Rubric for Prototype Phase Report
EDRD101 - 2024B
Project Title Final Mark
Group No
Name of Date Signature
Assessor
Criteria Excellent (80-100%) Good (60-79%) Satisfactory (40-59%) Needs Improvement Weighting
(0-39%)
Introduction Comprehensive introduction with Clear introduction with a Problem definition is Introduction is 10%
& Problem clear linkage to the problem basic link to the previously vague or unclear; the incomplete or
Definition defined earlier in the Design defined problem. introduction lacks depth. disconnected from the
Thinking process. problem.
Prototyping Well-defined goals and a detailed Clear goals with a good Prototyping process is Goals and process are 10%
Goals & explanation of the prototyping explanation of the mentioned, but lacks vague or missing.
Process process, tools, and methods. prototyping process and tools clarity or depth in
used. describing goals and
tools.
Prototype Prototype is described in great Adequate description of the Basic description of the Description of the 20%
Description detail with clear visuals and prototype, with some visuals prototype, but lacking prototype is unclear or
& Features explanations of key features. and features explained. depth or key visuals. incomplete, with no
visuals.
User Testing Detailed explanation of testing Clear testing methodology Basic testing is Testing is poorly 20%
& Feedback methodology and rich feedback, with good feedback, though described, with minimal explained or missing,
with clear links to prototype connections to improvements feedback or unclear links with little to no
improvement. are basic. to improvement. feedback discussed.
Iteration & Iteration is well-documented with Some iteration is Iteration is minimal or Little to no evidence 15%
Prototype clear explanations of changes documented, with basic lacks depth in explaining of iteration based on
Evolution made based on feedback. explanation of feedback- changes. feedback.
based changes.
Challenges & Insightful reflection on challenges Adequate discussion of Basic mention of Challenges and 15%
Lessons and comprehensive lessons challenges and lessons, challenges with limited lessons learned are
Learned learned that will inform future though lacking depth. discussion of lessons poorly addressed or
work. learned. missing.
Clarity, Report is well-organized, clear, Report is clear and organized, Report is basic in Report is poorly 5%
Structure, and visually engaging, with though lacking some visual organization and clarity, organized, unclear,
and attention to detail. or structural details. with some areas needing and lacks visuals or
Presentation improvement. logical structure.
References & All references and supporting Adequate referencing with Basic referencing, with No references or 5%
Supporting materials are relevant, well- minor omissions or lack of some important sources poorly documented
Material documented, and properly cited. detail in supporting materials. missing or incorrect supporting material.
citation.
