand red
areas that illustrate
experienced low,height
a flood moderate,of upand high
to 0.5 m,flooding
while thosehazards,
in therespectively.
medium
Areas within low hazard areas experienced a flood height of up to
hazard category were flooded between 0.5 and 1.5 m. High hazard areas experienced flood 0.5 m, while those in
heights greater than 1.5 m. These flood hazard classifications were based on the capability
of people to mobilize for evacuation in scenarios with those flood heights.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 9 of 22
Figure 4. The flood hazard map of Boac and Mogpog rivers using LiDAR DEM.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 6. Cont.
Appl.
Appl. Sci.
Sci. 2022,
2022, 12,3527
12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 11
of of
21 22
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
Figure 6. Spatial Grid map of (a) pH SW, (b) EC SW, (c) TDS SW, (d) Temperature SW, (e) Curve
Figure 6. Spatial Grid map of (a) pH SW, (b) EC SW, (c) TDS SW, (d) Temperature SW, (e) Curve
Number, (f) Flood hazard map, (g) Mn concentration in SW and (h) Mn content of soils with a 500
Number, (f) Flood hazard map, (g) Mn concentration in SW and (h) Mn content of soils with a 500 m
m grid size.
grid size.
[Link]
3.4. Physicochemical Properties
Properties of
of Surface
Surface Water
Water
Table 1 summarizes the physico-chemical properties
Table 1 summarizes the physico-chemical properties of surface
of surface water
water collected
collected instudy.
in the the
study.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of surface water.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of surface water.
PNSDW 2017
PNSDW 2017 WHO
Parameter Max Min Mean SD Guideline WHO
Parameter Max Min Mean SD Guideline Guidelines
Value Guidelines
Value
Temperature 34.5 27.4 31.2 0.972 n/a n/a
pH 8.05 Temperature
5.70 34.5 27.4
7.20 31.2 0.364
0.972 n/a
6.5–8.5 n/a
6.5–9.2
EC (µS/cm) 2430 pH 424 8.05 5.70
763 7.20 187.780
0.364 6.5–8.5
n/a 6.5–9.2
1500
TDS (mg/L) 1360 EC (μS/cm)
216 2430 424
390 763 112.526
187.780 n/a
600 1500
1200
TDS (mg/L) 1360 216 390 112.526 600 1200
All surface water collected in the study was tested using the HANNA multi-parameter
All surface
to gather water collected
physicochemical in the study
properties wasas
of water tested using the
this affects HANNA
heavy metalmulti-param-
concentration
eter to gather physicochemical properties of water as this affects
in it [56]. These parameters could aid in the analysis to identify how Mn heavy metal concentra-in
concentration
tion in it [56]. These parameters could aid
surface water and soils accumulates with time. in the analysis to identify how Mn concentration
in surface
Thesewater and soils accumulates
physicochemical propertieswith
were time.
compared with the available guidelines set
by Philippine National Standards for drinking water (PNSDW) and the World Health
Organization (WHO). The pH of the surface water ranged from 5.7 to 8.05 with an average
of 7.2, which is within the PNSDW and WHO guidelines, but the results show some
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 12 of 22
areas in the study with acidic pH values. Figure 6a shows the spatial distribution of pH
in surface water in the study area. Most of the regions in Mogpog have acidic surface
waters, especially near the abandoned mine pit and TSFs. Meanwhile, the highest EC
measured in the area was 2430 µS/cm while the minimum was 763 µS/cm with an average
of 424 µS/cm. Electric Conductivity was correlated to the salt content of water as the
water salinity hazard is measured using this parameter. Although the average EC was
less than the WHO guidelines, some locations in the river have high EC even though they
are far from the shore (Figure 6b). These high EC samples were concentrated close to the
abandoned pit and TSFs, suggesting that the higher EC values could be attributed to mine
drainage. The highest value of TDS, a measure of inorganic salts present in solution, was
1356 mg/L which exceeds the WHO guidelines. The lowest TDS was 216 mg/L with an
average value over the whole area of 390 mg/L, which is less than the environmental limit
(Figure 6c). The TDS was also highest in the areas where EC is highest, showing the direct
relationship between these two parameters. Lastly, the temperature doesn’t have any limits
identified by NSDW and WHO. The highest surface water temperature in the area was
34.5 ◦ C, while the lowest was 27.4 ◦ C, with a mean of 31.2 ◦ C (Figure 6d).
Table 2. Correlation analysis of EC, TDS, pH, and Temp. of SW, Mn in SW, CN, flood height with Mn
content of soils.
Table 2 presents the correlation matrix plot of each parameter with one another. Physic-
ochemical properties of water show the following correlation with the Mn concentration in
surface water: EC (r = 0.258), TDS (r = 0.231), pH (r = −0.704) and Temp (r = −0.073). Fur-
ther, Mn concentration in soils was inversely proportional with pH (r = −0.438) and Temp.
(r = −0.3). On the other hand, this parameter was positively correlated with EC (r = 0.196),
TDS (r = 0.186), Mn in SW (r = 0.381), CN (r = 0.142) and flood heights (r = 0.458). Based
on the statistical analysis, there is a significant and moderate positive correlation between
flood heights and the Mn content of soils. In contrast, a significant and moderate negative
correlation was observed between pH and Mn content of soils. There is also a significant and
strong negative correlation between pH and Mn concentration in surface water.
4. Discussion
Based on the results, using geographical information system and data sampling on-site
provided a deeper understanding of how flooding events affect the accumulation of Mn in
soils near the two rivers. The degree of Mn contamination in floodplain soils at the two
rivers was also measured and mapped using Igeo, and areas with the highest contamination
indices were identified. In areas with heavy Mn contamination, the Mn concentration in
floodplain soils reached 5.9% by weight (~59,000 mg/kg), an amount higher than that found
naturally in soils (40–900 mg/kg) [69] and exceeds permissible limits for agricultural use [70].
These maps could guide relevant national and local government agencies in plan-
ning appropriate mitigation and rehabilitation plans to limit human exposure to highly
contaminated areas along the Mogpog and Boac rivers.
A moderate positive correlation was observed between flood height and Mn content
of soils, suggesting that more extensive flooding promotes Mn contamination of floodplain
soils in the two rivers. The most likely explanation for this correlation is the mobilization of
Mn-bearing silt and sediments from the abandoned mine pits and TSFs and their transport
and re-deposition in downstream areas during flooding events. This is also consistent
with the moderate negative correlation between pH and Mn content in soils; that is, Mn
contamination originated from geologic materials with more acidic pH, like those found in
the abandoned mine pits and TSFs (Figure 6).
The most likely carriers of Mn during these flooding events are Fe-oxyhydroxides,
which are not only more stable than Mn-oxides (Figure 8) but also more abundant in
the soils. These deductions are consistent with the moderate correlation between Fe and
Mn in floodplain soils (r = 0.542) and are supported by the Mn geo-accumulation map
shown in Figure 7. Fe-oxyhydroxides like ferrihydrite can sequester Mn from solutions via
co-precipitation and adsorption reactions, both of which are well-known processes in envi-
ronmental studies [71]. It is also interesting to note the strong negative correlation between
pH and Mn concentration in surface water, a relationship attributed to the redissolution
of Mn-bearing minerals in soils like Mn(OH)3 and Hausmannite under acidic conditions,
as explained in Figure 8b. Curve number, on the other hand, is a dimensionless number
directly correlated to the permeability of the soil that pertains to its capability to absorb
water from the surface. In the case of the Boac and Mogpog rivers, where surface water
carries Mn, this plays a vital role in how the concentration of this element increases in
soil. Frequent flooding in the area provides a course for Mn to enter the soil and increase
its concentration to a point above permissible limits and background concentration. An
increase of concentration above its background concentration then promotes an increase in
the geoaccumulation level, which is what has happened in the Boac and Mogpog rivers
over time. There are some areas, such as the USA, where a community does not frequently
experience flooding, but after one major flooding event, a significant increase of heavy
metal concentration was observed in their area [27].
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 15 of 22
Figure 8. (a) Log activity–pH diagram of Fe-H2 O System created using the Geochemist’s Workbench®
in equilibrium with atmospheric O2 (Fugacity = 0.2), and (b) Log activity–pH diagram of Mn-H2 O sys-
tem created using the Geochemist’s Workbench® in equilibrium with atmospheric O2 (Fugacity = 0.2).
The dotted and dashed lines represent the maximum and minimum values measured for Mn concentra-
tions and pH in surface water on-site, respectively.
5. Conclusions
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of flooding on the accumu-
lation of Mn in the floodplain soils of the Boac and Mogpog rivers. The Inverse Distance
Weighting method was used as an interpolation technique to aid in the spatial analysis of
the area. Mn concentration in surface water ranged from 0.004–3.33 mg/L with an average
of 0.273 mg/L. The average Mn concentration of surface water in the area is still within the
standards (0.4 mg/L). However, some surface water samples recorded Mn concentration
beyond the reference guideline limits of the USEPA and the International Labour Organiza-
tion. Mn concentration in soil ranged from 8584–59,206 mg/kg, above the WHO allowable
limit of 4000 mg/kg.
Marinduque, like other areas in the Luzon Island and other parts of the country,
experiences extreme typhoon events that cause floods in the area, especially in the Boac
and Mogpog rivers. We discovered that 40% of the total area considered in the study is
subject to high hazards, experiencing flood heights of above 1.5 m based on the available
Lidar data.
Correlation analysis and geochemical modeling identified flood height to have a
moderate positive correlation with Mn accumulation in the soil, while pH had a moderate
negative correlation. This indicates that flooding carries more Mn-bearing materials from
the abandoned mine pit and TSFs to floodplains downstream. The correlation result of
pH emphasized the effect of acidic mine drainage from the abandoned mine site. These
contribute to higher geo-accumulation of Mn with time. Finally, a strong positive-negative
correlation between pH and Mn concentrations in surface water, a relationship to be
expected because Mn-bearing precipitates like Mn(OH)3 and Hausmannite become more
soluble under acidic conditions.
Contamination levels of Mn in floodplain soils of the two rivers were identified us-
ing Muller’s geo-accumulation index. The abandoned open pit and TSFs for the last
two decades have moderately contaminated 77.5% of the total area (1 < Igeo ≤ 2) while
those close to the abandoned open pit and TSFs were moderately to heavily contaminated
(2 < Igeo ≤ 3). These results suggest that intervention, remediation, and rehabilitation
strategies should be carried out by the national and local governments immediately, espe-
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 16 of 22
cially around the abandoned mine pit and TSF. This could limit the further spread of heavy
metal contaminants downstream of the Mogpog and Boac rivers.
Appendix A
Figure A1. Setup of heavy metal testing of surface water and soil using the portable XRF. (a) is the
portable XRF, (b) water samples, and (c) soil samples.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 17 of 22
FigureA6.
Figure A6. Spatial
Spatial mapmap forconcentration
for Mn Mn concentration
in Surfacein Surface
Water. Water.
References
1. Agence France-Presse. The Deadliest Natural Disasters in the Philippines. Available online: [Link]
89/the-deadliest-natural-disasters-in-the-philippines (accessed on 11 January 2022).
2. PAGASA. Tropical Cyclone Information. 2022. Available online: [Link]
information (accessed on 11 January 2022).
3. PSA. Damages Due to Natural Extreme Events and Disasters. 2022. Available online: [Link]
natural-extreme-events-and-disasters-amounted-php-463-billion (accessed on 11 January 2022).
4. Monjardin, C.E.; Cabundocan, C.; Ignacio, C.; Tesnado, C.J. Impact of climate change on the frequency and severity of floods
in the Pasig-Marikina river basin. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Water Resource and Environmental
Engineering (ICWREE2019), Singapore, 22–23 August 2019; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2019; Volume 117, p. 00005.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 20 of 22
30. Ponting, J.; Kelly, T.J.; Verhoef, A.; Watts, M.J.; Sizmur, T. The impact of increased flooding occurrence on the mobility of potentially
toxic elements in floodplain soil–A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142040. [CrossRef]
31. Antoniadis, V.; McKinley, J.D. Measuring heavy metal migration rates in a low-permeability soil. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2003, 1,
103–106. [CrossRef]
32. Tabelin, C.B.; Silwamba, M.; Paglinawan, F.C.; Mondejar, A.J.S.; Duc, H.G.; Resabal, V.J.; Opiso, E.M.; Igarashi, T.; Tomiyama, S.;
Ito, M.; et al. Solid-phase partitioning and release-retention mechanisms of copper, lead, zinc and arsenic in soils impacted by
artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) activities. Chemosphere 2020, 260, 127574. [CrossRef]
33. Muller, G. Schwermetalle in den sediments des Rheins-Veran-derngen seitt. Umschan 1979, 79, 778–783.
34. Liu, Z.; Meng, R.; Hong, Q.; Yan, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, T. Evaluation of heavy metals pollution in surface sediments using
an improved geo-accumulation index method. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2019, 38, 2157–2164.
35. Kyszczarz, S.; Blonska, E.; Lasota, J. The application of the geo-accumulation index and geostatistical methods to the assessment
of forest soil contamination with heavy metals in the Babia Góra National Park (Poland). Arch. Environ. Prot. 2020, 46, 69–79.
36. Liu, L.; Li, W.; Song, W.; Guo, M. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci.
Total Environ. 2018, 633, 206–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Yang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Wu, H.; Lin, A.; He, L. Using principal components analysis and IDW interpolation to deter-mine
spatial and temporal changes of surface water quality of Xin’anjiang River in Huangshan, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
2020, 17, 2942. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Ma, H.H.; Yu, T.; Yang, Z.F.; Hou, Q.Y.; Zeng, Q.L.; Wang, R. Spatial interpolation methods and pollution assessment of heavy
metals of soil in typical areas. Huan Jing Ke Xue Huanjing Kexue 2018, 39, 4684–4693. [PubMed]
39. Chen, T.; Chang, Q.; Liu, J.; Clevers, J.G.P.W.; Kooistra, L. Identification of soil heavy metal sources and improvement in spatial
mapping based on soil spectral information: A case study in northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565, 155–164. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
40. Ma, Z.; Chen, K.; Li, Z.; Bi, J.; Huang, L. Heavy metals in soils and road dusts in the mining areas of Western Suzhou, China: A
preliminary identification of contaminated sites. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 204–214. [CrossRef]
41. Salvacion, A.R. Mapping land limitations for agricultural land use planning using fuzzy logic approach: A case study for
Marinduque Island, Philippines. GeoJournal 2021, 86, 915–925. [CrossRef]
42. Miningwatch in the News. Available online: [Link]
wait-justice (accessed on 15 January 2022).
43. Surface Water Sampling Operating Procedure by US EPA. Available online: [Link]
documents/surface_water_sampling201_af.[Link] (accessed on 15 January 2022).
44. Soil Sampling Operating Procedure by US EPA. Available online: [Link]
[Link] (accessed on 15 January 2022).
45. Nkwunonwo, U.C.; Whitworth, M.; Baily, B. A review of the current status of flood modelling for urban flood risk management
in the developing countries. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00269. [CrossRef]
46. Yan, K.; Di Baldassarre, G.; Solomatine, D.P.; Schumann, G.J.P. A review of low-cost space-borne data for flood modelling:
Topography, flood extent and water level. Hydrol. Process. 2015, 29, 3368–3387. [CrossRef]
47. Monjardin, C.E.F.; Transfiguracion, K.M.; Mangunay, J.P.J.; Paguia, K.M.; Uy, F.A.A.; Tan, F.J. Determination of river water level
triggering flood in Manghinao River in Bauan, Batangas, Philippines. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 18, 181–192.
48. Carter, J.; Schmid, K.; Waters, K.; Betzhold, L.; Hadley, B.; Mataosky, R.; Halleran, J. An Introduction to LiDAR Technology, Data, and
Applications; NOAA Coastal Services Center: Charleston, SC, USA, 2012; Volume 2.
49. Reutebuch, S.E.; McGaughey, R.J.; Andersen, H.E.; Carson, W.W. Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer
forest canopy. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 29, 527–535. [CrossRef]
50. Melquiades, F.L.; Appoloni, C. Application of XRF and field portable XRF for environmental analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.
2004, 262, 533–541. [CrossRef]
51. Zhou, S.; Yuan, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, J. Rapid in situ determination of heavy metal concentrations in polluted water via
portable XRF: Using Cu and Pb as example. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 1325–1333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Wu, C.M.; Tsai, H.T.; Yang, K.H.; Wen, J.C. How reliable is X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurement for different metals in soil
contamination? Environ. Forensics 2012, 13, 110–121. [CrossRef]
53. Kim, S.M.; Choi, Y. Mapping heavy metal concentrations in Beach Sands using GIS and Portable XRF data. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019,
7, 42. [CrossRef]
54. Sikora, A.L.; Maguire, L.W.; Nairn, R.W.; Knox, R.C. A comparison of XRFS and ICP-OES methods for soil trace metal analyses in
a mining impacted agricultural watershed. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 490. [CrossRef]
55. Li, J.; Heap, A.D. Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 53,
173–189. [CrossRef]
56. De Jesus, K.L.M.; Senoro, D.B.; Dela Cruz, J.C.; Chan, E.B. A hybrid neural network—Particle swarm optimization informed
spatial interpolation technique for groundwater quality mapping in a Small Island Province of the Philippines. Toxics 2021, 9, 273.
[CrossRef]
57. Mitas, L.; Mitasova, H. Spatial interpolation. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications;
Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999; Volume 1.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3527 22 of 22
58. Lu, G.Y.; Wong, D.W. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34, 1044–1055.
[CrossRef]
59. Noori, M.J.; Hassan, H.H.; Mustafa, Y.T. Spatial estimation of rainfall distribution and its classification in Duhok governorate
using GIS. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2014, 6, 2. [CrossRef]
60. Schober, P.; Boer, C.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018, 126,
1763–1768. [CrossRef]
61. Fuhrimann, S.; Mol, H.G.; Dias, J.; Dalvie, M.A.; Roosli, M.; Degrendele, C.; Figueiredo, D.M.; Huss, A.; Portengen, L.; Vermeulen,
R. Quantitative assessment of multiple pesticides in silicone wristbands of children/guardian pairs living in agricultural areas in
South Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 812, 152330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Dirk, R.A.E.S. Frequency Analysis of Rainfall Data; College on Soil Physics—30th Anniversary (1983–2013); The Abdus Salam
International Centre for Theoretical Physica: Trieste, Italy, 2013; pp. 210–244.
63. Weng, Q. An evaluation of spatial interpolation accuracy of elevation data. In Progress in Spatial Data Handling; Springer:
Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 805–824.
64. Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Fu, C.; Kosmyna, T. A fishnet-constrained land use mix index derived from remotely sensed data. Ann. GIS
2017, 23, 303–313. [CrossRef]
65. Ramsdale, J.D.; Balme, M.R.; Conway, S.J.; Gallagher, C.; van Gasselt, S.A.; Hauber, E.; Orgel, C.; Sejourne, A.; Skinner, J.A.;
Costard, F.; et al. Grid-based mapping: A method for rapidly determining the spatial distributions of small features over very
large areas. Planet. Space Sci. 2017, 140, 49–61. [CrossRef]
66. HECRAS Manual Infiltration Methods. Total Dissolved Solids in Drinking Water. Available online: [Link]
sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/[Link] (accessed on 20 January 2022).
67. Bansode, A.; Patil, K.A. Estimation of runoff by using SCS curve number method and arc GIS. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2014, 5,
1283–1287.
68. Arao, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Murakami, M.; Abe, K.; Maejima, Y.; Makino, T. Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soil and
countermeasures in Japan. Paddy Water Environ. 2010, 8, 247–257. [CrossRef]
69. Howe, P.; Malcolm, H.; Dobson, S. Manganese and Its Compounds: Environmental Aspects; World Health Organization: London,
UK, 2004.
70. Li, J.; Jia, Y.; Dong, R.; Huang, R.; Liu, P.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Chen, Z. Advances in the mechanisms of plant tolerance to
manganese toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5096. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Lan, S.; Wang, X.; Xiang, Q.; Yin, H.; Tan, W.; Qiu, G.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J.; Feng, X. Mechanisms of Mn (II) catalytic oxidation on
ferrihydrite surfaces and the formation of manganese (oxyhydr) oxides. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 211, 79–96. [CrossRef]